Poor Treyvon Martin may your name liv...
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
drucilladeanothe rs

Farmington, MO

#22 Apr 25, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess you truly are stupid. Unthought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt but you can't even read. Damn
either back up your posts with something, "ANYTHING" that can be debated or shut the funk up.
drucilladeanothe rs

Farmington, MO

#23 Apr 25, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
the facts are that Martin was suspicious, Zimmerman called it in. Zimmerman followed instructions and did not continue pursuit after the Florida dispatcher told him to halt. And after Martin ran, he returned to Zimmerman's car where the confrontation occurred. Where Martin repeatedly beat Zimmerman who was on the ground yelling for help as per both eye witnesses. Then grabbed his weapon which he had a ccw for and shot Martin. All upheld by Florida's stand your ground law. Fact is you can't handle a legitimate argument with a well educated human being because you do not even understand simple law. I have a BD and am working on a masters in Forensic Science you incompetent asshole. You shouldn't argue a point that you can't back up.
i could give a shlt less about your b.s. degree
did they leave out rules of evidence in the big ole degree you have?
you state this as fact above: "the facts are that Martin was suspicious". I would love to see you testify in court with that statement
your statement above; "the Florida dispatcher told him to halt"
no, the dispatcher said, "are you following him now?, reply,"yes" DISPATCHER, "WE DONT NEED YOU TO DO THAT"
huge difference compared to your version above, and by the way its an irrelevant point but you need to see where your wrong
your words: "And after Martin ran", where did he run? why? who said he ran?
you words above:...Then grabbed his weapon which he had a ccw for and shot Martin. All upheld by Florida's stand your ground law. Fact is you can't handle a legitimate argument with a well educated human being because you do not even understand simple law. I have a BD and am working on a masters in Forensic Science you incompetent asshole.
how have we concluded this was "all upheld by the stand your ground law"?, hell its not even been to trial and you say its "all upheld by the stand your ground law. thats a big leap to make on your part to go from a shooting to its all upheld by sygl, BEFORE IT GOES TO COURT.
I sure hope your teacher grades on a curve, otherwise you arent going to pass
guest

Potosi, MO

#24 Apr 25, 2012
drucilladeanothers wrote:
<quoted text>i could give a shlt less about your b.s. degree
did they leave out rules of evidence in the big ole degree you have?
you state this as fact above: "the facts are that Martin was suspicious". I would love to see you testify in court with that statement
your statement above; "the Florida dispatcher told him to halt"
no, the dispatcher said, "are you following him now?, reply,"yes" DISPATCHER, "WE DONT NEED YOU TO DO THAT"
huge difference compared to your version above, and by the way its an irrelevant point but you need to see where your wrong
your words: "And after Martin ran", where did he run? why? who said he ran?
you words above:...Then grabbed his weapon which he had a ccw for and shot Martin. All upheld by Florida's stand your ground law. Fact is you can't handle a legitimate argument with a well educated human being because you do not even understand simple law. I have a BD and am working on a masters in Forensic Science you incompetent asshole.
how have we concluded this was "all upheld by the stand your ground law"?, hell its not even been to trial and you say its "all upheld by the stand your ground law. thats a big leap to make on your part to go from a shooting to its all upheld by sygl, BEFORE IT GOES TO COURT.
I sure hope your teacher grades on a curve, otherwise you arent going to pass
you are an utter moron. Because the facts were stated in a different way doesn't mean I'm an idiot. Because i did not state a formal argument doesn't matter. You wouldn't understand what I was saying if I didn't dumb it down. It is upheld by the law. Read the law. Weather he has gone to court or not is irrelevant. I have posed my argument. Stated facts and backed up what I have said. You on the other hand have said nothing productive at all. You can testify on a suspicious person apparently you have never been to or even seen a court room. No one knows why Martin ran, but he did. I never said I knew why he did it so those questions are bogus. Until you have an argument or even a statement that makes any since at all I suggest you go back to school. Learn a little bit and then get back to me. Hell just read the fucking case! You have stated absolutely nothing besides bashing me. If you are experienced in anything for 30 years I will be extremely surprised. The ignorance and stupidity that you have been so boastful to show, states exactly why you have no argument. You get on topix to post comments and get others all riled up, but when someone with education, experience, and common sense challenges you, you retreat and have nothing relevant to state.
drucilladeanothe rs

