Do Com miunists Qualify as LIBE RALS?

Do Com miunists Qualify as LIBE RALS?

Posted in the Utica Forum

Seeker

Utica, NY

#1 Dec 19, 2013
I wonder, with all that's feverishly progressed in washinton the past 20-30 years, but especialy the past 5-6, is it even accurate to refer to the constution raping, big govtt loving, wealth sharing, prosperity stealing, welfare lavishing, freedom eroding, patrot hating, sovereignty destroying, gunn grabbing trait orous, treesonous hores in America as librals? Leftists yes, but liberals? I hardly think not. Americans, who are simply libral-minded, but forever dutiful patrits loyal to the consttution- all of it, not just some of it only for the sake of other's special interests and skewed rationale- and the truly free American nation as a whole with great fidelity would never allow for the disloyal, un-American political whoring that has befallen this nation as described above. No, I think lib eral labeling is too good, excusable and inaccurate a term. Clearly the most apt description of such anti-republic lib erty mindset and behavior is commiunism, with a big side of socialism,not libralism. Let's start making proper, common use of what's what and who's who anymore. One DEAD give-away: THEY have begun referring to America-loving, vigilant constiutional patrots
Seeker

United States

#2 Dec 19, 2013
I just ejaculated.
Cogent Thought

Utica, NY

#3 Dec 23, 2013
Interesting... I'm thinking if someone identifies as a "libral" today, they clearly are "com m'nists" at heart. What some don't realize is that "na zism" and "social'ism" and "comm 'nism" are slight variant forms of the same monster. If you're a "libral" in today's climate and you refer to a pro- gun, pro-constitutin person as a right wing "na' zi" you're a truly confused person for hiltler's "na' zi's were abhorently against anything we have as a consttition and banned and confiscated the citizen's firearms and their previously legal rights to firearms, with the occasional exception of small caliber sporting/small game rifles barely more than bb guns (sound familar?). Stalin did the same thing, both creating tragic and propagandized events and incidents to fool and scare the citizenry into giving up there weapond "for their own safety"... So, I think the answer is clear, if you're a liberl by today's definition and examples, you're clearly a communist whether you think so or not. You're truly no constitutionalrepublic American...
huh

Utica, NY

#4 Dec 24, 2013
whats a comiunist?
huh--huh

Utica, NY

#5 Dec 24, 2013
Cogent Thought wrote:
Interesting... I'm thinking if someone identifies as a "libral" today, they clearly are "com m'nists" at heart. What some don't realize is that "na zism" and "social'ism" and "comm 'nism" are slight variant forms of the same monster. If you're a "libral" in today's climate and you refer to a pro- gun, pro-constitutin person as a right wing "na' zi" you're a truly confused person for hiltler's "na' zi's were abhorently against anything we have as a consttition and banned and confiscated the citizen's firearms and their previously legal rights to firearms, with the occasional exception of small caliber sporting/small game rifles barely more than bb guns (sound familar?). Stalin did the same thing, both creating tragic and propagandized events and incidents to fool and scare the citizenry into giving up there weapond "for their own safety"... So, I think the answer is clear, if you're a liberl by today's definition and examples, you're clearly a communist whether you think so or not. You're truly no constitutionalrepublic American...
Whats commmnists?--whats communism?
Do you speak English?
hahahahahahaahah ahahah

Utica, NY

#6 Dec 24, 2013
Cogent Thought wrote:
Interesting... I'm thinking if someone identifies as a "libral" today, they clearly are "com m'nists" at heart. What some don't realize is that "na zism" and "social'ism" and "comm 'nism" are slight variant forms of the same monster. If you're a "libral" in today's climate and you refer to a pro- gun, pro-constitutin person as a right wing "na' zi" you're a truly confused person for hiltler's "na' zi's were abhorently against anything we have as a consttition and banned and confiscated the citizen's firearms and their previously legal rights to firearms, with the occasional exception of small caliber sporting/small game rifles barely more than bb guns (sound familar?). Stalin did the same thing, both creating tragic and propagandized events and incidents to fool and scare the citizenry into giving up there weapond "for their own safety"... So, I think the answer is clear, if you're a liberl by today's definition and examples, you're clearly a communist whether you think so or not. You're truly no constitutionalrepublic American...
This is funny that you posted under cogent thought then went on an incoherent rant--good for you--you got guts.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Name all the Pension padder, county fraud workers 26 min Good for him 48
Gas spill 57 min Slow down 6
NYS Tax Trophies for All 2 hr SOI 5
Shelter Care Plus (Dec '12) 2 hr Tito 33
Utica schools 2 hr Concerned 1
only 10 MILLION BABIES R A P E D IN AFRICA EACH... 3 hr hides r us 33
Another local Catholic priest on leave over sex... 3 hr cretin punk back 17
Fitness Mill 5 hr LOL 22
Gordon's Tap Room Thu Always 31
Whitesboro cops and teachers who cheat Thu Unknown 27

Utica Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Utica Mortgages