Why We Need To Stop Exaggerating Thre...

Why We Need To Stop Exaggerating Threat To Cops

Posted in the Utica Forum

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Win win

United States

#1 Jun 12, 2013
The recent killings of two prosecutors in Texas, a Colorado Department of Corrections official and a sheriff in WV have law enforcement groups and the media once again buzzing about this "war on cops" or.

The "war on cops" talk heats up every time that one or more high-profile police killings hit the news. But there's just no evidence that it's true.
Truth is,the job of police officer has been getting progressively safer for a generation.

Last year was the safest year for cops since the early 1960s.

And it isn't just because the police are carrying bigger guns or have better armor. Assaults on police officers have been dropping over the same period inspite of a 25% increase in police in the last 3 years alone. Which means that not only are fewer cops getting killed on the job, people in general are less inclined to try to hurt them.
It's important to push back against this "war on cops" narrative.

It should go without saying, though I will: This has nothing to do with trying to diminish the tough job that police officers do or to cast aspersions on those who have been killed. But there are other reasons why journalists need to do a better job of reporting this story accurately.(Beyond the hopefully obvious value of reporting things accurately for the sake of reporting them accurately.)

For example, one effect of false perceptions about the dangers of policing that I've noted before is that they can sway public debate on issues like police budgets, police use of force, police militarization and what sort of accountability cops should face when they're accused of violating someone's civil rights. Exaggerating the threat that cops face makes policymakers and public officials more reluctant to hold bad cops accountable or more willing to outfit police departments with weapons and equipment better suited for warfare.

This would explain why police groups and "badgebunny" "blue rose" type social media groupies and wives tend to perpetuate the myth.

But why does the media credulously report their narrative? Part of it is probably just laziness -- a lack of will or interest in seeing whether the claims are backed up by any data. The "war on cops" meme also fits the "if it bleeds, it leads" idea. "While this officer's murder is tragic, generally speaking, law enforcement officers are safer on the job today than they've been in 50 years" just isn't as interesting as "This may be part of a growing trend of cop killing."

Much of the media also appear to be infatuated with the idea that we're in the midst of a dramatic rise in anti-government, anti-authority, pro-militia, right-wing, white nationalist -- pick your extremism -- violence in America, despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.(Just last weekend the Los Angeles Times ran a front-page report on the "sovereign citizen" movement, a group that authorities say is responsible for six deaths in 12 years.) In the interest of fairness -- or some might say false equivalence -- I'll note the conservative media seem just as enamored with the idea of a growing threat of violence from Muslim extremists and environmental radicals, again despite plenty of evidence to the contrary.

But there's a more pernicious effect of exaggerating the threat to police officers. In researching my forthcoming book, I interviewed lots of police officers, police administrators, criminologists and others connected to the field of law enforcement. There was a consensus among these people that constantly telling cops how dangerous their jobs are is affecting their mindset. It reinforces the soldier mentality already relentlessly drummed into cops' heads by politicians' habit of declaring "wars" on things.
Win win

United States

#2 Jun 12, 2013
Browse the online bulletin boards at sites like PoliceOne (where users must be credentialed law enforcement to comment), and you'll see a lot of hostility toward everyone who isn't in law enforcement, as well as various versions of the sentiment "I'll do whatever I need to get home safe at night." That's a mantra that speaks more to self-preservation than public service.

When cops are told that every day on the job could be their last, that every morning they say goodbye to their families could be the last time they see their kids, that everyone they encounter is someone who could possibly kill them, it isn't difficult to see how they might start to see the people they serve as an enemy. Again, in truth, the average cop has no more reason to see the people he interacts with day to day as a threat to his safety than does the average resident of St. Louis or Los Angeles or Nashville.

Last week I had lunch with a certified expert in police use of force -- a guy who teaches classes to police about how and when to use force, how much to use, and under what circumstances.

I was surprised by what he told me. In too many use-of-force classes, he said, cops aren't taught about appropriate vs. inappropriate force so much as they're taught what to say and do to justify whatever force they've already used. In other words, the courses aren't about training, they're about ass-covering.

Today, these courses stress officer safety above all else -- including the civil and constitutional rights and the safety of the citizens the police are supposed to be serving. They teach cops to use more force, sooner, more often, and how to justify it after the fact.

The Force Science Institute, for example, trains law enforcement officials in how to investigate allegations of excessive force. But browse the archives of the organization's newsletter and you'll mostly see articles justifying the use of Tasers and questioning claims that they cause injury or death; justifying (or at least mitigating the criticism of) police use of force in even egregious, high-profile incidents (such as the 2009 Oscar Grant shooting); and promoting junk science explanations of in-custody deaths like "excited delirium."

You'll have a much more difficult time finding articles about how to de-escalate volatile situations or how to create a police culture that emphasizes dealing with difficult subjects without using force -- or at least with the minimum amount of force possible.

