mike

United States

#21 Sep 23, 2012
Get A New Joke wrote:
<quoted text>
Get a new joke this one is worn out.
I never waste ammo on worthless targets..
Get A New Joke

French Settlement, LA

#22 Sep 23, 2012
mike wrote:
<quoted text>I never waste ammo on worthless targets..
Thats funny
Disappointed

Salyersville, KY

#23 Sep 25, 2012
When Clinton was president, he was offered Obama by another country. He declined offer. He had Janet Reno erect a Rock Wall between the FBI and the CIA, a wall that prohibited them sharing information. Why? Their liberal reasoning was this:(a) CIA operates on world stage and does not have to observe Constitutional rules to get infor; (b) FBI works mostly on national stage and has to observe Constitutional rules (e.g. search and seizure). That wall was in effect when Bush became president. During the 7 months that Bush was president, he had not removed that wall. HAD THAT WALL NOT EXISTED, THE 9.11 ATTACH WOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED. How? The FBI had some info on the terrorists that would be in the planes, but it was incomplete. The CIA had additional info. IF THAT INFO HAD BEEN PUT TOGETHER, NO 9.11. ATTACK. How do I know this? This knowledge is not widely circulated because both Clinton and Bush are culpable, Clinton for putting up the Info Wall and Bush for not tearing it down. But, this knowledge is avialable in some serious reports.
Disappointed

Salyersville, KY

#24 Sep 25, 2012
Oh, the reasoning behind not sharing the info was that if you get info without observing Constitutional constraints (CIA), not right to give that info to agency (FBI) that has to observe those constraints.
Election 2012

Washington, DC

#25 Sep 25, 2012
Disappointed wrote:
When Clinton was president, he was offered Obama by another country. He declined offer. He had Janet Reno erect a Rock Wall between the FBI and the CIA, a wall that prohibited them sharing information. Why? Their liberal reasoning was this:(a) CIA operates on world stage and does not have to observe Constitutional rules to get infor; (b) FBI works mostly on national stage and has to observe Constitutional rules (e.g. search and seizure). That wall was in effect when Bush became president. During the 7 months that Bush was president, he had not removed that wall. HAD THAT WALL NOT EXISTED, THE 9.11 ATTACH WOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED. How? The FBI had some info on the terrorists that would be in the planes, but it was incomplete. The CIA had additional info. IF THAT INFO HAD BEEN PUT TOGETHER, NO 9.11. ATTACK. How do I know this? This knowledge is not widely circulated because both Clinton and Bush are culpable, Clinton for putting up the Info Wall and Bush for not tearing it down. But, this knowledge is avialable in some serious reports.
Think you meant Osama. Natural mistake. ; )

Since: Aug 10

Rochester, NY

#26 Sep 25, 2012
Disappointed wrote:
When Clinton was president, he was offered Obama by another country. He declined offer. He had Janet Reno erect a Rock Wall between the FBI and the CIA, a wall that prohibited them sharing information. Why? Their liberal reasoning was this:(a) CIA operates on world stage and does not have to observe Constitutional rules to get infor; (b) FBI works mostly on national stage and has to observe Constitutional rules (e.g. search and seizure). That wall was in effect when Bush became president. During the 7 months that Bush was president, he had not removed that wall. HAD THAT WALL NOT EXISTED, THE 9.11 ATTACH WOULD HAVE BEEN STOPPED. How? The FBI had some info on the terrorists that would be in the planes, but it was incomplete. The CIA had additional info. IF THAT INFO HAD BEEN PUT TOGETHER, NO 9.11. ATTACK. How do I know this? This knowledge is not widely circulated because both Clinton and Bush are culpable, Clinton for putting up the Info Wall and Bush for not tearing it down. But, this knowledge is avialable in some serious reports.
TYpical conservative cowardice!

It was Bush's watch. Bush ignored the cia and went golfing!

Be a man!
Double Standard

Salyersville, KY

#27 Sep 27, 2012
Monica Lewinsky was a 21 year old Summer Intern from a Democrat family in California when the MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD let her perform a sex act on him in the Oral, er, I mean, Oval Office. After everyone found out about this, the National Organization of Women (NOW) and just about every democrat I know said, in essence, that since Monica was over 18 years old she could consent to the sex act and, since she could consent, no big deal. Now my Dem Friends, consider this for a moment: INSTEAD OF IT BEING MONICA AND POTUS, IMAGINE THE SAME FACTS EXCEPT IT WAS CHELSIA AND THE PRESIDENT OF HER COLLEGE. What Dems do you know who would have defended that? My opinion is that they would have wanted Chelsia's sex partner killed, or at least castratrated.
Double Standard

Salyersville, KY

#28 Sep 27, 2012
Make that castrated.
jpbugdust

Shorter, AL

#29 Oct 6, 2012
mike wrote:
<quoted text>Yes he has been disbarred but that was for 5 years from 2001 to 2006 and the disbarrment has since been lifted.As for him speaking there it was the decision of the university to invite him and you dont have hold a license to speak there so your protests are rather moot and since he couldnt practice law while president why get into a sweat about it..
Once the Supreme Court disbarrs a former attorney that person is no longer allowed to practice law. There is not a state in the Union, including Arkansas,who will re-instate Bill Clinton's law-licence.
(So far we have had two Presidents who have been PERMANENTLY disbarred,...Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. Both came about because both Presidents were committing felonies while in the White House.

