proud to be white

Posted in the Vine Grove Forum

First Prev
of 3
Next Last
Proud

New Albany, IN

#1 Sep 9, 2012
I am in NO WAY a racist... BUT DAMMIT I'm not ashamed to be white and don't feel bad about it at all even though the media try and try to make white people ashamed to be. If you're black, glad for ya. Mexican, ROCK ON!! But I'm a white man AND I LOVE IT!!!
FYI

Bardstown, KY

#2 Sep 9, 2012
Why would you be "proud" to be any skin color? Pride should be for something you accomplished. Skin color is something you were born with.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#3 Sep 9, 2012
Proud wrote:
I am in NO WAY a racist... BUT DAMMIT I'm not ashamed to be white and don't feel bad about it at all even though the media try and try to make white people ashamed to be. If you're black, glad for ya. Mexican, ROCK ON!! But I'm a white man AND I LOVE IT!!!
Sorry, but if you think the media is telling you to be ashamed to be white, then you probably are racist. I'm white too, but I don't hear any media voices telling me to be ashamed of it...are you sure those voices aren't in your own head? Minorities in this country should be proud that they've come a long way towards overcoming historical racism. If you feel threatened by that, then you need to examine your first statement again.
Second

Nashville, TN

#4 Sep 9, 2012
The Point wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, but if you think the media is telling you to be ashamed to be white, then you probably are racist. I'm white too, but I don't hear any media voices telling me to be ashamed of it...are you sure those voices aren't in your own head? Minorities in this country should be proud that they've come a long way towards overcoming historical racism. If you feel threatened by that, then you need to examine your first statement again.
If you're calling someone racist simply for noticing the existence of an undercurrent of anti-white propaganda in mass media, then you probably don't have a clue what racism truly is. There may be few examples of overtly anti-white rhetoric in the media, but there is definitely many examples of covertly anti-white rhetoric. Of course, such observation may require a degree of heightened perception. Selective media coverage that attempts to propagate the myth of white privilege and attempts to highlight white racism (think the Trayvon Martin incident and the outrageous initial spin,) is not uncommon and does give a not-so subtle hint of an anti-white worldview.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#5 Sep 9, 2012
Second wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're calling someone racist simply for noticing the existence of an undercurrent of anti-white propaganda in mass media, then you probably don't have a clue what racism truly is. There may be few examples of overtly anti-white rhetoric in the media, but there is definitely many examples of covertly anti-white rhetoric. Of course, such observation may require a degree of heightened perception. Selective media coverage that attempts to propagate the myth of white privilege and attempts to highlight white racism (think the Trayvon Martin incident and the outrageous initial spin,) is not uncommon and does give a not-so subtle hint of an anti-white worldview.
Yeah, I guess I don't have that "heightened perception" to know when I'm being persecuted. I need some good talk radio guys to point it out for me, I guess. It's all those self-hating rich white guys who own the mass media doing it, I'm sure (damn those anti-colonialist at Comcast!). Thanks for pointing it out for me...I'll keep my tinfoil antennae up for it in the future!
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#6 Sep 9, 2012
Second wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're calling someone racist simply for noticing the existence of an undercurrent of anti-white propaganda in mass media, then you probably don't have a clue what racism truly is. There may be few examples of overtly anti-white rhetoric in the media, but there is definitely many examples of covertly anti-white rhetoric. Of course, such observation may require a degree of heightened perception. Selective media coverage that attempts to propagate the myth of white privilege and attempts to highlight white racism (think the Trayvon Martin incident and the outrageous initial spin,) is not uncommon and does give a not-so subtle hint of an anti-white worldview.
BTW, I thought Trayvon Martin's shooter was Hispanic. Are white priders supposed to cheer for the Mexican over the black guy? We win either way, don't we? Heck, one dead, one in jail...that's two birds with one stone isn't it?
Second

