You confuse negative with realistic. How many times must we run this same scenario where taxpayers fund a private business venture and in the end get left holding the bag. A few well connected people stand to do well with this at taxpayer expense just like always. At least until the "bandwagon effect" wears off anyway. That's not negative. That's realistic, based on facts/history and this same template that is used every time one of these well connected people comes up with one of these schemes.<quoted text>
Save your breath because he is just another negative Utican.
Did you watch or listen to the press conference? The only one who didn't get thanked was the taxpayer. While these guys, to a man, were falling all over each other to pat each other on the back, when it came to the people who supplied the $5.25 million - crickets. That's very telling in and of itself.