Another Republican To Mess Things Up?

[blue]

No my mind is not screwed up. Every time i have told u somehting u didn't have an answer for this is what u come up with.

[Pale Rider]

Do we want another Republican to mess things up? No the people haven't forgot the last time a Republican was in the White House. You did a great job George W. Bush, in making sure no Republican is back in the White House. Thanks again George W. Bush - Way-to-go!

[blue]

I bet u know every time George Bush Farts.

[Neutral Party]

And then she tries to ignite it. Would blame him for the explosion.

Good one Blue.

[Pale Rider]

blue wrote:

I bet u know every time George Bush Farts.

Blue can come up with the most stupid stuff. He never says a thing on Warsaw Topix, that anyone in their right mind, anyone can truthfully can agree with. Blue is not on here anymore and thank goodness, he stop posting, he was the worst POSTER on here.

[Neutral Party]

Not exactly. As long as you are on here posting bogus stuff you will always be the worst.

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
Blue can come up with the most stupid stuff. He never says a thing on Warsaw Topix, that anyone in their right mind, anyone can truthfully can agree with. Blue is not on here anymore and thank goodness, he stop posting, he was the worst POSTER on here.

[Pale Rider]

Neutral Party wrote:

Not exactly. As long as you are on here posting bogus stuff you will always be the worst.
<quoted text>

Neutral Party, you don't know a damn thing.

[Rooster Cogburn]

Pale Rider wrote:

Do we want another Republican to mess things up? No the people haven't forgot the last time a Republican was in the White House. You did a great job George W. Bush, in making sure no Republican is back in the White House. Thanks again George W. Bush - Way-to-go!

No we haven't forgotten "Pale Rider". We haven't forgotten the sub-prime housing market meltdown that was falsely blamed on George w Bush.

We know though that it was Barney Frank, Cris Dodd, and William Jefferson Clinton who concieved the scam that forced banks to make loans to minorities and under-employed people so that they too could own a home. Many of these people had no hope of ever re-paying the loans, but these three Demo-crooks didn't care about that liitle detail, as long as it helped them to be re-elected -- and it did.

The whole purpose of this program was to buy votes for democrats. It's just one more example of the rampant corruption of the Clinton years. You gotta just love those "new democrats".

We know that liberal democrats did what liberal democrats always do, they blamed their failures on someone else, in this case George w Bush. And the leftwingers in the press glee-fully jumped aboard and took up the cry, "It's Bush's fault".

The same is true of the out of control spending and rising unemployment that occured late in Bush's second term. Most of it began after around six months after the democrats regained control of the house and thus controlled spending.

Again, the press helped to spread the fiction that it was all "Bush's fault.

It pleases me very much to see you still whipping that dead horse. Doing that didn't get democrats across the finish line for a win in 2010 (they lost 63 seats in the house and several Senate seats). More of the same won't work in 2012 either, but apparently that is all you have.

Your guy (Obama) has no accomplishments to run on. His healthcare bill is immensely unpopular. His stimulus program was a total failure. Unemployment is frozen at or above nine percent. The voters see that he used stimulus money to reward his political backers. His administration is involved in several scandals. He has sqaundered billions of dollars monetary assets (that we don't have).

Also big majority of the people say they are worse off than they were before Obama was elected. I believe only around sixteen percent think the country is moving in the right direction.

In short he has --not a single accomplishment-- that the majority of likely voters approve of. He has no option but to try to blame others for his incompetence.

So keep it up, "Pale Rider". It thrills me more than you can imagine to know that you democrats having nothing else at all to run on.

[Pale Rider]

Herman Cain will know how to raise the income for women want he? With only two months on the job training and all he has to do is come in the room, they scream, bingo, you just earned $50,000, that is what ROOSTER likes. A little screaming and high paying jobs for women, elect HERMAN CAIN.