United States

#7 Sep 9, 2012
There ya go. Utilize an ad hominem attack instead of a rational argument. Trayvon Martin's attacker was hispanic. If you recall, initial media reports listed him as white, and then later a "white hispanic" in a pathetic attempt to add a racial component to the incident. The Obama administration's justice department refused to prosecute the black panther group for voter intimidation, but this received very little mass media coverage. As I stated, such incidents indicate the presence of possible anti-white sentiment in some segments of the media. It has nothing do with white pride. I believe that pride in skin color or race is ludicrous. You're born the way you are, and the color of your skin or race has nothing to do with your merits as a human being. Race baiters have had a field day in this country by making race the central component of many social and political controversies, with a consequential backlash against white Americans by some groups, including some media outlets. That's all I'm saying.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#8 Sep 9, 2012
Second wrote:
There ya go. Utilize an ad hominem attack instead of a rational argument. Trayvon Martin's attacker was hispanic. If you recall, initial media reports listed him as white, and then later a "white hispanic" in a pathetic attempt to add a racial component to the incident. The Obama administration's justice department refused to prosecute the black panther group for voter intimidation, but this received very little mass media coverage. As I stated, such incidents indicate the presence of possible anti-white sentiment in some segments of the media. It has nothing do with white pride. I believe that pride in skin color or race is ludicrous. You're born the way you are, and the color of your skin or race has nothing to do with your merits as a human being. Race baiters have had a field day in this country by making race the central component of many social and political controversies, with a consequential backlash against white Americans by some groups, including some media outlets. That's all I'm saying.
What, exactly, would be the rational argument to refute that there is a mass media conspiracy against whites? Sorry, but that's tinfoil hat talk. Reporting about someone's position on something doesn't mean you're taking a position on it yourself...that's what journalists do. Were the black leaders in FL being racists by assuming the shooting was race related? Maybe. Were the Black Panthers being racists when they got into it. Yes (but that's pretty much what they do). Was the media being racists because they reported on it? No! I'm afraid your little comment about Obama and Holder failing to prosecute the Panthers kinda gave you away. Your implication is that that the two black guys failed to prosecute the other black guys and, because the media didn't cover that to your liking, the media is sweeping the great black conspiracy under the rug. You seem pretty reasonable, but that's birther talk, bro. Don't let the race baiters bait you.
Second

United States

#9 Sep 9, 2012
Well, I consider it more the expression of a prevalent worldview than I do a conspiracy. The same worldview that dominates academia for that matter. One of white dominance, injustice, and atrocity against minorities throughout America's history, and a commitment to perpetuating that belief. What the media chooses to cover and not cover strongly indicates what the media wants the public to believe about the world they live in. Covering Trayvon Martin as a racial incident, but failing to cover incidents such as the brutal 2007 murders of Channon Christian and Christopher Newsom are indicative of an idealistic agenda. The belief that the media is impartially objective is truly tinfoil hat talk. If you're curious as to the objectivity of the media in regards to racial crimes, I'd recommend a book written by Washington Post Columnist Colin Flaherty entitled, "White Girl Bleed a Lot." Quite eye opening.
Oldtimer

Brattleboro, VT

#10 Sep 9, 2012
All I ever hear good news about is blacks, jews gays and hispanics. Nobody mentions white guys at all except as racists. The US was built and founded largely by white people. Between Europe and the US most of the advancement of the human race of the past two thousand years has been made by European blood. The world as it stands could not have been possible without us whitefolk. Now the anger and resentment of all the disenchanted ha been brought upon us. In the last ten years I have witnessed the young white boys losing their identity. They are losing their interest in all things but the new sloppy culture of no education and no work and no ethnicity. Even worse yet they now embrace the ethnicity of blacks and will not speak of whites.

