Confess? Armstrong may not have much ...

Confess? Armstrong may not have much to gain

There are 43 comments on the Times Observer story from Jan 6, 2013, titled Confess? Armstrong may not have much to gain. In it, Times Observer reports that:

Lance Armstrong may be considering a change in course, dropping his years of denials and admitting that he used performance-enhancing drugs - though whether such a move would help him is uncertain.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Times Observer.

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

El Paso, TX

#43 Jan 29, 2013
Athos wrote:
<quoted text>I said that I would not bother replying to your ranting anymore, but as you are still getting things wrong I guess I will have to put you just a little right first get the name right
Got it? BRAILSFORD as for other forums and rumours, it would help it you gave a clue where the forums are, that would save us a lot of valuable time
OK I will have a little bet with you. I have been proved right with your Lance and Floyd cheaters. Would you care to have a wager?
I will bet you that Wiggins is CLEAN, if he is not, I will come over and treat you to a slap up meal, or pay for you to come over here and have the bill (cheque on me)
If he is guilty you can buy me a beer OK?
BTW well done your spelling is very good indeed
Chris, I see that you still have a problem in comprehending just what I had written above.

I'll state it one more time for you.
Gus and I will provide Bradley and company with the same support that we had provided to Floyd Landis and Lance Amsrtong in relation to, "They're innocent till proven guilty or if they admit to doping."

It's quite evident that you're too sacred to tip toe through the various cycling forums for fear in what you might read from other cyclists.

If you can try remembering, I don't make bets on anything.

I wish every rider and team good luck in this year's racing season.

My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

El Paso, TX

#44 Jan 29, 2013
It is interesting to see that Pat McQuaid cancelled the councile who was conducting an inside investigation of the UCI as he got p..... off with both WADA and USADA.

Lance Armstrong is trying to get the UCI to have him testify to them, instead of him testifying to the USADA as he knows that Pat McQuaid would lift the lifetime ban, where as Travis Tygart might not lift the ban and also might bring federal charges against Lance as well.

I'm curious to see how this turns out.
My Opinion_El Paso_Texas

El Paso, TX

#45 Apr 15, 2013
New toping on cycling needs to come your way.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Warren Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Did Kitty leave Otis? (Apr '16) May 22 Hannah Blake 4
Bike Path (Oct '16) May 14 bikepather 5
Nick Valencia May 11 maybemaybe 1
Ashlee Turner (Aug '15) May 9 Ashlee 4
man dead in car on 666 May 1 Dee 5
small business want to open branch jamestown May 1 Rustbeltretard 4
How did he die Apr 30 Barnabee 2

Warren Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Warren Mortgages