Girls in cell-phone photos sue DA ove...

Girls in cell-phone photos sue DA over threatened porn charges

There are 29 comments on the GoErie.com story from Mar 26, 2009, titled Girls in cell-phone photos sue DA over threatened porn charges. In it, GoErie.com reports that:

One summer night in 2007, a pair of 13-year-old northeastern Pennsylvania girls decided to strip down to their skivvies to beat the heat.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at GoErie.com.

First Prev
of 2
Next Last
Penny from Tenney

Edinboro, PA

#21 Mar 26, 2009
citi wrote:
<quoted text>
What a shocking reaction! It's so reasonable and practical. God, I hope you don't start something Penny! lol...
:) citi
I don't think that taking cell phones away from irresponsbile children is a shocking reaction. I think children taking pics of themselves in there underware is, and sending them over the phone is totally and utterly shocking. Remember children with cells have not been around for that many years, but all of a sudden cells are a neccisity. I don't think children are mature enough to handle the responsibility of a cell.
citi

Erie, PA

#22 Mar 26, 2009
Penny, I was joking. I think it's exactly the right reaction and I was just trying to be funny.
Please don't take it any other way.
:) citi
Penny from Tenney

Edinboro, PA

#23 Mar 26, 2009
citi wrote:
Penny, I was joking. I think it's exactly the right reaction and I was just trying to be funny.
Please don't take it any other way.
:) citi
No problem citi. I have heard so many parents defend the actions of there children when it comes to over use of texting or being constantly on there cells, or even talking/texting while driving. It just drives me crazy that parents think everything that there children wants should automatically be given to them.
Smitty

Erie, PA

#24 Mar 26, 2009
I don't care one bit about this DA but why are some here on this post calling him a perv and saying he likes looking at young girls in there underwear? I don't see anywhere in the article where it suggests that in anyway. Because he wants to charge 13 year old girls in there bras he's now a sex offender? You guys are wacky!
Chandu

Hudson, OH

#26 Mar 26, 2009
Why is the DA being called a perv, you ask? Because he sees something lascivious and threatening to the community in the childishness of some 13 year old children BECAUSE they're GIRLS!
Smitty wrote:
I don't care one bit about this DA but why are some here on this post calling him a perv and saying he likes looking at young girls in there underwear? I don't see anywhere in the article where it suggests that in anyway. Because he wants to charge 13 year old girls in there bras he's now a sex offender? You guys are wacky!
Realist

Pittsburgh, PA

#27 Mar 27, 2009
Chandu wrote:
Why is the DA being called a perv, you ask? Because he sees something lascivious and threatening to the community in the childishness of some 13 year old children BECAUSE they're GIRLS!
<quoted text>
Maybe he sees something improper in sending photos of scantily-clad children to others.
Chandu

Hudson, OH

#28 Mar 27, 2009
The story I read, realist, mentions no evidence that the photos were 'obscene' nor 'published' by the girls. As has been mentioned above the photos were of the sort you'd see in a Penney's newspaper insert.

Realist wrote:
<quoted text>
Maybe he sees something improper in sending photos of scantily-clad children to others.
K Mac

United States

#29 Mar 27, 2009
Chandu wrote:
The story I read, realist, mentions no evidence that the photos were 'obscene' nor 'published' by the girls. As has been mentioned above the photos were of the sort you'd see in a Penney's newspaper insert.
<quoted text>
Please point out to me the next time the Sunday paper has 13yos in underwear in the JCP insert. On second thought, I'm not a perv, I don't want to see it. Never mind.
Penny from Tenney

Erie, PA

#30 Jun 5, 2010
Penny from Tenney wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think that taking cell phones away from irresponsbile children is a shocking reaction. I think children taking pics of themselves in there underware is, and sending them over the phone is totally and utterly shocking. Remember children with cells have not been around for that many years, but all of a sudden cells are a neccisity. I don't think children are mature enough to handle the responsibility of a cell.
I did not post this. I googled my name today and saw that someone was stealing my name even back then. WOW what childish people. No wonder my husband and I both cannot wait to leave Erie.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Tunkhannock Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Idea for Tunkahannock. Aug 22 Frank 1
I Hate Gin's Tavern (Feb '09) Aug 16 Passing Through 24
This can help Tunkhannock. Jul '15 Asher 1
meshoppen pa (Dec '06) Jun '15 Darlene 12
Debate: Marijuana - Tunkhannock, PA (Sep '10) May '15 eric 10
looking for her May '15 you know 1
Harveys Lake officials to look into vicious dog... May '15 Shawn 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Tunkhannock Mortgages