Who do you support for Governor in Ohio in 2010?

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
The crazy gets crazier around here by the week. You and (OutofTouchWith)RealitySpeaks should get together and form Seal Team Sicks.

you ought to quit smoking crack all day

I bet you are going crazy today now knowing you were out played and out witted.

ha ha ha ha

woofie woofie

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>Then let's hear your learned military assessment, chief.

How about this, Fred? Why don't you and your two militia buddies bunker down in one of your houses and see how it ends?

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Not me, Fred. Recall elections don't work and they are a waste of money.

for once you are correct

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
you woke up at noon and are drunk already?
you don't possess the balls to laugh in my face first off; and second you laugh all you want in your slum.
It will be real taxpayers laughing at you when the Govt is shutdown do to debt ceiling.
all your grandiose plans with other peoples money just went down the chitter.
Aaaaaah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahahahhaha

Funny that you mention balls and your face in the same sentence. That explains why you call yourself a tea bagger. It also explains...well you know...all the spooge on your chops.

Also, it's "due" not "do" but then one can't be a magic unicorn warrior in the anti-robot tea party army and a scholar at the same time.

That's nice that you took that little Filipino boy on a fabulous boat ride but you still have a hit ratio lower than a magic 8-ball. I'd be happy to laugh in your face in real life, but be sure to bring a stool so I can look you in the eyes. Now dance you stammering clown of a man. Dance little jester dwarf, for the amusement of the forum. Dance while we toss coins at your funny little bell tipped shoes. Aaaaaah ha ha ha ha ha! Aaaaah ha ha ha!

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
for once you are correct

Now if only we could say the same about anything you have ever claimed on here. Take you being a man for instance.

Save Yourself wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny that you mention balls and your face in the same sentence. That explains why you call yourself a tea bagger. It also explains...well you know...all the spooge on your chops.
Also, it's "due" not "do" but then one can't be a magic unicorn warrior in the anti-robot tea party army and a scholar at the same time.
That's nice that you took that little Filipino boy on a fabulous boat ride but you still have a hit ratio lower than a magic 8-ball. I'd be happy to laugh in your face in real life, but be sure to bring a stool so I can look you in the eyes. Now dance you stammering clown of a man. Dance little jester dwarf, for the amusement of the forum. Dance while we toss coins at your funny little bell tipped shoes. Aaaaaah ha ha ha ha ha! Aaaaah ha ha ha!

That post would qualify as the subject of a grad degree thesis in Abnormal Psychology.

Save Yourself wrote:

<quoted text>
Now if only we could say the same about anything you have ever claimed on here. Take you being a man for instance.

laughing so hard I almost peed

how does it feel to be out played and out witted again?

with unions being bankrupt who is going to give money to the Democratic party?

And you media called it the end for the GOP

The GOP just ended unions, forced a balanced budget; and made it impossible to implement Obama care.

I guess America has brighter days ahead now

Merry Christmas

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
How about this, Fred? Why don't you and your two militia buddies bunker down in one of your houses and see how it ends?

If the opposing force thinks like you, they'll lose. Badly.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
That is your assumption. You assume Hostess would have found people like you who would work for them for any pay and under any conditions. You assume that Hostess wanted to stay open.

Unlike you, I'm out in the real world every day. How many labor disputes (union and non-union) do you think I've witnessed in my time? I know what the outcome of a non-union Hostess would have been because I've seen it so many times before compared to the many times I've seen union companies meet the same fate as Hostess.

One of our customers customers just went through that. They hired an outfit to sub-contract their S&R work. It was fine until the new contract came along and the company took bids from other sub-contractors. They went with a cheaper company. Some of their employees have been there for decades, but under the new outfit, they had to make $4.00 per hour less plus a benefits cut.

Most left before the new company took over. Some are still there, but are looking to get out. Why? Because they are non-union and that's the way non-union shops work.

