B'nai Brith: Sons of Schmucks

B'nai Brith: Sons of Schmucks

Posted in the Virginia Beach Forum

Luke

Winnipeg, Canada

#1 Apr 28, 2013
Why aren't those blasphemers who referred to the Holy Talmud as hate speech not on your list of antisemitic incidents? Are ignorant gentiles who blaspheme G-d acceptable to your organization? An Abrahamic covenant doesn't give Jews license to act like schmucks (dickheads, literally 'foreskin'). You are like lawyers who don't believe in practicing law--useless to G-d and destined for the fires of Sheol.
http://bringkatztojustice.blogspot.ca/
God of USA hells angels

Old Bridge, NJ

#2 Apr 28, 2013
Luke wrote:
Why aren't those blasphemers who referred to the Holy Talmud as hate speech not on your list of antisemitic incidents? Are ignorant gentiles who blaspheme G-d acceptable to your organization? An Abrahamic covenant doesn't give Jews license to act like schmucks (dickheads, literally 'foreskin'). You are like lawyers who don't believe in practicing law--useless to G-d and destined for the fires of Sheol.
http://bringkatztojustice.blogspot.ca/
DO you believe the Road reaper MC pay USA hells angels to be their friends ?
Un freaking real
Read about Dave Burgess the USA hells angels child porn king pig scumbag
UNITED STATES v. BURGESS
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David BURGESS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 08-8053.

-- August 11, 2009

As trial evidence demonstrated some of the file names in Burgess' hard drive were particularly descriptive and a review of the names would have legitimately aroused the suspicions of an agent trained in child pornography and inevitably led to the second search warrant.   See United States v. White, 326 F.3d 1135, 1138 (10th Cir.2003)(“the exclusionary rule is inapplicable if the evidence inevitably would have been discovered by lawful means.”).   For example, one folder named “Nastiest11yoSeries” had a subfolder titled “Sausage” containing pornographic images of a young girl.  (R. Vol. II at 574.)   Another folder titled “AGE” contained subfolders titled “03,”“04,”“05,”“06,”“07,”“08,” “09,”“10” and “11.”  (Id. at 569-70.)   Each subfolder folder contained images of children the same age as described in the title engaged in sexually exploitive conduct.   One file was entitled “Lolita,” a term which Agent Hughes testified is often seen in the investigation of child pornography.   (Id. at 573-74.)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Virginia Beach Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min window lickers 1,618,230
News Smokers will soon burn up even more money (Mar '09) Tue martin garey 4
News TNCC debates new smoking policies (Mar '09) Oct 16 martin garey 12
News Louisa Pot Bust: Louisa Investigators seize mar... (Jul '10) Oct 16 dbassb1msncom 57
News Sensitive FBI photos from Colonial Parkway murd... (Mar '10) Oct 15 NoQawinkydink 13
News Smoking policy (Nov '07) Oct 14 martin garey 176
Road Reapers MC allowed to pay USA hells angels... (Jun '13) Oct 14 Nun ya 14

Virginia Beach Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Virginia Beach Mortgages