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#30 Oct 7, 2012
jpbugdust wrote:
<quoted text>
Once the Supreme Court disbarrs a former attorney that person is no longer allowed to practice law. There is not a state in the Union, including Arkansas,who will re-instate Bill Clinton's law-licence.
(So far we have had two Presidents who have been PERMANENTLY disbarred,...Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton. Both came about because both Presidents were committing felonies while in the White House.
the supreme court has nothingg to do with disbarment. And Clinton is eligible in all states

Why dont conservatives ever research before posting their stupidity?

http://www.nysun.com/national/clinton-eligibl...

Clinton Eligible, Once Again, To Practice Law

By JOSH GERSTEIN, Staff Reporter of the Sun | January 17, 2006

After five years of banishment from the legal profession, President Clinton will be eligible this week to reclaim the law license he gave up as a consequence of the inaccurate responses he gave under oath to questions about his relationship with a White House intern.

Mr. Clinton's suspension from the Arkansas bar, which he formally agreed to a day before leaving office in 2001, expires on Thursday.
CONSERVATIVE

Jefferson, GA

#31 Oct 7, 2012
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>LOL, Conservatives are so desperate that they are going back to clinton? HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA
Its ok, You can root for Jeb in 2016
Ironic you should mention desperation. Because by going "back to cliton" shows just how desperate nobama has become. After his abysmal showing at the debates the other night. Poles in swing states made shifts to the RIGHT, especially among independents. I don't see why everyone is so surprised. His debate performance is no different than anything else he has to do ON HIS OWN, incompetent. With no one telling him what to say on a teleprompter and no media there to filter and spin for him. He looks like the empty suit we've always known him to be. What's really funny is all the lame a$$ excuses they've come up with for the showing of the real nobama, Bores being the best. "It was the altitude". Even you have to admit that is lame. What America saw the other night was the REAL nobama. What happened the other night was we finally pulled the curtain back and saw the "wizard" for the nothing he really is! There are two more debates, but I don't believe they'll be much different. The simple truth is nobama is way out of his depth. He has never ran anything in his life, and he's going to tell a lifelong businessman whose made himself and countless others millionaires, saved businesses, and created how many jobs, he doesn't know what he's talking about? I'm going to be honest. I didn't think Romney had it in him to be so forceful. Much less without being indignant, but he does! Tea Party 2012!
CONSERVATIVE

Jefferson, GA

#32 Oct 7, 2012
Double Standard wrote:
Monica Lewinsky was a 21 year old Summer Intern from a Democrat family in California when the MOST POWERFUL MAN IN THE WORLD let her perform a sex act on him in the Oral, er, I mean, Oval Office. After everyone found out about this, the National Organization of Women (NOW) and just about every democrat I know said, in essence, that since Monica was over 18 years old she could consent to the sex act and, since she could consent, no big deal. Now my Dem Friends, consider this for a moment: INSTEAD OF IT BEING MONICA AND POTUS, IMAGINE THE SAME FACTS EXCEPT IT WAS CHELSIA AND THE PRESIDENT OF HER COLLEGE. What Dems do you know who would have defended that? My opinion is that they would have wanted Chelsia's sex partner killed, or at least castratrated.
The left is nothing if not liars and hypocrites. Funny how during the cliton sexcapades not one womens advocacy group came forward to defend any of his victims or voice their condemnation of cliton's actions. While on the other hand when they were railroading Herman Cain out, their selective moral outrage was evident for all to see and hear. Funny after Herman dropped out, all those battered and abused trollops vanished like farts in the wind! Tea Party 2012!
CONSERVATIVE

Jefferson, GA

#33 Oct 7, 2012
Funny no one ever mentions if not for jimmy farter pardoning cliton for his crimes. He NEVER would have gotten an opportunity to run for president!
bolbobaggins

El Centro, CA

#35 Oct 7, 2012
Bill Clinton's own wife can't believe him. why should the American people believe anything The Bill has to say?

