New York Primary Election Sept 14: Wi...

New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote?

Created by Top Mod2 on Sep 13, 2010

3,731 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

bah

United States

#8601 Aug 23, 2012
bah
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8602 Aug 23, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Already posted on ryan's rape stance
Yes, you have - partisan propaganda.

Ryan has spoken clearly - and his stance on rape is identical to Obama's:

“Rape is rape, period. End of story.… There’s no splitting hairs over rape.”

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-...
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8604 Aug 23, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
Corporations have not been deemed people since the founding of the republic. That is ludicrous. They were only deemed to have full rights since SCOTUS stated so in citizens united, and its been haywire since then.
(continued ...)

"... the dissent (by Stevens, J.) notes that the Court 'did not recognize any First Amendment protections for corporations until the middle part of the 20th century.'... But it did that in Grosjean v. American Press Co., 297 U. S. 233 (1936), a case involving freedom of the press — which the dissent acknowledges did cover corporations from the outset. The relative recency of that first case is unsurprising. All of our First Amendment jurisprudence was slow to develop. We did not consider application of the First Amendment to speech restrictions other than prior restraints until 1919, see Schenck v. United States, 249 U. S. 47 (1919); we did not invalidate a state law on First Amendment grounds until 1931, see Stromberg v. California, 283 U. S. 359 (1931), and a federal law until 1965, see Lamont v. Postmaster General, 381 U. S. 301 (1965)." Ibid.

"Historical evidence relating to the textually similar clause “the freedom of ... the press” also provides no support for the proposition that the First Amendment excludes conduct of artificial legal entities from the scope of its protection. The freedom of “the press”...(in re: their free speech) activities were not stripped of First Amendment protection simply because they were carried out under the banner of an artificial legal entity. And the notion which follows from the dissent’s view, that modern newspapers, since they are incorporated, have free-speech rights only at the sufferance of Congress, boggles the mind." Ibid.

"... the individual person’s right to speak includes the right to speak in association with other individual persons. Surely the dissent does not believe that speech by the ... Democratic Party can be censored because it is not the speech of 'an individual American.' It is the speech of many individual Americans, who have associated in a common cause, giving the leadership of the party the right to speak on their behalf. The association of individuals in a business corporation is no different — or at least it cannot be denied the right to speak on the simplistic ground that it is not 'an individual American.'" Ibid.
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8605 Aug 23, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
"Im not concerned about the very poor theres a safety net" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =cb3i2T-m1LoXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
if you have a problem with paraphrasing...get off a forum lol
Thanks for posting the first link to the FULL context of Romney's actual statement, even though your lying partisan hack gene STILL wouldn't allow you to quote his quite reasonable position in full here.

So here - let me help you out with that: "Im not concerned about the very poor - there's a safety net, AND IF IT HAS HOLES IN IT, I WILL FIX IT."

As for the second link to lame partisan propaganda, you can shove that up your azz. Worthless to any serious person.

I don't have any problem with paraphrasing. i have a problem with dishonest partisan hacks like you lying.
really wrote:
<quoted text>you want me to pull up every birther, i would do that but it would take forever, then you would state "Oh well Romney didn't say that" , then i would point out that around 67% of his advisors are birthers, then you say but not him, then i would point out all the republicans campaigning for him, then you would say but not him...you want to twist...have fun trying.
No twist - a simple an typical and reprehensible partisan hack lie on your part exposed. You are the first to cry foul when Ayers' radical racist revolutionary words and ideas are ascribed to Obama - but then you turn around and engage in the very same behavior yourself.

Hypocrite.

Romney has never demanded Obama's Columbia U and High School transcripts, as you claimed.
really

Los Angeles, CA

#8606 Aug 23, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, you have - partisan propaganda.
Ryan has spoken clearly - and his stance on rape is identical to Obama's:
“Rape is rape, period. End of story.… There’s no splitting hairs over rape.”
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-...
So theres what a person says, and what a person does. I tend to go with what a person does. A person says they only define rape in one way. A person does put into pass legislation that redefines rape in multiple facets. A person does surround his campaign with the doctor who he used for reference for the bill....actions speak louder than words, especially when words are stated at a time when they're trying to hide what his actions were.

