Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

Aug 4, 2010 | Posted by: Topix | Full story: www.cnn.com

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Comments (Page 7,459)

Showing posts 149,161 - 149,180 of199,114
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170330
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
Winston Smiths dog wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is silly stupid when someone makes a comment that has no basis in fact.
http://www.dinklife.com/topic/trends-news/mar...
If that doesn't work copy and paste these together:
http://www.dinklife.com/topic/trends-news/
married-without-children-more- couples-opting
-be-%E2%80%98childless-choice% E2%80%99
and this:
http://www.censusscope.org/us/chart_house.htm...
Rare exceptions? Indeed.
Oh, BTW, same sex couples can employ some of the same methods for procreation that sterile heterosexual couples resort to.
To quote Mike DiRucci...
Dopey!
Nothing you said addressed the facts I stated.

They certainly did not disqualify my facts;

1. Heterosexual couples who do not procreate are still a large minority.

You simply argue that heterosexual couples are delaying or may not at this time choose to have children (those 'decisions' change all the time). Minor fluctuations in rates does not change my facts.

2. Gay couples are 'absolutely desolate' by mutual procreation.

You blatantly attempt to make the same idiotic, deceitful comparison.

-The unnatural barrenness of heterosexual couples to the absolute mutual desolation of every single gay couple.

-Even worse, your 'solution' leaves the child always absent one parent and one gender! A horrible and cruel deprivation of a child's well-being. Something that is diabolical and should be criminal. Anyone deliberately perpetrating this on a child is despicable.

This is a example of what evil consequences the attempt to equate duplicate couples to marriage leads to...

Your denial is sick and dangerous!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170331
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>to long did not read.
See Spot run.

Is too long for you.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170332
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

17Patriot76 wrote:
That judge is violating the U.S Constitution by taking the power of the peoples votes... Same sex marriage isn't protected under the U.S Constitution!
Equal protection of the law is protected under the U.S n! That includes marriage laws!

Constitutio
17Patriot76 wrote:
Obviously it wouldn't be controversial if it was!
You don't think inter-racial marriage was controversial? How old are you? 12?
17Patriot76 wrote:
The founders wouldn't have supported same sex anything because it fell under the "Sodomy Law" that was in effect until the Liberal party was formed in the late 1800's..
The founders are worm poop now.
Some even supported slavery, and murder of Natives.
If funny that the same people who claim they are for small government want the government telling us which sex positions we can use. And they think putting men in jail is a good way to get then to stop engaging is sodomy.
It's the 2010's now..
17Patriot76 wrote:
The dictionary clearly defines Marriage as 1 man & 1 woman in holy matrimony...
Which dictionary, stupid?
Dictionary.com doesn't say anything about "holy" and it mentions "
a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage. "

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marria...
17Patriot76 wrote:
So in reality Government really has no say in marriage because it comes from the church! Churches are against homosexuality (unless they're 501C3).....
It's alright enjoy it while it lasts lol The American Resistance will return America back to the Good Moral Country we used to be with the soon to come 2nd American Revolution!! GOD BLESS AMERICA & THE AMERICAN PATRIOTS
What did you like the best about Good Moral America? Slavery? Women being denied the vote? Jim Crow? Slaughter of Natives and the theft of their lands? Concentration Camps? Let's hear it.
GODLESS AMERICA

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170333
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
"you're wrong"??? That's your argument.
How old are you?
Marriage is a cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior. SS couples are a direct contradiction. A violation of nature. You could be blind as a bat and dumb as a rock and still know they are not the same. Even a child says, "Are you serious???"
Smirk.
Stupid, marriage is a legal contract. And you don't have to be able to reproduce in order to enter that contract.

Do you think you should have been aborted? You describe yourself as a mutated monster, or something similar.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170334
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.

Deal with that fact, for once.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170335
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
So you want to equate the rare exceptions to procreation in marriage to the absolute desolation of procreation in ss unions???
Really?
Kind of silly stupid, don't you think???
Smirk.
<quoted text>
Nothing you said addressed the facts I stated.
They certainly did not disqualify my facts;
1. Heterosexual couples who do not procreate are still a large minority.
You simply argue that heterosexual couples are delaying or may not at this time choose to have children (those 'decisions' change all the time). Minor fluctuations in rates does not change my facts.
2. Gay couples are 'absolutely desolate' by mutual procreation.
You blatantly attempt to make the same idiotic, deceitful comparison.
-The unnatural barrenness of heterosexual couples to the absolute mutual desolation of every single gay couple.
-Even worse, your 'solution' leaves the child always absent one parent and one gender! A horrible and cruel deprivation of a child's well-being. Something that is diabolical and should be criminal. Anyone deliberately perpetrating this on a child is despicable.
This is a example of what evil consequences the attempt to equate duplicate couples to marriage leads to...
Your denial is sick and dangerous!
If you want to put a chink in the armor of "Procreation is irrelevant in marriage" tell em you support incest marriage. Listen to the stuttering and double talk! Fun!

