The Hot Issue: Do you think the current federal penalty for pos...

Full story: Columbus Dispatch

Do you think the current federal penalty for possessing child porn - three years for a first offense - is too light, or too harsh? Monday, November 9, 2009 3:06 AM

Read All 2 Comments

Comments

Showing posts 1 - 2 of2

hartland22

Cardington, OH

Judged:

there is absolutely NO reason to possess child pornography.

jas

Chillicothe, OH

There is so much more to it than just some pictures. These kids have probably been raped, drugged and abused. They have been exsposed to STD's. Hartland22 hit the nail on the head. A second chance just means more kids getting abused. A slap on the wrist will not deter these disgusting perverts. Will anything?

	Sign up to receive email when someone responds
	(registration is not required)

Showing posts 1 - 2 of2

Type in your comments to post to the forum

Name
(appears on your post)

Comments

Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Sugar Grove Discussions

Topic	Updated	Last By	Comments
Franklin Township wary of casino deal \| The Col...	3 min	What do you ...	12
Hilltop residents debate possible casino \| The ...	4 min	jimmy agler	28
Heroin kingpin gets life sentence \| The Columbu...	4 min	Solomon	31
Polaris as casino site draws opposition \| The C...	5 min	No Trashy Ca...	4
JPMorgan Chase Faces Sexual Discrimination Suit...	6 min	20 year emplyee	1
Penn National willing to consider other casino ...	9 min	jimmy agler	244
Nationwide might cut additional 120 jobs \| The ...	9 min	Thanks	51