East Stroudsburg man accused of drugging, raping teen

Dec 6, 2012 Full story: Pocono Record 25

Police took into custody Thursday an East Stroudsburg man they were seeking in connection with a sexual assault on a minor.

Full Story
First Prev
of 2
Next Last
ImTiredOf_It

Wellsboro, PA

#1 Dec 8, 2012
I live being drugged and taken advantage of. Don't judge me.
ambler

Douglassville, PA

#3 Dec 8, 2012
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>
Slush?
HA!
Bullseye!
lotta

Dallas, PA

#4 Dec 9, 2012
"Police took into custody Thursday an East Stroudsburg man they were seeking in connection with a sexual assault on a minor."

Read the article you trolls. The minors were 13 and 14 year old girls. Shame on anyone on this forum that would use this as the basis for a personal attack on another poster. What you find funny I find absolutely disgusting. Grow up fellas and pray to God that you never have a child who is taken advantage of by a sick predator.
loose stool

Milford, PA

#5 Dec 9, 2012
lotta wrote:
"Police took into custody Thursday an East Stroudsburg man they were seeking in connection with a sexual assault on a minor."
Read the article you trolls. The minors were 13 and 14 year old girls. Shame on anyone on this forum that would use this as the basis for a personal attack on another poster. What you find funny I find absolutely disgusting. Grow up fellas and pray to God that you never have a child who is taken advantage of by a sick predator.
It is, for better or worse, human nature to dismiss the suffering of others at a distance. See this regarding "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus", even he title suggests indifference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape_with_t...
You, to me, exhibit a psychopathic personality, unable to discern an appropriately human response you bleat moralizing rhetoric. No accolades for you.
To imply a causative connection with "making fun" vs praying to God is, how you say, simpleminded? No?
lotta

Dallas, PA

#6 Dec 9, 2012
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>
It is, for better or worse, human nature to dismiss the suffering of others at a distance. See this regarding "Landscape with the Fall of Icarus", even he title suggests indifference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Landscape_with_t...
You, to me, exhibit a psychopathic personality, unable to discern an appropriately human response you bleat moralizing rhetoric. No accolades for you.
To imply a causative connection with "making fun" vs praying to God is, how you say, simpleminded? No?
To which "Landscape" are you referring? The one by Bols or the one attributed to Bruegel? I certainly see no indifference in the Bols version, nor in the Bruegel. In the Bruegel I only see unawareness.

Since you are arguing that jocularity is an appropriate human response to the rape of a child I have to wonder about your own mental well being.

I will also point out that your "causative connection" between my making fun and praying is false logic. Do not confuse association with causation. Although some would argue that the belief in the existence of God and the power of prayer are themselves illogical, that was the association I was making. No need to read any implications into it. The cause and effect of my closing statement was quite straightforward. If that is simpleminded, so be it.
ES Purity Guardians

East Stroudsburg, PA

#7 Dec 9, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
To which "Landscape" are you referring? The one by Bols or the one attributed to Bruegel? I certainly see no indifference in the Bols version, nor in the Bruegel. In the Bruegel I only see unawareness.
Since you are arguing that jocularity is an appropriate human response to the rape of a child I have to wonder about your own mental well being.
I will also point out that your "causative connection" between my making fun and praying is false logic. Do not confuse association with causation. Although some would argue that the belief in the existence of God and the power of prayer are themselves illogical, that was the association I was making. No need to read any implications into it. The cause and effect of my closing statement was quite straightforward. If that is simpleminded, so be it.
Dear lotta,
Your post evidences empathy for others and a complex logic that points to a keen mind. Please be advised that such attributes will not be tolerated on these threads. You would better serve the East Stroudsburg Topix community by initiating posts based on scurrilous right-wing internet fodder and Fox News stories. We will be watching you!
loose stool

Milford, PA

#8 Dec 9, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>

Since you are arguing that jocularity is an appropriate human response to the rape of a child I have to wonder about your own mental well being.
Please explain where my hilariously funny "Slush?" is at the expense of the victims in the rape case. It's obvious to any moron that's it's a response to the first post. I would add that slush is quite capable of giving as much as it takes. To imply someone's reputation is sullied on an anonymous message board is absurd. Maybe you need to grow some thicker skin or a at least a brain.
loose stool

Milford, PA

#9 Dec 9, 2012
ES Purity Guardians wrote:
<quoted text>
Dear lotta,
Your post evidences empathy for others and a complex logic that points to a keen mind. Please be advised that such attributes will not be tolerated on these threads. You would better serve the East Stroudsburg Topix community by initiating posts based on scurrilous right-wing internet fodder and Fox News stories. We will be watching you!
Reductionism of all discussions to Democrat/Republican, left wing/right wing is SO last month. I for one am not taking the bait, live trap or not.
lotta

Dallas, PA

#10 Dec 9, 2012
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain where my hilariously funny "Slush?" is at the expense of the victims in the rape case.
Please explain where you were so hilariously funny.
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text> It's obvious to any moron that's it's a response to the first post.
No shyt, Sherlock??? Really??? Boy, that first post was a real zinger, wasn't it? Two young girls were drugged and raped and the OP thinks they lived for it???? From your combined responses can we conclude that woman who are raped also live for it????