This is a group that certifies "investigators" of police shootings! Police use of stun guns and other allegations made against cops, and their educational materials show a strong bias toward highlighting research that justifies force.

Back in 2008, a SWAT team in Lima, Ohio, raided the home of a suspected drug dealer. During the raid, one SWAT officer perfunctorily shot and killed the suspect's dogs. As he did, another officer was ascending a flight of steps in the home. That officer mistook his colleague's gunfire for hostile fire and, seeing some shadows coming out of an upstairs bedroom, he opened fire into that room. Inside was 26-year-old Tarika Wilson. She was on her knees, as she'd been instructed. She had one arm in the air and the other holding her year-old son. Wilson was killed. Her son lost a hand.

Officer Joseph Chavalia was charged with manslaughter (a pretty rare thing in these cases). At his trial, one use-of-force expert -- someone who trains police officers on when it's appropriate to use force -- actually testified that not only had Chavalia not done anything wrong, but if anything he was too slow to fire on the unarmed woman and her child.(Chavalia was acquitted.) This is the training too many police officers get today -- shoot first, worry about what you're shooting at later.
Win win

United States

#3 Jun 12, 2013
Something that is lost on many police - cops assume a risk when they sign up for the job. That risk involves putting the safety of others above their own. That's kind of the whole point of having law enforcement officers in the first place.

Of course, there are other factors that have contributed to the psychological isolation of police. One example is the move from foot patrols to squad cars or, more broadly, from proactive to reactive policing. When cops walk beats, they become a part of the communities they patrol. Residents see them out and about. They learn names, faces and places. When police patrol in cruisers, they're walled off from neighborhoods. Most of their interactions with the public on a typical day will be the result of conflict or confrontation. Imagine a job where nearly all of your interactions with other people are negative -- you're either confronting someone you suspect has done something wrong, dealing with a volatile domestic dispute, or responding to a complaint about a crime, most always after that crime has been committed.

No matter what your job, if most of your interactions with other people are negative, it's going to make for a pretty miserable existence. Now add a baton, a gun, a Taser, and the authority to use force.

So we have cops whose interactions with the public are negative the vast majority of the time, who are constantly told they're fighting a war, and who are constantly reminded that their job is highly dangerous and getting more dangerous, and that they could be killed by anyone at any time.

When they start to see the people they serve as the enemy, they begin to treat them that way. The people in the communities treated that way then respond in kind. Thus, we get the hostile, often volatile cop-community relationships we see in too much of the country today, in which citizens don't trust cops enough to help them solve crimes, and cops feel so threatened and isolated that even well-meaning officers won't report fellow officers who break the law.

The fact that cops are safer today than they've been in a half century is great news. It should be big news. It's something we ought to be celebrating. Reporting that and challenging -- or at least attempting to verify -- opposing pronouncements from law enforcement groups would not only be getting the story right; it would help with the problem of cops who see people as the threat and their jobs as a mere quest for survival.

Better reporting probably won't eliminate these problems. But it will at least stop contributing to them.

Montréal, Canada

#4 Jun 12, 2013
Save the country take a REGGIN an run the REGGIN up tree


SREGGIN are the parasite of world leeches of the tree of life

Cliffy Alert

Gouverneur, NY

#6 Jun 12, 2013
Whitesboro Unemployment 7 wrote:
Papers sell fear and the police are the biggest benefactors.
Warning: Cliffy hates cops and anything decent. He's a hate filled fat slob that doesn't no sh!t.

Gouverneur, NY

#8 Jun 12, 2013
Whitesboro Unemployment 7 wrote:
<quoted text>
Someone's on my di ck.
It's that fat worthless lover of yours Cretin you sorry excuse for a son.

Your Mammy
Mrs Dranklesworth

Ithaca, NY

#10 Jun 12, 2013
Cops are constantly deified even though they stopped solving actual crimes years ago, and now only exist to generate tax revenue through citations.

United States

#11 Jun 12, 2013
Easy to see the mentality of the people who this exposes. Tonight should be fun.

Montréal, Canada

#12 Jun 12, 2013
take the bag off those stinking reggin heads

these are the vile animals that need ---0---<


have you teeth out like the SREGGIN
Latest UPD Race Bait post

United States

#13 Jun 12, 2013
Words out kids and it isn't going to get any easier soon! Just remember you do this to yourselves chumpy.

Montréal, Canada

#14 Jun 12, 2013
Latest UPD Race Bait post wrote:
Words out kids and it isn't going to get any easier soon! Just remember you do this to yourselves chumpy.
African-American women have:

Chlamydia (kluh-MID-ee-uh) rates that are more than seven times higher
Gonorrhea (gon-uh-REE-uh) rates that are about 16 times higher
Syphilis rates that are 21 times higher

The majority of Allegheny County cases of sexually transmitted disease occurs in African-Americans, prompting county health officials to consider new strategies to tackle the problem.

