The right to rebel

Full story: Vallejo Times-Herald

There is nothing in the Second Amendment about arming the citizenry to keep our government in check.
Comments
1 - 9 of 9 Comments Last updated Jan 19, 2013
Herb

Columbia, SC

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Jan 18, 2013
 
You have your opinion about the Second Amendment, Mr. McCombs. Now put some teeth in it.
Rich

Troy, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Jan 18, 2013
 
You're quite ignert. "Well regulated" in the context of the day does not mean what you believe it means. It meant "well drilled" and "well equipped". To the officer class of the American Revolution the well equipped part meant the most due to the fact that recruits would often show up with no rifle, no powder, no shot, and sometimes no shoes. That's the reason why the original militia act defined militia as all able males between certain ages, and required them to have a firelock rifle, and sufficent powder and shot. No this was not the Militia Act of 1903 that created the National Guard - which is not a militia in any sense since the federal government pays and equips them, and can claim their lives to service at any time. The firelock rifle was the assualt weapon of the day too. If they had AK-47's I guarantee they would have required those. The purpose of the 2A was not to guarantee militia members the right to have weapons, nor is it for hunters or self defense people. It merely states that a natural right that is yours simply from being born, cannot be infringed by the federal gov't of the U.S.- by inference, any act to infringe the right gives the owner of the right, the right to fight back. He/she may lose, but cumulatively I believe they will give a tyrant gov't pause before it really tries to own the citizenry. We're almost at the point where we find out. I can hardly wait - can you?
Tsgt B

Lewisville, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Jan 18, 2013
 
I would strongly suggest that someone read the Bill of Rights, Federalist Papers, and the Declaration of Independence to you, as you obviously cannot read or comprehend paslin English.
Tsgt B

Lewisville, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Jan 18, 2013
 
Pardon my typo; I meant to say "plain English"

TSgt B
KEvgenus

Broomfield, CO

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Jan 18, 2013
 
Try looking in the Declaration of Independence:

...We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed,--That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness....

It clearly states the purpose of Government, and it's responsibility to the people.
When the Government stops functioning in it's role to protect the natural rights of the people, the people have a right to abolish it and replace it with one that does.
Questions -- Try a book.
JCL

Vallejo, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Jan 18, 2013
 
All your letters are the same, foolish and without facts. Do you just like seeing your name in the paper?

Bottom line, nobody cares what you think!
Uncle Frank

Woodbridge, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Jan 18, 2013
 
Maybe that is why they created a Constitutional Republic instead of a Democracy. It is you who are wrong and can't stop sputtering long enough to see the truth. In many documents they hashed over the right of the people to change the government by any means necessary if it became repugnant. They stated in no uncertain terms a Democracy was one of those conditions.
Juan Lago

San Ramon, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Jan 18, 2013
 
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the article in their right to keep and bear their private arms." (Tench Coxe in `Remarks on the First Part of the Amendments to the Federal Constitution' under the Pseudonym `A Pennsylvanian' in the Philadelphia Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789 at 2 col. 1)
Boomer44

Barnesville, MN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Jan 19, 2013
 
Its not a democracy you misinformed dolt. Its a republic. Look it up.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

Vallejo News Video

•••
•••

Vallejo Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Vallejo People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Vallejo News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Vallejo
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••