What part of my comment indicates to you that I am embarrassed?KiMare wrote:
According to VV, there is no such thing as sexual orientation dysfunction...that he wants to hear about.
Which is why there is a pursuit and discussion of the cause of homosexuality. And your embarrassed gay twirl double step when the subject comes up.
And why I point out the violent abuse inherent in anal sex, the gay imitation of natural, normal sex.
You're the one who seems to be in denial when it comes to how common anal sex is.
You equate it with gay men, but you never discuss the fact that many straight couples engage in anal sex.
And I've always stood by the fact that anal sex is hardly dangerous or demeaning. Those have been your words. It's only dangerous if you don't use protection.
And I'll only point out, once again, that with 40,000,000 abortions each year; not to mention the millions of unwanted children born due to poor planning, unprotected sex in the heterosexual community seems to be more of an issue than any STD.