Who do you support for U.S. Senate in...

“ We are not permanent”

Since: Oct 08

Gaston County

#36593 Feb 19, 2013
waco1909 wrote:
Pro, I love you like a brother in Christ, but you know as much about history as Mike does about the military.
In regards to LBJ Pro is right you know. Where is was from or what title he held is irrelevant. Regardless of changing his vote later in his political career to appease the people he was a racist to the core. The historical revisionism of the civil rights movement have twisted, turned and left out just enough of the truth to push their agenda. It has always been the objective of the Democratic Party to suppress the minority.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36594 Feb 19, 2013
Did anyone see this news today? I heard it on the AM radio while driving and a friend sent me the link.
And the Commucrats say there's no need for voter ID and this poll worker ADMITTED to voting twice and possibly voting 4 more times....for a total of 6 times in the last election four months ago!

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/oh...

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#36595 Feb 19, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
In regards to LBJ Pro is right you know. Where is was from or what title he held is irrelevant. Regardless of changing his vote later in his political career to appease the people he was a racist to the core. The historical revisionism of the civil rights movement have twisted, turned and left out just enough of the truth to push their agenda. It has always been the objective of the Democratic Party to suppress the minority.
agreed

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36596 Feb 19, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
In regards to LBJ Pro is right you know. Where is was from or what title he held is irrelevant. Regardless of changing his vote later in his political career to appease the people he was a racist to the core. The historical revisionism of the civil rights movement have twisted, turned and left out just enough of the truth to push their agenda. It has always been the objective of the Democratic Party to suppress the minority.
Good to see you back in the fray TEW, thought you were AWOL along with AZ!:)

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36597 Feb 19, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
Did anyone see this news today? I heard it on the AM radio while driving and a friend sent me the link.
And the Commucrats say there's no need for voter ID and this poll worker ADMITTED to voting twice and possibly voting 4 more times....for a total of 6 times in the last election four months ago!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/oh...
And this lady is a poll worker!!!

"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do."

- Joseph Stalin

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36598 Feb 19, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>Good to see you back in the fray TEW, thought you were AWOL along with AZ!:)
Yeah TEW, don't stay gone so long.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36599 Feb 19, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
Did anyone see this news today? I heard it on the AM radio while driving and a friend sent me the link.
And the Commucrats say there's no need for voter ID and this poll worker ADMITTED to voting twice and possibly voting 4 more times....for a total of 6 times in the last election four months ago!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/oh...
Since when did it become illegal to discriminate against people breaking the law as this woman did? Isn't that the rally cry of those against people wanting people to have ID to vote "it's discrimination"? Geez. There used to be an old saying about voting "vote early and vote often", and guess where this saying first started, Chicago. See any correlation??
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#36601 Feb 20, 2013
OK. Let me review this from a republikan perspective. Suppose we just shot ALL poor people and turned their carcasses into fish food so that hungry hordes would not rebel and take my food. In doing so we eliminate the $800,000,000,000 (0.8 trillion) in social programs to the poor. That money would just pay the INTEREST PAYMENTS on the national debt and we would still have to continue borrowing money from China in order to continue giving $$1,300,000,000,000 (1.3 trillion) per year to the rich in the form of tax breaks, subsidies, exclusions, incentives,deductions, etc. The national debt would still continue increasing because of no payments toward the principal. The point is that IF we plan to survive as a nation in the long run, we have to cut welfare to the rich firs, then welfare to the poor also.
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
TSF, run some figures for me on this idea. What if the "rich" and I'm talking the filthy rich, began to downsize their income, ship their companies overseas, and decided "you know what, I've got all the money I need, I'm going to close my businesses, and let the chips fall where they may if all these people are to become unemployed. We'd be left with the "rich" but not the filthy rich, the middle class and the poor to run this country, how do you think it would do? We basically can eliminate the poor on govt. assistance because they can't help themselves let alone us and then on top of that add more people to unemployment. I know you don't have a crystal ball, but do you think this could ever happen and what do you think the outcome would be?
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#36602 Feb 20, 2013
It isn't just republikans who misunderstand the magnitude of our problem. The headline over an article in today's Charlotte Observer (left leaing paper) boldly announces that the debt can be reduced by Simpson/Boyles new plan to reduce the deficit. These educated editors are so math challenged that they do not even know the difference between the debt and the deficit. In order to address the DEBT, we would have to ELIMINATE THE DEFICIT AS WELL AS PRODUCE A SURPLUS IN TAX COLLECTIONS . To do that, we have to eliminate welfare to the rich,welfare to the poor, foreign aid, military expenditures and raise taxes back to the rates that previously kept our government solvent.

