Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...
TSF

Clinton, NC

#40677 Jun 25, 2013
A little levity helps me tolerate the constant negative news . I am really ok with the few republicans who are honest . Its the same for the few remaining honest democrats. My hostility is directed at the dishonest republikans because I see little push back against their blatant government for sale and constant impediments to a functioning governance. As I have stated before, my attacks on the corruption of republikans does not constitute an endorsement of democrat corruption. I know that is hard for partisans to understand. I really see no hope for either party. I pray for the emergence of a new political party with the intelligence and will to deal with our considerable problems.
Waco 1909 wrote:
All kidding aside TSF your hatred of Republicans is clouding your judgement. It's never about reality with people who have an axe to grind, its about perception.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40678 Jun 25, 2013
TSF wrote:
Late yesterday, Acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werful released a report that seemed to indicate that the “Be On The Lookout” lists utilized by IRS employees in charge of examining 501(c)(4) applications included not only words that tended to ensnare conservative organizations, but also those that would likely ensnare liberal/”progressive” organizations:
WASHINGTON — The instructions that Internal Revenue Service officials used to look for applicants seeking tax-exempt status with “Tea Party” and “Patriots” in their titles also included groups whose names included the words “Progressive” and “Occupy,” according to I.R.S. documents released Monday.
The documents appeared to back up contentions by I.R.S. officials and some Democrats that the agency did not intend to single out conservative groups for special scrutiny. Instead, the documents say, officials were trying to use “key word” shortcuts to find overtly political organizations — both liberal and conservative — that were after tax favors by saying they were social welfare organizations.
But the practice appeared to go much farther than that. One such “be on the lookout” list included medical marijuana groups, organizations that were promoting President Obama’s health care law, and applications that dealt “with disputed territories in the Middle East.”
Taken together, the documents seem to change the terms of a scandal that exploded over accusations that the I.R.S. had tried to stifle a nascent conservative political movement. Instead, the dispute now revolves around questionable sorting tactics used by I.R.S. application screeners.
The acting I.R.S. commissioner, Daniel I. Werfel, formally ordered an end to all such “lookout” lists on Monday when he issued an assessment of the controversy that has led to harsh criticism of the nation’s tax collector.
Such lists were in use as recently as this month, when Mr. Werfel took over the agency, far longer than initially thought. I.R.S. officials said Monday that the more recent lists did not include the terms aimed at conservative groups.
Mr. Werfel on Monday also created an expedited process for groups to attain the tax-exempt status known as 501(c)(4). To qualify, groups must agree that no more than 40 percent of their expenditures and time can be spent on campaigns for candidates seeking public office. At least 60 percent of the groups’ time and expenses must be dedicated to social welfare activities.
The new I.R.S. documents raise questions about how the controversy has been portrayed. They confirm that the applications of “various local organizations in the Tea Party movement” were given special scrutiny. But so were
Still can't think for yourself? NONE OF THE LEFT WING GROUPS HAD THEIR APPROVALS HELD UP OR DENIED!!! CAN'T YOU READ???
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40679 Jun 25, 2013
That's the problem I suppose. People only see and hear what they want to see and hear.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40680 Jun 25, 2013
TSF your problem? You care. A lot of people in America just don't care at all man. You, me and some few others in our country still care, and maybe it makes us a little crazy. I still can't get over the look on Putin's face while he sat on that stage with Obama. I wonder at his obvious contempt for our President. Obama was obviously aware of Putin's feelings, he was obviously uncomfortable being there with the Russian.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40681 Jun 25, 2013
TSF wrote:
Lets see here. My car burns gasoline, my truck burns diesel. There is a high tax on every gallon of fuel that pays for NC highway construction. So exactly how do you think I am escaping paying my share for road use. I think John Edwards is a closet republican who registered as a democrat. What you don't seem to understand is that party affiliation does in no way excuse corruption
<quoted text>
As far as your last sentence, think that is the point"just sayin" has been trying to make. As far as your fuel taxes, the State of North Carolina raided those funds for other projects. As to who was responsible for that, my bet would be both parties.
Taxpayer