Rooster doesn't give a damn, as long as they are Black, little or no political experience, and a way with women, what the Hell, he is a Republican, that is good enough for Rooster. He doesn't give a damn if NYC gets blowed up, and he starts a war with Iran, and long as there is no more then 5000 US Army people killed, and 2 million Iranians killed, he will be happy as a Meadow Lark if the war is still going on eight years later. More power to the Republican, if he doubles the amount of deficit, that will be normal too. He will like it when they fly a entire plane load of CASH to Iran, and as long as a few of his buddies get it, so what the Hell, we will just print more. Rooster really likes his Republican President to tell at least a few lies to congress, then say 4-5 to the US people. Then a few in the State of the Union Address, vote Republican says Rooster more power to the RICH, Hell give them a TAX BREAK, they need it. ROOSTER doesn't give a damn what they do as long as he can get more products from China. This is the ROOSTER go to HELL DEMOCRAT DREAM.

[Neutral Party]

WTF was that? Blabbering idiot speak? My only interpretation of the above is "clueless"!

[Pale Rider]

Neutral Party wrote:

WTF was that? Blabbering idiot speak? My only interpretation of the above is "clueless"!

Neutral Party is clueless about a lot of things. Reply to this Neutral Party, what happened under George W. Bush:

1. Under George W. Bush only 3 million jobs were created in eight years.

2. 750,000 jobs a month were being lost as Bush was about to leave office.

3. The United States was an industrial nation. Under George W. Bush, 29 steel mills shut down.

[Neutral Party]

Obama makes Bush look like an economic expert. Under Bush, unemployment never got above 9%. Under Obama, unemployment has never gotten below 9%.

Your 1st and 2nd points are invalid and incorrect. Besides, your socialist ally Obama has had ample chance to change and has. All for the worse.

You are not only clueless, you lack any substance to your arguments.

[Rooster Cogburn]

Neutral Party wrote:

Obama makes Bush look like an economic expert. Under Bush, unemployment never got above 9%. Under Obama, unemployment has never gotten below 9%.
Your 1st and 2nd points are invalid and incorrect. Besides, your socialist ally Obama has had ample chance to change and has. All for the worse.
You are not only clueless, you lack any substance to your arguments.

"Pale Nitwit"

Just totally goes bat sh*t crazy when confronted with a few facts that can't be refuted.

All that "Pale Moron" has is old tired lies about how awful Bush was, and wildly exagerated claims as to what a great President Clinton was. Is this supposed to somehow help the democrat causse?

The Clinton Presidency, to the extent it was great, was so only because the Republicans won control of the House. After that happened, Speaker Gingrich backed Willy into a corner by passing a legislative package that was popular with the voters and sending it down to the White House.

Newt's tax plan encluded a broad package of tax cuts, including a capital gains tax cut. Newt also insisted on reforming welfare. It was Willy's good fortune to have Dick Morris as an advisor. Morris persuaded Willy to sign Newt's legislative package into law.

Morris, knowing Newt's package was popular with the voters, and knowing that tax cuts always spur economic growth pushed Willy in the right direction. Thus Newt Gingrich and Dick Morris deserve the credit for anything good that came out of the Clinton administration.

Bill Clinton, without the people around him who forced him to rise above his sorry self, would have failed as dismally as Barack Obama has.

Clinton had no real accomplishments, that he initiated on his own.

Clinton, unlike Herman Cain, was a real womanizer and a woman abuser. He had a long string of women in his past that he harrassed, molested and raped. The names and the charges weren't phony and vague as they are with Herman Cain.

There was Paula Jones, Dolly Kyle Browning, Kathleen Willy, and more, plus gullible little Monica who was barely an adult.

Bill Clinton is a self-indulgent pervert. Sadly, he thought his behavior was cute.

Clinton's propensity for lying is legendary. "I did not inhale", "I did not have sex with that woman, Ms Lewinsky" and the famous "weasel words" in answering a question before grand jury, "That depends on what the dfinition of is, is', are a few of his lies.

Besides being a womanizer and a liar, Bill and Hillary are both notorius crooks. Their mis-deeds in Arkansas included, but were not confined to the "Whitewater" scandal, procurement of women for Clinton by state troopers, alleged drug running out of the Mena Arkansas airport, and numerous other mis-deeds.

Both Ron Brown and Vince Foster died under questionable circumstances while in Clinton's employ.

Then there was a box full of Vince Foster's missing documents that mysteriously turned up in Hillary's closet (long after the fact). Of course we know that no one went through and removed any incriminating evidence before they were found.

It finally caught up with him when a federal judge forced him to admit in writing to two felonys, perjury and obstruction of justice, while in office. By so doing he avoided the public humiliation of being prosecuted as a common criminal, which he was.

