Zach Buza : innocent or guilty
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#21 Jan 23, 2013
I am just wondering if you just noticed number two charge
2. 35-42-1-3(a)(1)/FA: Vol Manslaughter - Kill Another Human Being in Sudden Heat w/ Deadly Weapon (Attempt to Commit) 35-42-1-3(a)(1) Felony A 07/22/2012
3. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
4. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
HAS ANYONE OF YOU KNOW IT ALL PAID ATTENTION TO THESE CHARGES, NOW ILL ASK AGAIN, PLEASE TELL ME WHOS DEAD? I CHECKED THIS CHARGE IS NOT A TYPO
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#22 Jan 23, 2013
O who was disfigured??? NO ONE Both cops got minor scrapes, god I hope I am never charged with a crime here. you people sprout off and you don't even know what the charges are MMMMmmmmm
I HOPE THIS PERSON OUT OF WASHINGTON CAN GET THE REAL STORY

“The Ministry of Information”

Since: Jan 12

Terre Haute, In

#23 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
I am just wondering if you just noticed number two charge
2. 35-42-1-3(a)(1)/FA: Vol Manslaughter - Kill Another Human Being in Sudden Heat w/ Deadly Weapon (Attempt to Commit) 35-42-1-3(a)(1) Felony A 07/22/2012
3. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
4. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
HAS ANYONE OF YOU KNOW IT ALL PAID ATTENTION TO THESE CHARGES, NOW ILL ASK AGAIN, PLEASE TELL ME WHOS DEAD? I CHECKED THIS CHARGE IS NOT A TYPO
Are you completely retarded? It clearly says (attemp to commit).

Wow, some people.

“The Ministry of Information”

Since: Jan 12

Terre Haute, In

#24 Jan 23, 2013
Again, wow.
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#26 Jan 23, 2013
well not really, see there is attempeted vol manslaughter and then there is vol manslaughter. In this state, those are two different charges, you cant add in the attempted later. the main charge is what is is. that attempted in () not really a charge charge, that was added in. If you knew a thing about legals you would know that. Me I have 25 years in this industry and I guess that its not all that retarded. The feds are getting involved, You really haven't seen any evidence have you? Your just another blowhard trying to put their two cents in, and that you have nothing to do with this case right? Its people in small towns have nothing better to do.
this has been cracking me up... do you even know who you are talking to?... no you don't. do you know if I have seen the evidence no you don't. I think a lot of you are about to be very surprised by what happens over the next week with this case.
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#27 Jan 23, 2013
Oh and to be honest with you I copied and pasted that of of alphamale... that not how the charges truly read. Im looking at, it BTW there is also just 5 not 8
Molly

Noblesville, IN

#28 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
well cant you read charge 2 vol. manslaughter, that means he killed someone, and this kid lived there, also the couple charges on disfigurement? Its their charges not mine. And the new law says that he lived there and if the police didnt tell him who they were and this kid was beaten so badly before he was in his complete right. and I just figured that if you people knew so much you must be an insider, you were not there? were you? Only the people that claim to know what they are claiming would have to have seen the inside info on this case right? I wonder how you would feel if you were convicted or your loved one convicted by the public when they saw something on the news and have no CLUE whats going on... just saying
I was told the feds are getting involved because someone from out of town got ahold of the evidence, its not as cut and dry as you people think
What evedance would that be.

“The Ministry of Information”

Since: Jan 12

Terre Haute, In

#29 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
well not really, see there is attempeted vol manslaughter and then there is vol manslaughter. In this state, those are two different charges, you cant add in the attempted later. the main charge is what is is. that attempted in () not really a charge charge, that was added in. If you knew a thing about legals you would know that. Me I have 25 years in this industry and I guess that its not all that retarded. The feds are getting involved, You really haven't seen any evidence have you? Your just another blowhard trying to put their two cents in, and that you have nothing to do with this case right? Its people in small towns have nothing better to do.
this has been cracking me up... do you even know who you are talking to?... no you don't. do you know if I have seen the evidence no you don't. I think a lot of you are about to be very surprised by what happens over the next week with this case.
An attempt is defined in Ind. Code § 35-41-5-1:

"(a) A person attempts to commit a crime when, acting with the culpability required for commission of the crime, he engages in conduct that constitutes a substantial step toward commission of the crime. An attempt to commit a crime is a felony or misdemeanor of the same class as the crime attempted. However, an attempt to commit murder is a class A felony."

What the heck are you talking about "add in later"? You are obviously someone with no affiliation with the "legals industry".

The charges are clearly appropriate based on the story of the events that occurred.

No I have seen no evidence and neither have you. His innocence or guilt is not determined by us, on a topix forum. It will be determined in a court of law. Charges are not convictions.

And yes, you're still retarded.
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#30 Jan 23, 2013
oh I don't know... little things... ya know witnesses, depositions, ballistics, the 7 times the police changed their stories, or what has been filed on this case on both sides, what is the defense team working on and how come it got the attention of the feds? Anyone have answers for that
Molly

Noblesville, IN

#31 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
oh I don't know... little things... ya know witnesses, depositions, ballistics, the 7 times the police changed their stories, or what has been filed on this case on both sides, what is the defense team working on and how come it got the attention of the feds? Anyone have answers for that
Did you get hit in the head also?

