Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
Another Dem Lie

United States

#20706 Jul 29, 2013
Another Dem Lie

United States

#20707 Jul 29, 2013
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/stories/1998/1...

"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."

Clinton Lied!
teo

Kenna, WV

#20708 Jul 29, 2013
Another Dem Lie wrote:
http://articles.latimes.com/20 08/jun/16/opinion/oe-kirchick1 6
main stream media lie all the time

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Wilson, NC

#20709 Jul 29, 2013
How many Americans died as a result of Clinton's lies?

How much money did we spend on Clinton's lies?

Did we bankrupt our economy because of Clinton's lies?

Who was president when we sent troops into Iraq after Al Qaeda when there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq?
Another Dem Lie wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS /stories/1998/12/16/transcript s/clinton.html
"Earlier today, I ordered America's armed forces to strike military and security targets in Iraq. They are joined by British forces. Their mission is to attack Iraq's nuclear, chemical and biological weapons programs and its military capacity to threaten its neighbors."
Clinton Lied!
Well Duh

Harrisonburg, VA

#20710 Jul 29, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
What part of she voted for it because Bush lied to us all about it are you having trouble understanding?
Bush's approval rating was somewhere around 90% after 9/11. He used that trust and lied to us all. of course she voted for it. We all believed the lies told by Bush, Rumsfeld, and Powell.
<quoted text>
So Bush was smarter then we gave him credit for. I knew from the begining that he went to war to finish what his daddy did not. Plus he wanted to prove he was not a whimp like his daddy. Bush was a alcoholic cocaine user. But we did need to go after the people resonsible for 9/11 and that was not the starting ground.
Hmm

United States

#20711 Jul 29, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
How many Americans died as a result of Clinton's lies?
How much money did we spend on Clinton's lies?
Did we bankrupt our economy because of Clinton's lies?
Who was president when we sent troops into Iraq after Al Qaeda when there was no Al Qaeda in Iraq?
<quoted text>
I didn't realize 9/11 was just a war on Al Qaeda.
Maybe neither of them were lies? That both Presidents believed what they said?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_...

The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[1][2] It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government.

How did Clinton think it would happen?
Bush was just continuing Clinton's policies.
teo

Kenna, WV

#20712 Jul 29, 2013
im voting for alex jones the white one

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Wilson, NC

#20713 Jul 29, 2013
Actually, what senior did was correct. He knew that removing Hussein would upset the balance of power in the Mid East and he was correct. Look,what happened after Hussein was ousted from power. Iran started acting up. Syria started having political upheavals as did Egypt. Iraq is in shambles because of the power vacuum left by Hussein. It was a dumb idea and the world is still paying the price for it. Look how many trillion we spent there and how many billions we continue to spend.
Well Duh wrote:
<quoted text> So Bush was smarter then we gave him credit for. I knew from the begining that he went to war to finish what his daddy did not. Plus he wanted to prove he was not a whimp like his daddy. Bush was a alcoholic cocaine user. But we did need to go after the people resonsible for 9/11 and that was not the starting ground.

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Wilson, NC

#20714 Jul 29, 2013
No. If bush was continuing Clinton's policies, he would have just bombed them every time the violated the no-fly zone. Bush spent billions we didn't have to accomplish nothing.

Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.

That's been more than proven.
Hmm wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't realize 9/11 was just a war on Al Qaeda.
Maybe neither of them were lies? That both Presidents believed what they said?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_...
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[1][2] It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government.
How did Clinton think it would happen?
Bush was just continuing Clinton's policies.
Not a Republican

United States

#20715 Jul 29, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
Actually, what senior did was correct. He knew that removing Hussein would upset the balance of power in the Mid East and he was correct. Look,what happened after Hussein was ousted from power. Iran started acting up. Syria started having political upheavals as did Egypt. Iraq is in shambles because of the power vacuum left by Hussein. It was a dumb idea and the world is still paying the price for it. Look how many trillion we spent there and how many billions we continue to spend.
<quoted text>
Is that what Bill thought too?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_...

“Of Course I Can”

Since: Sep 08

Wilson, NC

#20716 Jul 29, 2013
Hmm wrote:
<quoted text>
I didn't realize 9/11 was just a war on Al Qaeda.
Maybe neither of them were lies? That both Presidents believed what they said?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iraq_Liberation_...
The Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 is a United States Congressional statement of policy calling for regime change in Iraq.[1][2] It was signed into law by President Bill Clinton, and states that it is the policy of the United States to support democratic movements within Iraq. The Act was cited in October 2002 to argue for the authorization of military force against the Iraqi government.
How did Clinton think it would happen?
Bush was just continuing Clinton's policies.
Again, who sent the troops in? Who went before the American people after 9/11 filling them with fear about WMD in Iraq?

Don't tell me you suffer fro blame Clinton syndrome.

