TSA: No full-body search, no flying

TSA: No full-body search, no flying

There are 66 comments on the DispatchPolitics story from Nov 20, 2010, titled TSA: No full-body search, no flying. In it, DispatchPolitics reports that:

If you don't want to pass through an airport scanner that lets security agents see an image of your naked body or undergo the alternative, a thorough search, you may have to find another way to travel this holiday season.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at DispatchPolitics.

First Prev
of 4
Next Last
the truth

Houston, AR

#1 Nov 20, 2010
Make the hacks in DC have to go though it if they think they can asult the American people like the man child marxist and Soros DNC hacks have so far.

Les see the new GOP AGs start to bring charges on the DNC TSA and put them on the sex offender list.
SCREW YOU TSA

Blacklick, OH

#2 Nov 20, 2010
I will walk before I submit to TSA tyranny!

"America where are you now?
Don't you care about your sons and daughters?
Don't you know we need you now
We can't fight alone against the monster."
LadyTara8

Mount Vernon, OH

#3 Nov 20, 2010
So the screening is only for the masses. The ruling elite just walk around the scanners?
All are equal in America but some are more equal than others.
Nanny State Losers

Columbus, OH

#4 Nov 20, 2010
I try not to fly unless absolutely necessary - the entire attitude of the TSA is just another reason to choose driving over flying, unless you are going way out West.

My wife has family on the east coast - looks like we will be loading up the minivan from now on.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#5 Nov 20, 2010
LadyTara8 wrote:
So the screening is only for the masses. The ruling elite just walk around the scanners?
All are equal in America but some are more equal than others.
Nay, they charter a plane or use their own.
Patriot1776

Columbia, MD

#6 Nov 20, 2010
If a person has an ileostomy bag or one for the bladder, how do they know that these are legitimate and do not contain chemicals. This is not a flippant question, and I have not heard this situation addressed in the media or by TSA.

“Apocalypse 8:6 Live!”

Since: Sep 09

Columbustan

#7 Nov 20, 2010
Put your money and mouth to better use.
Walk out to the cab stand and tell my African brothers what you need and how much you want to pay.
They dont smoke or drink either.
I could not be their dispatcher without scotch in the desk.
Tell em MR Steve sent ya
the truth is a whackjob

New York, NY

#8 Nov 20, 2010
poop2 wrote:
<quoted text>
Nay, they charter a plane or use their own.
The screening is only for commercial aircraft. It does not apply to private planes.
Straight Arrow

Westerville, OH

#9 Nov 20, 2010
Profiling is the answer! It is not invasive, and much less of a violation of our constitutional, civil and moral rights then having full body scans and/or being groped by a bunch of federally subsidized sex offenders. The Israelis' have been doing profiling for years, and doing it very sucessfully. The US should take lessons from Israel, and stop all it's PETTY bickering over profiling. If done right it can be accurate and not as degrading as the current practices of the T(ouch) your S(hit) A(gency)!!!!
Straight Arrow

Westerville, OH

#10 Nov 20, 2010
Patriot1776 wrote:
If a person has an ileostomy bag or one for the bladder, how do they know that these are legitimate and do not contain chemicals. This is not a flippant question, and I have not heard this situation addressed in the media or by TSA.
The TSA may not know, but the person will probably have to go through the body search as opposed to the scanner. I wear a very expensive medical device that cannot be subjected to xrays, mri's, etc. Consequently, I will have to let these perverts grop me.(However, I have given a lot of thought to simply stripping at the TSA inspection gate. The can arrest me for flashing but I will charge them with sexual molestation!)
the truth is a whackjob

New York, NY

#11 Nov 20, 2010
Straight Arrow wrote:
<quoted text>
The TSA may not know, but the person will probably have to go through the body search as opposed to the scanner. I wear a very expensive medical device that cannot be subjected to xrays, mri's, etc. Consequently, I will have to let these perverts grop me.(However, I have given a lot of thought to simply stripping at the TSA inspection gate. The can arrest me for flashing but I will charge them with sexual molestation!)
Why not just drive to your destination so that you will not need to suffer all of this trauma? If you need to go to Asia or Europe, then take a boat. It is a simple solution.
Lfod

