Court of Appeals
First Prev
of 560
Next Last
Why

United States

#1 Oct 19, 2017
Why did the court allow the Johnson to move forward with appeal.I see they mad on Twitter
Good Blue

Lincoln, NE

#2 Oct 19, 2017
LOL, a certain someone is losing her got-dang mind on twitter right now. You can almost trace the moment she heard the news.

And I think Do-Boy is still saying the Johnsons aren't allowed to leave Lowndes County. He doesn't understand court stuff so good though.

So much for "appeal proof"
Good Blue

Lincoln, NE

#3 Oct 19, 2017
Seems they don't want to talk about it.
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#5 Oct 19, 2017
The Johnsons depositions and the requests for admission are fatal to any hope the Johnsons had for a meritorious appeal
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#6 Oct 19, 2017
Us smart people are all for the appeal moving forward because the only possible outcome is the Johnsons will over even more money and the court of appeal will reaffirm LCSO and GBI findings
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#7 Oct 19, 2017
Just found another penalty the Johnsons will face

RULES OF THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA
III. DOCKETS AND CALENDARS

Ga. Ct. App. Rule 15 (2017)

(b) The panel of the Court ruling on a case, with or without motion, may by majority vote impose a penalty not to exceed $2,500.00 against any party and/or party's counsel in any civil case in which there is a direct appeal, application for discretionary appeal, application for interlocutory appeal, or motion which is determined to be frivolous.
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#8 Oct 19, 2017
Johnsons are toast!

Factual assertions in appellate briefs not supported by evidence in the record cannot be considered in the appellate process.

SHAMSAI v. COORDINATED PROPERTIES, INC. 259 Ga. App. 438
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#9 Oct 19, 2017
If an appellant knew or should have known that an appeal was ill-founded, sanctions should issue.[Cit.]"Stringer, supra at 704-705 (2).
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#10 Oct 19, 2017
You dolts didn't know about the consequences for Jackie's frivolous appeal did you
Why

United States

#11 Oct 19, 2017
Tards Are Fools wrote:
If an appellant knew or should have known that an appeal was ill-founded, sanctions should issue.[Cit.]"Stringer, supra at 704-705 (2).
Dammmn you mad is hell you a fool.
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#12 Oct 19, 2017
Why wrote:
<quoted text>

Dammmn you mad is hell you a fool.
LOLOLOLOLOLOL

Mad when the only possible outcome is the Johnsons owing even more money?
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#13 Oct 19, 2017
Imagine if the tards knew every single claim the Johnsons made in the frivolous appeal was responded to and shot down

http://www.gaappeals.us/docket/results_one_re...
Tards Are Fools

Fresno, CA

#14 Oct 19, 2017
Wackie Jackie shot herself in the foot by filing a frivolous appeal and now she will owe even more money
Why

United States

#15 Oct 19, 2017
Tards Are Fools wrote:
Wackie Jackie shot herself in the foot by filing a frivolous appeal and now she will owe even more money
You do know they had to show proof in order for the appeal to go forward right so the court of appeals had to see something to allow it to go forward
TOM67

Jacksonville, FL

#16 Oct 19, 2017
Why wrote:
<quoted text>

You do know they had to show proof in order for the appeal to go forward right so the court of appeals had to see something to allow it to go forward
An appeal can be granted just for how something is worded. Don't fly your kite too high as electric lines could be near.

The enticing appeal of an issue can be alluring but, potentially dangerous.

"Appellate rules are very strict, no matter how ridiculous they sound. Just as an example, there are innocent people in prison for murder where the supreme court has said that because a brief was filed one day late, it's too bad
TOM67

Jacksonville, FL

#17 Oct 19, 2017
In the past some ask why did the Bell's Lawyer up. Because they were wise. See below.

"Appellate rules are very strict, no matter how ridiculous they sound. Just as an example, there are innocent people in prison for murder where the supreme court has said that because a brief was filed one day late, it's too bad
Why

United States

#21 Oct 19, 2017
TOM67 wrote:
<quoted text>

An appeal can be granted just for how something is worded. Don't fly your kite too high as electric lines could be near.

The enticing appeal of an issue can be alluring but, potentially dangerous.

"Appellate rules are very strict, no matter how ridiculous they sound. Just as an example, there are innocent people in prison for murder where the supreme court has said that because a brief was filed one day late, it's too bad
If you had any sense you would know this is a different kind of appeal it's showing you people don't know anything
Southern

United States

#24 Oct 19, 2017
Why wrote:
<quoted text>

You do know they had to show proof in order for the appeal to go forward right so the court of appeals had to see something to allow it to go forward
Thanks for the updates. Had a feeling the trolls wouldn’t take this one well. They’re so delicate.
Barts A Fool

Fresno, CA

#25 Oct 19, 2017
Southern wrote:
<quoted text>

Thanks for the updates. Had a feeling the trolls wouldn’t take this one well. They’re so delicate.
#DELUSIONAL...

The only possible outcome is right here

O.C.G.A. 5-6-6 (2010)
5-6-6. Damages for frivolous appeal

When in the opinion of the court the case was taken up for delay only, 10 percent damages may be awarded by the appellate court upon any judgment for a sum certain which has been affirmed. The award shall be entered in the remittitur.
Barts A Fool

Fresno, CA

#26 Oct 19, 2017
I am happy the petition was granted because the only possible outcome is the Johnsons owing even more money

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 560
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Valdosta Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Would? (Jan '18) 1 hr fry 62
New Evidence 1 hr fry 1,604
Trump/Russia Episode 13 - Putin on The Ritz 1 hr fry 199
Random one sentence thoughts > (Jul '16) 4 hr Fryday 855
Good News Thread (Jan '16) 12 hr Fryday 4,419
Star Chart thread (Sep '16) 19 hr Fryday 851
The new trend > Aug 17 Fryday 54

Valdosta Jobs

Personal Finance

Valdosta Mortgages