The democrats make these wild, false claims about Bush, Cain and others to divert attention from --their people-- who are in fact guilty of the things they accuse Republicans of.

Pale Rider needs to idolize a better class of scumbag.

[Pale Rider]

Pale Rider wrote:

Hello you old goat (Rooster), I can't believe you could come out and defend the Republicans. They have supported the rich long enough. The people are tired of 400 people getting all of the tax breaks, looting our government, sending jobs to China, so 400 could make more money by hiring cheap Chinese labor.
Obama will start to tax these rich, and for just cause. The poor, the middle class is tired of doing all the work, while the rich, reap the harvest. There may be a quiet revolution to oust these rich from the USA. Look at what has happened to the dictators, they are being hunted down and killed. 150,000,000 people aren't going to take it much longer, people like you Rooster that support these fat cats, may find yourself losing in more then election, if things don't change. People are getting tired of government for a rich few. It is supposed to be a government for all people. Not the Herman Cain, the Republican that support the rich getting the cream, while the rest live off what of what has been skimmed off the top. The rich would be delighted to pay only 9% in taxes.

Lies and more lies looser.
Harry Truman 8.4 million
John F. Kennedy 3.6 million
Lyndon Johnson 11.9 million
Jimmy Carter 10.5 million
Bill Clinton 23.1 million
__________
Total = 57.5 Million jobs by the Democrats
Dwight Eisenhower 3.5 million
Richard Nixon 9.4 million
Gerald Ford 1.8 million
Ronald Reagan 16.0 million
George H.W. Bush 2.5 million
George W. Bush 3.0 million
__________
Total = 36.2 Million jobs by the Republicans = this is WEAK
The Worst President - Liar
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Bush FAILED HUNT for Osama - HE IGNORED - He doesn't matter. Tell that to the familes that lost loved ones in the WTC George W. Bush.
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Fool Me Once
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
What The DooFus GANG UNDERSTAND BEST
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
DooFUS GaNg EnJoY
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
George Bush is Loved
http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
It's all Bush's fault.
That's where most Americans still put the blame for our economic problems, even though it's been more than three years since George W. Bush left office.
A new Gallup Poll shows 68% of those surveyed say the former president deserves either a great deal or a moderate amount of blame. Thirty-one percent say he deserves not much or no blame at all.
Compare that to the man who has actually been steering the ship for the last three-plus years.
Fifty-two percent say President Obama deserves the blame for America's economic troubles. Forty-eight percent say he's not to blame.
The relative economic blame given to the two leaders is virtually the same as September 2011.
As is usually the case, there's a partisan divide here, although Republicans are more willing to blame Bush than Democrats are willing to blame President Obama.
As for independents, they are substantially more likely to blame Bush than Obama.
With the economy the top issue for November, all this is very good news for President Obama.
Even though Americans have more negative than positive views of the economy – and the direction it's headed – people are more likely to blame the president's predecessor.
It kind of makes you wonder at what point President Obama will own this nation's problems.
Meanwhile all this comes on the heels of another poll that showed President Bush as the least popular living ex-president.
Mitt Romney may want to keep this in mind as he selects his running mate. Several of his potential vice presidents have close ties to Bush, including folks like Rob Portman, Mitch Daniels and, of course, Jeb Bush.

[Pale Rider]

People say Obama hasn't done anything for America. He has sure done a lot since taking office. From the get go, there was that no good Rush Lumberhead saying he hoped Obama failed. Actually all of the Republicans on here hoped he would fail. They were hoping that more people were out of work. They wanted Obama to be a bigger failure then George W. Bush, so they wouldn't look like stupid Republicans. They want to blame the Democrats for their failure to elect a Republican to the White House. Their failure is because no one in America except a few Tea Party Members and a few like we see on here liked George W. Bush. He was a failure the minute he took office. He failed at everything. The Republican know he failed, America knew he failed. He failed America, and we are still paying the price of his failure. Not only was George W. Bush a failure, he was a liar on top of it. He lied to Congress, He lied to America. In the end, Iraq threw shoes at him, and became an ally to Iran. Iraq is now our enemy, they were more of a friend under Saddam Hussein, then they are today. It is people like we see on here in the Doofus Gang, they still think there are WMD over in Iraq, Iran, Syria, they believe alQaeda was in Iraq all along. Those poor dumb bastards would believe Marilyn Monroe was alive, if George W. Bush told them. They are stupid, not one, but everyone one of them. The reason they say Obama is a failure is so he will look worse then when George W. Bush was in office. They can't see any good for all of the George W. Bush failures that Obama is still trying to fix.

