Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

ELH

Portland, OR

#149548 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
Do you know how often you go to 'bitch'?
About 90% less often than you go to mentioning your "I'm not insane" letter or your half backed baseless views on SSM and adopition?
ELH

Portland, OR

#149549 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>

Nor does my entire argument hing on procreation. You forgot;
How can we forget your dumbazz pronouncements when you re-post them every two hours?

PS: this post was BULLSHIT the first time you posted it, all the times you have already re-posted it, this time and ever time you re post it in the future. Repetition doesn't correct idiocy, it simply highlights the idiot.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149550 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
... everyone knows when you go to 'bitch' you have no answer.
better stick to the nutty hermaphrodyte rants and steer away from the smug tone and sweeping pronouncement... especailly if the same one has already been posted by your puppet master.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149553 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go trying to inject your 'beliefs' instead of dealing with reality.


You're so flucking nuts you should have your own show on FOX "news".
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#149554 Jul 8, 2012
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Danny, it's a simple fact of reality. Changing the definition of a word doesn't change reality.
ANYONE looking at two couples; a heterosexual couple and a gay couple will see the difference.
Especially the child who sees mom and dad.
That will never change.
The sad thing is that you boys are angry that I am simply warning you about reality.
Back to the response at hand;
Ironically the post referred to mocking me about a paper validating normality while gays vainly attempt to acquire a paper validating their normality with heteros.
Incredible irony!
No irony there.

In fact the two aren't even related. You were bananas crzy and needed a letter to see the exit door from the asylum.

A couple of gays wanted to get married and did.

There's about as much connection there as a riverbed slug and a 1939 Chevrolet hood ornament.

Here's some reality ya looney goof - gays can marry.They've performed that circus trick just like heterosexuals. Maybe little Timmy will see a man holding hands with another man but it's the sme damn thing.

Now tke the pill that gets you some sleep crazy man because you need it.

LOL!!!
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#149556 Jul 8, 2012
Quest wrote:
<quoted text>
That includes gay people - thus the whole insistance on equal protection under the law.
It's not "of the majority for the only the majority".
You've got to wonder why we're even responding to an admitted batshit crazy bastard who probably got locked away for pissing on strangers on crowded New York subway systems who now waves around a letter from his psychologists admitting him into public places like 7-11 and Chuck-E-Cheese laying claim he's "OK' now.

LOL!!!
ELH

Portland, OR

#149557 Jul 8, 2012
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to wonder why we're even responding to an admitted batshit crazy bastard who probably got locked away for pissing on strangers on crowded New York subway systems who now waves around a letter from his psychologists admitting him into public places like 7-11 and Chuck-E-Cheese laying claim he's "OK' now.
LOL!!!


A. It's flucking HOT outside.

B. It's almost impossible to look away from a train wreck.

c. We are bored.

D. Some of the above.
Dan

Sacramento, CA

#149558 Jul 8, 2012
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
A. It's flucking HOT outside.
B. It's almost impossible to look away from a train wreck.
c. We are bored.
D. Some of the above.
I'm down with 'D'.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149564 Jul 8, 2012
RiccardoFire

Sacramento, CA

#149565 Jul 8, 2012
Jonah1 wrote:
<quoted text>
christians don't need to troll here either. This isn't a religious forum.
"There are no gay islamics"!!!!!
What a moron you are. Just like there are no gay Iraquis right Bruno?! But there are flying penguins!!!!
Nobody needs to troll here, I don't need to. This is a free country last time I checked. The "no gay islamics" was sarcasm. Because most don't allow it.
Ken

San Diego, CA

#149569 Jul 8, 2012
The judge is gay need i say more conflict of interest comes to mind. this has nothing to do with gay marriage. it has everything to do with tearing down anything that may shed an idea gay is wrong or whatever. if it was about same sex marriage then the gay community would of been satisfied with civil unions. but NOOOOOO we want to tear down what is good about america no matter what. Now if you suggest taking away anything the gay community has that gives more rights then everyone else. the out cry would be terrible. this shows what ive said all along its about tearing down the cerimony's we hold dear because it doesnt fit there way of life.
Smackeral