We have no White roll models because nobody tands up for whites as a group. If you think for one minute. Please do so. The nation is now noy run by whites but by Jewish people. Hollywood, the Federal Reserve, and many key positions in the white house are in jewish hands. How can anyone have a voice when 97 percent of the Radio, TV Music, and news are broadcast by jewish people. We get one opinion, theirs. The United Nations has has even condemned Israel unanimously for the atrocities against the Palestinian people. Yet they cannot act because of one holdout the US.

This is a cabal run Country. I have faith in all peoples. Not as just one race but as Different tribes of one race. Our kinship is not like cattle. It is jut like different breeds of dogs like each other. We dont mix purebred black dogs with white ones. We also dont let the one percent of jewish dogs tell all the others what to think and do.
Second

United States

#11 Sep 9, 2012
Oldtimer wrote:
All I ever hear good news about is blacks, jews gays and hispanics. Nobody mentions white guys at all except as racists. The US was built and founded largely by white people. Between Europe and the US most of the advancement of the human race of the past two thousand years has been made by European blood. The world as it stands could not have been possible without us whitefolk. Now the anger and resentment of all the disenchanted ha been brought upon us. In the last ten years I have witnessed the young white boys losing their identity. They are losing their interest in all things but the new sloppy culture of no education and no work and no ethnicity. Even worse yet they now embrace the ethnicity of blacks and will not speak of whites.
We have no White roll models because nobody tands up for whites as a group. If you think for one minute. Please do so. The nation is now noy run by whites but by Jewish people. Hollywood, the Federal Reserve, and many key positions in the white house are in jewish hands. How can anyone have a voice when 97 percent of the Radio, TV Music, and news are broadcast by jewish people. We get one opinion, theirs. The United Nations has has even condemned Israel unanimously for the atrocities against the Palestinian people. Yet they cannot act because of one holdout the US.
This is a cabal run Country. I have faith in all peoples. Not as just one race but as Different tribes of one race. Our kinship is not like cattle. It is jut like different breeds of dogs like each other. We dont mix purebred black dogs with white ones. We also dont let the one percent of jewish dogs tell all the others what to think and do.
Now there's your tinfoil hat conspiracy
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#12 Sep 10, 2012
Second wrote:
<quoted text>
Now there's your tinfoil hat conspiracy
Can't argue with that.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#13 Sep 10, 2012
Second wrote:
<quoted text>
Now there's your tinfoil hat conspiracy
Really, though, your argument is no different than his. He blames the Jews, you blame some other unnamed conspirator (based on a book from a wacko who writes for a conspiracy theory website). I'll buy your "worldview" argument...that those who have studied minority oppression have some degree of guilt about it. But to say that pro-minority reporting is anti-white is a lot like saying feel good stories about handicapped children and wounded vets is anti-able-body reporting. The only agenda that media ownership has is to sell more advertising. And any journalistic endeavor worth its salt ensures that a wall between business and editorial is maintained. Try staying away from the kooky side of the Internet before you end up sounding like the other guy.
Proud

New Albany, IN

#14 Sep 11, 2012
Wait a second... Wait a second. I NEVER once downed another race nor will I... So for you idiots claiming I'm a racist kiss my ass. I am however sick of BLACK ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, Black History Month, etc. What, they can be proud to be black, but the f*ckin moment I say I am not ashamed to be white you claim I'm a racist, Well F*CK you very much you hypocrites. Now if you will excuse me I will go back to listening to Hank and watching Friends on TV while you judge me for not being ashamed because I'm a white man. By the way... I LOVE BEING A WHITE MAN IN AMERICA!!!
Proud