Defiance, OH

#12 Nov 20, 2010
"those who give up freedom for safety end up with niether" BOYCOTT FLYING If the Israilies can provide security with El Al , without strip seaches/sexual assults,so can we. If you must fly,protest PEACEFULLY. Do NOT bathe for several days befor flying. Do not go through the porno imager, make them grope your stinky parts. SUE THEM for sexual assult, and violating your rights against unreasonable search.
Lfod

Defiance, OH

#13 Nov 20, 2010
Straight Arrow wrote:
Profiling is the answer! It is not invasive, and much less of a violation of our constitutional, civil and moral rights then having full body scans and/or being groped by a bunch of federally subsidized sex offenders. The Israelis' have been doing profiling for years, and doing it very sucessfully. The US should take lessons from Israel, and stop all it's PETTY bickering over profiling. If done right it can be accurate and not as degrading as the current practices of the T(ouch) your S(hit) A(gency)!!!!
You RACIST!!!!!! I agree with you!
Lfod

Defiance, OH

#14 Nov 20, 2010
One more thing, eat a bunch of things tah give you gas. Give the TSA worker a good stinky toot when they run their hand up your bottom!

Since: Nov 08

Location hidden

#15 Nov 20, 2010
Change it to the T & A. Tits and Ass. That's what Obama and the other commies have reduced our great country to. Tits and ASS at the airports.
Unbelievable

United States

#16 Nov 20, 2010
Sad day in America when a law biding citizen has to be sexually assaulted by the government before we can fly. Yet the Mexican Drug Cartel and illegal aliens can waltz right across our borders without a care in the world. In fact it's illegal for our police to even question them.

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#17 Nov 20, 2010
the truth is a whackjob wrote:
<quoted text>
The screening is only for commercial aircraft. It does not apply to private planes.
That was kinda like my point.

Since: Nov 10

Gervais, OR

#18 Nov 20, 2010
Lfod wrote:
<quoted text> You RACIST!!!!!! I agree with you!
Actually, when referring to the successful profiling used by the Israelis, we would be talking about behavioral profiling, not racial profiling. The Israelis recognized that you can not tell a terrorist by age, skin tone, tattoos, haircut, etc. Behavioral profiling is observing a person's behavior. Like how do they react when a Security Agent asks them, "How are you?"
The Israelis also invest a lot into intelligence gathering...catching the bad guys before they get to the airport.
Seriously Now

Nashport, OH

#19 Nov 20, 2010
Straight Arrow wrote:
Profiling is the answer! It is not invasive, and much less of a violation of our constitutional, civil and moral rights then having full body scans and/or being groped by a bunch of federally subsidized sex offenders. The Israelis' have been doing profiling for years, and doing it very sucessfully. The US should take lessons from Israel, and stop all it's PETTY bickering over profiling. If done right it can be accurate and not as degrading as the current practices of the T(ouch) your S(hit) A(gency)!!!!
Any males that look like Timothy McVeigh and any females that look like Amy Bishop, should have to pass through a scanner or else undergo a full-body search.

Is that what you are talking about?

Does that work for you?

Seriously now, those who say invasive and unconstitutional, without discriminating, with them, I agree!
speedlimit55

Sherwood, OR

#20 Nov 20, 2010
The 81 percent who do not object to this big government intrusion are either perverts who love to expose themselves or just plain liberals who see nothing wrong with a government agent looking at them. This is not security this is borderline communism. I hear people saying well if you have nothing to hide then why fear this? Remember the jews in WWII who had nothing to fear well the rest is history. Ladies and gentlemen, this is a perfect example of a slippery slope that none of us want to go there, believe me.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

West Chester Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Running mate for Clinton, Elizabeth Warren offe... 2 hr Donny Loves Chachi 20
Adult Children Ignore Me (Sep '13) 10 hr Sad Mom 55
Indict Hillary 19 hr Kyboy 95
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 20 hr JackArmStrong 20,383
News Clinton in, Trump out for national NAACP conven... 21 hr NAWP 27
private Investigator ? Fri mynameis25charact... 4
Obama now wants this country to Unite Fri Pops 9

West Chester Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

West Chester Mortgages