Why Won't Media Touch Clinton 'Secret...

Why Won't Media Touch Clinton 'Secret Son' Story?

Posted in the Washington, DC Forum

First Prev
of 6
Next Last
Curious

Salyersville, KY

#1 May 11, 2013
Remember early in the '08 election when the National Enquirer broke the story about John Edwards and his 'secret' child? Remember that no other media source would touch it, not until several months later when the election was history? Well, last week the GLOBE tabloid published a front page story titled, "CLINTON'S SECRET SON," a story with dates and details, a story with names and photos, a story about a 27-year-old resident of Arkansas and his mother who state that they took and passed polygraph tests and a story that states that Bill Clinton is the young man's father. I have no idea whether or not it is true, but I know this: IF IT IS NOT TRUE, CLINTON CAN SUE AND BANKRUPT THE MAGAZINE AND MAKE A FEW MILLION IN DAMAGES. I also know this, if a magazine wrote such a story about me, I would sue their pants off. One more point: WHY WON'T THE MEDIA TOUCH THIS STORY, not necessarily saying that it is or is not true, but do a "Story about the Story" and get in touch with Clinton, get his denial, and ask him if he intends to sue? I would appreciate your insight.
Solid

Lexington, KY

#3 May 12, 2013
What ? I thought that their son lived with them in the White House isn't that who we seen all the time ? Will that was ether the ugliest girl or the sissiest boy ever
Savvy

Hagerhill, KY

#4 May 12, 2013
Your question about Why Media Won't Touch Clinton Son Story is real easy to answer: Same reason media would not report a word about John Kennedy and all his women in the White House and other places. THE MEDIA IS DEMOCRAT CONTROLLED.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#5 May 12, 2013
Curious wrote:
Remember early in the '08 election when the National Enquirer broke the story about John Edwards and his 'secret' child? Remember that no other media source would touch it, not until several months later when the election was history? Well, last week the GLOBE tabloid published a front page story titled, "CLINTON'S SECRET SON," a story with dates and details, a story with names and photos, a story about a 27-year-old resident of Arkansas and his mother who state that they took and passed polygraph tests and a story that states that Bill Clinton is the young man's father. I have no idea whether or not it is true, but I know this: IF IT IS NOT TRUE, CLINTON CAN SUE AND BANKRUPT THE MAGAZINE AND MAKE A FEW MILLION IN DAMAGES. I also know this, if a magazine wrote such a story about me, I would sue their pants off. One more point: WHY WON'T THE MEDIA TOUCH THIS STORY, not necessarily saying that it is or is not true, but do a "Story about the Story" and get in touch with Clinton, get his denial, and ask him if he intends to sue? I would appreciate your insight.
what is your source.....seeing as how the media doesn't know about it? How are you privy to such information? Let me guess, a right wing blog of some sort? Shocking I tell you
Savvy

Hagerhill, KY

#7 May 13, 2013
FFS, the source is same source as the story about John Edwards. Remember him? During the '08 Dem President primary, a national magazine ran a story about him and his love child. No other news media touched it in any way, not until after the election when they all did. The source for the Clinton "love child" story is the same. Again, the medial won't touch it, just like the medial would not touch the story about the POTUS and his hookup in the oral, I mean, oval office with an intern.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#8 May 13, 2013
Savvy wrote:
FFS, the source is same source as the story about John Edwards. Remember him? During the '08 Dem President primary, a national magazine ran a story about him and his love child. No other news media touched it in any way, not until after the election when they all did. The source for the Clinton "love child" story is the same. Again, the medial won't touch it, just like the medial would not touch the story about the POTUS and his hookup in the oral, I mean, oval office with an intern.
Here's a hint for you.....if even lying Fox News wont touch it...it aint real!!
Savvy

Hagerhill, KY

#9 May 13, 2013
Here's a hint for you, FFS: THE STORY ABOUT JOHN EDWARDS WAS ALL MADE UP, NOT A WORD OF TRUTH. By the way, FFS, I am not saying the story is true or not true, I am just saying that it is a STORY that the media won't touch. Remember HERMAN CAIN, FFS, the Black Republican candidate for President? An unnamed woman said he had "sexed" her and it was National News for a week. Why the Double Standard, FFS?

Since: Sep 08

Neon City Oh.

#10 May 13, 2013
Curious wrote:
Remember early in the '08 election when the National Enquirer broke the story about John Edwards and his 'secret' child? Remember that no other media source would touch it, not until several months later when the election was history? Well, last week the GLOBE tabloid published a front page story titled, "CLINTON'S SECRET SON," a story with dates and details, a story with names and photos, a story about a 27-year-old resident of Arkansas and his mother who state that they took and passed polygraph tests and a story that states that Bill Clinton is the young man's father. I have no idea whether or not it is true, but I know this: IF IT IS NOT TRUE, CLINTON CAN SUE AND BANKRUPT THE MAGAZINE AND MAKE A FEW MILLION IN DAMAGES. I also know this, if a magazine wrote such a story about me, I would sue their pants off. One more point: WHY WON'T THE MEDIA TOUCH THIS STORY, not necessarily saying that it is or is not true, but do a "Story about the Story" and get in touch with Clinton, get his denial, and ask him if he intends to sue? I would appreciate your insight.
You right wingers post so many lies, even if you came up with something that was true, nobody would believe it.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#11 May 13, 2013
Savvy wrote:
Here's a hint for you, FFS: THE STORY ABOUT JOHN EDWARDS WAS ALL MADE UP, NOT A WORD OF TRUTH. By the way, FFS, I am not saying the story is true or not true, I am just saying that it is a STORY that the media won't touch. Remember HERMAN CAIN, FFS, the Black Republican candidate for President? An unnamed woman said he had "sexed" her and it was National News for a week. Why the Double Standard, FFS?
Real news outlets usually dont run stories unless they can be verified