New Albany, IN

#15 Sep 11, 2012
Oh and OldTimer is ABSOLUTELY correct about Isreal. We spend SO MUCH time kissing there ass that people fail to understand they are using depleted uranium to exterminate the Palastinians while they are SCREAMING for help. F*CK Isreal and there Zionist beliefs. And take that tinfoil and wipe your ass with it. Those are the FACTS.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#16 Sep 11, 2012
I never said that you can't be proud of whatever you want to be proud of (and agree with you and Old Timer about kissing Israel's ass). I said the media (whatever that means) isn't a conspiracy telling anybody to do anything. The guy who runs BET is black and puts on entertainment that shows black people doing things black people do for the enjoyment of black people. He doesn't do it just to piss you off...he mainly does it to sell advertising to marketers of black hair products, I'd guess. If XYZ station shows stories about Black or Hispanic people doing positive things, its not an affront to your whiteness. Again, if you feel personally insulted by the presence of other cultures and ideas, then that's something for you to work through. No one is conspiring to make you feel or do anything.
Proud

New Albany, IN

#17 Sep 11, 2012
So... By your statement if I were to start a channel called White Entertainment Channel or have a non-profit org. called the National Ass. for the Advancement of White people I wouldn't be called a racist? I'm saying bullsh*t. I would be hated by everyone in America and labeled not just A racist but THE racist. There is a double standard in America and it pisses me off which is EXACTLY why I posted this. I WILL NOT BE ASHAMED to be a white man and god bless every race out there.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#18 Sep 12, 2012
Proud wrote:
So... By your statement if I were to start a channel called White Entertainment Channel or have a non-profit org. called the National Ass. for the Advancement of White people I wouldn't be called a racist? I'm saying bullsh*t. I would be hated by everyone in America and labeled not just A racist but THE racist. There is a double standard in America and it pisses me off which is EXACTLY why I posted this. I WILL NOT BE ASHAMED to be a white man and god bless every race out there.
But we already have CMT and the GOP :) No, the theory is that our race is already in power, so there would be no reason to advance it. Do you have a problem with woman's organizations? Catholic organizations? LGBT organizations? The theory with all these is that white, male, protestant, straight men already hold a disproportionate position of power in America, so advocating for further advancement wouldn't make sense. But don't worry, we won't be in power in about 50 years, so you'll be able to have your organizations and channels then.
Cumminsgirl

Columbia, KY

#19 Sep 12, 2012
The Point wrote:
<quoted text>
But we already have CMT and the GOP :) No, the theory is that our race is already in power, so there would be no reason to advance it. Do you have a problem with woman's organizations? Catholic organizations? LGBT organizations? The theory with all these is that white, male, protestant, straight men already hold a disproportionate position of power in America, so advocating for further advancement wouldn't make sense. But don't worry, we won't be in power in about 50 years, so you'll be able to have your organizations and channels then.
CMT has black people on it. Click over to BET and you might see 1 white person in the background of a movie. It also goes down to scholarships for college. There is one just for black people, and one just for indians, and many other race have their own scholarship. But not one just for white people because that would be racist.
The Point

Elizabethtown, KY

#20 Sep 12, 2012
Cumminsgirl wrote:
<quoted text>
CMT has black people on it. Click over to BET and you might see 1 white person in the background of a movie. It also goes down to scholarships for college. There is one just for black people, and one just for indians, and many other race have their own scholarship. But not one just for white people because that would be racist.
JK on the CMT...it's not really supposed to be a white network. Again, there are lots of scholarships for "disadvantaged" groups, including women, poor people, minority people, etc. But, the point is, being a white male isn't a disadvantage in this country, so there would be no basis for a white-male-only scholarship. So you have to call it an FFA scholarship (JK again in case you missed that).

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 3
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Vine Grove Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
JE Berry is dishonest on HMH job losses 21 min Just Say NO to Berry 1
Belt Spanking 1 hr Southernbred1 35
Thoughts on Memorial Angels Childcare 1 hr Mom of two boys 3
hmh 2 hr Yep 1
Nikki 2 hr Bonnieville Chick 17
Buying car 6 hr Angry home owner 8
Kala Booth 9 hr Flint Hill Bandit 7
Vine Grove Dating
Find my Match

Vine Grove Jobs

Vine Grove People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Vine Grove News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Vine Grove

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]