DAs office and the police dont destro...

DAs office and the police dont destroy kid porn when case is done

Posted in the Utica Forum

piggy

Carthage, NY

#1 Jan 3, 2013
Stanley Dorozynski was charged with kid porn how come the DAs office doesnt destroy the kid porn how come the victims have to have their photos on the internet because the DA failed to destroy the evidence after the case is done how come this Stanley Dorozynski officer had case evidence from old cases how come the case evidence wasnt destroyed why is this man in possion of this the familys should sue the DAs office for letting these photos be released to officers for take home jerking off
We should

Charlestown, MA

#2 Jan 3, 2013
Drown all child molesters.
Garramone brothers probably have kiddie porn or maybe a little girl tied up in basement!
theysellittotheg arramones

Hamilton, NY

#3 Jan 3, 2013
so them and theyre dad can get the fix they need!
evidence

Buffalo, NY

#4 Jan 3, 2013
evidence remains in file , idiots. they dont destroy it for appellate reasons. it all must remain intact. damn you morons are so pathetically stupid. really unbelievable about how you have no clue. look, stick to what you know: TV, porno, video games, etc. leave the legal issues to those with the brain capacity to understand it.
piggy

Carthage, NY

#5 Jan 3, 2013
evidence wrote:
evidence remains in file , idiots. they dont destroy it for appellate reasons. it all must remain intact. damn you morons are so pathetically stupid. really unbelievable about how you have no clue. look, stick to what you know: TV, porno, video games, etc. leave the legal issues to those with the brain capacity to understand it.
if it stays in evidence then how did the officer Stanley Dorozynski get the evidence all evidence kid porn should be in the DAs hands not in some officers hands at his home something must be done to stop everyone from looking at the evidence
piggy

Carthage, NY

#6 Jan 3, 2013
evidence wrote:
evidence remains in file , idiots. they dont destroy it for appellate reasons. it all must remain intact. damn you morons are so pathetically stupid. really unbelievable about how you have no clue. look, stick to what you know: TV, porno, video games, etc. leave the legal issues to those with the brain capacity to understand it.
and i do know about the appellate reasons this is why i say it should be locked up in a safe with the DA only to have access
Wonder

United States

#7 Jan 3, 2013
I wonder what kind of deal the DA will be giving the Parkway Drugs owner who molests teenage drug addict boys?
ur mom

Fayetteville, NY

#8 Jan 3, 2013
piggy wrote:
<quoted text>if it stays in evidence then how did the officer Stanley Dorozynski get the evidence all evidence kid porn should be in the DAs hands not in some officers hands at his home something must be done to stop everyone from looking at the evidence
So when you and daddy where on his computer and playing hide the fireman like you and dad do everyday, when did you go into the evidence room at the UPD to know it was the same ?
You and daddy need to be extem.
piggy

Carthage, NY

#9 Jan 3, 2013
ur mom wrote:
<quoted text>So when you and daddy where on his computer and playing hide the fireman like you and dad do everyday, when did you go into the evidence room at the UPD to know it was the same ?
You and daddy need to be extem.
Stanley Dorozynski was a upd officer who worked on cases regarding kids and abuse like this its the DAs job to tell the parrents of the victims or he wouldnt have a case.. there has to be a victim... the DA has to know the age of the person in the photos no ages where released to the press in the Stanley Dorozynski case also he admitted to guilt and when you admitt to guilt you have to tell them where you recived the porn and he told them he took it from work.... every person who worked with him who was abused for porn has a lawsuit against the DAs office because its their job to secure the evidence and not let it be released into the world ever the victims have a case and should be told and compensated
ur mom

Fayetteville, NY

#10 Jan 3, 2013
piggy wrote:
<quoted text>Stanley Dorozynski was a upd officer who worked on cases regarding kids and abuse like this its the DAs job to tell the parrents of the victims or he wouldnt have a case.. there has to be a victim... the DA has to know the age of the person in the photos no ages where released to the press in the Stanley Dorozynski case also he admitted to guilt and when you admitt to guilt you have to tell them where you recived the porn and he told them he took it from work.... every person who worked with him who was abused for porn has a lawsuit against the DAs office because its their job to secure the evidence and not let it be released into the world ever the victims have a case and should be told and compensated
I know your welfare brain can't function beyond eating gov cheese so I'll post this for humans to see.

During his plea, Dorozynski acknowledged that he knowingly possessed a computer, compact disks and zip disks that contained images of child pornography. And because the images were transported through interstate and foreign commerce using a computer, the allegations rose to the level of a federal crime.

From the UPD station to his home is NOT, considered transported through interstate and foreign commerce.

The welfare scum is making up lies. Its a welfare scum.

He got the images off the INTERNET not from UPD.

Chop down your welfare family tree.
ur mom

Fayetteville, NY

#11 Jan 3, 2013
piggy wrote:
<quoted text>Stanley Dorozynski was a upd officer who worked on cases regarding kids and abuse like this its the DAs job to tell the parrents of the victims or he wouldnt have a case.. there has to be a victim... the DA has to know the age of the person in the photos no ages where released to the press in the Stanley Dorozynski case also he admitted to guilt and when you admitt to guilt you have to tell them where you recived the porn and he told them he took it from work.... every person who worked with him who was abused for porn has a lawsuit against the DAs office because its their job to secure the evidence and not let it be released into the world ever the victims have a case and should be told and compensated
Now he broke into the DA's office and stole them.

You are one sick useless scum.
get help

Fayetteville, NY

#12 Jan 3, 2013
piggy wrote:
<quoted text>Stanley Dorozynski was a upd officer who worked on cases regarding kids and abuse like this its the DAs job to tell the parrents of the victims or he wouldnt have a case.. there has to be a victim... the DA has to know the age of the person in the photos no ages where released to the press in the Stanley Dorozynski case also he admitted to guilt and when you admitt to guilt you have to tell them where you recived the porn and he told them he took it from work.... every person who worked with him who was abused for porn has a lawsuit against the DAs office because its their job to secure the evidence and not let it be released into the world ever the victims have a case and should be told and compensated
You're sick in the head.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
12 north sports bar 2 min safe 30
Unstable Fire Marshall 8 min Fire Marshall Bill 70
one person shot every 3 hours this year 11 min all nonsense 4
worst places to work 24 min steve 4
Carol Altimonte - ABUSE of POWER 31 min Perfect Circle th... 2
Phil fasolo 33 min Living it 4
Tenney Strikes Again 59 min Yeah 3
Is the mafia still in Utica? (Jul '08) 1 hr Elmer 244
New Hartford Baskets 2 hr no depth 30
Par 15 hr Puhlease 86

Utica Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Utica Mortgages