white girls who date black guys in eliazbethtown

[northern wind]

Your Answer wrote:

I see white racists complain about being out-bred by the browns all the time and all I can think is, "You can't stand your own women enough to fark them. It's almost like subconsciously you aren't convinced of your own superiority after all."

If you knew the statistics involved in that whole situation, you would know how retarded what you just said is.

[nastywhitegirls]

whitebgirls dating black males? disgusting..

[nastywhitegirls]

i think yall darkies should stick to your race before its completely whiped out

[believe a cracker]

True Helm wrote:

<quoted text>
Hahaha. I'd take that as a comment if I thought you knew what you were talking about.

thats the problem with you pseudo educated "new age philosopher's" , you hold no value to anything said unless one agrees. your speculation is fact,but mine is pure ignorance? it is a common known fact that most people see nietzche as a direct influence on hitler. no amount of pointing out failures of spelling,grammer,or just plain bad writing on my part takes this simple fact of statistic away.
if you people are trying to win converts to your religion of atheism via quotes from nietzshe, i suggest you find a new hero.

[believe a cracker]

believe a cracker wrote:

<quoted text>thats the problem with you pseudo educated "new age philosopher's" , you hold no value to anything said unless one agrees. your speculation is fact,but mine is pure ignorance? it is a common known fact that most people see nietzche as a direct influence on hitler. no amount of pointing out failures of spelling,grammer,or just plain bad writing on my part takes this simple fact of statistic away.
if you people are trying to win converts to your religion of atheism via quotes from nietzshe, i suggest you find a new hero.

i will give you one thing, nietzche,and hitler loved one thing,just like their "father".....the separation of human beings! why dont we cut the the chase and talk about that? how do you people claim to not believe in God while spouting off aleister crowley talking points? its confusing to me how you can agree with a satan worshiping zealot,but disagree with the bible with so much passion?

[believe a cracker]

believe a cracker wrote:

<quoted text>thats the problem with you pseudo educated "new age philosopher's" , you hold no value to anything said unless one agrees. your speculation is fact,but mine is pure ignorance? it is a common known fact that most people see nietzche as a direct influence on hitler. no amount of pointing out failures of spelling,grammer,or just plain bad writing on my part takes this simple fact of statistic away.
if you people are trying to win converts to your religion of atheism via quotes from nietzshe, i suggest you find a new hero.

this division is the biggest "false flag attack" this nation has ever experienced, it makes 911 look like a circus sideshow! if you want to think with me :)

[northern wind]

believe a cracker wrote:

<quoted text>thats the problem with you pseudo educated "new age philosopher's" , you hold no value to anything said unless one agrees. your speculation is fact,but mine is pure ignorance? it is a common known fact that most people see nietzche as a direct influence on hitler. no amount of pointing out failures of spelling,grammer,or just plain bad writing on my part takes this simple fact of statistic away.
if you people are trying to win converts to your religion of atheism via quotes from nietzshe, i suggest you find a new hero.

What's with you trying to classify what I am so hard? Nothing I am saying is "new age". It's actually more common that people tell people who compare Nietzsche to Hitler that they have no clue what they are talking about. Nietzsche is a great writer. He is not a god, but I do enjoy what he writes and it is very relevant. So what if Hitler shoehorned him into his half-baked eugenics bullshit? There is a difference in prophecy and agenda.

I am not an atheist, I tell you this AGAIN, but I will not get into spirituality with you. It is this simple. I do not believe mixing races is a good thing. I just don't. It robs people of their roots, a more ancient and essential(slightly continental) origin that I believe is important and healthy. The Hopi natives have a model for it, where humanity is sustained by many great spiritual cores, each nurturing its people and keeping the world a balanced and diverse place. I have a hard time repeating it because I am afraid that I might fudge it up, this thing I learned from a completely "uneducated" tribe of people. It is close, though, to what many people beleive. Cultures and diversity enrich the world. A people have the right to preserve their ancient culture and greater race. It is perfectly natural to come to this conclusion, and not hateful at all. A community that has something common, and is smaller and more close-knit, has a greater chance of prosperity. What I feel is hateful is the neurotic PCness infecting the minds of people today, where they beleive the genocide of their people is the greater evil compared to a monochromatic slave-existence. I'm sorry. I don't see it. I don't think race-mixing is a GOOD thing. It may not be the WORST problem we are facing today, but it certainly poses a problem and is not a good thing.

[Just wondering]

I'm 30% Cherokee but u don't here me blaming others for all ur an sisters killing my people, at least u we're slaved an set free!!! We only hv little peaces of land we can live on now!!! So quit being so selfish!!!!! Cry bby!!!!

[northern wind]

Just wondering wrote:

I'm 30% Cherokee but u don't here me blaming others for all ur an sisters killing my people, at least u we're slaved an set free!!! We only hv little peaces of land we can live on now!!! So quit being so selfish!!!!! Cry bby!!!!

That's because you are Cherokee. Go tell that to a Lakota, and get slapped in the face.