If we took out the 20,000,000 Mexicans, that George W. Bush let in for votes. If we had the huge 100 companies a year on average that George W. Bush outsourced, moved out of America. We would be doing pretty darn good. But all of that happened under George W. Bush. If we had any management of goverment, there might not have been an Enron. The economic policy of the George W. Bush administration was a combination of tax cuts, expenditures for fighting two wars, and a free-market ideology intended to de-emphasize the role of government in the private sector. He advocated the ownership society, premised on the concepts of individual accountability, less government, and the owning of property, all of which was a complete failure under George W. Bush. The trickle down economics of Ronald Reagan hasn't worked for years. It didn't work under G.H. Bush (failure) G. W. Bush (failure). It turned into greed, and failures all over America under the Bush watch. Plus we got attacked. Do we want another bastard in there, just like the last Republican in the White House, that failed America. If you do, vote for Mitt Romney, he is your man.

[Pale Rider]

Pale Rider wrote:

<quoted text>
Neutral Party is clueless about a lot of things. Reply to this Neutral Party, what happened under George W. Bush:
1. Under George W. Bush only 3 million jobs were created in eight years.
2. 750,000 jobs a month were being lost as Bush was about to leave office.
3. The United States was an industrial nation. Under George W. Bush, 29 steel mills shut down.

Rooster and Neutral don't believe I have Followers? Here is the Countries they live in.

[Pale Rider]

Cry Your Heart's Out Rooster Cogburn, Neutral Party. The two Illegals, Drunks, Pill Pushers, Dope Dealers, Vagrants, Homeless.

22,325 That are my Followers and growing daily from all over the world.

[Neutral Party]

??? You must have gotten some bad meth because the posts above make no sense.

Pale the only thing that follows you is the dog and the rats thinking your going to drop a fry.

[Rooster Cogburn]

"Pale Braggart" said,

"22,325 That are my Followers and growing daily from all over the world"

As a child, Pale was so homely and obnoxious that she had no friends. No one would play with Pale, not even her dog.

Pales mother solved that problem by poking a shoestring through a small hole in a pork chop, she then tied the string around Pale's neck.

Pale's little dog would tag along trying to get the pork chop. Because the little dog would follow her everywhere, Pale decided she must be a leader.

But Pale has never led anything except her little dog and a few neighborhood strays (maybe 10 or 15) trying for the pork chop around her neck.

Pale just made up the part about 22,325 followers. She couldn't count that far anyway. She doesn't have enough fingers and toes.

She thought we'd be impressed that she could write a number that large. No doubt she saw it somewhere and copied it.

Doesn't "Pale windbag" tell some really big whoppers?

But why tell an ordinary lie when you can "super-size" it?

Pale, "Real leaders" don't feel compelled to brag about the number of people who follow them. Folks around them know they are leaders without even being told.

[Pale Rider]

Rooster Cogburn wrote:

"Pale Braggart" said,
"22,325 That are my Followers and growing daily from all over the world"
As a child, Pale was so homely and obnoxious that she had no friends. No one would play with Pale, not even her dog.
Pales mother solved that problem by poking a shoestring through a small hole in a pork chop, she then tied the string around Pale's neck.
Pale's little dog would tag along trying to get the pork chop. Because the little dog would follow her everywhere, Pale decided she must be a leader.
But Pale has never led anything except her little dog and a few neighborhood strays (maybe 10 or 15) trying for the pork chop around her neck.
Pale just made up the part about 22,325 followers. She couldn't count that far anyway. She doesn't have enough fingers and toes.
She thought we'd be impressed that she could write a number that large. No doubt she saw it somewhere and copied it.
Doesn't "Pale windbag" tell some really big whoppers?
But why tell an ordinary lie when you can "super-size" it?
Pale, "Real leaders" don't feel compelled to brag about the number of people who follow them. Folks around them know they are leaders without even being told.

Your comment are off the wall. Not worth comment. A waste of time.