Hertford, NC

#40682 Jun 25, 2013
TSF wrote:
Voting rights act struck down by the courts. Now the feds cannot interfere in state elections. This will give republikans a better chance to get those pesky minorities politicians out of office and back into chopping cotton .
Republicans, Republicans same old HS.
justasayin

Greer, SC

#40683 Jun 25, 2013
TSF wrote:
Lets see here. My car burns gasoline, my truck burns diesel. There is a high tax on every gallon of fuel that pays for NC highway construction. So exactly how do you think I am escaping paying my share for road use. I think John Edwards is a closet republican who registered as a democrat. What you don't seem to understand is that party affiliation does in no way excuse corruption
<quoted text>
Damn, I think the ole' boy finally gets it, POLITICIANS are corrupt. Hence my lack of "party affiliation".
justasayin

Greer, SC

#40684 Jun 25, 2013
TSF wrote:
A little levity helps me tolerate the constant negative news . I am really ok with the few republicans who are honest . Its the same for the few remaining honest democrats. My hostility is directed at the dishonest republikans because I see little push back against their blatant government for sale and constant impediments to a functioning governance. As I have stated before, my attacks on the corruption of republikans does not constitute an endorsement of democrat corruption. I know that is hard for partisans to understand. I really see no hope for either party. I pray for the emergence of a new political party with the intelligence and will to deal with our considerable problems.
<quoted text>
No "dishonest" Democrats to share your ire? How convenient. You would carry more weight if you said Edwards was just a crappy Democrat. NOOO, you have to try an say he's a "closet Republican". Both sides are guilty and you know it.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40685 Jun 25, 2013
Whatever happened to Randolph Scott??
justasayin

Greer, SC

#40686 Jun 25, 2013
Waco 1909 wrote:
Whatever happened to Randolph Scott??
Why do you ask?
TSF

Clinton, NC

#40687 Jun 26, 2013
You have no way of knowing if your statement is true or not. As I mentioned earlier, a non profit organization of which I am an officer, had our tax exempt status cancelled by the IRS for seemingly frivolous reasons. We definitely are not a conservative organization. Only after submitting 42 pages of information was the tax exempt status restored. It was burdensome and irritating but I did not suspect a conservative conspiracy . Non profit corporations are where much mischief and fraud is hidden. The IRS is charged with the duty of finding that. That is their job.
The conspiracy screaming ninnies need to get a grip.
Waco 1909 wrote:
<quoted text> Still can't think for yourself? NONE OF THE LEFT WING GROUPS HAD THEIR APPROVALS HELD UP OR DENIED!!! CAN'T YOU READ???
TSF

Clinton, NC

#40688 Jun 26, 2013
I think Edwards is just a crappy person, period. But like Mark Sanford and Jim Baker, he has expressed remorse. That makes it ok. Ha, just joking. Anyway, he is human, and I would hate to be publically pilloried for mistakes that I have made I thought I said I did not endorse dishonest democrats.
justasayin wrote:
<quoted text>No "dishonest" Democrats to share your ire? How convenient. You would carry more weight if you said Edwards was just a crappy Democrat. NOOO, you have to try an say he's a "closet Republican". Both sides are guilty and you know it.
TSF

