Judge overturns California's ban on s...

Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage

There are 201862 comments on the www.cnn.com story from Aug 4, 2010, titled Judge overturns California's ban on same-sex marriage. In it, www.cnn.com reports that:

A federal judge in California has knocked down the state's voter-approved ban on same-sex marriage, ruling Wednesday that the state's controversial Proposition 8 violates the U.S. Constitution.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at www.cnn.com.

Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181991 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Look Jizzy, all that is true. Also true is that prop 8 prohibits poly marriage EQUALLY to prohibiting same sex marriage.
Double illegal! Wow! That will be hard to overturn.
Xavier Breath

Hoboken, NJ

#181992 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Is polygamy already illegal? Why yes it is.
Why would a law then be crafted, to outlaw something that's already illegal?
Because double illegal serves Frankie's logic.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181993 Mar 1, 2013
Proposition 8 was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment passed in the November 2008 state elections. The measure added a new provision, Section 7.5 of the Declaration of Rights, to the California Constitution, which provides that "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."[2][3][4]

By restricting the recognition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, the proposition overturned the California Supreme Court's ruling of In re Marriage Cases that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. The wording of Proposition 8 was precisely the same as that which had been found in Proposition 22, which had passed in 2000 and, as an ordinary statute, had been invalidated by the State Supreme Court in 2008. California's State Constitution put Proposition 8 into immediate effect the day after the election.[5] The proposition did not affect domestic partnerships in California,[6] nor same-sex marriages performed before November 5, 2008.[7][8][9]

After the elections, demonstrations and protests occurred across the state and nation. Same-sex couples and government entities filed numerous lawsuits with the California Supreme Court challenging the proposition's validity and effect on previously administered same-sex marriages. In Strauss v. Horton, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, but allowed existing same-sex marriages to stand (under the grandfather clause principle).

United States District Court Judge Vaughn Walker overturned Proposition 8 on August 4, 2010 in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger, ruling that it violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution.[10] Walker issued an injunction against enforcing Proposition 8 and a stay to determine suspension of his ruling pending appeal.[11][12] The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals continued the stay, keeping Walker's ruling on hold pending appeal.[13]

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181994 Mar 1, 2013
Continued:

On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.[14] The panel also unanimously affirmed Judge Ware's holding that Walker was not obligated to recuse himself from the case because he is gay.[15] Still, the panel continued a stay on the ruling, barring any marriages from taking place pending further appeals.[16] On June 5, 2012, a majority of the full Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc and stayed the ruling pending appeal.[17] The proposition's proponents filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting that the Court review the case, on July 30, 2012. On December 7, 2012, the Supreme Court granted the proponents' petition for certiorari.[18][19] The Court is expected to issue its ruling in Hollingsworth v. Perry by late June 2013.[20]

Where does Polygamy come into play?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181995 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Is polygamy already illegal? Why yes it is.
Why would a law then be crafted, to outlaw something that's already illegal?
If the other few laws against poly were repealed, the only law against poly in CA would be prop 8. It's as discriminatory against poly marriage as it is against same sex marriage.

It going away is a victory to poly EQUALLY to being a victory for same sex marriage.

There is no limit on equal rights, there are enough to go around for EVERYBODY. Allowing poly marriage will in no way effect your marriage. The numbers are so few, you'll probably never have to be offended by the sight of a happy poly family.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#181996 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
Continued:
On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.[14] The panel also unanimously affirmed Judge Ware's holding that Walker was not obligated to recuse himself from the case because he is gay.[15] Still, the panel continued a stay on the ruling, barring any marriages from taking place pending further appeals.[16] On June 5, 2012, a majority of the full Ninth Circuit denied a petition for rehearing en banc and stayed the ruling pending appeal.[17] The proposition's proponents filed a petition for certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting that the Court review the case, on July 30, 2012. On December 7, 2012, the Supreme Court granted the proponents' petition for certiorari.[18][19] The Court is expected to issue its ruling in Hollingsworth v. Perry by late June 2013.[20]
Where does Polygamy come into play?
Eliminating a law that says a man and a woman is the only recognized marriage in CA. That's where.
DonnAcare

Covina, CA

#181997 Mar 1, 2013
Who gives a hoot about an issue that was already a done deal.
Big D

Modesto, CA

#181998 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
I am incorrect in saying that "a man and a woman" prohibits poly marriage as well as same sex marriage? How so?
You are incorrect in thinking that Poly was legal before prop 8 and became illegal when prop 8 passed and will become legal again when Prop 8 is struck down.

It was illegal the entire time. Prop 8 made no change whatsoever to existing polygamy laws

Now if you are trying to say saying that Prop 8 would make it more difficult to make Polygamy legal yes, but had no direct impact on it as it was already illegal, and will still be illegal when prop 8 is overturned

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#181999 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If the other few laws against poly were repealed, the only law against poly in CA would be prop 8. It's as discriminatory against poly marriage as it is against same sex marriage.
It going away is a victory to poly EQUALLY to being a victory for same sex marriage.
There is no limit on equal rights, there are enough to go around for EVERYBODY. Allowing poly marriage will in no way effect your marriage. The numbers are so few, you'll probably never have to be offended by the sight of a happy poly family.
If If If If, now throw in a few buts. The topic at hand ( overturning Prop 8) has nothing to do with polygamy
Big D

Modesto, CA

#182000 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
If the other few laws against poly were repealed, the only law against poly in CA would be prop 8. It's as discriminatory against poly marriage as it is against same sex marriage.
It going away is a victory to poly EQUALLY to being a victory for same sex marriage.
There is no limit on equal rights, there are enough to go around for EVERYBODY. Allowing poly marriage will in no way effect your marriage. The numbers are so few, you'll probably never have to be offended by the sight of a happy poly family.
That is a pretty big IF, and currently there is no serious movement on overturning that law.

