Neale Wins With 48%; Smith 32%, Lay 20%

Neale Wins With 48%; Smith 32%, Lay 20%

Posted in the Warsaw Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Peanut

Louisville, KY

#1 Sep 15, 2010
Second Prediction.
Peanut

Louisville, KY

#2 Sep 15, 2010
Here is Ronnie and Bill "splitting the vote", which they'll probably end of doing if both 3rd party candidates stay in the race. Splitting the vote is where when you combine Ronnie's and Bill's total, it equals out more than the front runner's percentage of votes, so the assumption is if Bill or Ronnie dropped out, that their voters would have voted for the other democratic contender, and therefore they would have won... if only one of them would have dropped out before the race! This happened during the Democratic Primary in Gallatin County for a magistrate position.

Also both of these candidates should have challenged Mr. Neale to a debate by now.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#3 Sep 17, 2010
There is an open challenge for a debate, but neither of the other candidates want to debate me, If you know them go ask them to debate me!

I guarantee we can have a huge turnout for a debate.
countryboy

Florence, KY

#4 Sep 17, 2010
How about neale 70% lay 20% and smith 10%..That sounds about right.
Peanut

Louisville, KY

#5 Sep 17, 2010
Ronnie Smith for Sheriff wrote:
There is an open challenge for a debate, but neither of the other candidates want to debate me, If you know them go ask them to debate me!
I guarantee we can have a huge turnout for a debate.
They wouldn't want to debate you, because then they would actually have to match wits with you. They'd rather b.s. the public, and never actually have to match wits with anybody. They are scared of you. That shows something about Neale and Lay.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#6 Sep 17, 2010
How about a debate!
ACTUALLY

Bowling Green, KY

#7 Sep 18, 2010
im sure if you went out on a limb josh would be open for a debate not sure about mr lay
Peanut

United States

#8 Sep 18, 2010
Actually, from what I'm seeing here it looks like 70% against ronnie and 30% for him. And that's the bottom line. As long at it's at least 35 for Josh, 35 for Lay and 30 for Ronnie then it's still enough to keep Ronnie out of office and it's still a majority against him.
Peanut

Louisville, KY

#9 Sep 18, 2010
Peanut wrote:
Actually, from what I'm seeing here it looks like 70% against ronnie and 30% for him. And that's the bottom line. As long at it's at least 35 for Josh, 35 for Lay and 30 for Ronnie then it's still enough to keep Ronnie out of office and it's still a majority against him.
That would be a majority against all of them. You got it out for Ronnie, don't ya? Picking on a Libertarian candidates as much as you all do just makes you all look like a bully.

Bullies for Neale.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#10 Sep 18, 2010
If someone will hold the debate I will be there!

I doubt the others would show up!
ACTUALLY wrote:
im sure if you went out on a limb josh would be open for a debate not sure about mr lay
Peanut

Louisville, KY

#11 Sep 18, 2010
October 1st, in the City Building, Sheriff's Debate, 7pm. Lay, Smith, and Neale.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#12 Sep 18, 2010
cool I will do that!
Peanut wrote:
October 1st, in the City Building, Sheriff's Debate, 7pm. Lay, Smith, and Neale.
ACTUALLY

Bowling Green, KY

#13 Sep 18, 2010
okay so who is going to notify the other candidates so they actually have a chance to show up
Peanut

United States

#14 Sep 18, 2010
I dont' have it out for ronnie. I just don't have agree with most of the stuff he says. My brother is a libertarian so politics is not the issue. It's the platform he runs on his personality. I dont' like him and I don't like you or your other personalities.
countryboy

Florence, KY

#15 Sep 18, 2010
I dont want a pot head running gallatin county.
Peanut

United States

#16 Sep 18, 2010
Regardless of what ronnie thinks, the sheriff does not run the county. The county execs do. My problem with ronnie is that he has no law enforcement background and the nonsense he spouts on here doesn't show a rational mind. I don't want someone as sheriff who himself does not know right from wrong. Under his theory of law, you can do anything you want to defend your family regardless of what is legal. The same with the whole pot issue. As long as it is illegal I expect the sheriff to arrest and charge people with posession. He's already said he won't do that. So what other laws will he pick and choose to not enforce. He went off half cocked and ran up to St E and created a huge mess there and posted the damn film for the whole country to see. With HIS version of what was right not what was legal on it. From what I have seen on the forums, the ones who support him tend to be the drug addicts and the dealers. Go figure.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#17 Sep 18, 2010
I will not enforce any law that has no victim.
I will enforce any crime where a victim is involved.

