Mark Scheidelman accused of child molestation?

[The View]

hmmm wrote:

You seem to be in the know. How about the father you got anything to say about him. I'm not so sure you'll not be barking about him on here. I'm sure his and his family status won't help mark either. Think about this. How is it the child came to know mark.

His father is a rentboy who has been living off Mark for years, and who has participated in the group action. Why would you bring your child into this scene? John should be investigated too.

[idiots]

The View wrote:

<quoted text> His father is a rentboy who has been living off Mark for years, and who has participated in the group action. Why would you bring your child into this scene? John should be investigated too.

You jerks should be investigated. True, Mark has been "using" the father as a sex toy for years, in return he provides for him. Neither is in a morally defensible position. However, to infer that Mark isnt to blame for abusing the child, simply because the father should not have brought the child "into the scene"? Thats perverted.

Dont forget Mark is the sexual predator here. He has used his position and home(s) for years to "provide" for young men. He targets those from troubled backgrounds or low esteem, providing comfort for them by taking them in and putting them in a position where they would naturally feel as if they owe or need him. He is by definition a predator.He does not get a pass because he has entrapped the childs father.

Anyone defending Mark or minimizing his guilt should take a long look in the mirror.

[Third World Health]

Trenton sounds like a cesspool orgy for pedophiles.
If he touched my kid I would torture him to death and castrate him after I had him hooked hard on heroin!
That's just to start!

[nexen]

does anybody know what the plea offer is? It better have jail time in it.Marc does'nt think he did anything wrong, he has Sandusky syndrome! if he skates he will offend again,this sicko needs prison time to learn a "long and hard" lesson if ya know what i mean!

[no plea]

He is not going to take any plea. He will admit no guilt. He is too sick for that. People like him dont think they are doing wrong
here then when they get busted they claim in was an accident or taken the wrong way.

[no plea]

And he knows once he goes to the big house he is done.

[The View]

idiots wrote:

<quoted text>
You jerks should be investigated. True, Mark has been "using" the father as a sex toy for years, in return he provides for him. Neither is in a morally defensible position. However, to infer that Mark isnt to blame for abusing the child, simply because the father should not have brought the child "into the scene"? Thats perverted.
Dont forget Mark is the sexual predator here. He has used his position and home(s) for years to "provide" for young men. He targets those from troubled backgrounds or low esteem, providing comfort for them by taking them in and putting them in a position where they would naturally feel as if they owe or need him. He is by definition a predator.He does not get a pass because he has entrapped the childs father.
Anyone defending Mark or minimizing his guilt should take a long look in the mirror.

Not saying Mark wasn't a predator. Just don't think babydaddy is a sweet young innocent who doesn't deserve some time himself for putting his kid in Mark's hands. Not like he doesn't know what Mark does. People on here seem to think it's worse to be a gay predator than a bisexual who pimps his kids out.

[Not so Sure]

How is everyone in the know about what happens in Mark's house? If any of you that are posting the allegations against both men know someone that was abused have them come forward. Support them, encourage them to do the right thing. The man that I think you are referring to has 5 kids with 2 different women. I do not know him personally but I do think he has some parenting issues. No matter what Mark has to get these people out of his life. If Mark has been in sexual relationships with other consenting adults that might be unsavory to you and me, so what? As long as they are consenting adults who cares. Does not prove that he is a pedophile. My understanding of the allegations is that it is very questionable and if my sources are correct I do not even see how they can prosecute based on what they are claiming he did.

[no plea]

Not so sure. You are an absolute moron. What is your definition of sexual contact. Your sources are probably the type of people that considered sexual contact with skin to skin. When it is a child clothing or not any kind of inappropriate touching in inappropriate places is sexual contact. Kids are not stupid they know what's right and they know what's wrong. So until you get it right from the source shut the f*** up

[123afr]

saw mark tonight at the rfa play with an old lady, walked right in and sat down like he owned the place.legally blonde

[arrogant]

Using some poor old lady so he can go to the school next town over cause hp will run him out of there. Probably looked like pee wee herman in a movie theater. Thats the last place anyone needs that pig, is in our schools

[trenton]

123afr wrote:

saw mark tonight at the rfa play with an old lady, walked right in and sat down like he owned the place.legally blonde

old lady was his shriveled up protector, next town supervisor, Betsy Mack.

[nexen]

He's got two days to do himself in before he becomes someones bitch in state prison!

[hope]

One can only hope thats the way it will end.

[Galumph]

hope wrote:

One can only hope thats the way it will end.

It's by no means certain. He's a Republican, don't forget. 7655

[nexen]

Galumph wrote:

<quoted text> It's by no means certain. He's a Republican, don't forget. 7655

Yes, but there are a lot of eyes on this one. And nobody wants to be known as the one who helped a child molester go free.except that scumbag lawyer of his.

[trenton]

nexen wrote:

<quoted text> Yes, but there are a lot of eyes on this one. And nobody wants to be known as the one who helped a child molester go free.except that scumbag lawyer of his.

Nobody wanted Sullivan to go free either, and DA even had video evidence of the crime.....same scumbag lawyer.

[Gauloise]

trenton wrote:

<quoted text>
Nobody wanted Sullivan to go free either, and DA even had video evidence of the crime.....same scumbag lawyer.

Oh, hell, everybody in Oneida County loves drunk drivers. They only kill people, but sex offenders touch peepees.

[tomorrow]

Wonder why he needed an extra 2 days to think about it more. He has had months to think about it. Could it be because his lawyer knows there is alot of credible evidance and mark would be found guilty if it goes to trial. And he is trying to convince mark to take the plea they have given him. After all he states he is innocent that there were "other people" in the room and it was all an accident. Ha. But he keeps forgetting that all those "other people"in were all children under 12

[my8kinbutt]

trenton wrote:

<quoted text>
old lady was his shriveled up protector, next town supervisor, Betsy Mack.

That's his girl friend,just ask her.They go everywhere together,she won't let him out of her sight.They make a lovely couple.