its wrong to live together before mar...
Blah

Elizabethtown, KY

#41 Mar 9, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>you are still trying to convince me of how your lack of morals are better than wooden teeth's morals, why are yours better? you said, "i gave myself the authority". why is yours special?
when you scolded wooden teeth for giving his moral authority, you did in fact say it didnt and should align with yours!
if you think you are dropping some "logic bomb",you have lost your mind. it sounds like the same regurgitated line to me!
Ahem. Let me make myself clear. I think he is a blooming idiot, but that's my personal opinion. I think negative things about people all the time and I judge and I have other human flaws. Just as many judge me. So what? It's not the end of my life. Who are you to begin with? Nor should my opinion be the end of his life. Who am I? So, don't confuse me with the other poster. But, Pastor Teeth isnt going to run my life from Topix and neither are you, Uncle Cracker. You can flip and flop and use circular logic to justify your moral actions on this website all that you want to, but I see through your bull. My moral authority tells me that you have very few morals or else you wouldn't be here posting this nonsense. Yep, im judging.:) That is all. Now please carry on as I don't normally post here, but was reading up on something about a local restaraunt and saw this and laughed. No, really I did.:)
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#42 Mar 9, 2013
Blah wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahem. Let me make myself clear. I think he is a blooming idiot, but that's my personal opinion. I think negative things about people all the time and I judge and I have other human flaws. Just as many judge me. So what? It's not the end of my life. Who are you to begin with? Nor should my opinion be the end of his life. Who am I? So, don't confuse me with the other poster. But, Pastor Teeth isnt going to run my life from Topix and neither are you, Uncle Cracker. You can flip and flop and use circular logic to justify your moral actions on this website all that you want to, but I see through your bull. My moral authority tells me that you have very few morals or else you wouldn't be here posting this nonsense. Yep, im judging.:) That is all. Now please carry on as I don't normally post here, but was reading up on something about a local restaraunt and saw this and laughed. No, really I did.:)
i speak my mind. what is my bull? the fact that i pointed out that preaching no morals holds the same hypocrisy as preaching morals? if you are going to point out that i am no saint....i will agree with you and hold your hand in the process!
how does wooden teeth "run your life" by posting on topix?
i think your logic is "circular"
what are you trying too say? wooden teeth shouldnt be allowed to post because you "feel" his post is running your life? what if i want to be a more moral person,but your post influences me to be a less moral person? are YOU "running my life" of course not....its your opinion,just like it is yours to illuminate your opinion as if it is golden!
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#44 Mar 9, 2013
Blah wrote:
<quoted text>
Ahem. Let me make myself clear. I think he is a blooming idiot, but that's my personal opinion. I think negative things about people all the time and I judge and I have other human flaws. Just as many judge me. So what? It's not the end of my life. Who are you to begin with? Nor should my opinion be the end of his life. Who am I? So, don't confuse me with the other poster. But, Pastor Teeth isnt going to run my life from Topix and neither are you, Uncle Cracker. You can flip and flop and use circular logic to justify your moral actions on this website all that you want to, but I see through your bull. My moral authority tells me that you have very few morals or else you wouldn't be here posting this nonsense. Yep, im judging.:) That is all. Now please carry on as I don't normally post here, but was reading up on something about a local restaraunt and saw this and laughed. No, really I did.:)
" thank you "pastor blah", i will carry on like you never posted here before you use your entire mental capability and educate us cave people. sorry for posting...:)
sigh

United States

#46 Mar 10, 2013
You know, we as a society would be so much better off if we stopped trying to impose our enterpretation of morality on to everyone else and just lived our own lives. People are going to do what tgey think is best for themselves. Perhaps you should spend less time worrying about everyone else's sins and transgressions. Life is much more peaceful that way.
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#47 Mar 11, 2013
sigh wrote:
You know, we as a society would be so much better off if we stopped trying to impose our enterpretation of morality on to everyone else and just lived our own lives. People are going to do what tgey think is best for themselves. Perhaps you should spend less time worrying about everyone else's sins and transgressions. Life is much more peaceful that way.
if we all lived like "yes men" what would this world become? "sins and transgressions" is a broad term,from what i read on here. for example, if someone spends all of their money and alcohol forgetting to feed their children....is it wrong to point out "sin and transgression". what and who is the dividing line of where we stop and start?
i am in no way defending some of the outlandish,and sometimes anti female comments on here(i have a wife,daughter,mother,sister and niece,who are very opinionated),but what is wrong with a little instruction? even if you dont agree, why is it offensive?
Mandy

