Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201878 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#216113 Sep 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's what I propose;
Abortion is murder, it should once again be outlawed.
Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. It should once again be outlawed.
Vaginal sex is safe within the bounds of marriage.
We are all suffering and paying a price for the abuses of some. That is wrong.
Most risks can be avoided by using common sense.
<quoted text>
Here is what is funny.
What I just stated is classic morality. Not just Christian morality, but historic morality.
You immediately desecrate that morality by putting it into today's immorality, and then assert it is disqualified.
Moreover, you deny the inherent harm, unhealthiness and demeaning nature of anal sex. Something that has been medically proven time and time again.
In the beginning, and in the end, you are consistently the liar.
Everytime.
"Classic morality"?!? By whose standards? Western standards? Contemporary standards? Christian standards?

Do I need to remind you of the many countries that even today practice polygamy? What about the cultures that turn a blind eye to mistresses? Seems like history is replete with men who held concubines.

You conveniently forget about those cultural practices that aren't a part of your own personal, ideal worldview.

There is no "classic morality", you boob.

You keep forgetting that YOU don't get to impose YOUR notions of morality onto anyone else. This would be an example of a classic narcissistic characteristic.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#216114 Sep 12, 2013
Dusty Mangina wrote:
<quoted text>
You're the worst troll ever. Nobody, even you, is this backward.
Carry on , KiMerde.
Your name, your avatar, and your whole reason for being on Topix is to stalk him. And then you say he is a troll. Priceless.

That's why I like you silly jackasses.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216115 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Your opinion.
And contracts are a dime a dozen?? LOL!!!
Tell that to your bank when you fall short on your mortgage by 32 months.
Geeeezus you're an idiot. Bar none.
Damn, Dan, you are also in hock to the bank? You're a mess. And, BTW, contracts ARE a dime a dozen. Regardless of the mortgage issues that you face...
Or, are you implying that because you have cracked away your house, that contracts are rare? Because that is the "stinking thinking" of the addict.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216116 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
What...your opinion???
No one cares about your opinion let alone wants to change it.
You can believe gay marriages are "only ever be a mutually sterile, pointlessly duplicate gendered half of marriage" until you pass out from lack of oxygen by stating it repeatedly you dumbfuck....LOL!!!
Unfortunately I doubt many are going to follow your pied piper routine and believe you.
What an expansive imagination you have. "No one"? LOL Guess again, butt dumpling... You don't speak for anyone except yourself. You DO know that, don't you?
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#216117 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey dumbfuck,
I think it's up to the individual if they want to put themselves at risk no matter what the venture.
Not you or your monkey crew.
Just an FYI. Mind your own business loser given I have no doubt it needs more attention than your sorry ass looking over the fence and deciding how your neighbor should live his or her life.
Uh-oh! Temper temper!

Meet him at the Home Depot parking lot behind the dumpster time?

YUK!YUK!YUK! What a hothead.

Since: Dec 09

Knoxville, TN

#216118 Sep 12, 2013
Trust in Jesus wrote:
<quoted text>80% of all HPV cases are lesbians so your shift is laughable. You paint yourself in a corner and show how foolish you are by suggesting that premarital intercourse is an issue. That is odd since all gay sex is outside of marriages, because same sex unions are not marriages and 99% of all gays have predominately sex outside of marriage.
Anybody can pull statistics out of their ass. I'm guessing that's where you get yours. Show one study that indicates that HPV is predominately a lesbian disorder. And while you're at it, prove that 99% of all gays have sex predominately outside of marriage or a committed relationship.
6foot Jew 8inch Pole

Chicago, IL

#216119 Sep 12, 2013
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio wrote:
<quoted text>
Not funny. Our federal government is going down in flames, and you dance....
And you accuse us of being drama queens.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216120 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Why didn't you ask why a Chevrolet Malibu and a Nissan work truck can't get married given you seem to be just that stupid.
LOL!!!
Why don't you tell us why? I'm interested in knowing the tricky currents and pitfalls in which automobiles exist... The poor little vehicles... Describe their pain for us... Oh, the anguish....the trauma.... Quick, let's all slit our wrists in sympathy...
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#216122 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Who says a gay couple has to?
LOL!!!
And their "mix-n-match" will amount to a previously abandoned or abused child to have a stable home should a gay couple adopt.
Brother - that's a positive.
The fact you and KiKrazy don't like it is your problem. Added to your angst will be the fact you can't stop them from either marrying or adopting. You're impotent little man.
Calm down fruitloops.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216123 Sep 12, 2013
Don Sclio wrote:
<quoted text>
Riiiiiiiight.
"Everyone".
Just not the courts. LOL!!!
I gotta know who's included in your "everyone". You, the lost soul that married your sorry ass and your 3 ragged dogs????
LOL!!!
Get lost fabricator.
I'll help you out. The majority of Americans. The 5:1 ratio that has an opinion about the issue. Most of us don't support your side.
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#216125 Sep 12, 2013
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio wrote:
<quoted text>
What an expansive imagination you have. "No one"? LOL Guess again, butt dumpling... You don't speak for anyone except yourself. You DO know that, don't you?
Dan speaks for the gay community. He doesn't realize it's counterproductive. He's a student of Rose_NoHo.
frankies mommy