La Puente, CA

#149570 Jul 8, 2012
Fish bend isn't the same.
Bill Of Rights

Livermore, CA

#149572 Jul 8, 2012
Ken wrote:
The judge is gay need i say more conflict of interest comes to mind. this has nothing to do with gay marriage. it has everything to do with tearing down anything that may shed an idea gay is wrong or whatever. if it was about same sex marriage then the gay community would of been satisfied with civil unions. but NOOOOOO we want to tear down what is good about america no matter what. Now if you suggest taking away anything the gay community has that gives more rights then everyone else. the out cry would be terrible. this shows what ive said all along its about tearing down the cerimony's we hold dear because it doesnt fit there way of life.
No,so sorry bigit boy! The judge was gay but he followed the Constitution and ruled the only way he could with the evidence presented before him! His decision was then backed up by the next higher court! Him being gay has nothing to do with bias,do they disqualify a black judge from presiding over a civil rights case? NO! Do they disallow a women from presiding over a womens issue before her? NO,they do not! All you have our whiny sour grapes! It's funny,when a court rules in you favor you are all giddy and happy,they were just doing their job! But when a ruling rightfully goes against you its OH an activist court! So sorry it doesn't work that way! Marriage is a secular function first and foremost and religion does NOT own marriage! Equal treatment under the law as per our Constitution is what counts! Oh and by the way,not gay,I just can't stand unamerican haters like yourself!
ELH

Portland, OR

#149575 Jul 8, 2012
Ken wrote:
...this shows what ive said all along its about tearing down the cerimony's we hold dear because it doesnt fit there way of life.
Do you ever READ the crap that spews out of your (blissful) ignorance?

"They" want to get married to destroy marriage becasue it doesn't fit "their" way of life? News flash: What you "have said all along" is laughably RIDICULOUS.

And if (heterosexual) marriages are so "dear" and "sacred" then how come almost HALF of them FAIL?
ELH

Portland, OR

#149576 Jul 8, 2012
Bill Of Rights wrote:
<quoted text>
The judge was gay but he followed the Constitution and ruled the only way he could with the evidence presented before him! His decision was then backed up by the next higher court!


It would be counter productive for "Ken" and his ilk to admit any of this. Especially acknowledging that the ruling has already been UPHELD by a higher (and probably HETEROSEXUAL) court.

In fact I doubt that "Ken" is even aware of this ruling, after all, the ONLY important part and the ONLY thing worth remembering or repeating is that the overturning judge is GAY.
ELH

Portland, OR

#149577 Jul 8, 2012
Wherte's professor marvleous? I'm really worried that my posts about Men being Girl Scout Leaders and heterosexual pedophile scout masters being shielded from prosecution by the Boy Scouts of America has given him sick "ideas"....

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#149580 Jul 9, 2012
Danny boy wrote:
<quoted text>
You've got to wonder why we're even responding to an admitted batshit crazy bastard who probably got locked away for pissing on strangers on crowded New York subway systems who now waves around a letter from his psychologists admitting him into public places like 7-11 and Chuck-E-Cheese laying claim he's "OK' now.
LOL!!!
ELH wrote:
<quoted text>
A. It's flucking HOT outside.
B. It's almost impossible to look away from a train wreck.
c. We are bored.
D. Some of the above.
E. Even a bat shit crazy bastard can look like a genius and hilariously turn idiots in deep denial on their hollow heads.

It has to be sooooo embarrASSing.

Smile

“Yellow Brick Road”

Since: Mar 12

The Land of OZ

#149581 Jul 9, 2012
ELH wrote:
Wherte's professor marvleous? I'm really worried that my posts about Men being Girl Scout Leaders and heterosexual pedophile scout masters being shielded from prosecution by the Boy Scouts of America has given him sick "ideas"....
Nope, I told him that I was a Pastafarian. He is looking for the nearest CatOlick church, needs to bathe in holy water. OR he got hooked up in a three way with two wayward priests. I am putting all my money on the three way.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#149582 Jul 9, 2012
RiccardoFire wrote:
<quoted text>islamics don't need to troll here, there are no gay islamics.
hahahahahahah
ahahahahahahah
ahahahahahaha

Yeah, right. Just like there are no gay Congressman.
Mona Lott

Hoboken, NJ

#149583 Jul 9, 2012
Ken wrote:
The judge is gay need i say more conflict of interest comes to mind.
Um... news flash... you LOST that argument in Court because it is laughably ridiculous.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Walnut Creek Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Two arrested in armored truck robbery (Aug '07) 6 hr Tiffany Chance 31
Wana chat Sat SEVEND12 1
Ron Fleishman is the World's Most Underrated Ph... (Sep '15) Jun 23 Great Dark Art 90
News Oakland museum's marijuana exhibit: Scholarly, ... Jun 16 Fred 1
News Internet Prostitution Sting Nets 13 In East Bay (Jul '06) Jun 9 Emily 84
Outdoor exercise area Apr '16 curiousjogger 1
News Two stabbings at Newhall Park in Concord (Jul '08) Mar '16 ACAB 17
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Walnut Creek Mortgages