Barns what are you hiding
jury bought it

Ashburn, VA

#24 Sep 23, 2013
He never answered the question in court or in all his pathetic public speeches he goes around making. Something rotten in Denmark and why does he dodge this question. This is one of the factors that sent him away by a jury of his peers.
pew

Minoa, NY

#25 Sep 23, 2013
he never took the stand in his own defence.
he probably was home making coffee when you had a bad trip
poor baby

Herkimer, NY

#26 Sep 23, 2013
They need to solve this case. Smh
randy

East Hartford, CT

#27 Sep 23, 2013
You guys have no Clue !!!!! I'm a very very close friend of Steve's and I'm going to tell you ...you have no business talking about something you know nothing about !!!!
ask drunk

Los Angeles, CA

#28 Sep 23, 2013
randy wrote:
You guys have no Clue !!!!! I'm a very very close friend of Steve's and I'm going to tell you ...you have no business talking about something you know nothing about !!!!
Get 8 or 9 beers in the drunk and see if you can find out why the drunk was acting crazy searching the school the morning after the night see went missing. If that does not work throw him a few shoots, but make sure he doesn't go all violent an attack someone.
Tim

Utica, NY

#29 Sep 24, 2013
ask yourself who wrote:
<quoted text>
Enough years have passed so you can make these statements. Let's say your correct then he should have answered that question and his defense subpoena her to answer. Neither did that!
Now, all these other characters some dead and some are living bull! Most likely they all know the perp or possibly related to the perp. Reason Barnes is now out because they wanted to prove DNA works thus DNA works both ways, to free the innocent or guilty and to jail the innocent or guilty. Barry Scheck has now destroyed his Innocence projects credibility for Barnes' DNA and Simons has been tampered with and it would have come from the DA's office and dirty cops involved.
Many suggest Barnes was railroaded, if so, then they NEVER would have saved DNA and saving DNA was unheard of then for it was in it's dire infancy. These idiots who rule this area would not have known how to save anything for they are corrupt and spend their time seeding and weeding projects for themselves.
The person involved is someone who has now been well known, who is highly connected and has or has had a high profile political position. For example, high profile who is no longer would be Mike Arcuri for he also fits the profile he tampers with evidence, hangs the innocent and frees his drunken friend who killed someone while driving drunk.
It would be someone like Arcuri who is well known in the community and also despised in the community! It also would be more than one person involved and Barnes knows for he went to that school alarmed but refused to answer the question. Why not? If it was a girlfriend, she would have testified admitting they were two-some. He is covering for someone. A man who was declared EXONERATED never would have gone to work with the likes of those who convicted him. You couldn't. So ask, it might be someone in that group and Scott McNamara knows who it is! These names such as Miller, Mandy (?) etc are only names to be thrown out.
Remember, Capecelartro rarely lost a case, but he did and why? It was an inside job. Barnes, were you promised dollars for time? Many who have been wrongly convicted do get more money, you settled for a tiny sum! You also have admitted you want to help find the killer! No, a true exonerated person is damaged, thus would never help! You are a player and are playing with those who did the job!
Remember, the Innocence Project Barry Scheck admitted that it was in Barnes' best interest to stay another night! How could Scheck say that and keep an innocent person behind bars another night unless he is not all innocent thus it did place Scott McNamara right on the hot seat for it was also up to him to release him on the condition he return the next day for Oneida County belonged to him and Dwyer, not Barry Scheck so one of your players is Scott McNamara so pound on him, what does he know?
We also need to know was it possible Barnes took this dive because his family was threatened or was he such a loser that taking the dive was in his best interest!
Please state your real name. These are a lot of accusations you're making behind the cloak of anonymity. Or do you not have the balls to come yourself known?
utican

Utica, NY

#30 Sep 24, 2013
Tim wrote:
<quoted text>
Please state your real name. These are a lot of accusations you're making behind the cloak of anonymity. Or do you not have the balls to come yourself known?
dont even bother. these pussies wouldn't come forward with their real identity if you put a gun to their heads. we all know what happened with barnes, how it was fixed from the beginning. theres nothing his attorney could have done. barnes could have hired johnny cochran and the verdict would have been the same. the jury was told what to decide by the judge. the case is cold. unfortunately the simons will never what what really happened with their daughter but hopefully they can find some peace.
drunk