[northern wind]

Just wondering wrote:

I'm 30% Cherokee but u don't here me blaming others for all ur an sisters killing my people, at least u we're slaved an set free!!! We only hv little peaces of land we can live on now!!! So quit being so selfish!!!!! Cry bby!!!!

That's because you are 30% Cherokee. Which means shit. I am 25% Seminole. Red hair and blue eyes. My kids have blonde hair and blue eyes. Go tell that crap you just said to a Lakota, and get slapped in the face.

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

<quoted text>
What's with you trying to classify what I am so hard? Nothing I am saying is "new age". It's actually more common that people tell people who compare Nietzsche to Hitler that they have no clue what they are talking about. Nietzsche is a great writer. He is not a god, but I do enjoy what he writes and it is very relevant. So what if Hitler shoehorned him into his half-baked eugenics bullshit? There is a difference in prophecy and agenda.
I am not an atheist, I tell you this AGAIN, but I will not get into spirituality with you. It is this simple. I do not believe mixing races is a good thing. I just don't. It robs people of their roots, a more ancient and essential(slightly continental) origin that I believe is important and healthy. The Hopi natives have a model for it, where humanity is sustained by many great spiritual cores, each nurturing its people and keeping the world a balanced and diverse place. I have a hard time repeating it because I am afraid that I might fudge it up, this thing I learned from a completely "uneducated" tribe of people. It is close, though, to what many people beleive. Cultures and diversity enrich the world. A people have the right to preserve their ancient culture and greater race. It is perfectly natural to come to this conclusion, and not hateful at all. A community that has something common, and is smaller and more close-knit, has a greater chance of prosperity. What I feel is hateful is the neurotic PCness infecting the minds of people today, where they beleive the genocide of their people is the greater evil compared to a monochromatic slave-existence. I'm sorry. I don't see it. I don't think race-mixing is a GOOD thing. It may not be the WORST problem we are facing today, but it certainly poses a problem and is not a good thing.

listen, you have missed my point, its not that i am saying what you said isnt true( to a point),but at this point in world history is it productive? like i said, i am a very proud celt,if being proud of that makes me a racist....so be it!
listen my friend, i see all of what you are saying,but it doesnt matter. work with what you have left(this is where the bible comes into play). i know you hate hearing that,but that grace is the only thing that keeps me alive or sane(thats a matter of debate).

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

<quoted text>
What's with you trying to classify what I am so hard? Nothing I am saying is "new age". It's actually more common that people tell people who compare Nietzsche to Hitler that they have no clue what they are talking about. Nietzsche is a great writer. He is not a god, but I do enjoy what he writes and it is very relevant. So what if Hitler shoehorned him into his half-baked eugenics bullshit? There is a difference in prophecy and agenda.
I am not an atheist, I tell you this AGAIN, but I will not get into spirituality with you. It is this simple. I do not believe mixing races is a good thing. I just don't. It robs people of their roots, a more ancient and essential(slightly continental) origin that I believe is important and healthy. The Hopi natives have a model for it, where humanity is sustained by many great spiritual cores, each nurturing its people and keeping the world a balanced and diverse place. I have a hard time repeating it because I am afraid that I might fudge it up, this thing I learned from a completely "uneducated" tribe of people. It is close, though, to what many people beleive. Cultures and diversity enrich the world. A people have the right to preserve their ancient culture and greater race. It is perfectly natural to come to this conclusion, and not hateful at all. A community that has something common, and is smaller and more close-knit, has a greater chance of prosperity. What I feel is hateful is the neurotic PCness infecting the minds of people today, where they beleive the genocide of their people is the greater evil compared to a monochromatic slave-existence. I'm sorry. I don't see it. I don't think race-mixing is a GOOD thing. It may not be the WORST problem we are facing today, but it certainly poses a problem and is not a good thing.

the only reason i "classify so hard" is because you guys do it even harder. i didnt mean to make an example of you,but you guys do it alot.......i thought i would return the favor. not trying too be mean.:)

[northern wind]

believe a cracker wrote:

<quoted text>listen, you have missed my point, its not that i am saying what you said isnt true( to a point),but at this point in world history is it productive? like i said, i am a very proud celt,if being proud of that makes me a racist....so be it!
listen my friend, i see all of what you are saying,but it doesnt matter. work with what you have left(this is where the bible comes into play). i know you hate hearing that,but that grace is the only thing that keeps me alive or sane(thats a matter of debate).

Not only is it productive, it is NEEDED. As a cultural offset. To give people a cause and purpose. Will it work on a massive scale? No. Should it? Of course not. WIll it make a difference? Very much. Even if there are just communities and towns dotted across Europe and the US that are culture-centric and serve as hubs for traditional peoples. I am not sure what grace is. In my religion we beleive in something called Frith, which is an anglo-saxon term that roughly translated to "peace". Which is defended by a people and garnered by kith and kin.