Farmington, MO

#25 Apr 25, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
I guess you truly are stupid. Unthought I'd give you the benefit of the doubt but you can't even read. Damn
what is an Unthought? you seem to want to correct everone's grammer, I for one need the definition.
drucilladeanothe rs

Farmington, MO

#26 Apr 25, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
you are an utter moron. Because the facts were stated in a different way doesn't mean I'm an idiot. Because i did not state a formal argument doesn't matter. You wouldn't understand what I was saying if I didn't dumb it down. It is upheld by the law. Read the law. Weather he has gone to court or not is irrelevant. I have posed my argument. Stated facts and backed up what I have said. You on the other hand have said nothing productive at all. You can testify on a suspicious person apparently you have never been to or even seen a court room. No one knows why Martin ran, but he did. I never said I knew why he did it so those questions are bogus. Until you have an argument or even a statement that makes any since at all I suggest you go back to school. Learn a little bit and then get back to me. Hell just read the fucking case! You have stated absolutely nothing besides bashing me. If you are experienced in anything for 30 years I will be extremely surprised. The ignorance and stupidity that you have been so boastful to show, states exactly why you have no argument. You get on topix to post comments and get others all riled up, but when someone with education, experience, and common sense challenges you, you retreat and have nothing relevant to state.
first, I would like for you find someone with education, experience and common sense for me to respond to.

I see you incorporated this into your post "The ignorance and stupidity that you have been so boastful to show, states exactly why you have no argument". I believe you will find my post above stating I am not arguing anything.

bashing you? you responded to my post #4 first. Idiot
drucilladeanothe rs

Farmington, MO

#27 Apr 25, 2012
guest wrote:
<quoted text>
you are an utter moron. Because the facts were stated in a different way doesn't mean I'm an idiot. Because i did not state a formal argument doesn't matter. You wouldn't understand what I was saying if I didn't dumb it down. It is upheld by the law. Read the law. Weather he has gone to court or not is irrelevant. I have posed my argument. Stated facts and backed up what I have said. You on the other hand have said nothing productive at all. You can testify on a suspicious person apparently you have never been to or even seen a court room. No one knows why Martin ran, but he did. I never said I knew why he did it so those questions are bogus. Until you have an argument or even a statement that makes any since at all I suggest you go back to school. Learn a little bit and then get back to me. Hell just read the fucking case! You have stated absolutely nothing besides bashing me. If you are experienced in anything for 30 years I will be extremely surprised. The ignorance and stupidity that you have been so boastful to show, states exactly why you have no argument. You get on topix to post comments and get others all riled up, but when someone with education, experience, and common sense challenges you, you retreat and have nothing relevant to state.
You get on topix to post comments and get others all riled up

name one, you should be able to do that if one exists, your credibility is on the line, you haven't refered us to my post(s) that would substantiate what you accuse me of, ARE YOU EVER GOING TO? or are you just going to ramble?
guest

Chicago, IL

#28 Apr 26, 2012
drucilladeanothers wrote:
first, I would like for you find someone with education, experience and common sense for me to respond to.

I see you incorporated this into your post "The ignorance and stupidity that you have been so boastful to show, states exactly why you have no argument". I believe you will find my post above stating I am not arguing anything.

bashing you? you responded to my post #4 first. Idiot
the first response you had to me was "

your just a shithouse wanna-be self professed legal analyst with no more knowledge than anyone else.". So it was I that responded to you.

You state you are not arguing with anything, yet you still continue to comment and try to seem like something you are not. You have now been proven wrong. Have a great day!
drucilladeanothe r

Farmington, MO

#29 Apr 26, 2012
how do you know who i am or what i do, and so far you have only proved you cant back up a post nor will you reply when your post is in question, just try to redirect to somewhere else, good by goofy
drucilladeanothe r

Farmington, MO

#30 Apr 26, 2012
this is your first response to my post:

guest: No one knows the story!

in the next post you put this:

guest : Zimmerman wasn't white, he was Latino. It wasn't a racial shooting and it fell under the stand your ground law in Florida. You should probably read up before you pass judgement on anyone.
drucilladeanothe rs
Farmington, MO
Reply »
|Report Abuse
|Judge it!
|#8
Monday Apr 23 Judged:

1
this is my very first response back to you, seems like you ommitted a little,

I'm willing to bet i have forgotten more than you know about the incident you refer to.