When someone goes to court, they have a right to face their accusor, if there is no accusor you can face in a court of law, then there is no crime.
Peanut wrote:
Regardless of what ronnie thinks, the sheriff does not run the county. The county execs do. My problem with ronnie is that he has no law enforcement background and the nonsense he spouts on here doesn't show a rational mind. I don't want someone as sheriff who himself does not know right from wrong. Under his theory of law, you can do anything you want to defend your family regardless of what is legal. The same with the whole pot issue. As long as it is illegal I expect the sheriff to arrest and charge people with posession. He's already said he won't do that. So what other laws will he pick and choose to not enforce. He went off half cocked and ran up to St E and created a huge mess there and posted the damn film for the whole country to see. With HIS version of what was right not what was legal on it. From what I have seen on the forums, the ones who support him tend to be the drug addicts and the dealers. Go figure.
Peanut

United States

#18 Sep 18, 2010
WRONG! You think that because YOU don't think there is a victim that there isn't one. How about the pot head who is high and drives down the road and runs off the road and hits a sign? No victim? Tell that to his insurance company who has to pay for the repair to the vehicle and the sign. What if he's weaving down the road? Doesn't hit anyone but he's a danger to others? No one got hurt this time so it isn't a crime?
How about the mother how get's her toddler high? Is that okay with you because the child isn't a victim in your world? What about the dealer who sells bad pot to someone? Not a problem because there is not victim because there are no standards for pot?
What about the kid who takes his parent's stash to school and sells it? I guess you don't think there is a victim here either? And someone goes to your clinic, takes the treatment with an early stage cancer, dies from the cancer and there is no victim? You can't do any of the things you want to ronnie. Even if by some chance you would win the election. Because those of us who disagree with your drug use and your plans will make sure that the FDA, DEA, ATF and every other agency we can find will be made aware of your claims, plans and faults.

Ronnie Smith for Sheriff

Since: Apr 10

Location hidden

#19 Sep 18, 2010
I have personally informed all of the "alphabet" agencies already, what are you gonna tell them? "hey the sheriff we elected says he won't let you guys into the county!"

You just sound really scared that people cannot handle personal freedoms.
How many people cross over the center line while changing the radio, and die in a head on collision?
What if someone crosses the center line while changing radio stations and hits a person who smokes pot head on? whos fault is it the pothead or the music lover?

your whole argument is loaded with what ifs and if we legislate peoples personal freedoms because of a bunch of what ifs, then we might as well all stay home and make sure we are safe.
Peanut wrote:
WRONG! You think that because YOU don't think there is a victim that there isn't one. How about the pot head who is high and drives down the road and runs off the road and hits a sign? No victim? Tell that to his insurance company who has to pay for the repair to the vehicle and the sign. What if he's weaving down the road? Doesn't hit anyone but he's a danger to others? No one got hurt this time so it isn't a crime?
How about the mother how get's her toddler high? Is that okay with you because the child isn't a victim in your world? What about the dealer who sells bad pot to someone? Not a problem because there is not victim because there are no standards for pot?
What about the kid who takes his parent's stash to school and sells it? I guess you don't think there is a victim here either? And someone goes to your clinic, takes the treatment with an early stage cancer, dies from the cancer and there is no victim? You can't do any of the things you want to ronnie. Even if by some chance you would win the election. Because those of us who disagree with your drug use and your plans will make sure that the FDA, DEA, ATF and every other agency we can find will be made aware of your claims, plans and faults.
just so you know

Hamilton, OH

#20 Sep 18, 2010
your in a pot cloud induced haze!! fat old pot head, your not funny. i'd rather wach reruns of senfield!!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Warsaw Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Thomas vernon ellis III Fri Tera 13
Mcdonald Thu Ionu 1
gallatin county fair Thu #greatidea 1
Gallatin County Sheriff Jun 23 Love you daddy 9
News MRS. Carroll County Jun 23 Star 3
Deacons Market Jun 23 Extermination needed 1
Jeremy m boothe Jun 15 Jussayn 2
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Warsaw Mortgages