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#36 Oct 7, 2012
CONSERVATIVE wrote:
<quoted text>
Ironic you should mention desperation. Because by going "back to cliton" shows just how desperate nobama has become. After his abysmal showing at the debates the other night. Poles in swing states made shifts to the RIGHT, especially among independents. I don't see why everyone is so surprised. His debate performance is no different than anything else he has to do ON HIS OWN, incompetent. With no one telling him what to say on a teleprompter and no media there to filter and spin for him. He looks like the empty suit we've always known him to be. What's really funny is all the lame a$$ excuses they've come up with for the showing of the real nobama, Bores being the best. "It was the altitude". Even you have to admit that is lame. What America saw the other night was the REAL nobama. What happened the other night was we finally pulled the curtain back and saw the "wizard" for the nothing he really is! There are two more debates, but I don't believe they'll be much different. The simple truth is nobama is way out of his depth. He has never ran anything in his life, and he's going to tell a lifelong businessman whose made himself and countless others millionaires, saved businesses, and created how many jobs, he doesn't know what he's talking about? I'm going to be honest. I didn't think Romney had it in him to be so forceful. Much less without being indignant, but he does! Tea Party 2012!
clinton was a head speaker at the DNc because he is a loved figure in the American public

Where was the last rublican president at he republican convention? Ohhhhhhh......right
CONSERVATIVE

Jefferson, GA

#37 Oct 7, 2012
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>clinton was a head speaker at the DNc because he is a loved figure in the American public
Where was the last rublican president at he republican convention? Ohhhhhhh......right
A KNOWN womanizer and sexual predator is a beloved figure in the American public? Talk about the war on women! Cliton is a one man army! If that's the case Hermain Cain should be as well! Come on, even you have to know the ONLY reason cliton was there is because nobama is tanking. The reason Bush wasn't there is most likely because he wants nothing to with politics of any kind. He has had little to nothing to do with politics since leaving orifice, and I don't blame him. Remember to make your check payable to Tea Party Patriots! Tea Party 2012!

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#38 Oct 7, 2012
CONSERVATIVE wrote:
<quoted text>
A KNOWN womanizer and sexual predator is a beloved figure in the American public? Talk about the war on women! Cliton is a one man army! If that's the case Hermain Cain should be as well! Come on, even you have to know the ONLY reason cliton was there is because nobama is tanking. The reason Bush wasn't there is most likely because he wants nothing to with politics of any kind. He has had little to nothing to do with politics since leaving orifice, and I don't blame him. Remember to make your check payable to Tea Party Patriots! Tea Party 2012!
coward, bush was not there because repubs don't want to remind people of their last time in office.
CONSERVATIVE

Jefferson, GA

#39 Oct 7, 2012
FFS- wrote:
<quoted text>coward, bush was not there because repubs don't want to remind people of their last time in office.
I believe People would rather be where they WERE than where they are. It's a simple question, Reagan asked. Are you better off now than you were 4 yrs ago? The answer is a resounding NO! The last time I checked 5.2 trillion in 4 yrs is MORE "irrisponsible and unpatriotic" than 4 trillion in 8 yrs. Why is it so hard to admit nobama has failed at everything he's done? More -'s than +'s = failure. That is the sum of nobama's presidency. That is why on November 6th he WILL be voted out! Tea Party 2012!

Since: Aug 10

Hollis Center, ME

#40 Oct 7, 2012
CONSERVATIVE wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe People would rather be where they WERE than where they are. It's a simple question, Reagan asked. Are you better off now than you were 4 yrs ago? The answer is a resounding NO! The last time I checked 5.2 trillion in 4 yrs is MORE "irrisponsible and unpatriotic" than 4 trillion in 8 yrs. Why is it so hard to admit nobama has failed at everything he's done? More -'s than +'s = failure. That is the sum of nobama's presidency. That is why on November 6th he WILL be voted out! Tea Party 2012!
really? You are dim enough to believe that people wish the economy was losing nearly 1,000,000 jobs every month, as the were when bush left office?

You're a terrible liar
Get Facts Straight

Salyersville, KY

#41 Oct 7, 2012
One or two posters said that Bill Clinton's Disbarment Time is "up" since 5 years have elapsed and that he can now pracice law. That is close but not the case. A disbarred lawyer can, after 5 years have expired, PETITION THE BAR ASSOCIATION THAT DISBARRED HIM (in this case, Arkansas) TO REINSTATE HIM. A reinstatement process takes time. The lawyer must undergo CLE training for one thing. Has Clinton petitioned the Bar Association for reinstaement? To my knowledge, he has not. If he has not, he continues to be a DISBARRED LAWYER. Obama--the law professor--turned to a DISBARRED LAWYER who lost his license for Lying to deliver the main speech at his convention. THE MAIN DEM SPEAKER, PEOPLE, WAS A DISBARRED LAWYER! Does that not saw a lot, or is it just me?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Washington, DC Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
More nonsense threads about me won't turn your ... 50 min Donald duck Von T... 26
What's truly disgusting about the KKK and Alt r... 1 hr General Patton 48
Trump.............OFF !!!!! Get OFF!!!! 4 hr Usa justice 1
Good by ducky 4 hr iowa kid 2
Ducky be like waaaaa whaaaaaa 7 hr Aponi 3
Pay your tax 7 hr Aponi 6
Why ducky 7 hr Aponi 2
North Korea 18 hr Thanks DT MAGA 89

Washington, DC Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Washington, DC Mortgages