“Arch Nemisis of Democrats”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#36603 Feb 20, 2013
TSF wrote:
<quoted text>OK. Let me review this from a republikan perspective. Suppose we just shot ALL poor people and turned their carcasses into fish food so that hungry hordes would not rebel and take my food. In doing so we eliminate the $800,000,000,000 (0.8 trillion) in social programs to the poor. That money would just pay the INTEREST PAYMENTS on the national debt and we would still have to continue borrowing money from China in order to continue giving $$1,300,000,000,000 (1.3 trillion) per year to the rich in the form of tax breaks, subsidies, exclusions, incentives,deductions, etc. The national debt would still continue increasing because of no payments toward the principal. The point is that IF we plan to survive as a nation in the long run, we have to cut welfare to the rich firs, then welfare to the poor also.
Sent your check yet with your voluntary extra?

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36604 Feb 20, 2013
TSF wrote:
OK. Let me review this from a republikan perspective. Suppose we just shot ALL poor people and turned their carcasses into fish food so that hungry hordes would not rebel and take my food. In doing so we eliminate the $800,000,000,000 (0.8 trillion) in social programs to the poor. That money would just pay the INTEREST PAYMENTS on the national debt and we would still have to continue borrowing money from China in order to continue giving $$1,300,000,000,000 (1.3 trillion) per year to the rich in the form of tax breaks, subsidies, exclusions, incentives,deductions, etc. The national debt would still continue increasing because of no payments toward the principal. The point is that IF we plan to survive as a nation in the long run, we have to cut welfare to the rich firs, then welfare to the poor also.
<quoted text>
TSF, thanks for breaking it down for me. Now one more question. I tried to do the research last night and learned "filthy rich" has been replaced with "ultra or super rich", kind of like replacing "used" car with "pre-owned", anyway what if the "ultra rich" began to ship their jobs and monies overseas causing massive layoffs, which scenario would be more detrimental to the U.S. economy? Do you see this happening? As you said, our country is borrowing money hand over fist from China, at the rate the U.S is going China will own the U.S. pretty soon. Can taxing the "ultra rich" more keep up with the national debt?

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#36605 Feb 20, 2013
The Enemy Within wrote:
<quoted text>
In regards to LBJ Pro is right you know. Where is was from or what title he held is irrelevant. Regardless of changing his vote later in his political career to appease the people he was a racist to the core. The historical revisionism of the civil rights movement have twisted, turned and left out just enough of the truth to push their agenda. It has always been the objective of the Democratic Party to suppress the minority.
we shall disagree dudes.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#36606 Feb 20, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
<quoted text>And this lady is a poll worker!!!
"The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do."
- Joseph Stalin
Florida,2000.

“Vote”