It was illegal before, is still illegal, and will still be illegal when prop 8 is overturned.

If wishes were fishes we would call cast nets

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#182001 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Eliminating a law that says a man and a woman is the only recognized marriage in CA. That's where.
On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.

That ruling said nothing of or about polygamy, now did it?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182002 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
That ruling said nothing of or about polygamy, now did it?
Prop 8 is also a ban on poly marriage. Why does that disturb you so? Are you against marriage equality?

You cannot spin away the fact that it is a ban on same sex and poly marriage EQUALLY. No matter how hard you try.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182003 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Is polygamy already illegal? Why yes it is.
Why would a law then be crafted, to outlaw something that's already illegal?
Are you trying to convince me prop 8 doesn't ban polygamy too? Why?
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182004 Mar 1, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
If....
Yeah... that has a chance of happening....
That's what they said about SSM, as little as a few short years ago.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182005 Mar 1, 2013
Xavier Breath wrote:
<quoted text>
Double illegal! Wow! That will be hard to overturn.
One man one woman. Bans more than one of each. Sorry for you, I know your bigoted ignorant opinions of polygamy well.

“Reality bites”

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#182006 Mar 1, 2013
Frankie Rizzo wrote:
<quoted text>
Prop 8 is also a ban on poly marriage. Why does that disturb you so? Are you against marriage equality?
You cannot spin away the fact that it is a ban on same sex and poly marriage EQUALLY. No matter how hard you try.
On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182007 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
Proposition 8 was a California ballot proposition and a state constitutional amendment passed in the November 2008 state elections. The measure added a new provision, Section 7.5 of the Declaration of Rights, to the California Constitution, which provides that "only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California."[2][3][4]
By restricting the recognition of marriage to opposite-sex couples, the proposition overturned the California Supreme Court's ruling of In re Marriage Cases that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. The wording of Proposition 8 was precisely the same as that which had been found in Proposition 22, which had passed in 2000 and, as an ordinary statute, had been invalidated by the State Supreme Court in 2008. California's State Constitution put Proposition 8 into immediate effect the day after the election.[5] The proposition did not affect domestic partnerships in California,[6] nor same-sex marriages performed before November 5, 2008.[7][8][9]
After the elections, demonstrations and protests occurred across the state and nation. Same-sex couples and government entities filed numerous lawsuits with the California Supreme Court challenging the proposition's validity and effect on previously administered same-sex marriages. In Strauss v. Horton, the California Supreme Court upheld Proposition 8, but allowed existing same-sex marriages to stand (under the grandfather clause principle).
United States District Court Judge Vaughn Walker overturned Proposition 8 on August 4, 2010 in the case Perry v. Schwarzenegger, ruling that it violated both the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the United States Constitution.[10] Walker issued an injunction against enforcing Proposition 8 and a stay to determine suspension of his ruling pending appeal.[11][12] The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals continued the stay, keeping Walker's ruling on hold pending appeal.[13]
Does prop 8 ban polygamy? Yes in that pesky "A" in a man and a woman. Sure there are other laws against it, but it's one less when prop 8 goes away. How can you argue otherwise? And why try?
Big D

Modesto, CA

#182008 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
That ruling said nothing of or about polygamy, now did it?
You are depressing his sister, and perhaps his goat.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182009 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>On February 7, 2012, in a 21 decision, a Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals panel affirmed Walker's decision declaring the Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage to be unconstitutional.
Prop 8 is also a ban on poly marriage.
Frankie Rizzo

Union City, CA

#182010 Mar 1, 2013
Jazybird58 wrote:
<quoted text>Is polygamy already illegal? Why yes it is.
Why would a law then be crafted, to outlaw something that's already illegal?
Because the law was made to only allow marriage between a man and a woman.

Sure it was directed at same sex marriage mainly but it was worded to ban polygamy also. Kill two birds with one stone so to speak.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Studio-City Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Police Investigate Murder-Suicide Incident In C... Thu Vee 3
Democracy Symphony - My Newest Work (Still in P... Aug 25 Patricia_McGurk 1
News Woman found dead in Pacoima may be victim of fa... (Aug '12) Aug 25 FrancisEdgarsSister 27
News Hundreds Of Cameras Unified To Keep Watchful Ey... Aug 24 unknown Chicano 1
News Police to Hold Two DUI Checkpoints in the Valle... Aug 23 cisnerospainting 1
News Costco store announced for Woodland Hills (Aug '10) Aug 23 cisnerospainting 28
Review: Paris House Modeling Studio (Jun '10) Aug 21 ParisModel 3
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Studio-City Mortgages