Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010?

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
Most of us post internet sites to back up our claims. Are you saying that all pro-GW sites are accurate while all anti-GW sites are not to be believed?

Now where did I ever say such a thing? You are slowly turning into (CantAccept)RealitySpeaks.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
He can't because it's not his issue. It's the issue of the Supreme Court.

It's my hypothetical, I get to set the scenario. So Roe v. Wade has been overturned. There.

What does POTUS do, Pops?

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
No, the waaaah comes from having the most divisive President in our time. He has political enemies and political friends. He is your President, not mine.

The only reason you say that is because this time it is your ox being gored.

Be a man, be an American, and stop your crying.

"I earned capital in this campaign, political capital, and now I intend to spend it."

Pops wrote:

<quoted text>adjust for inflation bozo (no offense to the original Bozo) & then do the math!! With the literally 100,000's of billions that have been printed & the downgrade of the U.S.of A. credit rating combined, there is a downfall in the stockmarket. It is all simple math when honesty is in the numbers.
Quit drinking the koolade & be honest with the situation. Including the tabulation of unemployment.

Do you ever read anything?

http://observationsandnotes.blogspot.com/2011...

Also, my post was in response to the vary specific bullshit statement by (CantAccept)Reality Speaks that the dow closed down 1000 points lower yesterday than 5 years ago. You really could stand to pay attention to the context of the posts you reply to. This isn't the firts time you have done this.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>The one conducted on 11-06-2012.

Oh. I did realize an option in that election was the return of W.

So what number screen name are you on now, 7? What did you do this time?

^didn't

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
I have been here refuting Rush's "facts" since about July.
It's quite sad that a grown man admits to getting all of his facts from a carnival barker.

No, we get the links of where he got his information from. Liberals won't do that. They just spew out crap and hope everybody believe them.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It's raw data, brother. No filter.

It also doesn't tell me about the increase in government employees.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
It's my hypothetical, I get to set the scenario. So Roe v. Wade has been overturned. There.
What does POTUS do, Pops?

If it's overturned, then it becomes a state issue. States would determine if they want abortion or not.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>You also forgot that the info came from Tony Blair and MI-6. Now, you people are all gung-ho about Syrian WMDs...and where do you think they came from?

One would think that someone as educated as yourself would be able to find an answer to that question all by himself.

http://www.nti.org/country-profiles/syria/che...

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
If it's overturned, then it becomes a state issue. States would determine if they want abortion or not.

Not if federal legislation banning abortion was introduced in congress.

Pops wrote:

<quoted text>I have said such for years & years! The world KNOWS that WMD's were used against the Iranians AND the Kurds for years. Saddam didn't quit fighting because he was out of WMD's. He wouldn't allow UN inspectors in so the world wouldn't see where they went.
FACTS!

Is that all one has to do to make something true? Type FACTS in all caps with an exclamation point at the end of it? Wow.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
No, we get the links of where he got his information from. Liberals won't do that. They just spew out crap and hope everybody believe them.

I've posted more links here than anyone other than maybe Duke or Indy.

You are really losing it, man. This may be getting to be too much for you.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
It also doesn't tell me about the increase in government employees.

Sure it does.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Not if federal legislation banning abortion was introduced in congress.

Please. Abortions are like the gun issues: nobody wants to mess with that hot potato. Republicans use it to get votes and that's it. You would never get it through Congress, Senate and then to the President even if it were a Republican majority.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
I've posted more links here than anyone other than maybe Duke or Indy.
You are really losing it, man. This may be getting to be too much for you.

I was talking about liberal broadcasters--not people here. Go to Rush's site and click on any link. There you will find a transcript of the subject and all the links he got his information from.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
It also doesn't tell me about the increase in government employees.

A thinking person would be able to figure out that an increase in government employees would reflect and be indicative of an improving economy.

woof

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
I was talking about liberal broadcasters--not people here. Go to Rush's site and click on any link. There you will find a transcript of the subject and all the links he got his information from.

Does he have links to his prescription records from when he was doctor shopping?

woof

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
Please. Abortions are like the gun issues: nobody wants to mess with that hot potato. Republicans use it to get votes and that's it. You would never get it through Congress, Senate and then to the President even if it were a Republican majority.

This isn't intended to be an abortion debate. It is intended to demonstrate the fatal fallacy in Pops' POTUS as representative of all people hypothesis.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
I was talking about liberal broadcasters--not people here. Go to Rush's site and click on any link. There you will find a transcript of the subject and all the links he got his information from.

Huh. Here is a link from his website. A very long transcript of Rush bloviating about the fiscal cliff and not a single citation or footnote.

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/12/07/...