Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

[Knowledge]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
What the hell? What child's note to me?

I would hope by now, you would know. Look for #33177

[KiMare]

TXgurl wrote:

<quoted text>
There are a lot of idiots that come on here with the sole purpose of causing trouble... way too many of them. They always make having a decent discussion into an ordeal... a good example would be Mr Cool Hand Luke and his sock puppets. There are also a lot of people out there that don't question what they were taught as children, and have no drive to research and learn anything different. Some people are stuck to "tradition" like superglue. I know it gets hard to not lash out when they are on here spouting their crap, and I have lashed out before, too... but all it does is let them win, because their sole purpose was to get us upset in the first place.

Then there are those who simply point out reality. Who have done their research and have gone beyond talking points and debate about faith.

Like a ostrich, you stick your head in the sand and pretend you don't see or hear.

[Knowledge]

TXgurl wrote:

<quoted text>
I get judged for holding my girlfriend's hand or giving her a kiss... people look at us with hate and disgust. On our 2nd anniversary we went out to dinner and she leaned across the table and gave me a kiss and told me happy anniversary and we got so many disgusted looks. Luckily no one said anything, but the looks they gave us said enough. It's not like we were making out, it was just a peck on the lips... soooooo, you might not get judged for doing something like that, but I DO, and I am at the point where I don't care how disgusted people feel, I am going to show affection to my girlfriend... I WILL hold her hand in public, people can judge us all they want but I am fed up with having to hide my love because others think it is yucky.

I don't know what to tell you...except now you know how a white girl and black guy feels, or any other mixed color with another that people don't like. You are always going to have people who will be rude to you, know matter how nice you are, or they just don't like you anyway. I have told my kids, and family members sometimes it is not what you do, they just don't like the way you look or dress. Some people are just mean. I don't agree with the lifestyle of my friends that are gay, they know it. Heck I don't agree with the lifestyle my kids are doing?LOL But, that is their business, we have to make our own choices in life. When we fail, we move on and try again. Life is pretty simple, but we make it complicated. Why would you care what complete strangers say to you anyway?LOL You gotta get thick skinned girl, if you are going to have this lifestyle. Nobody said life would be easy, no matter who you are, or what you believe . Bottom line sometimes life is hard, rich or poor, educated or uneducated.

[Knowledge]

Mona Lott wrote:

<quoted text>
Permission from my mom? I haven't lived with my parents for over 40 years.
Going to bed so early? School day tomorrow?

Go back and reread the comment. The first line was addressed to you. The rest was to the kid? So you said you have been out on your own forty years? huh. You are so intelligent, you lack common sense.

[Knowledge]

Sorry, I hit it twice.

[Marengo Jon]

heylegion wrote:

<quoted text>
I would rather be a bad speller than a know it all as you are

Her point, which you've seemingly missed, it that the reader finds it difficult to discern your point when your post is riddled with errors. She's not being loquacious, or supercilious.

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
Then there are those who simply point out reality. Who have done their research and have gone beyond talking points and debate about faith<sic>.
Like a ostrich, you stick your head in the sand and pretend you don't see or hear.

Speaking of research, how's the research going on that defective gay gene assertion of yours? Are we any further than "...points to.."?
No, I didn't think so. Keep up the good research, however.

[KiMare]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
Speaking of research, how's the research going on that defective gay gene assertion of yours? Are we any further than "...points to.."?
No, I didn't think so. Keep up the good research, however.

You have no answer for it, do you?

At the very core, in the deepest point, totally absent of your favorite whipping post, Christianity, is evolution, your very own bastion, exposing the absurdity of gay 'marriage'.

Go back as far as you can. To the point where human genders first appear. In that very point, you find the roots of marriage. The transition from simple cells to male and female.

Some things will never change, they are, simply reality.

It's why you childishly pretend I don't exist.

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You have no answer for it, do you?
At the very core, in the deepest point, totally absent of your favorite whipping post, Christianity, is evolution, your very own ......

Excellent attempt at dodging the question, schmister.

You can't prove that being gay is a defect, so you deflect to history, evolution and Christianity.

Your opinion proves nothing.

[KiMare]

KiMare'a wrote;

You have no answer for it, do you?

At the very core, in the deepest point, totally absent of your favorite whipping post, Christianity, is evolution, your very own bastion, exposing the absurdity of gay 'marriage'.

Go back as far as you can. To the point where human genders first appear. In that very point, you find the roots of marriage. The transition from simple cells to male and female.

Some things will never change, they are, simply reality.

It's why you childishly pretend I don't exist.

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
Excellent attempt at dodging the question, schmister.
You can't prove that being gay is a defect, so you deflect to history, evolution and Christianity.
Your opinion proves nothing.

Very poor attempt at deflecting humiliation.

You can't even copy my entire post.

[dot]

what?

[Marengo Jon]

KiMare wrote:

KiMare'a wrote;
You have no answer for it, do you?
At the very core, in the deepest point, totally absent of your favorite whipping post, Christianity, is evolution, your very own bastion, exposing the absurdity of gay 'marriage'.
Go back as far as you can.....
<quoted text>
Very poor attempt at deflecting humiliation.
You can't even copy my entire post.

