Anniversary of Roe vs. Wade

Anniversary of Roe vs. Wade

There are 35 comments on the WKTV story from Jan 22, 2013, titled Anniversary of Roe vs. Wade. In it, WKTV reports that:

Local people on Tuesday quietly reflected on the 40th anniversary of a Supreme Court decision that has divided the nation like few others.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at WKTV.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Well Well Well

Utica, NY

#24 Jan 25, 2013
They are not babies and fetuses don't count.
Happy Anniversary

United States

#25 Jan 25, 2013
Baby killers!! We should change that amendment!! Oh, wait. Don't change my 2nd amendment. While you're at it, bring back slavery and take away women's rights. THOSE amendments were changed.

Listen, you kooks. You can't have it both ways. The Supreme Court said it's legal and how dare YOU tell a woman what they can and can't do. Should they get your permission for other things, too?

We'd all love to live in a perfect world. No stupid pregnancies, no killing thy neighbor with an assault rifle, no world hunger, no Topix. But life ain't that easy. Maybe it even sucks for you -- but like the Grumpy Cat -- I don't care.
Ocean56

AOL

#26 Jan 26, 2013
I hate cow killers wrote:
Yeah , I am pro life and I have a right to pray for anything I want to pray for, an I pray that all of the evil rotten people who are for abortion will fall into a well (pit) of rattle snakes for the rest of eterity. Then they will cry like the little bitches that really are.
No, you're ANTI-CHOICE who obviously wants to see all women's rights removed, especially women's reproductive rights. Got it.

The Roe v. Wade decision made it possible for EACH woman to decide what to do about a pregnancy, including the choice NOT to continue it. Yes, we know all anti-choice extremists like you are pissed about it. Too bad.

Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required. I suggest you deal with it.
abortion is evil

Herkimer, NY

#27 Jan 26, 2013
Ocean56 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you're ANTI-CHOICE who obviously wants to see all women's rights removed, especially women's reproductive rights. Got it.
The Roe v. Wade decision made it possible for EACH woman to decide what to do about a pregnancy, including the choice NOT to continue it. Yes, we know all anti-choice extremists like you are pissed about it. Too bad.
Motherhood is OPTIONAL, not required. I suggest you deal with it.
Did you ever consider that more than 50% of the babies slaughtered by abortions are GIRLS(baby women). Baby killers are going to hell.

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Level 2

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#28 Jan 28, 2013
"abortion is evil"
Did you ever consider that more than 50% of the babies slaughtered by abortions are GIRLS(baby women). Baby killers are going to hell.

another lier for jebus

“lightly burnt,but still smokin”

Level 2

Since: Dec 06

in the corner of your mind,

#29 Jan 28, 2013
"Tondaleyo" aka "knutter"
Hey Chicky, Heyhey ho ho RvW has got to go!

i'm not chicky,but you're a moron
Slappy

Ithaca, NY

#30 Jan 28, 2013
What's red and white and crawls up your leg? A homesick aborted fetus!
hank hill

Washington, DC

#31 Jan 28, 2013
What would happen to all of these "unwanted" children if women were forced to have them? I would like to know how many of the anti abortionists would adopt even 1 of these kids.

I don't really have a dog in this fight but I have always been curious about this. I mean, I have my own views on this but I don't feel its necessary to force my opinion on others.
abortion is evil

Herkimer, NY

#32 Jan 28, 2013
hank hill wrote:
What would happen to all of these "unwanted" children if women were forced to have them? I would like to know how many of the anti abortionists would adopt even 1 of these kids.
I don't really have a dog in this fight but I have always been curious about this. I mean, I have my own views on this but I don't feel its necessary to force my opinion on others.
I would adopt 10 of them.
hank hill

Washington, DC

#33 Jan 29, 2013
abortion is evil wrote:
<quoted text>I would adopt 10 of them.
really? Thats great! How many other pro lifers do you think would do the same?
Butters

Ithaca, NY

#34 Jan 30, 2013
Well Well Well wrote:
They are not babies and fetuses don't count.
you were a fetus
Dan

Omaha, NE

#35 Jan 31, 2013
hank hill wrote:
What would happen to all of these "unwanted" children if women were forced to have them? I would like to know how many of the anti abortionists would adopt even 1 of these kids.
I don't really have a dog in this fight but I have always been curious about this. I mean, I have my own views on this but I don't feel its necessary to force my opinion on others.
If one makes the "who's going to adopt all these children" argument, the base assumption being made is that they ARE children.

Many pro-choice people will argue that it's not a child being killed during an abortion, so I'm always curious as to why they trot that argument out.
Dan

Omaha, NE

#36 Jan 31, 2013
Well Well Well wrote:
They are not babies and fetuses don't count.
Women who get abortions think they're babies.

They're getting an abortion so they don't have one, aren't they?
hank hill

Belvidere, IL

#37 Jan 31, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
If one makes the "who's going to adopt all these children" argument, the base assumption being made is that they ARE children.
Many pro-choice people will argue that it's not a child being killed during an abortion, so I'm always curious as to why they trot that argument out.
I think the best solution is to do mid term if were going to allow it. Im not stating an opinion one way or another but sometimes I think it might be easier the earlier its done because theres no time to realize or form an attachment when done early. I know this wouldn't stop all, but it would probably cut down on the number done.

I say this because mandatory sterilization doesn't seem to be an option since that infringes on "reproductive rights".

Morgana 9

“And the Horse You Rode in On”

Level 1

Since: Sep 08

Minneapolis

#38 Jan 31, 2013
Dan wrote:
<quoted text>
Women who get abortions think they're babies.
They're getting an abortion so they don't have one, aren't they?
They are getting an abortion to avoid a medical condition that processes a baby. That is correct.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Utica Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Most over and under rated restaurants...a poll 8 min Pissed off 44
All lives matter March this Saturday July 30th 44 min Democraps 4
extreme auto sales junk cars see mob boss behin... 45 min frankfort 1
Utica's Auto Shops: Which Ones We Can Trust, Wh... (Mar '13) 53 min frob 20
CNY Corruption 1 hr Asseater Dumbablo... 17
Zalivodroga to spend 1 year in Madison County j... 1 hr danny 3
Why is DA McNamara's office investigated for co... 1 hr SlobSmith 49
WHICH Assistant DA RESIGNIED over Utica Court W... 1 hr Cretin Handjob Fair 21

Utica Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Utica Mortgages