I do. I support all forms of marriage among consenting adults. I find some of the biggest bigots against less common forms of marriage are same sex marriage advocates. Funny that. You'd think maybe they are hypocrites.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170336
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
There you go again, with that fantasy stuff. He didn't say that. He said marriage had a clear purpose, other than sexual gratification. Can't you post without adulterating context ? And you are not in any position to hand anything over, you have no power to control it. The Constitution was written very clearly, and no mention was made of SSm.
But stupid, it can't mention every law in the Constitution. So, it says we should have equal protection under THE law. That includes marriage laws. That's why the 14th Amendment was sited in Loving v VA. The Constitution doesn't mention inter-racial marriage either.
R Hudson wrote:
Your side is using legal loopholes to turn our society upiside down, and if we didn't have special interest groups involving themselves in politics, we'd not be facing this issue now. Fact of the matter is, common sense has been replaced with libertine values, and we are witnessing the demise of sensibility and order. Our politicians have decided that the very nature of our country is to be violated.
Gay marriage will violate the very nature of our country!?
Wiccan, my black backside.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170337
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.
Deal with that fact, for once.
Yes. that is why there is no reason incest marriage not be allowed.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170338
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is you don't comprehend the definition of "Equal Protection"- you seem to think that is synonymous with equal outcome.
BTW< how about you come off the playground for a minute and stop ending your sentences with- grow a pair, and LOLSER- thay hardly add any meaning to your already meaningless rants.
LOLSER. Look who's talking! All you do is attack me, and don't even try to counter what I've said. So, b!tch, STFU.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170339
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Equal protection of the law is protected under the U.S n! That includes marriage laws!
Constitutio<quoted text>
You don't think inter-racial marriage was controversial? How old are you? 12?
<quoted text>
The founders are worm poop now.
Some even supported slavery, and murder of Natives.
If funny that the same people who claim they are for small government want the government telling us which sex positions we can use. And they think putting men in jail is a good way to get then to stop engaging is sodomy.
It's the 2010's now..
<quoted text>
Which dictionary, stupid?
Dictionary.com doesn't say anything about "holy" and it mentions "
a similar institution involving partners of the same gender: gay marriage. "
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/marria...
<quoted text>
What did you like the best about Good Moral America? Slavery? Women being denied the vote? Jim Crow? Slaughter of Natives and the theft of their lands? Concentration Camps? Let's hear it.
GODLESS AMERICA
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.

Good Work Rose-

Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170340
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
You are silly stupid. The ability to reproduce is just not a requirement for marriage.
Deal with that fact, for once.
Good, than what is the argument against incest?

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170341
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyone want to try and translate this into English?
Guess you are too dumb to get it.
Oh, well.

Since: Apr 11

North Hollywood, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170342
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

R Hudson wrote:
Nevertheless, there is plenty of evidence that homosexuality is not innate....zzzz....
From: http://www.defendthefamily.com/_docs/resource...
From a fundie hate site.
Wow, there's a shock.
Why would a Wiccan slurp up fundie splooge like you do?
Could it be you're not really a Wiccan?
Nah...

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170343
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
From a fundie hate site.
Wow, there's a shock.
Why would a Wiccan slurp up fundie splooge like you do?
Could it be you're not really a Wiccan?
Nah...
No one seems to care what religion other posters are except you.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170344
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

5

Rose_NoHo wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess you are too dumb to get it.
Oh, well.
Perhaps you'd tell us what it means then. We won't wait.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170345
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.
Good Work Rose-
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)
Yes.#8. She's got that old tattered dog eared race card and she just can't believe it doesn't work so well anymore.

We have voted as a nation for a black president twice and I am proud of that. Not Rose_NoHo. Rose_NoHo misses the old days.

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170346
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Qusetion. Why do people referance the bible at all. Its not a law, nor does it pertain to the question of same sex marriage? Answer, Jesus Freaks think that the bible is law. Now move on asshat
Aw shuddup jackass! Keep your bible nonsense to yourself it's off topic here.

Take your fundie ass to the Jesus threads if you want to talk about that stuff.

Fundie dope!
Lisa

Irvine, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170347
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

God made Adam and Eve not Adam and Steve and Jane and eat

“Formerly Frankie Rizzo”

Since: Sep 12

Canarsie, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170348
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

6

6

6

akpilot wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's hear it for Rose and her perfect implementation of Rose Tactic #8.
Good Work Rose-
Rose tactic #1- Act stupid-(not so sure it is an act)
Rose Tactic #2- Misdirect
Rose Tactic #3- Make stupid comments until opposition is tired of replying then claim victory
Rose Tactic #4- Attack the poster- scream Racist, Bigot, Homophobe
Rose Tactic #5- Act intelligent by making silly statistical references such as- Most people who have anal sex are straight-
Rose Tactic #6- Falsely accuse others of lies- when proven wrong through links to previous posts revert back to tactics 2 and 4.
Rose Tactic #7- Claim to have made an argument, then claim others can't counter the argument that doesn't actually exist.
Rose Tactic #8- Claim that everything is linked to- Slavery, Jim Crow Laws, and the plight of the blacks.(See also Tactic #4)
I gotta say it again. You've got the old war horse down to a tee!

Truly LOL!

P.S. I'm on her sh!t list. She swore to never ever respond to me again. I'm real proud of that!
phaines

Big Bear Lake, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170352
Dec 8, 2012
 

Judged:

5

5

5

R Hudson wrote:
<quoted text>
3 corrections..."too" long, not "to" long, "didn't" read, not "did not" read, and "reference", not "referance". I tend to give vets some slack, so don't push it with the "asshat" ...
spelling natzi's ..

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 149,161 - 149,180 of199,114
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Walnut Discussions

Search the Walnut Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Low flying Plain 1 hr curious 1
CA CA Proposition 23 - Global Warming (Oct '10) 2 hr Pack coal in deep 7,328
CA California Proposition 19: the Marijuana Legali... (Oct '10) 2 hr Hole 15,676
La puente shows us the way. 2 hr Sunset 12
Gang member sentenced to 90 years in prison (Oct '07) 3 hr ESE LIL MAN 176
California congressman woos Sriracha pepper sau... 4 hr Responsibility 2
BPUSD misconduct of officials and employees goe... (Sep '07) 4 hr dumb people of bp 2,299
•••
•••

Walnut News Video

•••
Walnut Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Walnut Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Walnut People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••