Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-S...

Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions

There are 52052 comments on the CBS2 story from Nov 30, 2010, titled Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil Unions. In it, CBS2 reports that:

The Illinois House has approved a measure to legalize civil unions for same-sex couples.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at CBS2.

“visit HudsonDildoEmpor ium.com”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#35790 Nov 1, 2012
closet queen wrote:
<quoted text>
I would suggest that you look up the word "homosexual" for your edification. Then see what's between you legs.
I would suggest YOU look up the words LOVE, relationship, commitment. And if you think that looking at my crotch will help me define "homosexual" you're an even a bigger assclown that I first though.

“visit HudsonDildoEmpor ium.com”

Since: Sep 12

Location hidden

#35792 Nov 1, 2012
KiMare wrote:
You can only respond to the simple, one sentence posts...


I don't want to confuse you with reality that is real. Do you keep the heads of your victims in a freezer in the garage?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#35793 Nov 1, 2012
KiMare wrote:
You can only respond to the simple, one sentence posts...
Laquesha Jefferson PhD wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't want to confuse you with reality that is real. Do you keep the heads of your victims in a freezer in the garage?
Thank you for validating my point.

You can post a redhead, but we all know you are a true blue blonde.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35794 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Nice but there are more hetero marriages that don't and/or can't produce offspring than there are homosexual couples wanting to marry. Perhaps a fertility mandate should be written into law with a promissory addendum to produce offspring to validate marriage.
All heteros at least have the POSSIBILITY to produce offspring because of their sex organs. There are NO HOMOSEXUALS that can produce offspring together because it's not natural for their sex organs. That's is why a marriage has been between a man and woman for thousands of years. Homosexuals perverting marriage will not change that biological fact.

Homosexual brothers can't have biological children so should these two brothers be allowed to marry if they want to?

"Twincest" is pushing limits in an industry known for extremes. What is it, and why are so many people watching?

By Thomas Rogers

Elijah and Milo Peters

My brother is my boyfriend, and I am his boyfriend, says one of the twins during a phone call from Prague (Elijah and Milo sound so much alike on the phone it is impossible to tell which one is speaking).He is my lifeblood, and he is my only love.

While the concept of twin performers is not new to the gay porn world, the Peters twins are notable both because of the extent of their popularity and the things they are willing to do with each other on camera. They French kiss; they perform oral sex on each other; they have anal sex; and most shockingly of all, they do it in a tender and romantic way.

http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/twincest/

The proponents of homosexual marriage in their TV ads say the freedom to marry should not be limited and government should not interfere and judge morality. They say everyone should have the freedom to marry if they love each other. So if that is true they should allow brothers and others to marry. Why would they want to restrict redefining marriage to just certain homosexuals? What would be the reason as to why brothers can't marry. They can't have biological children together. They could always adopt or have a woman carry their sperm!

If they don't allow brothers to marry then they are bigots like they accuse others of being. And if you're going to allow brothers to marry why not sisters, brother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son? Why should there be any restrictions at all to marry if the pro-homosexual crowd says "don't limit the freedom to marry?" Or is the push to redefine marriage to be limited to just certain homosexuals and not others?
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35795 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
So two guys that are a loving couple that don't have anal sex aren't "homo"?
Do you even know what a homosexual is? Let me help you.

What is a Homosexual?

1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.

2: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hom...

So two guys that are a loving couple that don't have anal sex could be brothers or best friends and are not "homosexual." But if they have a sexual desire for each other then they are "homosexual."

Does that help?
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35796 Nov 1, 2012
Laquesha Jefferson PhD wrote:
<quoted text>
I would suggest YOU look up the words LOVE, relationship, commitment. And if you think that looking at my crotch will help me define "homosexual" you're an even a bigger assclown that I first though.
Do you even know what a homosexual is? Let me help you.

What is a Homosexual?

1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.

2: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hom...

Homosexuality is not about LOVE, relationship, commitment. See above.

LOVE, relationship, commitment, can be about any human relationship that doesn't involve sexual desire. Once you throw in sexual desire you are either hetero, homosexual, bisexual, etc...

