You jerks should be investigated. True, Mark has been "using" the father as a sex toy for years, in return he provides for him. Neither is in a morally defensible position. However, to infer that Mark isnt to blame for abusing the child, simply because the father should not have brought the child "into the scene"? Thats perverted.<quoted text> His father is a rentboy who has been living off Mark for years, and who has participated in the group action. Why would you bring your child into this scene? John should be investigated too.
Dont forget Mark is the sexual predator here. He has used his position and home(s) for years to "provide" for young men. He targets those from troubled backgrounds or low esteem, providing comfort for them by taking them in and putting them in a position where they would naturally feel as if they owe or need him. He is by definition a predator.He does not get a pass because he has entrapped the childs father.
Anyone defending Mark or minimizing his guilt should take a long look in the mirror.