“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10730 Jun 5, 2013
Obamination wrote:
2013 they year Obama gets thrown out of office.
Sounds similar to your prediciton he would get voted out of office in 2012; your analysis never dissapoints.

You have zero credibility. You write like an illiterate fool and you have never shown one shred of sophisticated thought.

What was the name of the last book you read?

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10731 Jun 5, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds similar to your prediciton he would get voted out of office in 2012; your analysis never dissapoints.
You have zero credibility. You write like an illiterate fool and you have never shown one shred of sophisticated thought.
What was the name of the last book you read?
And if your credibility is like the Obama administration’s then we are at an impass.

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10732 Jun 5, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
And if your credibility is like the Obama administration’s then we are at an impass.
So wouldn't it be the case that you, the guy that promised us all Romney was going to be our next POTUS, is the one that has no credibility.

I have unmatched credibility which gives great power and authority to my words.
You have no credibility which means anything you say can easily be dismissed as tripe.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10733 Jun 5, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
So wouldn't it be the case that you, the guy that promised us all Romney was going to be our next POTUS, is the one that has no credibility.
I have unmatched credibility which gives great power and authority to my words.
You have no credibility which means anything you say can easily be dismissed as tripe.
I have FAITH in the American people, in America, and in her Values. I never promised Romney(you're taking a strategy like our administration?), and as we have learned the American people have been lied to… it started with HOPE and CHANGE, and now we have 17 trillion dollar debt, Obamacare, fast and furious, Benghazi, the IRS, and the AP… Sorry but my creditability stands strong as your administration struggles to stand.
Like I said… IMPASS.

Level 7

Since: May 11

Location hidden

#10734 Jun 5, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds similar to your prediciton he would get voted out of office in 2012; your analysis never dissapoints.
You have zero credibility. You write like an illiterate fool and you have never shown one shred of sophisticated thought.
What was the name of the last book you read?
"Anal Fever"
suds

Aylett, VA

#10735 Jun 5, 2013
Dix Did Trudi Pitchfork ug Outage ChicPenicuik Knox BethDuffg
commie is a puke

Bronx, NY

#10737 Jul 19, 2013
You are a leech and nothing more
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
So wouldn't it be the case that you, the guy that promised us all Romney was going to be our next POTUS, is the one that has no credibility.
I have unmatched credibility which gives great power and authority to my words.
You have no credibility which means anything you say can easily be dismissed as tripe.

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10738 Jul 24, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
...my creditability stands strong as your administration struggles to stand.
Struggles to stand aye? Yup, they are barely holding on. The GOP is less popular than ever. Obama is Einstein compared to GOP/conservative leadeship. Hannity, Palin, Bachman, Cruz...please.

Who is a conservaitve you admire? Dead ones don't count.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10739 Jul 24, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
Struggles to stand aye? Yup, they are barely holding on. The GOP is less popular than ever. Obama is Einstein compared to GOP/conservative leadeship. Hannity, Palin, Bachman, Cruz...please.
Who is a conservaitve you admire? Dead ones don't count.
The men I admire you would have no idea of who they are, because they are of local leadership, nor would you care because they oppose everything you are and believe… However, they understand that this administration lies, has abused its power, and is doing so at the expense of the American population. They are men who understand that America is founded on the principle that citizens have the God given, unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, and believe that government is BOUND to protect these rights. They also understand that socialism, consolidates power to government, trusts that government knows what’s best, removes choice from its people, attempts to redistribute wealth while allowing government officials to reap the spoils of its people, causes wasteful use of resources until a collapse takes its toll and ruins the country.
It’s not the GOP you should worry about, it’s the patriots and tea party who understand and defined our Constitution against people like you who hate liberty and desire control over that which was never meant to be controlled, the human spirit.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10741 Jul 25, 2013
You know the US economy is bad when the president has to tour the Country to convince people it is good… Hope he hits Detroit!

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10742 Jul 30, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
... understand that socialism, consolidates power to government, trusts that government knows what’s best, removes choice from its people, attempts to redistribute wealth....it’s the patriots and tea party who understand and defined our Constitution against people like you who hate liberty and desire control over...
blah blah blah. Was that an automatic "tea party letter generator" you used to write that?

Redistribute wealth? I still haven't heard a convincing argument on that point. All taxes redistribute wealth. That is what taxes do. Our founders would be fine with that.

I like progressive taxes. The rich make more, let them pay more. I bet Thomas Jefferson would agree with me on that. Do you disagree? Do you really think progessive taxation is socialism?

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10743 Jul 30, 2013
They would support progressive taxation of any kind. The principle of taxing the rich more is not antithetical to the ideals of the revolution.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10744 Jul 30, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>
blah blah blah. Was that an automatic "tea party letter generator" you used to write that?
Redistribute wealth? I still haven't heard a convincing argument on that point. All taxes redistribute wealth. That is what taxes do. Our founders would be fine with that.
I like progressive taxes. The rich make more, let them pay more. I bet Thomas Jefferson would agree with me on that. Do you disagree? Do you really think progessive taxation is socialism?
“blah blah blah. Was that an automatic "tea party letter generator" you used to write that?” Sigh.