Los Angeles, CA

#31 Sep 24, 2013
Tim wrote:
<quoted text>
Please state your real name. These are a lot of accusations you're making behind the cloak of anonymity. Or do you not have the balls to come yourself known?
Go get a job, then pay for the court transcript, then ask the POS BARNS drunk why, then when the drunk lie's and say's he never did, you can show the drunk how he lied. I bet you can hand food out a window or dig a hole, will only take you a week to raise the money for one I bet.
jofer

Utica, NY

#32 Sep 24, 2013
How do you spell proof positive---DNA---not drop dead all of you liars.
32 brain dead

Los Angeles, CA

#33 Sep 24, 2013
jofer wrote:
How do you spell proof positive---DNA---not drop dead all of you liars.
What does DNA have to do with a crazed panicked drunk waking up from a drunk night and running too school asking for a missing girl in a CRAZED PANIC. Go help Tim dig some holes.
hahaha

Utica, NY

#34 Sep 24, 2013
I'm glad you all have time on your hands to be spending hours posting on Utica Topix about this. Steven Barnes is free and I guarantee he doesn't give a damn what faceless people are saying behind a computer screen.

My suggestion to you all: Get laid. I know it's probably been awhile for you guys, but I promise you won't have so much time to worry about accusing strangers of "hiding something."
Psycho

Newport, NY

#35 Sep 24, 2013
ask yourself who wrote:
<quoted text>
Enough years have passed so you can make these statements. Let's say your correct then he should have answered that question and his defense subpoena her to answer. Neither did that!
Now, all these other characters some dead and some are living bull! Most likely they all know the perp or possibly related to the perp. Reason Barnes is now out because they wanted to prove DNA works thus DNA works both ways, to free the innocent or guilty and to jail the innocent or guilty. Barry Scheck has now destroyed his Innocence projects credibility for Barnes' DNA and Simons has been tampered with and it would have come from the DA's office and dirty cops involved.
Many suggest Barnes was railroaded, if so, then they NEVER would have saved DNA and saving DNA was unheard of then for it was in it's dire infancy. These idiots who rule this area would not have known how to save anything for they are corrupt and spend their time seeding and weeding projects for themselves.
The person involved is someone who has now been well known, who is highly connected and has or has had a high profile political position. For example, high profile who is no longer would be Mike Arcuri for he also fits the profile he tampers with evidence, hangs the innocent and frees his drunken friend who killed someone while driving drunk.
It would be someone like Arcuri who is well known in the community and also despised in the community! It also would be more than one person involved and Barnes knows for he went to that school alarmed but refused to answer the question. Why not? If it was a girlfriend, she would have testified admitting they were two-some. He is covering for someone. A man who was declared EXONERATED never would have gone to work with the likes of those who convicted him. You couldn't. So ask, it might be someone in that group and Scott McNamara knows who it is! These names such as Miller, Mandy (?) etc are only names to be thrown out.
Remember, Capecelartro rarely lost a case, but he did and why? It was an inside job. Barnes, were you promised dollars for time? Many who have been wrongly convicted do get more money, you settled for a tiny sum! You also have admitted you want to help find the killer! No, a true exonerated person is damaged, thus would never help! You are a player and are playing with those who did the job!
Remember, the Innocence Project Barry Scheck admitted that it was in Barnes' best interest to stay another night! How could Scheck say that and keep an innocent person behind bars another night unless he is not all innocent thus it did place Scott McNamara right on the hot seat for it was also up to him to release him on the condition he return the next day for Oneida County belonged to him and Dwyer, not Barry Scheck so one of your players is Scott McNamara so pound on him, what does he know?
We also need to know was it possible Barnes took this dive because his family was threatened or was he such a loser that taking the dive was in his best interest!
Sounds like you've run out of your medication. Get back to the psychiatrist wacko!
agreed

Utica, NY

#36 Sep 24, 2013
Yeah or dial back on the meth and bath salts.
Officer

Utica, NY

#37 Sep 24, 2013
Sounds like there are some scared people out there trying to throw suspicion on Barnes. What do YOU know??? Hmmm? Don't worry. DNA cannot be changed or modified. Someday, you'll be found.
DNA tampering McNamara

Utica, NY

#40 Sep 24, 2013
Officer wrote:
Sounds like there are some scared people out there trying to throw suspicion on Barnes. What do YOU know??? Hmmm? Don't worry. DNA cannot be changed or modified. Someday, you'll be found.
THATot TRUE! dna CAN be changed! DNA can be modified, altered and stolen. If any of you people go out to eat, get a drink or other be prepared that your DNA can be stolen and planted at a crime scene. Barry Scheck has brought issues of credibility to his Innocence Project. Mike Arcuri and Scott McNamara have been tampering with DNA and Barnes' case was a special case to showcase the exploitation of DNA.