13 years of actions can't be outdone by stating I never did that, don't look at my record, btw i'm proud of my record
really

Los Angeles, CA

#8607 Aug 23, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for posting the first link to the FULL context of Romney's actual statement, even though your lying partisan hack gene STILL wouldn't allow you to quote his quite reasonable position in full here.
So here - let me help you out with that: "Im not concerned about the very poor - there's a safety net, AND IF IT HAS HOLES IN IT, I WILL FIX IT."
As for the second link to lame partisan propaganda, you can shove that up your azz. Worthless to any serious person.
I don't have any problem with paraphrasing. i have a problem with dishonest partisan hacks like you lying.
<quoted text>
No twist - a simple an typical and reprehensible partisan hack lie on your part exposed. You are the first to cry foul when Ayers' radical racist revolutionary words and ideas are ascribed to Obama - but then you turn around and engage in the very same behavior yourself.
Hypocrite.
Romney has never demanded Obama's Columbia U and High School transcripts, as you claimed.
you're right he hasn't...just a vast majority of anyone associated with his policy decisions and his campaign that he approves of has.....your right my mistake....his entire campaign calls for it not him....how sorry i am for my mistake
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8608 Aug 23, 2012
tbird19482 wrote:
<quoted text> 3 GENERATIONS of Progressive Dems. ripping off the american people?
May I remind you that over the last 50 years that 29 of those years we had a Rep. Pres.
and from 1962 the dems controled the Sen. 30 years and House 36 years.
the Rep.s controlled the Sen for 20 years and House for 14 years and for 12 years the Rep. had complete control. Pres, House, Sen all of it.[ 1995 - 2007]
So it isn't all the " Progressive Dems " that were ripping off the American people the Republicans were in there too.
Have a nice day
Fair cop.

I hereby amend my post to recognize we have had 70 years of Nanny-Statist Progressive spendthrifts OF BOTH MAJOR PARTIES ripping off Americans by turning SSI into the Ponzi scheme we know it as today.

Thanks for correcting me.

Have a nice day yerself!
really

Los Angeles, CA

#8609 Aug 23, 2012
Teddy R wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for posting the first link to the FULL context of Romney's actual statement, even though your lying partisan hack gene STILL wouldn't allow you to quote his quite reasonable position in full here.
So here - let me help you out with that: "Im not concerned about the very poor - there's a safety net, AND IF IT HAS HOLES IN IT, I WILL FIX IT."
As for the second link to lame partisan propaganda, you can shove that up your azz. Worthless to any serious person.
I don't have any problem with paraphrasing. i have a problem with dishonest partisan hacks like you lying.
<quoted text>
No twist - a simple an typical and reprehensible partisan hack lie on your part exposed. You are the first to cry foul when Ayers' radical racist revolutionary words and ideas are ascribed to Obama - but then you turn around and engage in the very same behavior yourself.
Hypocrite.
Romney has never demanded Obama's Columbia U and High School transcripts, as you claimed.
oh so you're saying mitt romney believes in the safety nets? man why does he believe in helping moochers. What a scumbag. Letting people have free rides. Stupid liberal.....oh wait....

so he doesn't care about poor, or lets them have free rides. Which is it?
really

Los Angeles, CA

#8610 Aug 23, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
So theres what a person says, and what a person does. I tend to go with what a person does. A person says they only define rape in one way. A person does put into pass legislation that redefines rape in multiple facets. A person does surround his campaign with the doctor who he used for reference for the bill....actions speak louder than words, especially when words are stated at a time when they're trying to hide what his actions were.
13 years of actions can't be outdone by stating I never did that, don't look at my record, btw i'm proud of my record
to add to this, doing something for 13 years then saying you don't believe in it.....thats the definition of hypocrisy ....
really

Los Angeles, CA

#8611 Aug 23, 2012
Really wrote:
Republicana not going to be able to run? What Senate campaign didn;t they run properly? Only a few years back the Democrats changed candidates is New Jersey AGAINST the law and the Democrats were allowed to do it, so no the Republicans will have a candidate and no matter who that candidate is they will WIN. Republicans will take control of the Senate, the House and the Presidency. No doubt.
<quoted text>
In Washington State, it is required to hold at least 5% of the vote in an election to be a major party...the last senate election there was a mistake and no one won and no one was on the ballot for republican...thats 0% of the vote. They are no longer a major party in Washington. That means they can't have a ballot slot, they have to sign up like a minor party....that deadline passed 2 weeks ago. Libertarians are making this charge to keep Republicans off the ballot....have fun with that. No republicans can come from Washington
Democrats are SICK

United States

#8612 Aug 23, 2012
Democrats axxept alleged rapists and the killing of babies and chastise a candidate like Aiken who fights to save babies lives. How siCk is that
Democrats are SICK