Whatever the reason for your response, it comes across as just as insensitive as the OP's did.
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>I would add that slush is quite capable of giving as much as it takes. To imply someone's reputation is sullied on an anonymous message board is absurd.
You assumed too much. Slush's reputation is not my concern or my point, anonymously or otherwise. I am well aware she can defend herself if she so chooses assuming she thinks that's even worth her trouble.

To clarify for you as simply as I can; my point was that the rape of a child is an act of depravity of such enormous magnitude that God forbid we ever become so morally bankrupt that such a crime would be used to poke fun at any other human being. Or is moral bankruptcy what you refer to as thick skin? if so, I'll keep the skin I have, thank you:)

Now does that 'splain it to ya, Lucy?:)

@ESPG- a sincere thanks for the kind words but simple minded is probably a better description of me:). That said, I have to agree with Diarrhea Boy. Some of your post also smelled a lot like loose stool to me. IMHO, that kind of stuff is about as productive in conversation as his use of ad hominem logic.
loose stool

Milford, PA

#11 Dec 9, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain where you were so hilariously funny.
You know perfectly well "where".
lotta wrote:
" What you find funny I find absolutely disgusting.
See, you know where and you admit it is funny. I can't please everybody all the time.
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
From your combined responses can we conclude that woman who are raped also live for it????
Talk about assuming too much. Your hyperbole is only surpassed by your hypothetical moral indignation.
The truth is, it hardly matters what the news story was. It's the drug addled first post that makes my post funny. Get off your high horse and have another drink.
lotta

Dallas, PA

#12 Dec 9, 2012
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>
You know perfectly well "where".
<quoted text>
See, you know where and you admit it is funny. I can't please everybody all the time.
<quoted text>
Talk about assuming too much. Your hyperbole is only surpassed by your hypothetical moral indignation.
The truth is, it hardly matters what the news story was. It's the drug addled first post that makes my post funny. Get off your high horse and have another drink.
So Diarrhea Boy, according to your position the rape of children hardly matters?. Alrighty then, NOW I understand you.

Thanks for the advice. Let me return the favor. Get your head off the toilet and grab some more kaopectate before you embarrass yourself any further.

and oh yeah... Merry Christmas:) And I say that with all the good will of the season!
loose stool

Brooklyn, NY

#13 Dec 9, 2012
You have a vivid imagination, no doubt with the accompanying voices and perseverations. So be it! Someday you and me are gonna have a serious disagreement.
lotta

Dallas, PA

#14 Dec 10, 2012
loose stool wrote:
Someday you and me are gonna have a serious disagreement.
LOL That was actually funny! The Kaopectate must be working:)

Again, I wish you a most joyous Christmas!

“Not an Obumble Voter!”

Since: Dec 08

Bar Harbor, ME

#15 Dec 10, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
So Diarrhea Boy, according to your position the rape of children hardly matters?....
This is known as selective dissection to illustrate a weak point.

I got the original line as a joke aimed not at violated tots, but at a poster who has a somewhat high opinion of his own intelligence. To extrapolate your conclusion based on the original premise is a tad weak.

However, entirely passable based on the typical rhetorical bile we witness from the left on these forums.(The dispensation of which has been kind of light these last few days.)

Merry Christmas!
lotta

Dallas, PA

#16 Dec 10, 2012
Jeff Woehrle wrote:
<quoted text>
This is known as selective dissection to illustrate a weak point.
I got the original line as a joke aimed not at violated tots, but at a poster who has a somewhat high opinion of his own intelligence. To extrapolate your conclusion based on the original premise is a tad weak.
However, entirely passable based on the typical rhetorical bile we witness from the left on these forums.(The dispensation of which has been kind of light these last few days.)
Merry Christmas!
Merry Christmas to you, too Jeff.

