Really? So someone makes a post referring to "Keith" and there are no posts with the name "Keith" as a heading but we are suppose to know who it is referring to. Why? Is the council president the only person in society named Keith? It would seem logical that anyone wishing to identify someone would use their Christian and their surname and/or position instead of just assuming everyone knew who they were referring to.
Still all that has been said here is accusations. No proof that the job was awarded before it was listed. No proof that the person getting the job is unqualified, No proof about any of the allledged improprieties. So, as has been said people resort to name calling when they cannot back up their allegations.
All you need do is show the documentation to validate your claims. Should be easy enough. Of course if you can't, if all you are capable of doing is resorting to school yard comments it is reasonable to assume you have nothing to verify your gripes.
Thomas T. you are obviously new to Topix. Calling someone out by their full name (especially in a negative manner) gives them the right to report ABUSE subsequently getting those comments removed. If you pay attention take notes and watch the Council meetings, this dialogue would be much easier for you to follow. Of course unless you are really that naÔve or you are attempting to covering up the truth. I bet you are much smarter and are very close to these situations.