Now, exactly who have you identified that has had judgement passed on them by me? specifically who.

your just a shithouse wanna-be self professed legal analyst with no more knowledge than anyone else.

you feel like challenging me about this case, your gonna lose, and you cant reference one post of your that has a point
guest

Chicago, IL

#31 Apr 26, 2012
drucilladeanother wrote:
this is your first response to my post:

guest: No one knows the story!

in the next post you put this:

guest : Zimmerman wasn't white, he was Latino. It wasn't a racial shooting and it fell under the stand your ground law in Florida. You should probably read up before you pass judgement on anyone.
drucilladeanothe rs
Farmington, MO
Reply »
|Report Abuse
|Judge it!
|#8
Monday Apr 23 Judged:

1
this is my very first response back to you, seems like you ommitted a little,

I'm willing to bet i have forgotten more than you know about the incident you refer to.

Now, exactly who have you identified that has had judgement passed on them by me? specifically who.

your just a shithouse wanna-be self professed legal analyst with no more knowledge than anyone else.

you feel like challenging me about this case, your gonna lose, and you cant reference one post of your that has a point
if you go back an look I didnt reply to any ones post with the first two that was to everyone. You truly are incompetent
guest

Chicago, IL

#32 Apr 26, 2012
drucilladeanother wrote:
how do you know who i am or what i do, and so far you have only proved you cant back up a post nor will you reply when your post is in question, just try to redirect to somewhere else, good by goofy
I have answered every question you have asked
abc

Bernie, MO

#33 Apr 26, 2012
Martin was out of school because of having drugs in his backpack. Did they do a blood test to see if he had drugs in his system?
malcom

Hamburg, Germany

#34 Apr 26, 2012
guest you haven't answered anything yet. I've been reading for a couple days and it looks like drucdeanothrs ask you several questions about your accusations of him or her, I don't see your response either, looks like you cant back up your mouth
guest

Chicago, IL

#35 Apr 26, 2012
abc wrote:
Martin was out of school because of having drugs in his backpack. Did they do a blood test to see if he had drugs in his system?
autopsy confirmed
guest

Chicago, IL

#36 Apr 26, 2012
malcom wrote:
guest you haven't answered anything yet. I've been reading for a couple days and it looks like drucdeanothrs ask you several questions about your accusations of him or her, I don't see your response either, looks like you cant back up your mouth

The only answers I should answers are the ones about the argument. Now which ones about my accusations have I not answered?
guest

Chicago, IL

#37 Apr 26, 2012
malcom wrote:
guest you haven't answered anything yet. I've been reading for a couple days and it looks like drucdeanothrs ask you several questions about your accusations of him or her, I don't see your response either, looks like you cant back up your mouth
and if you are referring to the question of whom I referred to him judging, then, go back and read and see that, that post was not a reply to him or her. And if you are refering to the question where he said it was a racial discrimination. I answered in his very first post.
malcom

Hamburg, Germany

#38 Apr 26, 2012
you posted back to back, the first one says no one knows what happened for sure, your next post says its not a racial shooting and it falls under the stand your ground law, is this fact or speculation?

I did go back and I didnt see a post where they said the shooting was discrimination, wheres that at?
malcom

Hamburg, Germany

#39 Apr 26, 2012
if your talking about your response to post #4 with your post #7, their right your an idiot.
the outcome of this will impact the entire U.S. and the gun laws as well, hell after reading the thread hes right more than you, at least he knows this is going to set a precdence with case law...yes you need to study up.
guest

Dallas, TX

#40 Apr 27, 2012
malcom wrote:
if your talking about your response to post #4 with your post #7, their right your an idiot.
the outcome of this will impact the entire U.S. and the gun laws as well, hell after reading the thread hes right more than you, at least he knows this is going to set a precdence with case law...yes you need to study up.
this is not about guns either. Bahahaha it's about BAD LAW. You can go on thinking what you do, that is perfectly fine, but at the end of the day I know that the ignorance and stupidity of the common person is just a handicap.

Oh and btw great new name.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Wappapello Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Life chapel whats the scoop on it 4 hr guest 5
Tanner Turner Fri fastest Vette in ... 1
Need camper storage in wappapello (Apr '16) Dec 8 Billy 4
Dylan Ward Dec 8 Walker 13
Big B*tt Cindy Dec 8 Jamie 2
New stripper in town Dec 8 Jeeeeeff 12
Gravel (Jun '14) Dec 7 vroom 13

Wappapello Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Wappapello Mortgages