I deleted the better portion of your post because it was so absurd (re-read your second "sentence"). Why waste space by re-posting it?
Further, you think you've humiliated me? Not a chance. Not even close. I see you're still struggling with "reality" issues.

[KiMare]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
I deleted the better portion of your post because it was so absurd (re-read your second "sentence"). Why waste space by re-posting it?
Further, you think you've humiliated me? Not a chance. Not even close. I see you're still struggling with "reality" issues.

"waste space"??? What a childish, stupid cop-out! It is scary you can fool yourself with BS like that.

It really is a incomplex point, but I guess I need to explain the second sentence for you...

"Go back as far as you can. To the point where human genders first appear. In that very point, you find the roots of marriage. The transition from simple cells to male and female."

Go back to the evolutionary roots of human existence, when genders first appeared.

At that very point you also find the roots of marriage.

Guess what? It was male and female.

That same identity of marriage permeates all of human history.

In fact, marriage models the re-embodiment of pre-gender human existence, the re-union of male and female into one. Another item of marriage SS couples never can model.

[lol]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>"waste space"??? What a childish, stupid cop-out! It is scary you can fool yourself with BS like that.

It really is a incomplex point, but I guess I need to explain the second sentence for you...

"Go back as far as you can. To the point where human genders first appear. In that very point, you find the roots of marriage. The transition from simple cells to male and female."

Go back to the evolutionary roots of human existence, when genders first appeared.

At that very point you also find the roots of marriage.

Guess what? It was male and female.

That same identity of marriage permeates all of human history.

In fact, marriage models the re-embodiment of pre-gender human existence, the re-union of male and female into one. Another item of marriage SS couples never can model.

There had never been a "pre-gender" human dum-dum.

[Mona Lott]

heylegion wrote:

<quoted text>
Who said anything about homophobe? I just asked you a question and now you try to say I'm a homophobe!!! That is rich. And just because I may not spell good I'm labled I'm stupid??? Well you made my point you think your better than everyone. No need to talk to you I see already no one could talk to you your a very very smart fellow and everyone is below you right??? Well go ahead and beleve your own demented mind and I was right you are truely a disgrace to all pastors everywhere you can't be taught anything you know it all well wollow in your ignorence because it is bliss to you bye and god have mercy on your soul I would rather be a bad speller than a know it all as you are

When did I claim to be a pastor? Thank you for once again proving that religious conservatives have low IQs.

[Mona Lott]

Knowledge wrote:

<quoted text>
Go back and reread the comment. The first line was addressed to you. The rest was to the kid? So you said you have been out on your own forty years? huh. You are so intelligent, you lack common sense.

You're a nut job.

[Mona Lott]

Marengo Jon wrote:

<quoted text>
Her point, which you've seemingly missed, it that the reader finds it difficult to discern your point when your post is riddled with errors. She's not being loquacious, or supercilious.

lol

[Mona Lott]

Knowledge wrote:

<quoted text>
I don't know her mom either. What is it with you? You really couldn't tell that was a child? I am not gullible, I have raised children and have grandchildren, maybe you have not. I was merely telling you to back off because you obviously had upset that kid. She got Jew mixed up as in Jesus, you surely was able to understand that? To me that would show how young she was. I know there are trolls, but I don't think it was. My grandkids sneak phones for their use all the time most kids do. Some children have their own phone at age seven, I don't think they should but they do. Some people live under the lies that their children do nothing wrong, LOL but they all sneak around and do things. You are a rude individual, you act like you are better than everyone else. I have news for you we are all the same but in different suits. You or anyone else should not mock people because they can't spell, or haven't had the money to go to college. Maybe you did, consider yourself one of the lucky ones, not all are so blessed. Why is it you keep calling me back if you don't like me, don't address me. Just because I don't go along with the lifestyle you choose, does not mean I don't like that person for it. What a person does in their own house is their own business, not mine. Now for the last time, when I said your mom and dad should be proud of you, I was talking to you sarcastically. I was implying that you were so rude they should be so proud of you, and you are saying I am stupid?(or anyone else) I didn't get on this site to argue with you so let it go, or do you want to keep arguing with me? For what reason? I am getting the feeling that you might be an older person by some past remarks, if so, you just need to grow up and let things go. You made a kid upset, it's over, move on.

I have a bridge for sale.... cheap! You can make a fortune from the tolls!

[Mona Lott]

KiMare wrote:

<quoted text>
You have no answer for it, do you?
At the very core, in the deepest point, totally absent of your favorite whipping post, Christianity, is evolution, your very own bastion, exposing the absurdity of gay 'marriage'.
Go back as far as you can. To the point where human genders first appear. In that very point, you find the roots of marriage. The transition from simple cells to male and female.
Some things will never change, they are, simply reality.
It's why you childishly pretend I don't exist.

To the point where human genders first appear? WTF???????

[Mona Lott]

Knowledge wrote:

<quoted text>
I would hope by now, you would know. Look for #33177

And you KNOW this poster is a child how?