Remington arms will be moving in 9 months

[Sam]

This company will be moving out of New York It is sad but true

[FedUp]

Sam wrote:

This company will be moving out of New York It is sad but true

And they should. I hope all factories and businesess move out of here. I know l am.
I was mad hearing about Oklahoma wanting to seperate from US. They got it right.

[carl]

It's a shame but I cant blame them. they wont be the last. its a no wonder utica knife has not left yet lol. i've been gone for 6 years.... best choice ever. ny sooner or later will fall flat on its face and i cant wait to see it crummble.

[blame the voters]

BLAME tje isiot votera thAt voted for the Democrats.

[Shut it]

They are being courted by other states that respect freedom. I don't blame them. Good luck. I hope they take everyone of the employees with them.

I've got a few years to go in my career. But when I'm done we are out of this dump. Year after year people vote with there feet and leave for
Better everything. Those downstate liberals running this bitch into the ground can have it all.

[Democrats are IDIOTS]

The democrats will not be happy until they control our lives and we are all in poverty while they live in castles.

[Yes]

Not looking good

[noonessafe]

i dont think it will be worth it we need our own leaders in office the ones that re not gay friendly and the ones that carry and against http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/19/demo...

[noonessafe]

the mayors of ny are getting together to make sure the gun makers do what they wont or they wont get the police and city contracts tey are takeing numbers on how many guns and ammo they buy and only going to give the contracts to who they want now based on safty

[noonessafe]

we will find out the wasteful spending on ammo http://www.politico.com/story/2013/01/dem-may... also i this what we are paying our mayors to do to take our rights away and disrupt business owners its not remmingtons fault

[Bart]

Let them go. They would have left regardless of NY's gun laws. It will be the same all over the US.

[noonessafe]

things we all will miss http://www.youtube.com/watch... oh yeah only cops have guns like this letting woman with nothing on fire them

[noonessafe]

http://www.youtube.com/watch... yeah dad

[Texas]

Welcomes Remington Arms.

[haha]

noonessafe wrote:

i dont think it will be worth it we need our own leaders in office the ones that re not gay friendly and the ones that carry and against http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/19/demo...

guns are safety they protect you and me its the doctors job to keep the nuts in place was any of the people seeing a doctor yes so its the doctors fault not the guns the goverment has to do an overhaul of doctors because this will keep hapening

[Max]

haha wrote:

<quoted text>guns are safety they protect you and me its the doctors job to keep the nuts in place was any of the people seeing a doctor yes so its the doctors fault not the guns the goverment has to do an overhaul of doctors because this will keep hapening

If th nuts didn't have any guns in the first place, they would not be able to shoot anyone. If the stores did not have any guns to sell, then the nuts could not buy any. The best solution is to impose strict limitations on who can buy a gun and when they can do it. None of the current new laws go far enough. We need sticter laws and more regulations. Losing Remington Arms would be a tough, yet worthy solution if it means that no more assault weapons could be made or sold. And please don't tell me there is no such thing as an "assult weapon". Let's call these deadly toys what they really are.

[Sam]

Max wrote:

<quoted text>If th nuts didn't have any guns in the first place, they would not be able to shoot anyone. If the stores did not have any guns to sell, then the nuts could not buy any. The best solution is to impose strict limitations on who can buy a gun and when they can do it. None of the current new laws go far enough. We need sticter laws and more regulations. Losing Remington Arms would be a tough, yet worthy solution if it means that no more assault weapons could be made or sold. And please don't tell me there is no such thing as an "assult weapon". Let's call these deadly toys what they really are.

We need stricter laws for all the drunk drives that kill people also,how many people have 3 to 6 DWI and have hit people, head on crashes No such thing as a good drunk driver

[sad]

Max wrote:

<quoted text>If th nuts didn't have any guns in the first place, they would not be able to shoot anyone. If the stores did not have any guns to sell, then the nuts could not buy any. The best solution is to impose strict limitations on who can buy a gun and when they can do it. None of the current new laws go far enough. We need sticter laws and more regulations. Losing Remington Arms would be a tough, yet worthy solution if it means that no more assault weapons could be made or sold. And please don't tell me there is no such thing as an "assult weapon". Let's call these deadly toys what they really are.

then only police would own guns everyone has a record and or pled out a case DWI a girl mad at you make a report to police they can make it so no one owns a gun their has to be numbers to how many people will own a gun who are law abiding you tell me how many people have records nd cant own a gun no one will if the went by records doesnt the goverment know how many people have records

[hap]

Democrats are IDIOTS wrote:

The democrats will not be happy until they control our lives and we are all in poverty while they live in castles.

maybe if you got a job you could live in a castle. I need someone to clean my potty if you really want to work.

[Michael]

Max wrote:

<quoted text>If th nuts didn't have any guns in the first place, they would not be able to shoot anyone. If the stores did not have any guns to sell, then the nuts could not buy any. The best solution is to impose strict limitations on who can buy a gun and when they can do it. None of the current new laws go far enough. We need sticter laws and more regulations. Losing Remington Arms would be a tough, yet worthy solution if it means that no more assault weapons could be made or sold. And please don't tell me there is no such thing as an "assult weapon". Let's call these deadly toys what they really are.

Really? You really think if stores didn't sell guns, then nutjobs wouldn't be able to get their hands on them? Which store is it that all these drug addicts go to to buy their cocaine and meth? Last I heard, those drugs weren't sold at the store, they are completely illegal, and completely banned in this country but yet there are still millions of people that continue to obtain them. You can ban and restrict all you want but criminals will find a way to get their hands on whatever it is they want. You have to be delusional if you think otherwise.

I would like to keep my right to protect myself from these people that DON'T abide by the law, including any NEW gun laws that people have been brainwashed into believing will solve the problem. If you need evidence, look no further than Australia: http://www.youtube.com/watch...
You can't legislate morals.