Chicago, IL

#216126 Sep 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Your name, your avatar, and your whole reason for being on Topix is to stalk him. And then you say he is a troll. Priceless.
That's why I like you silly jackasses.
TROLLING and troll-stalking are 2 different things.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216129 Sep 12, 2013
Reverend Alan wrote:
<quoted text>
http://politix.topix.com/homepage/6461-childr...
Children of SSM couples are better off.
Oh, wow. Another (yawn) supposedly "honest and unbiased" "poll" (propaganda piece) showing how much better off we'll all be when you guys get what you want. Even though the kids can go to hell, now that you've gotten your way. Remember? These kids that used to matter? The ones that are now shunted off, in favor of laboratory processes that give biologically related children to a SSSB couple?
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216132 Sep 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Dan thinks he sounds intelligent by awkwardly using unnecessary words such as "viable". YUK!YUK!YUK! Too funny!
....I haven't fallen for it.....
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216134 Sep 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down spice trooper. Your already atrocious spelling suffers even more when you get upset like that. And we suffer along with it. YUK!YUK!YUK!
....I'm not suffering. I'm laughing my ass off......He starts to stutter through his keyboard..... I hear Curly "Whoop whoop whoop"
:-D
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216136 Sep 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Calm down fruitloops. I know you love me.
Yeah, he posts this: "
Huh wrote:
YUK YUK YUK LOOK HOW DUMB I AM I CALL NAMES AND DONT GIVE ANYTHING ELSE. I AM A BABY KILLING NAM VET WHO SI CRIPPLED MY WIFE AND KIDS HATE ME AND LEFT ME TO DIE.
From Frankie Rizzo
YOUR PATHETIC FRANKIE..."
And expects us to believe that he is a veteran. ROFLMAO at him. If he's a veteran, he'd never even think of spouting off with that.
OMG.
I've never doubted that "TooManyLaws" was a moron, but his idiocy has reached a new level.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216137 Sep 12, 2013
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
I was kind of hoping your friend, Duh would help you out so I didn't have to embarrass you.
Just what don't you understand about the term 'default family'??? There's not any really big words in that...
I'm not sure I can help you though, if you get lost going back to my last post....
Snicker.
Neither one of those Pop-Tarts can act like adults, and get with the program. If they had to act so, then they would not pretend to be oblivious to the meaning of vernacular. They'd get past the "stuck on stupid" point and respond like adults. The more that they demand explanations, the more they show their lack of age and comprehension. Thus increasing the rift that exists between them and the adults...
Frankie Rizzo

Hayward, CA

#216139 Sep 12, 2013
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio wrote:
<quoted text>
'No one is "redefining marriage" you dolt.'? OMG. Of course you are. 20 years ago, it was a legal union of one man and one woman. Don't lie. You don't want to be like Big D.
It's only four words. "One man, one woman". Dropping two of the words "man" and "woman" leaves only "one one" That's redefinition.

The fact that they are adamant we cannot drop the "one" part proves they are redefining marriage.

I say so what? Why not admit it? The answer lies in dishonesty and spin of course.

I support SSM, but not in dishonesty to achieve it. That makes me their enemy you may have noticed.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216140 Sep 12, 2013
heartandmind wrote:
<quoted text>
just pointing out that you, as always, have no point, legalistically speaking.
show us a law (local, state or federal) regulating mating behaivior that is enacted to allow only married people to give birth. this would then link procreation as a requirement to obtain a marriage license. unless you can prove that, then you might have a point. until then, nada.
so, you STILL got NADA, kim.
You have legalistic, we have realistic. You will never measure up to the real thing, any more than an illegal immigrant invader will be a real American.
Randy Hudson Wooster Ohio

Wooster, OH

#216143 Sep 12, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Godwin's Law. An internet adage. Never use Nazi analogies. Poor form. Means you forfeit.
Oh well. So sorry! Play again. Insert another nickel please.
Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies) is an assertion made by Mike Godwin in 1990[2] that has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1." In other words, Godwin said that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis. Godwin's law applies especially to inappropriate, inordinate, or hyperbolic comparisons of other situations (or one's opponent) with Nazis – often referred to as "playing the Hitler card". The law and its corollaries would not apply to discussions covering known mainstays of Nazi Germany such as genocide, eugenics, or racial superiority, nor, more debatably, to a discussion of other totalitarian regimes or ideologies, if that was the explicit topic of conversation, since a Nazi comparison in those circumstances may be appropriate, in effect committing the fallacist's fallacy. Whether it applies to humorous use or references to oneself is open to interpretation, since this would not be a fallacious attack against a debate opponent.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Westlake Village Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Officials hope a knock-knocka arrests have deal... Sat okrahomo 1
News Gwyneth Paltrow gushes over Barack Obama: 'You'... (Oct '14) May 17 Flynn Firing 5
News For undocumented immigrants, Mothera s Day rais... May 14 spytheweb 4
News Former Porn Star Buck Angel Is On a Mission to ... May 3 TerriB1 1
News Obama helps raise campaign cash for Democrats a... (Oct '14) Apr 24 Swedenforever of ... 12
News Newhall boy suffers "severe bites" by pit bull (Jun '10) Apr 22 URmisinformed 65
News Thousands march in Los Angeles to demand releas... Apr '17 right guard 4

Westlake Village Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Westlake Village Mortgages