Axing straight-party option in judicial races won't produce better-informed voting
There are 2 comments on the Star-Telegram.com story from Nov 19, 2012, titled Axing straight-party option in judicial races won't produce better-informed voting. In it, Star-Telegram.com reports that:
Admit it: If you looked at that long list of court races on your ballot at all, you probably bypassed most of them.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Star-Telegram.com.
#1 Nov 24, 2012
Is the pugs upset
Do the pugs like their candidate
What is wrong with straight democratic voting
I am a yellow dog Democrat
#2 Nov 24, 2012
That is why I didn't go straight Democrat vote. I went through and looked at each one. If a Democrat was not running, but another party was running against a Republican, then I voted for the other party.
Our justice system has got to change. I don't feel it will happen too often with a Republican judge. The problem was that too many times a Republican was running with no one running against him.
Add your comments below
|Julie Parker (Jul '12)||Tue||Anon||10|
|Review: Branson Dental (May '09)||Dec 1||Big bad john||43|
|Limited spots available for the newest and most...||Dec 1||CoachJeffTFW||3|
|Application process takes new route (Nov '06)||Nov 28||Mary Mindieta||5|
|Tarrant breakfast crawl: First Watch||Nov 17||michaelchapman127||1|
|Patients voice support for accused dentist (Jun '07)||Nov '16||TIa Tann||13|
|Is anyone else fed up with Watauga Texas City C... (Sep '14)||Sep '14||Bad butt Johnny||8|
Find what you want!
Search Watauga Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC