Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10803 Jan 22, 2013
ten thousandth comment wrote:
wheeeee do i win something? does topix explode? is the end nigh? aaaiiiyyyyyeeeeeee
lol.
Sorry bud, you were one too late ;)
Matthew

Montgomery, TX

#10804 Jan 22, 2013
obama fan wrote:
<quoted text>I think he is doing a great job, he has too step on some toes but heck give the man a chance he at least is trying his best,everyone will not agree too what he is doing butbut it can't get any worse
He has made one big mistake of banning guns it will not stop the criminals they will still find the guns and use them for crime all it is doing is encouraging them
Langoley

Sumerduck, VA

#10805 Jan 23, 2013
You brainwashed liberals just don't get it!There is another election coming QUICKLY and this one matters the most!There is a small matter of 20 democratic senators up for reelection,let the "chosen one" continue to spew his retoric about gun control and he will guarntee they will all lose to republicans or indepedants.Onca that happens,what will the numbers be then?I will tell you,if they all win it will be 65 rep,33 dems and 2 ind.yes a veto override!

“HobertC The1Great AwesomeOne ”

Since: Apr 08

Welch WV

#10806 Jan 23, 2013
Langoley wrote:
You brainwashed liberals just don't get it!There is another election coming QUICKLY and this one matters the most!There is a small matter of 20 democratic senators up for reelection,let the "chosen one" continue to spew his retoric about gun control and he will guarntee they will all lose to republicans or indepedants.Onca that happens,what will the numbers be then?I will tell you,if they all win it will be 65 rep,33 dems and 2 ind.yes a veto override!
Hate to ruin your dream but it the Tea-publicans that going lose their seats in 2014.... They came in 2008 and 2010 talking how they go change Washington DC and the USA, yeah they change the city and the USA just in new faces but the same shi..... anyways don't be surprise if Republican lose big in 2014.... If I have to pick right now i see them losing 3 seats and gaining one in West Virgina with Shelly...
tea party is over

United States

#10807 Jan 23, 2013
Mr_h wrote:
<quoted text>
Hate to ruin your dream but it the Tea-publicans that going lose their seats in 2014.... They came in 2008 and 2010 talking how they go change Washington DC and the USA, yeah they change the city and the USA just in new faces but the same shi..... anyways don't be surprise if Republican lose big in 2014.... If I have to pick right now i see them losing 3 seats and gaining one in West Virgina with Shelly...
repbublicans are going to lose due to hatful positions they sound like idiots with the gun control (NRA, Rush, Drudge, Ted Nugent)

This is what people assoicated or will with the republican party

look at the debt limit...they want small governement but make $174K
per year for what???? All BS.....
a thought

Fairmont, WV

#10808 Jan 23, 2013
Langoley wrote:
You brainwashed liberals just don't get it!There is another election coming QUICKLY and this one matters the most!There is a small matter of 20 democratic senators up for reelection,let the "chosen one" continue to spew his retoric about gun control and he will guarntee they will all lose to republicans or indepedants.Onca that happens,what will the numbers be then?I will tell you,if they all win it will be 65 rep,33 dems and 2 ind.yes a veto override!
Most Americans support gun regulations and an assault weapons ban. The democrats had a million more votes than republicans in the 2012 house election. They are supported by more people. Just because the republicans side is louder doesn't mean they're right. No one is going to come take your guns. We just want some common sense gun laws. It keeps happening. It's only a matter of time until it hits home. Shouldn't we at least try to save American lives?
Just Askin

Fairmont, WV

#10809 Jan 23, 2013
tea party is over wrote:
<quoted text>
repbublicans are going to lose due to hatful positions they sound like idiots with the gun control (NRA, Rush, Drudge, Ted Nugent)
This is what people assoicated or will with the republican party
look at the debt limit...they want small governement but make $174K
per year for what???? All BS.....
Last time I checked Einstein democrats were paid the same as republicans.
Just Askin

Fairmont, WV

#10810 Jan 23, 2013
a thought wrote:
<quoted text> Most Americans support gun regulations and an assault weapons ban. The democrats had a million more votes than republicans in the 2012 house election. They are supported by more people. Just because the republicans side is louder doesn't mean they're right. No one is going to come take your guns. We just want some common sense gun laws. It keeps happening. It's only a matter of time until it hits home. Shouldn't we at least try to save American lives?
I am sure that you are going to take the same stance when it comes to abortion.
Common Sense

France

#10811 Jan 23, 2013
and just what would common sense gun laws be? Have you ever bought a gun? Background checks already have to be ran, your purchase is registered, and the average person can't even afford to spend a day at the range learning actual gun control because the taxes on firearms/ammunition is outrageous. What good will it do to ban so called "assault rifles" or limit magazine capacity to 7? The shooting in Connecticut was a tragedy, but did you know Connecticut already has a "assault weapons" ban? Also, the legislation that just passed in NY limiting magazine capacity to 7 was rushed through by liberal over-reactionists and forgot to exempt law enforcement, whose standard side arm has a capacity over 7. yes, because that is common sense.
a thought

Fairmont, WV

#10812 Jan 23, 2013
Just Askin wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure that you are going to take the same stance when it comes to abortion.
abortion is not the same. You are taking away from the horror of these tragedies. No one gets a abortion without guilt or remorse. You can't change the subject anymore. You are not in the majority. How does it feel to be a minority? It isn't very fun is it? Just try to have some dignity during your fall from grace gun owner. It's pitiful.
a thought

Fairmont, WV

#10813 Jan 23, 2013
Common Sense wrote:
and just what would common sense gun laws be? Have you ever bought a gun? Background checks already have to be ran, your purchase is registered, and the average person can't even afford to spend a day at the range learning actual gun control because the taxes on firearms/ammunition is outrageous. What good will it do to ban so called "assault rifles" or limit magazine capacity to 7? The shooting in Connecticut was a tragedy, but did you know Connecticut already has a "assault weapons" ban? Also, the legislation that just passed in NY limiting magazine capacity to 7 was rushed through by liberal over-reactionists and forgot to exempt law enforcement, whose standard side arm has a capacity over 7. yes, because that is common sense.
State assault weapons ban don't matter when all you have to do is drive 6 hours to a gun show to purchase one. Background checks should include mental history, and the records should be kept not destroyed. Insurance wouldn't be a bad idea for gun owners either. You just hold on to your gun, aka your phallus, and let the real men and women deal with this nonsense. You will survive without your assault rifle. Some children won't survive the next slaughter. Have some compassion and stop being a paranoid pussy.
a thought

Fairmont, WV

#10814 Jan 23, 2013
Common Sense wrote:
and just what would common sense gun laws be? Have you ever bought a gun? Background checks already have to be ran, your purchase is registered, and the average person can't even afford to spend a day at the range learning actual gun control because the taxes on firearms/ammunition is outrageous. What good will it do to ban so called "assault rifles" or limit magazine capacity to 7? The shooting in Connecticut was a tragedy, but did you know Connecticut already has a "assault weapons" ban? Also, the legislation that just passed in NY limiting magazine capacity to 7 was rushed through by liberal over-reactionists and forgot to exempt law enforcement, whose standard side arm has a capacity over 7. yes, because that is common sense.
. Also, private sales should have to do background checks.
Never fear

Summersville, WV

#10815 Jan 23, 2013
Lets just give up our guns. The government will be there to protect us every time a criminal tries to kill us. We can trust the government. They have never been dishonest.
Obama Hitler has our best interests at heart. Everyone knows that more than 7 people should never be killed at a time, we must limit clips to that.
The guns Obama was selling to Mexican drug cartels held more than 7 bullets but the Mexican druggies are more responsible than Americans.
Anonymous

Huntington, WV

#10816 Jan 23, 2013
Never fear wrote:
Lets just give up our guns. The government will be there to protect us every time a criminal tries to kill us. We can trust the government. They have never been dishonest.
Obama Hitler has our best interests at heart. Everyone knows that more than 7 people should never be killed at a time, we must limit clips to that.
The guns Obama was selling to Mexican drug cartels held more than 7 bullets but the Mexican druggies are more responsible than Americans.
Is this post ironic?

The government isn't protecting us. We are lied to everyday of our lives.
Earl

Clay, WV

#10817 Jan 23, 2013
Obama will take my water pistol from my cold dead hands! F him!
Anonymous

Huntington, WV

#10818 Jan 23, 2013
Common Sense wrote:
and just what would common sense gun laws be? Have you ever bought a gun? Background checks already have to be ran, your purchase is registered, and the average person can't even afford to spend a day at the range learning actual gun control because the taxes on firearms/ammunition is outrageous. What good will it do to ban so called "assault rifles" or limit magazine capacity to 7? The shooting in Connecticut was a tragedy, but did you know Connecticut already has a "assault weapons" ban? Also, the legislation that just passed in NY limiting magazine capacity to 7 was rushed through by liberal over-reactionists and forgot to exempt law enforcement, whose standard side arm has a capacity over 7. yes, because that is common sense.
The masses are being frightened. This "gun law" will be rushed through congress.

I'm not sure what the stipulations are, what are they getting at? can cops only have 7 bullets? i keep trying to research it but i can't stop from going on tangents.

http://www.recordonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/art...

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#10819 Jan 23, 2013
a thought wrote:
<quoted text> State assault weapons ban don't matter when all you have to do is drive 6 hours to a gun show to purchase one. Background checks should include mental history, and the records should be kept not destroyed. Insurance wouldn't be a bad idea for gun owners either. You just hold on to your gun, aka your phallus, and let the real men and women deal with this nonsense. You will survive without your assault rifle. Some children won't survive the next slaughter. Have some compassion and stop being a paranoid pussy.
A deranged psycho doesnt need an assault rifle to slaughter children, look at Tim McVeigh. He is another example: The first mass killing of schoolchildren in the US, which took place in the small town of Bath, Michigan, in 1927, and left 45 people dead, including 38 children. An eccentric farmer named Andrew Kehoe, upset about an increase in property taxes meant to pay for the new Bath Consolidated School, spent months packing the school with dynamite. He set it off on the morning of May 18 with a timed detonator.

I agree with background checks and closing loopholes, but banning assault weapons will not stop crazy people from killing. It will make you feel like you did something, but in reality it accomplishes nothing other than taking rights away from law abiding gun owners.

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#10820 Jan 23, 2013
The only constant in this short life is change!.

change can be good or bad -balance is most often included in the healthier change -to swing one way or another toooo far is most often calamatus/damaging to a positive social fabric.

We are not talking about social security or medicare which have been paid for as they have been already taken from peoples earnings..

But changing to a largely ,slovenly, uneducated dependent nation overwhelmed by children w/o fathers in the home -largely unwed single mothers often with multiple kids -many with no real education or means to take care of them-not only causes social chaos[look at our overburdened jails]-but also economic chaos as smaller proportions of working people are being forced to economically subsidize all--'these babies mommas daddies and other daddies babies mammas,etc,etc,

I am not begrudging people who need temporary help and use some welfare services to better educate themselves for a period of time. BUT-there are scores of deadbeats out there who feel entitled to sit home and watch Springer or Maury Povich's comedy of horrors while collecting more"FREE TO THEM" money for each bastard child they produce on hard working peoples backs. It is morally wrong for this permanent dependecy to exist for lazy people with little self control-[of all races]-it will exponentially spreadlike rabid cancer

This is the type of change that will bring the U.S. closer and ever closer to 3rd world type living..making the new majority[a sheep voting block] but ever truly dumber and ever more dependent w/o incentive to go out and survive on their own at higher more personally rewarding levels in this short earthly life,

This is change that will help destroy-this great country as we know it - from within.

Idea-stop rewarding poor judgement and horribly irresponsible behavior--THIS CHANGE BRINGS NO HOPE-ONLY AN EVER LESS EDUCATED LAZY POPULATION WHO ARE LIKE ETERNAL CHILDREN

MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA
1 post removed
Ignorance

Fairmont, WV

#10822 Jan 23, 2013
cherokee mountain lady wrote:
The only constant in this short life is change!.
change can be good or bad -balance is most often included in the healthier change -to swing one way or another toooo far is most often calamatus/damaging to a positive social fabric.
We are not talking about social security or medicare which have been paid for as they have been already taken from peoples earnings..
But changing to a largely ,slovenly, uneducated dependent nation overwhelmed by children w/o fathers in the home -largely unwed single mothers often with multiple kids -many with no real education or means to take care of them-not only causes social chaos[look at our overburdened jails]-but also economic chaos as smaller proportions of working people are being forced to economically subsidize all--'these babies mommas daddies and other daddies babies mammas,etc,etc,
I am not begrudging people who need temporary help and use some welfare services to better educate themselves for a period of time. BUT-there are scores of deadbeats out there who feel entitled to sit home and watch Springer or Maury Povich's comedy of horrors while collecting more"FREE TO THEM" money for each bastard child they produce on hard working peoples backs. It is morally wrong for this permanent dependecy to exist for lazy people with little self control-[of all races]-it will exponentially spreadlike rabid cancer
This is the type of change that will bring the U.S. closer and ever closer to 3rd world type living..making the new majority[a sheep voting block] but ever truly dumber and ever more dependent w/o incentive to go out and survive on their own at higher more personally rewarding levels in this short earthly life,
This is change that will help destroy-this great country as we know it - from within.
Idea-stop rewarding poor judgement and horribly irresponsible behavior--THIS CHANGE BRINGS NO HOPE-ONLY AN EVER LESS EDUCATED LAZY POPULATION WHO ARE LIKE ETERNAL CHILDREN
MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA
. Yea forget the fact that you have to work to get assistance. All of problems would be solved if people were less lazy. Maybe we should look at wages, and stop focusing on the poor.
uh huh

Fairmont, WV

#10823 Jan 23, 2013
cherokee mountain lady wrote:
The only constant in this short life is change!.
change can be good or bad -balance is most often included in the healthier change -to swing one way or another toooo far is most often calamatus/damaging to a positive social fabric.
We are not talking about social security or medicare which have been paid for as they have been already taken from peoples earnings..
But changing to a largely ,slovenly, uneducated dependent nation overwhelmed by children w/o fathers in the home -largely unwed single mothers often with multiple kids -many with no real education or means to take care of them-not only causes social chaos[look at our overburdened jails]-but also economic chaos as smaller proportions of working people are being forced to economically subsidize all--'these babies mommas daddies and other daddies babies mammas,etc,etc,
I am not begrudging people who need temporary help and use some welfare services to better educate themselves for a period of time. BUT-there are scores of deadbeats out there who feel entitled to sit home and watch Springer or Maury Povich's comedy of horrors while collecting more"FREE TO THEM" money for each bastard child they produce on hard working peoples backs. It is morally wrong for this permanent dependecy to exist for lazy people with little self control-[of all races]-it will exponentially spreadlike rabid cancer
This is the type of change that will bring the U.S. closer and ever closer to 3rd world type living..making the new majority[a sheep voting block] but ever truly dumber and ever more dependent w/o incentive to go out and survive on their own at higher more personally rewarding levels in this short earthly life,
This is change that will help destroy-this great country as we know it - from within.
Idea-stop rewarding poor judgement and horribly irresponsible behavior--THIS CHANGE BRINGS NO HOPE-ONLY AN EVER LESS EDUCATED LAZY POPULATION WHO ARE LIKE ETERNAL CHILDREN
MAY GOD BLESS AMERICA
That sound like a lot of your feelings. None of it is back up with empirical data. You can't get welfare without working. Unless you have a disability. Focusing on the poor will never fix our problems. Your rant is just rhetorical vitriol.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Washington Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Create your own Forum 1 hr Jinxed 759
News Legalize marijuana now 15 hr pee wee sux 3
Rick Phillips Newspaper Article 20 hr with a slice of t... 3
william (billy) nutter ... who knows him? (Apr '14) Sun Anonymous 28
hospital employees are unaware Sun The Messenger 1
Jeff Ingram Sun Kn-VIII 2
mylisha stephens Sat Kn-VIII 8
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Washington Mortgages