|
mitch
Ottawa, Canada
|
Judged:
1
nice jugs
|
|
pepe
Fishkill, NY
|
What is wrong with people?!
|
|
cjd
Huntington Station, NY
|
THATS HOT mtv has reshaped our youth into wh-res
|
|
Homely
East Meadow, NY
|
Since when does an eleven year old girl have a boyfriend? No wonder this country is messed up.
|
|
Girls will be girls
Saint Louis, MO
|
what about the girls that transmitted the pics. If it was more then them in the photo, thenshoudln'g they be charged.
In this day and age, the way technology, education, non-traditional roles parents play in raising their kids, all laws that involve specifically male/female, husband/wife, rapist/raped relationshiops need to be overhauled.
How many female teachers get slaps on the wrist for having sex with underage students compared to men? Women get probation then marry the kid they banged while the man gets 30 years in prison.
This underage kid is getting into more trouble for the same crime the girls committed.
|
|
manny
West Islip, NY
|
disgusting, I understand some of these girls were not properly groomed
|
|
Christopher Drury
Stony Brook, NY
|
Ah.....
Kids will be kids.....
When I was a 4th grader, the gal next door and I "showed wee-wee's" in the woods..... It happened before, it'll happen again......but now we have the internet that can broaden the "viewership". If the girls were willing participants, so be it...... if not, there should be some sort of punishment.....possibly a swift kick to the yambag would suffice.
|
|
DIGGLA
United States
|
How can he be charged with holding and/or distributing child porn if he is also a child according by law. If I had downloaded nudie pic's of legal aged women or better yet bought a playboy magazine. This is not apples to apples it is appled to melons. Sooooooo confusing
|
|
|
|
no tell
Markham, Canada
|
|
|
Sgt Goose
Austin, TX
|
Let's get this straight. Some 11 to 14 year old girls take racy pictures of themselves and distribute them to their boyfriends (distributing child pornography) and no punishment. A male student who sees the pictures sends them to friends (distributing child pornography) and is promised "no more than five years probation." Is it just me who sees something wrong here? If they aren't going to punish the underage girls for taking the pictures and sending them out, they shouldn't punish the underage boy who did the same thing.
|
|
Barbies lil sister
Lakewood, NJ
|
at 11 years old, these girls should be playing with Barbie dolls...what happened to childhood?
|
|
fern
Sundbyberg, Sweden
|
Some French dude once said "if you let the administration deal with the Sahara desert it wouldn't take long before the desert was out of sand". If I were a policeman I'd rather catch couples naked in a park or in the wood than try to stop a robber with a loaded shotgun, allowing lawmakers and judge decide what legal or illegal in your sex life is heading for trouble.
|
|
Chris Hansen
Brooklyn, NY
|
I see a future Dateline episode here. We go to the news, even it's a the one horse town of Cicero. Giddy-yup!
|
|
Tired
Copiague, NY
|
Newsday omits the most important fact. This young man was 17 years old. He has no business possessing naked pictures of 11 year old girls, let alone passing them on to others.
|
|
Commercialism
Stony Brook, NY
|
Barbies lil sister wrote: at 11 years old, these girls should be playing with Barbie dolls...what happened to childhood? Come on Barbie, it was a Kodak moment, they had to do it......
|
|
FreddyXxlover
Rahway, NJ
|
|
|
Tell me when this thread is updated:
(Registration is not required)
Add to my Tracker
Send me an email
|