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

<quoted text>
That's because you are 30% Cherokee. Which means shit. I am 25% Seminole. Red hair and blue eyes. My kids have blonde hair and blue eyes. Go tell that crap you just said to a Lakota, and get slapped in the face.

btw, thanks for picking one name to go by..."northern wind" it makes it alot better to have a good conversation.

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

<quoted text>
Not only is it productive, it is NEEDED. As a cultural offset. To give people a cause and purpose. Will it work on a massive scale? No. Should it? Of course not. WIll it make a difference? Very much. Even if there are just communities and towns dotted across Europe and the US that are culture-centric and serve as hubs for traditional peoples. I am not sure what grace is. In my religion we beleive in something called Frith, which is an anglo-saxon term that roughly translated to "peace". Which is defended by a people and garnered by kith and kin.

i thought you didnt want to get spititual? how do you suppose we go about this separation at this point? do you have big balls? tell the people how this will be done? please allow us as a republic understand the solution to the problem you have addressed! problem is....you have little bitty balls,and you are affraid to tell the public how YOUR goals will be accomplished!
im tired,and im done with topix,will someone pick up my slack?

[northern wind]

I never said anything about separation. That should not be the goal, but perhaps an outcome, and not as extreme in manner as you are thinking. I am talking about encouraging cultures and races to GATHER, and stick together. What you will have is many "hubs" or centers of living for a specific culture, sustained by the individual communities. The yuppies from the city can then come down and visit, bringing in a bit of money through tourism.:P (that was a joke)

The point is that these folkish communities can serve themselves and also trade resources with other such semi-tribal communities.

This is all vague speculation. The point of contemplating all of this is not to tell how I would organize things in a perfect world. If that were the case then I would propose we go back to living how the early anglo-saxons did. Where communities consisted of a few large families and the law and its enforcement was in the hands of every citizen.

Why do you I am afraid? Because I have a sparse agenda? I'm a pre-law student, I have not reached that particular stage of megalomania yet. Why are you concerned with my reproductive organs? Where did you even get that from?

[Other White Man]

In my opinion they should casterate the Black SOB's and hog ring the White Thrash B@t@h. That would stop a lot of that Sh^t from going on.
Where the Hell is the KKK? This is also for Big Cracker the first to have the knive.

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

I never said anything about separation. That should not be the goal, but perhaps an outcome, and not as extreme in manner as you are thinking. I am talking about encouraging cultures and races to GATHER, and stick together. What you will have is many "hubs" or centers of living for a specific culture, sustained by the individual communities. The yuppies from the city can then come down and visit, bringing in a bit of money through tourism.:P (that was a joke)
The point is that these folkish communities can serve themselves and also trade resources with other such semi-tribal communities.
This is all vague speculation. The point of contemplating all of this is not to tell how I would organize things in a perfect world. If that were the case then I would propose we go back to living how the early anglo-saxons did. Where communities consisted of a few large families and the law and its enforcement was in the hands of every citizen.
Why do you I am afraid? Because I have a sparse agenda? I'm a pre-law student, I have not reached that particular stage of megalomania yet. Why are you concerned with my reproductive organs? Where did you even get that from?

good points! i think if the country,and its debt and inflation continues you will get your wish. or if we have a huge "false flag attack" you will get your wish,until people beg for martial law(and they will).
interesting subject!

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

I never said anything about separation. That should not be the goal, but perhaps an outcome, and not as extreme in manner as you are thinking. I am talking about encouraging cultures and races to GATHER, and stick together. What you will have is many "hubs" or centers of living for a specific culture, sustained by the individual communities. The yuppies from the city can then come down and visit, bringing in a bit of money through tourism.:P (that was a joke)
The point is that these folkish communities can serve themselves and also trade resources with other such semi-tribal communities.
This is all vague speculation. The point of contemplating all of this is not to tell how I would organize things in a perfect world. If that were the case then I would propose we go back to living how the early anglo-saxons did. Where communities consisted of a few large families and the law and its enforcement was in the hands of every citizen.
Why do you I am afraid? Because I have a sparse agenda? I'm a pre-law student, I have not reached that particular stage of megalomania yet. Why are you concerned with my reproductive organs? Where did you even get that from?

what if the outcome was orchestrated,or ready made by evil people?

[believe a cracker]

northern wind wrote:

<quoted text>
Not only is it productive, it is NEEDED. As a cultural offset. To give people a cause and purpose. Will it work on a massive scale? No. Should it? Of course not. WIll it make a difference? Very much. Even if there are just communities and towns dotted across Europe and the US that are culture-centric and serve as hubs for traditional peoples. I am not sure what grace is. In my religion we beleive in something called Frith, which is an anglo-saxon term that roughly translated to "peace". Which is defended by a people and garnered by kith and kin.

"frith" is what JESUS CHRIST promoted in the gospels,but i guess this is a retarded subject, not worth bringing up? true christianity involves "frith" thru support and accountability, but i guess since its in the bible its a fairytale? when the god of yourself makes the same point its genius?........idk about you?