“The Ministry of Information”

Since: Jan 12

Terre Haute, In

#32 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
oh I don't know... little things... ya know witnesses, depositions, ballistics, the 7 times the police changed their stories, or what has been filed on this case on both sides, what is the defense team working on and how come it got the attention of the feds? Anyone have answers for that
Obviously no one will have answers to your questions about your made up case evidence. You're representing yourself to be an insider, with knowledge of the case that none of us "regular people" should have access to. Also, if you were some sort of person "in the know", I'm almost certain you're violating some sort of ethics code by openly attempting to discuss evidence in a pending criminal case.

You're doing an ok job of pretending you didn't notice that you were just schooled on several incorrect statements.

I'm fairly certain your assertion that the charges have been reduced from 8 counts to 5, has no credibility due to your previous erroneous statements and display of ignorance and arrogance.
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#33 Jan 23, 2013
we shall see... you are so very wrong. you do not know what is happening... I do. say what you will, you shall see
fed up

Indianapolis, IN

#34 Jan 23, 2013
do some homework. there is a lady here from WASHINGTON for the defense. thats easy to find out, she is in Civil rights know it all

“The Ministry of Information”

Since: Jan 12

Terre Haute, In

#35 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
we shall see... you are so very wrong. you do not know what is happening... I do. say what you will, you shall see
Cool story bro.
what

Terre Haute, IN

#36 Jan 23, 2013
Keep Calm and Carry On wrote:
<quoted text>
Obviously no one will have answers to your questions about your made up case evidence. You're representing yourself to be an insider, with knowledge of the case that none of us "regular people" should have access to. Also, if you were some sort of person "in the know", I'm almost certain you're violating some sort of ethics code by openly attempting to discuss evidence in a pending criminal case.
You're doing an ok job of pretending you didn't notice that you were just schooled on several incorrect statements.
I'm fairly certain your assertion that the charges have been reduced from 8 counts to 5, has no credibility due to your previous erroneous statements and display of ignorance and arrogance.
very well said
but fed up will not be able to comprehend unless you put you statement into a language he can understand
i would try the mid west dirtball dialect
Papaw

Clinton, IN

#37 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
I am just wondering if you just noticed number two charge
2. 35-42-1-3(a)(1)/FA: Vol Manslaughter - Kill Another Human Being in Sudden Heat w/ Deadly Weapon (Attempt to Commit) 35-42-1-3(a)(1) Felony A 07/22/2012
3. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
4. 35-42-2-1.5(1)/FB: Aggravated Battery (injury causes serious permanent disfigurement)(Attempt to Commit) 35-42-2-1.5(1) Felony B 07/22/2012
HAS ANYONE OF YOU KNOW IT ALL PAID ATTENTION TO THESE CHARGES, NOW ILL ASK AGAIN, PLEASE TELL ME WHOS DEAD? I CHECKED THIS CHARGE IS NOT A TYPO
Dear Buza mom, learn to read, talk to your attorney and let him/her take care of interpreting the law, recognize your own limitations (stupidity) and stop trying to bulldoze your opinion at everyone. You should have been a mother to him BEFORE this happened.
Don't be surprised if he is sentenced to prison.
Blah blah

Chicago, IL

#38 Jan 23, 2013
fed up wrote:
do some homework. there is a lady here from WASHINGTON for the defense. thats easy to find out, she is in Civil rights know it all
Oh u mean Jennifer Thomas? Check her history, she is a nobody and isn't actually on the defense team anyway. And your little Feds getting involved comment is hilarious. Do u really think they would waste their time especially since no federal charges were filed. Keep living in your delusional world "fed up" or actually I should say mother of buza.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#39 Jan 23, 2013
all u guys funny :p buzas gunna be walkin past ur house before u know it and it upsets u guys :( awww poor wittle babys :(((
Molly

Noblesville, IN

#40 Jan 23, 2013
yogirlsidejob wrote:
all u guys funny :p buzas gunna be walkin past ur house before u know it and it upsets u guys :( awww poor wittle babys :(((
My house is across from the Fed Pen so he defently won't be walking by ill wave as he is driven in.
alphamale

Terre Haute, IN

#41 Jan 23, 2013
yeah walking he will do, but not by my house. he will walk to the shower once released from his cell. upon reaching the shower he will probably limp back from the penetration he will receive. just speculation obviously, as i will not be doing the penetration. seriously though, walk free...... maybe in about 50 years.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Terre Haute Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
stand off 11 min Duke Defender 10
The Dog Days of Winter 20 min Murray 3
99% of the People on here Walfare trash and Bums 22 min Sick of It 4
Fennel’s Trial Begins 1 hr Wow 17
List users and abusers of women 2 hr HesARapist 19
Fennel not guilty 2 hr Hey 6
Mike Pick SUN FACTORY OWNER and VIGO COUNTY SCH... (Nov '16) 2 hr LEO 29
Terre Haute Sports 8 hr curious 25
Boycott Baeslers Market. Mon fieu2hfenk2ibnek2j 45

Terre Haute Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Terre Haute Mortgages