Clinton, NC

#40689 Jun 26, 2013
Yes most politicians are corrupt. That is why our government has become dysfunctional. That is why our finances are a wreck. We and the politicians pretend that they will serve , but we all know they will only feather their own nests.
I am registered unaffiliated because I have basic philosophical differences with both parties. I find it impossible to justify labeling myself with the limited stereotypes of "democrat" , "republican" , conservative or liberal. The neocons (republikans) think I am a liberal because I disagree with them on certain points and will not ignore corruption. The la de da s (democrats) think I am a gun toting tea party because I cannot buy into unrealistic perspectives like gun control, abortion etc. Both sides claim that if you are not with us, you are against us. I am for the USA. To hell with parties.
justasayin wrote:
<quoted text>Damn, I think the ole' boy finally gets it, POLITICIANS are corrupt. Hence my lack of "party affiliation".
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40690 Jun 26, 2013
TSF wrote:
You have no way of knowing if your statement is true or not. As I mentioned earlier, a non profit organization of which I am an officer, had our tax exempt status cancelled by the IRS for seemingly frivolous reasons. We definitely are not a conservative organization. Only after submitting 42 pages of information was the tax exempt status restored. It was burdensome and irritating but I did not suspect a conservative conspiracy . Non profit corporations are where much mischief and fraud is hidden. The IRS is charged with the duty of finding that. That is their job.
The conspiracy screaming ninnies need to get a grip.
<quoted text>
v Organizations that the administration disapproved of were denied and held up. Trust me on this, would be all over the news if lefty orgs had been denied and held up like conservative ones were. I say again, the number of conservative groups that were subjected to this far exceeded the number of left wing groups. Looks like conspiracy to me, and like I said, I voted for the guy.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40691 Jun 26, 2013
TSF the best thing we as Americans can do is to hold both parties responsible for their actions, EVEN IF WE ARE MEMBERS OF THAT PARTY!! The way things are going now, with the extreme factionalism currently in vogue, a President guilty of the crimes that Nixon engaged in, simply would not be subjected to impeachment. Party first, country last.

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#40692 Jun 26, 2013
TSF wrote:
Yes most politicians are corrupt. That is why our government has become dysfunctional. That is why our finances are a wreck. We and the politicians pretend that they will serve , but we all know they will only feather their own nests.
I am registered unaffiliated because I have basic philosophical differences with both parties. I find it impossible to justify labeling myself with the limited stereotypes of "democrat" , "republican" , conservative or liberal. The neocons (republikans) think I am a liberal because I disagree with them on certain points and will not ignore corruption. The la de da s (democrats) think I am a gun toting tea party because I cannot buy into unrealistic perspectives like gun control, abortion etc. Both sides claim that if you are not with us, you are against us. I am for the USA. To hell with parties.
<quoted text>
Our government is dysfunctional and our finances are a wreck because the people have discovered that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. Finally, the money runs out and we begin printing it. Our problems are just beginning.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40693 Jun 26, 2013
Plainly, the the Piper will have to be paid. While we bankrupt ourselves, we send our money to China to build a huge new modern military. Mathematics does not lie.
Waco 1909

Greenville, SC

#40694 Jun 26, 2013
Political correctness, the new scourge.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#40695 Jun 26, 2013
1 down, 100 million more to go!

http://youtu.be/n_YQ8560E1w
TSF

Clinton, NC

#40696 Jun 26, 2013
You are right. The money printing devalues the dollar every day. Money that I worked for years ago , paid taxes on and saved isn't worth even 10% of what it was when I banked it. I fear it will come to a value situation described to me by an older German who said that after WWII, burning the Reich marks would produce more heat than the firewood they would buy.
Robert Stowe wrote:
<quoted text>Our government is dysfunctional and our finances are a wreck because the people have discovered that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury. Finally, the money runs out and we begin printing it. Our problems are just beginning.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Waynesville Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Just wondering (Aug '12) Sat trey 3
jason messer (Nov '10) Jun 21 Just me 5
ghost town in the sky (Jul '06) Jun 21 Tammi Newman 24
New in town Jun 19 Concerned 1
Williamsons. Fishet creek Jun 13 Ceptwsm 1
Review: Carolina West Dental - Letita Ballance DDS (Oct '11) Jun 9 Anonymous 3
River Park Trailer Park (Aug '10) Jun 6 Diane Rogers 27
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Waynesville Mortgages