Since: May 12

Houston

#36607 Feb 20, 2013
Too many laws, too many regulations.Being watched by the government, via"drones", doesn't reassure me.
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#36608 Feb 20, 2013
It will make little or no difference if we tax the ultra rich slightly more. They are not and have not been creating jobs with the lowest taxes in 50 years because they are just sitting on the money.So why would anyone think that lowering their taxes more would help? It will not. Another factor not considered is that if they pull up and move themselves and the money they have not already moved to tax havens like the Caymans, they will also not have the protection of being a US citizen and open themselves up to extortion or outright theft by their new government. If they want to move, good ridance for my part because they and their lobbist are creating obstacles giving them and their cronies a business advantage over small operators like myself. What I see happening right now is the exact opposite of free enterprise.
Makin bacon wrote:
<quoted text>
TSF, thanks for breaking it down for me. Now one more question. I tried to do the research last night and learned "filthy rich" has been replaced with "ultra or super rich", kind of like replacing "used" car with "pre-owned", anyway what if the "ultra rich" began to ship their jobs and monies overseas causing massive layoffs, which scenario would be more detrimental to the U.S. economy? Do you see this happening? As you said, our country is borrowing money hand over fist from China, at the rate the U.S is going China will own the U.S. pretty soon. Can taxing the "ultra rich" more keep up with the national debt?
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#36609 Feb 20, 2013
I am sending the checks on time because if I don't they will penalize me with fines and take even more. I am being taxed heavily because of stupidity and corruption of public and elected officials. For instance, the republikan legislature just voted to eliminate medicare/medicaid expansion in NC even though it would have been paid for in its entirety by the feds for 3 years and 90% afterwards. It also would have created another 25,000 jobs and increased the GDP of our state. As a result of this stupid "money saving" move by the legislature, I will pay more in insurance premiums because emergency rooms will have a flood of emergencies which will cost us around $1 billion dollars more which would have been preventable if those folks had been able to get treatment before their conditions became an emergencys.
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Sent your check yet with your voluntary extra?
TSF

Fayetteville, NC

#36610 Feb 20, 2013
Do't worry. Those drones are "un armed". Then worry because all they have to do is land and get armed in around 15 minutes.
waco1909 wrote:
Too many laws, too many regulations.Being watched by the government, via"drones", doesn't reassure me.

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#36611 Feb 20, 2013
Pro-American wrote:
Did anyone see this news today? I heard it on the AM radio while driving and a friend sent me the link.
And the Commucrats say there's no need for voter ID and this poll worker ADMITTED to voting twice and possibly voting 4 more times....for a total of 6 times in the last election four months ago!
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/02/19/oh...
So due to two extra votes, we need to disinfrachise masses of people?

“Breaking the spell”

Since: Feb 13

Location hidden

#36612 Feb 20, 2013
Silvercoastcorks wrote:
<quoted text>
Sent your check yet with your voluntary extra?
Straw man.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#36613 Feb 20, 2013
TSF wrote:
It will make little or no difference if we tax the ultra rich slightly more. They are not and have not been creating jobs with the lowest taxes in 50 years because they are just sitting on the money.So why would anyone think that lowering their taxes more would help? It will not. Another factor not considered is that if they pull up and move themselves and the money they have not already moved to tax havens like the Caymans, they will also not have the protection of being a US citizen and open themselves up to extortion or outright theft by their new government. If they want to move, good ridance for my part because they and their lobbist are creating obstacles giving them and their cronies a business advantage over small operators like myself. What I see happening right now is the exact opposite of free enterprise.
<quoted text>
TSF, I agree the days of free enterprise is dwindling quickly. As I told someone this morning there's 3 sides to every political issue, the dems's side, the repubs' side and the truth. What this country needs is a healthy does of the truth and the truth is, our government is killing this country economically from within. I don't lay the blame on just one party, it's all of them even up to the POTUS. You speak of lobbyists, I researched yesterday and you can't flip a coin between which party uses more. I pay my taxes, pay on time and I do grouch, but hey, I just grouch; however, I don't blame anyone for moving to another country to keep their money they worked for to avoid paying off debts people like you and I didn't make, but the politicians in D.C. did. Kind of damned if you do and damned if you don't. Caymans Islands are the only safe haven for people moving their money.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Trinity Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pat McCory lost by 10,000 votes, 300,000 Illega... Dec 5 MAGA2016 1
motel at north end of town has two way mirrors Dec 2 Curious 8
News One mac daddy of a deal (Jan '08) Dec 1 Mutti123 6
Time to start suing people in High Point Dec 1 Courtney 4
Does High Point have a Black problem? Nov 19 Courtney 2
High Point women in need of sexual assaut (Apr '11) Nov 19 Mad As Hell 9
Poll Why can't Black men in High Point date only the... (Sep '11) Aug '16 Intrigue 29

Trinity Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Trinity Mortgages