Corbett's new liquor privatization plan would benefit public schools
Call it liquor privatization with a twist. Like others before him, Gov. Corbett wants to auction off Pennsylvania's wine and liquor stores - but he wants to use the projected $1 billion in proceeds to help public schools.
Join the discussion below, or Read more at Philly.com.
#1 Feb 15, 2013
The $500 million annual tax revenue would, more or less, remain whether liquor/wine sales are in state or private hands. There is some debate on how the state would replace the $103 million in annual net profit afforded by the LCB. Not much is said of the other $100 million given annually to private landlords, the state police, or various scholarship funds. But what is not even remotely guaranteed is the $1 billion windfall projected by the governor. Not even Sheetz is keen on paying the exorbitant license fees.
Here are the last four states that privatized elements of their liquor sales.
Iowa went private with retail operations of wine in 1985, and liquor in 1987.
West Virginia privatized liquor retail operations in 1991.
Both states earned less than $20 million each. Operational costs were greatly reduced, but the expected windfalls never materialized.
In 1986, Iowa earned $71.6 million. In 1987 -$43.6 million. Sales tax revenue did not return to pre-privatization levels until 2004. They chose to retain wholesale operations, because they would have lost $60-70 million/year.
In 2004, Maine earned $125 million for a 10 year lease of their wholesale operations, but since, has lost over $100 million due to revenue sharing with the wholesale distributor.
In 2011, we know that Washingtons liquor sales contributed $461 million to their general fund, roughly equal to our PLCB. When they privatized in 2012, Washington only earned $150 million for wholesale rights,$30.8 million for their existing stores, and a new liquor/wine/beer license is only $166.00. They exploded from 300 to over 1,400 stores, many open until 2:00 AM. Unit sales only increased by 8%, which strongly suggests the state was adequately served by the original 300 outlets.
Since 2011, the governors windfall estimate has been $1.6 billion. Today it is $1.0 billion. Ironically, the governors billion dollar number and the real market comparables are both deal killers.
#2 Feb 16, 2013
What I find unacceptable is PA. law on out of state liquer sales are illegal to bring into PA. I seldom go to state stores. However the point I raise is the people of S.W. PA. arr near the border of Delaware and N.J. Should you bring a bottle or two from either state and caught you get fined. If you buy anything else out of Delaware or N.J. is not illegal. I can buy goods and cross state line and not be stopped by police. But get some alcohol-big NO-NO. So why is that? No need to worry about revenue/taxes to PA. as long as the purchase isn't alcohol. What about lost revenue from all those other goods boight out of state?
#3 Feb 16, 2013
Then those ads in the local newspaper to buy alcohol in Delaware. TRI-STATE LIQUERS. Advertised in the Daily Times newspaper.
Add your comments below
|Town rallies around Jewish family hit by swasti...||Sun||stubi marshak||1|
|Teenagers out of control in CH (Aug '09)||Aug 20||The truth hurts||19|
|Beer & Pizza (Jan '11)||Aug 11||classybiker1||4|
|Nine arrested in Upper Darby robbery spree (Aug '09)||Aug 4||zionist dbl std||2|
|where's bucky pagel?||Jul '16||davis st||1|
|A Movie Theater That Did It Right (May '06)||Jul '16||bobc70||28|
|Your school property taxes are probably rising ...||Jul '16||unfair tax debate||1|
Find what you want!
Search Upper Darby Forum Now
Copyright © 2016 Topix LLC