This aint rocket science skippy!
Beach Pig

Statham, GA

#12 May 13, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>Real news outlets usually dont run stories unless they can be verified
This aint rocket science skippy!
Go read the "Obama / Biden" thread. Dan admits he just got outta the loony bin. All Danny did was confirm what we already knew. Not sure I'm going to continue exposing him. It is kinda wrong to mess the mentally ill, but yet at the same time it's fun. What's the word I'm looking for? Duality maybe.
Spectator

Salyersville, KY

#13 May 13, 2013
FFS, please answer the question, Why the Double Standard? Please, if you can.
mike

Cookeville, TN

#14 May 13, 2013
THE SECRET SON story is just that-a story and if this came from the NATIONAL INQUIROR its no doubt phoney.Stories like these are a dime a dozen like the jailed drug dealer who claimed DAN QUAYLE was a customer of his was blanyly false.Now again people latch onto these stories because they want to believe the worst of anyone and dont care how much damage they do.The people who say that its a liberal thing just are not dealing in reality and seem to me would knife their own mother for the attention..
Savvy

Hagerhill, KY

#15 May 13, 2013
Mike, you may very well be correct. Story may not be true, but, given that a similar story broken by the Nat Inquirer about John Edwards proved to be true should mean something. If I was Clinton and if such a magazine wrote such a story about me and if it was untrue, I WOULD SUE THEM AND ANNOUNCE THAT ALL THE MONEY I WOULD GET FROM THE SUIT WOULD GO TO SOME GOOD CAUSE. In other words, Mike, I WOULD MAKE THEM PAY. On the other hand, if the story is true (like the story about Edwards) I would keep quiet and hope that story goes away and hope that guys like you keep on defending me.
Savvy

Hagerhill, KY

#16 May 13, 2013
The magazine is worth millions. Sue them, Bill, make they pay. On the other hand, keep very quiet, Bill, if story is true.

Since: Aug 10

Buffalo, NY

#17 May 13, 2013
Savvy wrote:
Here's a hint for you, FFS: THE STORY ABOUT JOHN EDWARDS WAS ALL MADE UP, NOT A WORD OF TRUTH. By the way, FFS, I am not saying the story is true or not true, I am just saying that it is a STORY that the media won't touch. Remember HERMAN CAIN, FFS, the Black Republican candidate for President? An unnamed woman said he had "sexed" her and it was National News for a week. Why the Double Standard, FFS?
What double standard? When did i ever support any story from this rag? Was the cain story from the globe, or reputable sources? As i recall even fox ran the cain stories!

Youre not very good at this!
Beach Pig

Statham, GA

#18 May 13, 2013
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>What double standard? When did i ever support any story from this rag? Was the cain story from the globe, or reputable sources? As i recall even fox ran the cain stories!
Youre not very good at this!
Cover of this months Globe. The Globe is the paper you see at the grocery check out stand right beside the Enquirer. No one in their right mind quotes the Globe. Just saying.

Oink Oink

http://www.globemagazine.com/
Spectator

Salyersville, KY

#19 May 13, 2013
Come on Bill, sue the magazine. Make them pay Millions. Then, give the money to a good cause. You're already rich. Wait! Bill, if the story IS true, like the story about John Edwards, don't sue them. Keep quiet.

Since: Aug 10

Bethesda, MD

#20 May 13, 2013
The globe is the same source that W was doinking condi rice....I just could never believe that Bush would be screwing a woman.
Spectator

Salyersville, KY

#21 May 13, 2013
Come on, FFS, comment on something real, like the John Edwards story.

Since: Aug 10

Bethesda, MD

#22 May 13, 2013
Spectator wrote:
Come on, FFS, comment on something real, like the John Edwards story.
Its your source For Fuggs Sake.

the Globe did report that w was doinking condi.

Is the Globe a reputable source or not? I simply cant believe W would sleep wth a woman. Jeff Gannon yes...condi, now way!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 6
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Washington, DC Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News The 25 Most Dangerous Cities in the U.S. Are Mo... (Nov '10) 23 min Ronald 20,286
News GOP-led House moves ahead with bill to boost mi... 4 hr Andy J 2
Politics 6 hr Sunshine 3
Subliminal Mind Control at Full Sail University... 12 hr Jays Yankee cap 1
Congress and Mr. President: Answer To Prescript... 21 hr Legal Drug Dealers 19
Hillary makes me want to puke! Tue The Punisher 1
Healthcare Racketeering Mon WATCHDOG 25
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Washington, DC Mortgages