With all due respect, reread the "original" line, the one to which DB responded. As I read it, it had nothing to do with slush but was a reference to minor victims of sexual predation. At best, DB's "joke" was a weak one based on a pretty horrendous crime. If you don't see it that way, so be it but I couldn't let that go in good conscience. IMHO, there is plenty of fodder for personal attacks in this world without the need to use violence involving innocent children to bolster one's own ego.

And just as an aside, as DB said earlier and which we both agree, "Reductionism of all discussions to Democrat/Republican, left wing/right wing is SO last month."

“Not an Obumble Voter!”

Since: Dec 08

Bar Harbor, ME

#17 Dec 10, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
Merry Christmas to you, too Jeff.
With all due respect, reread the "original" line, the one to which DB responded. As I read it, it had nothing to do with slush but was a reference to minor victims of sexual predation. At best, DB's "joke" was a weak one based on a pretty horrendous crime. If you don't see it that way, so be it but I couldn't let that go in good conscience. IMHO, there is plenty of fodder for personal attacks in this world without the need to use violence involving innocent children to bolster one's own ego.
And just as an aside, as DB said earlier and which we both agree, "Reductionism of all discussions to Democrat/Republican, left wing/right wing is SO last month."
HA! Ain't it the truth!

I'm just saying that I didn't take the response (#2) to be anything other than a dig at Slush...who is a magnet for degrading comments...as well as a fountain of them, for that matter :-)

Just got back from a little jaunt to KMart, Walmart and Lowes. Dodging the truck traffic from the 80 detour. Mount Pocono is hopping today!
loose stool

Brooklyn, NY

#18 Dec 10, 2012
lotta wrote:
<quoted text>
With all due respect, reread the "original" line, the one to which DB responded. As I read it, it had nothing to do with slush but was a reference to minor victims of sexual predation. At best, DB's "joke" was a weak one based on a pretty horrendous crime.
This is turning into a booger roll BUT I will say this. If anything I took the first post and turned it away from the news story into something that recent and chronic posters would recognize as funny (if not then, my bad). It became independent of the news story, standing on it's own as a parody of slush's MO.
Like Jeff says,
"your conclusion based on the original premise is a tad weak".
Other then being in a thread titled "East Stroudsburg man etc." my "joke" has nothing to do with indifference to rape.
Merry Christmas? Yes? Well, then Yes it is!
I have run out of oxygen, returning to character NOW!
PS Slush, even when not posting you're annoying. I hope you're happy!

Since: Aug 07

Location hidden

#19 Dec 10, 2012
They are lurking and judging......

Since: Dec 09

Location hidden

#20 Dec 10, 2012
AunieEm2 wrote:
They are lurking and judging......
Surely you must be mistaken, they are much too busy for that...
lotta

Dallas, PA

#21 Dec 10, 2012
loose stool wrote:
<quoted text>
This is turning into a booger roll BUT I will say this. If anything I took the first post and turned it away from the news story into something that recent and chronic posters would recognize as funny (if not then, my bad). It became independent of the news story, standing on it's own as a parody of slush's MO
LOL DB, you may not be so bad after all:) Perhaps we both overreacted. Thanks for taking the time to reasonably explain yourself and losing the ad hominem assault line. But that said, don't take that as indifference on my part to the crime committed though I'll admit I probably could have been more tactful in my original post and less confrontational.

As for slush related matters I'll continue to let her remain responsible for herself and recuse myself from any and all snarky polls. But from what I usually see here we all have the capacity to be a little snarky at times, myself included.

Now carry on and get back to your boogers!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 2
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Stroudsburg Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Pennsylvanians pay nation's highest gas tax to ... 7 hr Blackman in Hazly 3
Look at crimes involving Hispanics reveals comp... (Jun '06) Tue JJJ 5,283
Review: Ali's Hair Magic (Feb '13) Jan 23 Elinyc 8
Hugo Selenski Trial Jan 23 Toothy 2
portland pa petshop puppy mills (Dec '08) Jan 21 kneeglit mills R ... 42
Police: Allentown construction worker crawled t... Jan 11 silly rabbit 5
Top business stories in Luzerne County for 2014 Jan 2 Roberto 1
Stroudsburg Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Stroudsburg People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 5:14 pm PST

NBC Sports 5:14PM
Boston College's Ryan Day joins Philadelphia Eagles staff
NBC Sports 5:15 PM
Eagles hire Chip Kelly protege as quarterbacks coach
Bleacher Report 6:12 PM
5 Mistakes Steelers Can't Repeat in Offseason
Bleacher Report 9:03 PM
Should Eagles Target Upgrades at WR?
Bleacher Report 9:30 PM
5 Changes Eagles Must Make This Offseason