You think it can't happen well understand that a local undercover cop at Wendy's in Oneida watched a suspect eat his food. when the suspect threw out his left overs, including his cup, the cop quickly grabbed those items. The man was arrested for he had been careful about DNA up til then! Yes, the man was guilty of murder, but remember, if you are a marked person and you throw your DNA out you most likely could be targeted in a crime that you did not do because your DNA was taken out of the trash.

Scott McNamara showed his true colors the day before Barnes was released, it was up to McNamara to ask questions not pull his finger on his tsties baby fker crap and cry I'm not gonna ask him (Scheck) as it went with keeping Barnes another night. McNamara and ARcuri have been tampering with DNA, they did get themselves aligned with Scheck and one day Schecks program will be frowned upon for what a wonderful tool DNA would have been to exonerate someone, all will learn because of the Barnes case, DNA and Schecks Innocence project will no longer be of use for the material has now been destroyed, no longer credible thanks to Arcuri & McNamara's tampering with DNA.
why barns why barns why

Ashburn, VA

#41 Sep 24, 2013
Why did you wake up and run to Kim's school looking for her after a night of drinking. Who told you she was missing if you went their because she was missing. If someone said she was missing why would you go to her school and ask people where she was. She was missing, only a idiot would check her school.
camel face joe

Utica, NY

#42 Sep 25, 2013
"sing a song everyboy"
gee

Utica, NY

#43 Sep 25, 2013
Given the fact that you don't even know how to spell his last name correctly, you probably don't know shit about Steven Barnes or this case. Crawl back into your hovel, Rome person.
gee

Utica, NY

#44 Sep 25, 2013
DNA tampering McNamara wrote:
<quoted text>
THATot TRUE! dna CAN be changed! DNA can be modified, altered and stolen. If any of you people go out to eat, get a drink or other be prepared that your DNA can be stolen and planted at a crime scene. Barry Scheck has brought issues of credibility to his Innocence Project. Mike Arcuri and Scott McNamara have been tampering with DNA and Barnes' case was a special case to showcase the exploitation of DNA.
You think it can't happen well understand that a local undercover cop at Wendy's in Oneida watched a suspect eat his food. when the suspect threw out his left overs, including his cup, the cop quickly grabbed those items. The man was arrested for he had been careful about DNA up til then! Yes, the man was guilty of murder, but remember, if you are a marked person and you throw your DNA out you most likely could be targeted in a crime that you did not do because your DNA was taken out of the trash.
Scott McNamara showed his true colors the day before Barnes was released, it was up to McNamara to ask questions not pull his finger on his tsties baby fker crap and cry I'm not gonna ask him (Scheck) as it went with keeping Barnes another night. McNamara and ARcuri have been tampering with DNA, they did get themselves aligned with Scheck and one day Schecks program will be frowned upon for what a wonderful tool DNA would have been to exonerate someone, all will learn because of the Barnes case, DNA and Schecks Innocence project will no longer be of use for the material has now been destroyed, no longer credible thanks to Arcuri & McNamara's tampering with DNA.
A straight jacket and some padded walls would do you a world of good.
camel face joe

Utica, NY

#45 Sep 25, 2013
"sing a song"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Joy Behar 13 min Dum di dumdum 5
Kim Strong rescue in Brookfield? 20 min Truth 21
Another Trump move stopped- so much failure! 42 min Boom is a pervert 32
Nano officially dead. 1 hr Old broad 17
What ever happened to Vagatucci? 1 hr Vagabrokatucci 1
the hookers are out its warm 1 hr Lakewood100 30
wktv news 1 hr Really 1
Remington Arms Thanks 2 hr LIBERALCLOWNS 40
Spartan Dilemma 3 hr good grief 53
Best head in Utica?!? 5 hr Somebody 42

Utica Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Utica Mortgages