“Our founders”

Since: May 13

NEVER COMPLIED

#20717 Jul 29, 2013
Bush is a war criminal, not just for recklessly invading the wrong country and predicating it upon absolute lies, but for the way in which it was waged. A half million innocent people dead. Cities carpet-bombed. Torture prisons. It's a disgrace upon the history of this nation ranked with slavery and the internment of the Japanese. It was a financial blunder the likes of which have never been seen. Defending it or any part of it is foolish.
Not a Republican

United States

#20718 Jul 29, 2013
Sundog512 wrote:
No. If bush was continuing Clinton's policies, he would have just bombed them every time the violated the no-fly zone. Bush spent billions we didn't have to accomplish nothing.
Um, Clinton signed a bill into law to oust Saddam out of power. How did he think that was going to be accomplished?
Sundog512 wrote:
Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.
That's been more than proven.
Good thing the war on Terror had more to do with terrorism in general, and not just the 9/11
Not a Republican

United States

#20719 Jul 29, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
Bush is a war criminal, not just for recklessly invading the wrong country and predicating it upon absolute lies, but for the way in which it was waged. A half million innocent people dead. Cities carpet-bombed. Torture prisons. It's a disgrace upon the history of this nation ranked with slavery and the internment of the Japanese. It was a financial blunder the likes of which have never been seen. Defending it or any part of it is foolish.


http://www.youtube.com/watch...

And your post is hyperbolic. I presume you are slathering at the mouth.
Not a Republican

United States

#20720 Jul 29, 2013
The War on Terror (also known as the Global War on Terrorism) is a term commonly applied to an international military campaign which started as a result of the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks on the United States. This resulted in an international military campaign to eliminate al-Qaeda and other militant organizations. The United Kingdom and many other NATO and non-NATO nations participate in the conflict

"Primarily groups that could hurt Saddam's regional foes. Iraq has helped the Iranian dissident group Mujahadeen-e-Khalq, the Kurdistan Workers' Party, a separatist organization fighting the Turkish government, and several far-left Palestinian splinter groups that oppose peace with Israel. Iraq also hosted the mercenary Abu Nidal Organization, whose leader was found dead in Baghdad in August 2002. Saddam was a secular dictator, and his regime generally tended to support secular terrorist groups rather than Islamists such as al-Qaeda, experts say. But Iraq also supported some Islamist Palestinian groups opposed to Israel, and before the 2003 war, the CIA cited Iraq's increased support for such organizations as reason to believe that Baghdad's links to terror could continue to increase."
Not a Republican

United States

#20721 Jul 29, 2013
So lets recap. Clinton not only said Saddam had WMDs, and NUKES!(He must have lied?) But he signed a bill to OUST Saddam out of power. To get rid of him. How did he think he was going to do that? So Bush did it for not only reasons Clinton gave, but security ones. But he's the war criminal.

lol

“Our founders”

Since: May 13

NEVER COMPLIED

#20722 Jul 29, 2013
Not a Republican wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =8USRg3h4AdEXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
And your post is hyperbolic. I presume you are slathering at the mouth.
Nice name, tea bagger. I'd be ambarassed to call my self a republican too. Lemme guess - you're a "Libertarian" like Bloomberg. Hilarious.

Guantanamo? Really? Blame the tea baggers.

http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3438347
Nice

United States

#20723 Jul 29, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice name, tea bagger. I'd be ambarassed to call my self a republican too. Lemme guess - you're a "Libertarian" like Bloomberg. Hilarious.
Guantanamo? Really? Blame the tea baggers.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3438347
So Obama was unable to close it because he was stopped?

And it's not just the tea party, who represents very few in Congress.

"President Barack Obama's hardest sell in his renewed push to close the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may be members of his own party moderate Senate Democrats facing tough re-election bids next year in the strongly Republican South."

What happened when he had the majority? Why not just force it closed like he forced Obamacare through?

No one to blame then when it failed I guess. Seems to be more Democrats worried about their political career. And less about closing it.
Nice

United States

#20724 Jul 29, 2013
My only point here is to show it's just not one sided like a few partisan Obama shills claim it is. It's sad that our very own people turn a blind eye to lying and wrong doing, as long as "their team" is the one doing it. It doesn't matter what is best for the country. It's what is best for THE TEAM.(Political Party) And this will be the ruin of the nation. Partisan bullcrap.
operators s ck

Kenova, WV

#20725 Jul 29, 2013
bacon hater wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice name, tea bagger. I'd be ambarassed to call my self a republican too. Lemme guess - you're a "Libertarian" like Bloomberg. Hilarious.
Guantanamo? Really? Blame the tea baggers.
http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/3438347
even the one at braskem

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Weirton Heights Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Create your own Forum (Jun '15) Feb 22 Jamie 4,413
Tyler Blanco Feb 17 wellyeah 1
News Christie's fire now 'suspicious' (Dec '07) Feb 1 miami heat 14
Ugly Strippers (Apr '14) Feb 1 Zack 9
News Harrison Commission approves roof contract, awa... Jan '18 Unnamed Source 2
Beware of Terry Wellham!! (Jul '17) Dec '17 Wellham 2
Homes on west street Dec '17 Moving 1

Weirton Heights Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Weirton Heights Mortgages