“Redistribute wealth? I still haven't heard a convincing argument on that point. All taxes redistribute wealth. That is what taxes do. Our founders would be fine with that.” Doubtful… or the 16th amendment would have been instated at the founding… It was not.

“I like progressive taxes. The rich make more, let them pay more. I bet Thomas Jefferson would agree with me on that.” Again… doubtful.

“Do you disagree?” I do.
“Do you really think progessive taxation is socialism?” Especially now it is with the looming threat of social health care removing the fundamental rights of it’s citizens… We all know you love socialism but it doesn’t work in American society.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10745 Jul 30, 2013
evil commie wrote:
They would support progressive taxation of any kind. The principle of taxing the rich more is not antithetical to the ideals of the revolution.
Currently it’s not about taxation, it’s about how the funds are being misused and abused… 17 trillion dollars in debt… That’s NOT promoting the general welfare of people with unalienable right from God.

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10746 Jul 30, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
"the 16th amendment would have been instated at the founding… It was not."
The primary revenue for the FED GOV at the founding was the tarriff. We're talking 90% of all revenue. But as you know free trade is the new norm. I say bring back the tarriff, you just have to convince 99% of the GOP and about 75% of the DNC to agree.

“The World's Tallest Midget”

Level 3

Since: Jul 08

Tristan da Cunha

#10747 Jul 30, 2013
Respect71 wrote:
<quoted text>
“I like progressive taxes. The rich make more, let them pay more. I bet Thomas Jefferson would agree with me on that.” Again… doubtful.
“Do you disagree?” I do.
Too easy. I think you are the victim of a very parochial education, I mean that. You really go beyond what you read in a few paragraphs in text book and the Federalist / anti-Federalist papers. Read the letters the founders sent to each other, the minutes from the delegates at the constitutional convention.

Here is a letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison while Jefferson was in France.

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/do...

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind...

He goes on "Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise."

That is a progressive tax. The poor would pay nothing, the rich would pay more in proportion to their wealth. I had to chop it up to fit it in. I encourage you to read the entire letter. My guess is you will argue this was a specific argument for landless peasants etc...but you would of course be wrong.

I can also provide similar letters from Thomas Paine as well as others. Paine was also an advocate for a heavy death tax and that money would be used to give to the poor to give them a shot at life.

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10748 Jul 30, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>The primary revenue for the FED GOV at the founding was the tarriff. We're talking 90% of all revenue. But as you know free trade is the new norm. I say bring back the tarriff, you just have to convince 99% of the GOP and about 75% of the DNC to agree.
Right

Level 6

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#10749 Jul 30, 2013
evil commie wrote:
<quoted text>Too easy. I think you are the victim of a very parochial education, I mean that. You really go beyond what you read in a few paragraphs in text book and the Federalist / anti-Federalist papers. Read the letters the founders sent to each other, the minutes from the delegates at the constitutional convention.

Here is a letter from Thomas Jefferson to James Madison while Jefferson was in France.

http://teachingamericanhistory.org/library/do...

"I am conscious that an equal division of property is impracticable, but the consequences of this enormous inequality producing so much misery to the bulk of mankind, legislators cannot invent too many devices for subdividing property, only taking care to let their subdivisions go hand in hand with the natural affections of the human mind...

He goes on "Another means of silently lessening the inequality of property is to exempt all from taxation below a certain point, and to tax the higher portions or property in geometrical progression as they rise."

That is a progressive tax. The poor would pay nothing, the rich would pay more in proportion to their wealth. I had to chop it up to fit it in. I encourage you to read the entire letter. My guess is you will argue this was a specific argument for landless peasants etc...but you would of course be wrong.

I can also provide similar letters from Thomas Paine as well as others. Paine was also an advocate for a heavy death tax and that money would be used to give to the poor to give them a shot at life.
I've read them. And as I said before the problem isn't taxation.
Dude

New Hartford, NY

#10750 Jul 30, 2013
It is now official Obama admits he wasted the 1 trillion dollars of stimulus money he borrowed from China.

Housing market DOWN
unemployment UP

Obama failure and more failure.

For the 19th time Obama is not going to rest until he creates jobs? Another LIE as Obama s going on his upteenth vacation this month.

Obama equal failure
Obamination

New Hartford, NY

#10751 Jul 30, 2013
Home ownership in 18 year LOW.

Obama is a failure

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Big drug bust new hartford 25,000 cash money 6 min Rocco DaLuca 31
Bobby Zumpano - Dave's Big Brother BUSTED 17 min a mom 14
Compassion Coalition- Who's In Charge There? 17 min True 2
New Hartford music teacher 39 min Moolie 5
What Nano Means To the Average Utican 43 min Comets Welfare Na... 9
Dumpster Diving 50 min Comets Welfare Na... 3
Jobs coming in Utica with potential impact on L... 52 min Comets Welfare Na... 34
Utica teachers to Kids: Drop Dead 2 hr On the Loose 32
bobby mancuso finally fired from UFD 3 hr becky 6
Utica Dating
Find my Match

Utica Jobs

Utica People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Utica News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Utica

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]