United States

#48 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text> if we all lived like "yes men" what would this world become? "sins and transgressions" is a broad term,from what i read on here. for example, if someone spends all of their money and alcohol forgetting to feed their children....is it wrong to point out "sin and transgression". what and who is the dividing line of where we stop and start?
i am in no way defending some of the outlandish,and sometimes anti female comments on here(i have a wife,daughter,mother,sister and niece,who are very opinionated),but what is wrong with a little instruction? even if you dont agree, why is it offensive?
Nothing wrong with a little instructions, but the person who started this is over the top with a lot of things. What works for one person might not work for another. I would never tell someone that they should live together before marriage, but I sure wouldn't tell them they shouldn't either. Its their life & they have to live it the way they want to.
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#49 Mar 11, 2013
sigh wrote:
You know, we as a society would be so much better off if we stopped trying to impose our enterpretation of morality on to everyone else and just lived our own lives. People are going to do what tgey think is best for themselves. Perhaps you should spend less time worrying about everyone else's sins and transgressions. Life is much more peaceful that way.
btw, anton levey agrees with your philosophy . idk what that says too you?
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#50 Mar 11, 2013
Mandy wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing wrong with a little instructions, but the person who started this is over the top with a lot of things. What works for one person might not work for another. I would never tell someone that they should live together before marriage, but I sure wouldn't tell them they shouldn't either. Its their life & they have to live it the way they want to.
i have lived with all of my wives before marriage, so i couldnt scorn anyone.
sometimes i do wonder though....what if a woman saw herself as the princess she was born too be? what if she made the man who was interested in her prove himself to her,by establishing himself,making money,providing a home,having a long term job....ect. i think this very pro woman! if you think about it,men are only as wicked as females allow us too be(we are simple creatures)
Mandy

United States

#51 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>i have lived with all of my wives before marriage, so i couldnt scorn anyone.
sometimes i do wonder though....what if a woman saw herself as the princess she was born too be? what if she made the man who was interested in her prove himself to her,by establishing himself,making money,providing a home,having a long term job....ect. i think this very pro woman! if you think about it,men are only as wicked as females allow us too be(we are simple creatures)
My husband didn't live with his ex before they were married & she did a number on him. We lived together for years before we got married. He had a long term job, but with down sizing he lost it. I have always worked as I was raised to be able to take care of myself & not ever depend on a man to do it. My grandmother didn't believe in living together, but when I told her that I was going to buy a house with my now husband, she told me that I had to live my own life. She didn't look down on me or tell me I was wrong. She was also only married once & divorced. She said she had one man, it didn't work & she didn't want another. She didn't ever tell anyone that they shouldn't ever get married or try again after a divorce. I just think if no one is getting hurt & no laws are being broken, then just let other people live their lives. Everyone does have a right to their own opinion, but some people do go to extremes with their's such as wooden teeth or dad, whichever moniker he decides to use.
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#52 Mar 11, 2013
Mandy wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing wrong with a little instructions, but the person who started this is over the top with a lot of things. What works for one person might not work for another. I would never tell someone that they should live together before marriage, but I sure wouldn't tell them they shouldn't either. Its their life & they have to live it the way they want to.
the person that started this meant well, but really didnt understand why he felt the way he did. did i explain it well enough for him to create a better topic from now on?(sorry wooden teeth, see above, " sin and transgressions" everyone is fair game).
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#53 Mar 11, 2013
Mandy wrote:
<quoted text>
Nothing wrong with a little instructions, but the person who started this is over the top with a lot of things. What works for one person might not work for another. I would never tell someone that they should live together before marriage, but I sure wouldn't tell them they shouldn't either. Its their life & they have to live it the way they want to.
you seem like a good woman mandy, i enjoy your input! dont quit posting.
Mandy

United States

#54 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>the person that started this meant well, but really didnt understand why he felt the way he did. did i explain it well enough for him to create a better topic from now on?(sorry wooden teeth, see above, " sin and transgressions" everyone is fair game).
I doubt he meant well as he is one who believes all male doctor's are perverrts out to do harm to his wife. He encourages women to not go to any type of gyno as it isn't necessary because no one gets cervical cancer. Yeah tell that to the women who can't have kids now or died. I'm all for letting people do what they want with their lives & making their own choices because it doesn't affect me.
Mandy

United States

#55 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>you seem like a good woman mandy, i enjoy your input! dont quit posting.
Thanks. Its nice to have someone who, even if we don't agree completely, can debate without the name calling. You always have some valid points.
not fooling anyone