In 2008, 49 of 89 cases of syphilis in Allegheny County, or more than 60 percent of all cases, involved African-Americans, who make up 13.5 percent of the county population.

Herkimer, NY

#15 Jun 12, 2013
Will be up all night posting cop hate while this cop sleeps in bed with a beautiful woman. The best part is I won't read his response to this as I unlike him have a life. Oh cretin how pathetic you are.
Poor utican poopiechucker

United States

#17 Jun 12, 2013
Cretin wrote:
Will be up all night on billable hours.
Latest monkey feces! It truly is all they know. I would really like to see them in a negotiation process.

Outsider " I think it's only worth 1.1 million"

Typical utican " well you're a loser and your fat wh ore mother is on welfare so go give a rim job to another black you homo".

United States

#18 Jun 14, 2013
Bump bump!!

Utica, NY

#19 Jun 14, 2013
Did the WORMHEAD REGGIN lose his food stamps or just a kid ?

Utica, NY

#22 Jun 15, 2013
<quoted text>Funnier
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =WNDlf6hA6TYXX
The rate of chlamydia among black women was over six times the rate among white women (1,563.0 and 232.7 per 100,000 women, respectively)(Figure O). The chlamydia rate among black men was over nine times the rate among white men (787.7 and 82.3 cases per 100,000 men, respectively).
click click click

Utica, NY

#26 Jun 15, 2013
San Bernardino police recently announced a big arrest in the case of Mary Beth Blaskey, a 76-year-old woman they say was found dead Nov. 14 in her home.

Police arrested 57-year-old Jerome Rogers, a San Bernardino nestless black, and prosecutors charged it with Blaskey’s murder. It’s being held on $1 million bail at West Valley Detention Center in Rancho Cucamonga.

Police Chief Rob Handy said Monday that his investigators are still on the hunt for at least one other suspook in the killing.

One of Blaskey’s two sons arrived at her San Bernardino home on Fremontia Drive that morning, a Wednesday, to take her to a doctor’s appointment. He found her dead. Police immediately said there was evidence of foul play, saying her house had been thoroughly ransacked.

On a website set up to honor Blaskey’s memory and plead for information leading to her killer, Blaskey’s sons wrote “The black took a couple hundred dollars worth of stuff and her Lexus ES300&#8243;. Police found the car Dec. 1 in a parking lot near University Avenue and Kendall Drive in north San Bernardino.

Blaskey’s sons buried their mother Dec. 8. On the website they set up, they wrote,“It is not possible to convey the depth of our sorrow and sadness at losing our mom, or the horror that someone as warm and wonderful as Mary Beth should die a cruel, wrongful death.”

Investigators arrested Rogers about 4:30pm Friday. Police say part of his schtick was going door-to-door, offering to do odd jobs for people. He is also a convicted sex offender.

The black was one of about 70 blacks rounded up by police for questioning. It denied having anything to do with Blaskey’s death, but investigators did some science that disputed his testimony, officials said.

Detectives pulled DNA from Blaskey’s home that pointed to Rogers as a suspook. How did police get that DNA? Officials wouldn’t elaborate, but said Blaskey’s death involved “sexual crimes.”

Utica, NY

#27 Jun 15, 2013
The "threat to cops" situation is the same as the "terrorism" situation and the gun control. There is an agenda behind what is being done so every detail is amplified and exaggerated to insure that as many people as possible will support whatever the people in control want to do.

Run the numbers on people killed by "terrorism" in the last 20 years. Do the same for officers killed in the line of duty and crimes committed by legally owned weapons. Once you see the real numbers, it's obvious what the intention of the propaganda is.
Utica Is High Tech LOL

Albany, NY

#28 Jun 15, 2013
Most cops are overpaid cry babies.
Pays your meals

United States

#29 Jun 20, 2013
Utica Is High Tech LOL wrote:
Most cops are overpaid cry babies.
This is the big scam on american taxpayers right here! Arrogant self important retard-class nonproducers claiming they deserve 65% of the tax base.

Problem solved.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
missy topa, i can see you post here !! 1 hr LickPinkStink 1
Biggest women beaters in Utica ny (Apr '13) 1 hr LickPinkStink 11
Nicole Mazza 1 hr Utica John 4
What happen to Marc csternastec or chad 1 hr LickPinkStink 2
Brian cass 1 hr LickPinkStink 2
Council samantha and mello testa 2 hr The people of nor... 6
Kristen Copeland looked great tonight 2 hr LQQK in good 1
Utica Common Council 3 hr Read This 65
it is ONE person that posts all these bogus thr... 5 hr FlattenedVagVagin... 37
Slocum Urgent Care 7 hr agree 43

Utica Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Utica Mortgages