Save Yourself wrote:

<quoted text>
Funny that you mention balls and your face in the same sentence. That explains why you call yourself a tea bagger. It also explains...well you know...all the spooge on your chops.
Also, it's "due" not "do" but then one can't be a magic unicorn warrior in the anti-robot tea party army and a scholar at the same time.
That's nice that you took that little Filipino boy on a fabulous boat ride but you still have a hit ratio lower than a magic 8-ball. I'd be happy to laugh in your face in real life, but be sure to bring a stool so I can look you in the eyes. Now dance you stammering clown of a man. Dance little jester dwarf, for the amusement of the forum. Dance while we toss coins at your funny little bell tipped shoes. Aaaaaah ha ha ha ha ha! Aaaaah ha ha ha!

what a fool you are

at 6'2 I require a stool to look you in the eye?

why are you not the savior for the Cavs?

you don't have any coins to throw....that is what is so funny

you are all azz and not hat

all wind no rain

and you are the joke

it is just my duty to keep pointing out the facts to you

I save my dancing for my trophy wife

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Now we can add "the government being shut down for the next 4 years" to the list of brilliant predictions from (Can'tAccept)RealitySpeaks. Oh my.
When you wage your war against the gendarmes, how are you going to handle the drone?
You do realize that all "right to work" does is allow people to freeload off the union, right? Union shops will still be union shops.

Not if they vote to remove the union which is more likely to happen.

Unions are weakened to the point they will have no power over the company. Will they go on strike? No, because they will lose more union members that way. Union members will opt to leave the union so they can continue working and getting a paycheck every week.

For the suckers that remain in the union and get nothing out of it, good for them. Everybody has a right to waste their own money.

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Pay close attention to the next 20 days or so. John Boehner will anounce that the GOP has agreed to raise taxes on the top 2% and extend the Bush tax cuts to the remaining 98%.
Remember when I told you a month before the election that President Obama would get over 300 electoral votes?

Yes, and unfortunately, we will have to hear about it from you for the next four years.

The GOP did agree for tax increases provided spending cuts were met. No spending cuts--not tax deal. This is called negotiating--something DumBama is incapable of.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>If the opposing force thinks like you, they'll lose. Badly.

they already did and know it

and since the ride over the cliff shuts down govt

then Obamacare can't be implemented and hold the debt ceiling.

yes taxes go up in 2013; but now that 47% that had a free ride under Bush get to pay their fair share.

Michigan just killed unions by cutting off the flow of money to them.

Maybe all the union folk will move to Illinois now?

Che Reagan Christ wrote:

<quoted text>
Will that be in all 54 states or only Michigan?

57 states if you use DumBama's count.

xxxrayted wrote:

<quoted text>
Yes, and unfortunately, we will have to hear about it from you for the next four years.
The GOP did agree for tax increases provided spending cuts were met. No spending cuts--not tax deal. This is called negotiating--something DumBama is incapable of.

over the cliff we go; and shut the govt down at the same time

the debt ceiling is at the ceiling, so no borrowing

taxes go up, spending cut in half

Michigan becomes a right to work state ending unions ability to function.

so now that the defunct UAW owns 50% of GM can we demand payment on the loan or foreclose?

the Akron mutts were picked up by the dog catcher and put back into the pen

here is a piece of kibble

woofie woofie

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>That's what you people said about the recall election.

If anyone thinks that the government will shut down for four years because Boehner won't capitulate, or believes that union members will simply kow tow to those who seek to emasculate their political influence without reorganizing and fighting back during the next election cycle, those people are really not living in reality.

woof

Reality Speaks wrote:

<quoted text>
you ought to quit smoking crack all day
I bet you are going crazy today now knowing you were out played and out witted.
ha ha ha ha
woofie woofie

Outwitted? So this was all part of Mitt's grand scheme? Or was Mitt a patsie in Boehner's scheme? Or maybe it was the Freemasons?

Tell us, oh wacky one, whose brilliant plan was it to lose the election on purpose so that the GOP could drive the country into disaster just to make Obama look responsible?

Karl Monday wrote:

<quoted text>
You rate Syrian Islamist goat humpers, higher in combat capability than the good ol' boys?

Absolutely. They have balls.

Hugh Victor Thompson III wrote:

<quoted text>If the opposing force thinks like you, they'll lose. Badly.

Ok, David Koresh.