Elizabethtown, KY

#56 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>btw, anton levey agrees with your philosophy . idk what that says too you?
Except not. You're reaching really far. Cute that you compared my "philosophy" to that of the founder of the church of Satan. It says wonders about your character.
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#57 Mar 11, 2013
not fooling anyone wrote:
<quoted text>
Except not. You're reaching really far. Cute that you compared my "philosophy" to that of the founder of the church of Satan. It says wonders about your character.
even the gospels are full of instruction against "sin and transgression" were the apostals wrong to deliver such a message? should paul have not wrote? would his letters be offensive? by your philosophy,none of the bible would exist(except the parts where you get good things)instruction is noll and void,in your opinion. why? im not promoting legalism by any means,but what do you promote? it is not cute that i compare your teachings to the church of satan....it should be a scary concept to you
believe a cracker

Elizabethtown, KY

#58 Mar 11, 2013
Mandy wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt he meant well as he is one who believes all male doctor's are perverrts out to do harm to his wife. He encourages women to not go to any type of gyno as it isn't necessary because no one gets cervical cancer. Yeah tell that to the women who can't have kids now or died. I'm all for letting people do what they want with their lives & making their own choices because it doesn't affect me.
there is a problem with what you are saying though. alot of peoples personal decisions are effecting the rest of us. i wonder what percentage of people "living together" draw a government check by not reporting the males income? thats where the anger comes from.
as far as the obgyn, wooden teeth needs to grow up, if my wife's doctor can satisfy her more than i can in her short visit after all the years ive had studying what she likes.......he can have her!:)
Mandy

United States

#59 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>there is a problem with what you are saying though. alot of peoples personal decisions are effecting the rest of us. i wonder what percentage of people "living together" draw a government check by not reporting the males income? thats where the anger comes from.
as far as the obgyn, wooden teeth needs to grow up, if my wife's doctor can satisfy her more than i can in her short visit after all the years ive had studying what she likes.......he can have her!:)
Oh I get that. I know someone who is doing that & it makes me mad because they both make more than I do, but yet she got a medical card so she was out nothing to have her baby or to get a breast pump, but I do have insurance that I pay for even if it is a struggle. I refuse to put my baby on a state medical card as I do not want them telling me where to take my baby. This way I decide which doctor she see's. I also know a lot of married couple's who say they aren't together, so the woman can draw a check, but the husband is still there. The system is flawed. The people who really need help & are trying to get by, can't get any help usually, while some can lay around & do nothing & get everything.
Heh

Elizabethtown, KY

#60 Mar 11, 2013
believe a cracker wrote:
<quoted text>even the gospels are full of instruction against "sin and transgression" were the apostals wrong to deliver such a message? should paul have not wrote? would his letters be offensive? by your philosophy,none of the bible would exist(except the parts where you get good things)instruction is noll and void,in your opinion. why? im not promoting legalism by any means,but what do you promote? it is not cute that i compare your teachings to the church of satan....it should be a scary concept to you
I used the term "sins and transgressions" tongue in cheek, which was obvious. What I do find scary, unfortunately, is your inability to recognize that you and i are practically saying the same thing, but instead of comprehending that, you take one small obviously facetious phrase and base everything else I said around that. Context, it's an amazing thing.
wooden teeth

Elizabethtown, KY

#61 Mar 11, 2013
look how scorned we get just for having a differant opinion, and an opinion that actually promotes good instead of evil. im sorry but yes i do believe its wrong for male doctors to intimately examine women. that should be a no-brainer. but hey, everyone thinks its aliright to live together too, these things used to be called fornication, what do we call them now if not that? can we change the term and make it ok somehow?
Mandy

Campbellsville, KY

#62 Mar 11, 2013
wooden teeth wrote:
look how scorned we get just for having a differant opinion, and an opinion that actually promotes good instead of evil. im sorry but yes i do believe its wrong for male doctors to intimately examine women. that should be a no-brainer. but hey, everyone thinks its aliright to live together too, these things used to be called fornication, what do we call them now if not that? can we change the term and make it ok somehow?
You'r really going to call this stuff evil? Murderers are evil. Living together isn't evil. Maybe wrong by a lot of people's standards, but most wouldn't say evil. As for the male doctor thing, you just make yourself sound more crazy everytime you talk about it. Most people don't care about gender. They just want good doctor.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Vine Grove Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Laura Schmidt 16 hr She the cheater 3
Who's been in my hen house Thu Lol 4
She does it so well Thu Hatersclub360 6
Alone this weekend Thu Hatersclub360 23
Doesn't anyone know any GOOD gossip??? (Jan '08) Thu Its about winning... 15
who knows her Thu Its about winning... 8
Miss you my love (Mar '16) Wed Never again 78

Vine Grove Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Vine Grove Mortgages