United States

#8613 Aug 23, 2012
Admitted liar, women abuser, and alleged rapist Bill Clinton throws his support to failure obama and racist Biden.. Can you imagine. Admitting you got the endorsement of an alleged rapist?
democrat

United States

#8614 Aug 23, 2012
As a democrat I accept abortion if it means I still get my entitlement check$
I accept an alleged rapist as a leader of my party if I still get my welfare check.
I accept the lies of obama if I still get my government check.
I accept more people being driven into poverty if I get free healthcare.
I accept racist comment from Joe Biden if I can get more money from the Democrats.
I will accept anything as long as I get money in return.
you are a fruit cake

United States

#8615 Aug 23, 2012
yOu need help. See a doctor.
really wrote:
<quoted text>
In Washington State, it is required to hold at least 5% of the vote in an election to be a major party...the last senate election there was a mistake and no one won and no one was on the ballot for republican...thats 0% of the vote. They are no longer a major party in Washington. That means they can't have a ballot slot, they have to sign up like a minor party....that deadline passed 2 weeks ago. Libertarians are making this charge to keep Republicans off the ballot....have fun with that. No republicans can come from Washington
rob

Little Neck, NY

#8616 Aug 23, 2012
as long as you have democrats running new york city, this great city will never recover, over taxed, small business`s over regulated, property taxes, education, immigration, welfare.
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8617 Aug 23, 2012
democrat wrote:
Teddy,I agree with you on ss,but remember Al Gore said he would put it in a lock box and not touch,and he was roundly castigated for it by bush,cheney and all the republicans.Taking your idea further,to which i am agreeing.How would you insure it doesn't get touched by outside forces?Because after the wall street bank disaster,I don't want those clowns handling my retirement money.
Similar to what Ryan's proposing on Medicare - give folks the option.

You can choose to entrust your retirement life savings to the political class that runs the Washington money-pit if you like - and good luck with that. I'll entrust mine to tightly-regulated (principally by the States) private retirement fund custodians who are subject to independent audit (Washington isn't ...), minimum capital reserve requirements, and strict rules governing the kinds of instruments these private SSI funds may be invested in.

Just don't tell me you expect to have me or taxpayers or anyone else bail out your retirement fund when the Washington political fraudsters in government who are exempt from ANY regulation or independent audit oversight defraud you - AGAIN - by looting your retirement fund to pay for their pork and boondoggles, and fill your account with federal IOU notes when you're not looking. If that happens - you're on your own. Tough darts - you trusted the wrong guys.

As long as you're fine with that - go for it. Your choice. It's a free country.
you are a fruit cake

United States

#8618 Aug 23, 2012
Court threw it OUT. Romney is in!!!!!!!
Teddy R

Houston, TX

#8619 Aug 23, 2012
really wrote:
<quoted text>
oh so you're saying mitt romney believes in the safety nets? man why does he believe in helping moochers. What a scumbag. Letting people have free rides. Stupid liberal.....oh wait....
so he doesn't care about poor, or lets them have free rides. Which is it?
Foolish and fallacious strawman argument unworthy of serious response.
you are a fruit cake

United States

#8620 Aug 23, 2012
hYpocricy is allowing an alledged rapist to stand in front of thE Dumbasscrat convention and giving a speech
Hypocricy is not condeming Biden's racist remarks
Hypocricy is going to an anti american church for over 20 years and saying you did not hear the bigoted rev when he wa preaching
really wrote:
<quoted text>
to add to this, doing something for 13 years then saying you don't believe in it.....thats the definition of hypocrisy ....
Mrs Joe Biden

Queensbury, NY

#8621 Aug 23, 2012
democrat wrote:
As for Akins all he did was show how repukes really feel about women and rape.The only difference between them and the Taliban is they don't make women wear burkahs,yet.Romneys plan will lower taxes on the rich and raise them on the middle class,anyone that says different is just being stupid and stubborn.
Joe is going to put chains on you, you lying yellow bellied skunk

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Thendara Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Port Leyden man accused of stealing copper cabl... (Feb '14) 3 hr Gag 11
Nirvana Plant Closing 4 hr William Gene 3
Shari Andrews 14 hr Curious 1
Amanda 21 hr Kim 1
Justin Pate 22 hr Percs 8
bruce mcbroom Sat sexytaco 5
moedown cancelled Sat William Gene 16
More from around the web

Thendara People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Thendara Mortgages