So yes, it is about what is between your "crotch" assclown.
a clown

Saint Louis, MO

#35797 Nov 1, 2012
Your are a gay bashing bigot.
That ought to shut ya up.
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you even know what a homosexual is? Let me help you.
What is a Homosexual?
1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.
2: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hom...
Homosexuality is not about LOVE, relationship, commitment. See above.
LOVE, relationship, commitment, can be about any human relationship that doesn't involve sexual desire. Once you throw in sexual desire you are either hetero, homosexual, bisexual, etc...
So yes, it is about what is between your "crotch" assclown.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#35798 Nov 1, 2012
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>All heteros at least have the POSSIBILITY to produce offspring because of their sex organs. There are NO HOMOSEXUALS that can produce offspring together because it's not natural for their sex organs. That's is why a marriage has been between a man and woman for thousands of years. Homosexuals perverting marriage will not change that biological fact.

Homosexual brothers can't have biological children so should these two brothers be allowed to marry if they want to?

"Twincest" is pushing limits in an industry known for extremes. What is it, and why are so many people watching?

By Thomas Rogers

Elijah and Milo Peters

“My brother is my boyfriend, and I am his boyfriend,” says one of the twins during a phone call from Prague (Elijah and Milo sound so much alike on the phone it is impossible to tell which one is speaking).“He is my lifeblood, and he is my only love.”

While the concept of twin performers is not new to the gay porn world, the Peters twins are notable both because of the extent of their popularity and the things they are willing to do with each other on camera. They French kiss; they perform oral sex on each other; they have anal sex; and most shockingly of all, they do it in a tender and romantic way.

http://www.salon.com/2010/05/21/twincest/

The proponents of homosexual marriage in their TV ads say the freedom to marry should not be limited and government should not interfere and judge morality. They say everyone should have the freedom to marry if they love each other. So if that is true they should allow brothers and others to marry. Why would they want to restrict redefining marriage to just certain homosexuals? What would be the reason as to why brothers can't marry. They can't have biological children together. They could always adopt or have a woman carry their sperm!

If they don't allow brothers to marry then they are bigots like they accuse others of being. And if you're going to allow brothers to marry why not sisters, brother and sister, father and daughter, mother and son? Why should there be any restrictions at all to marry if the pro-homosexual crowd says "don't limit the freedom to marry?" Or is the push to redefine marriage to be limited to just certain homosexuals and not others?
So you agree that no fertility or promise to reproduce mandate should be needed to validate a marriage license.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#35799 Nov 1, 2012
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>Do you even know what a homosexual is? Let me help you.

What is a Homosexual?

1: of, relating to, or characterized by a tendency to direct sexual desire toward another of the same sex.

2: of, relating to, or involving sexual intercourse between persons of the same sex.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hom...

So two guys that are a loving couple that don't have anal sex could be brothers or best friends and are not "homosexual." But if they have a sexual desire for each other then they are "homosexual."

Does that help?
Thanks for clearing that up. I agree brothers or best friends in loving relationships who make out and flirt with each other without ever doing the act are still homosexuals.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35800 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
So you agree that no fertility or promise to reproduce mandate should be needed to validate a marriage license.
No because marriage is between a man and woman. Would homosexuals need to sign that mandate? If not, why not?
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35801 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for clearing that up. I agree brothers or best friends in loving relationships who make out and flirt with each other without ever doing the act are still homosexuals.
I'm glad you finally figured out that homosexuality involves sexual desire toward the same sex.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35802 Nov 1, 2012
a clown wrote:
Your are a gay bashing bigot.
That ought to shut ya up.
<quoted text>
Another mental midget whose gay argument is name-calling.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35803 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for clearing that up. I agree brothers or best friends in loving relationships who make out and flirt with each other without ever doing the act are still homosexuals.
Here's some more education for you.

What is Sexual Perversion?

: activity (as sodomy, fellatio, bestiality) leading to complete sexual gratification that is preferred by an adult to heterosexual coitus.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sex...

The question is... should society and the government promote the above definition by legalizing gay marriage? Just because a certain minority of heterosexuals,(also perverts), may fit the above definitions doesn't mean society and/or the government should promote more of it with their blessing through legalizing SSM.
a clown

Saint Louis, MO

#35804 Nov 1, 2012
Yes, You SHOULD be ashamed of yourself.
We forgive your complete lack of education.
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
Another mental midget whose gay argument is name-calling.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35805 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for clearing that up. I agree brothers or best friends in loving relationships who make out and flirt with each other without ever doing the act are still homosexuals.
Now do you believe that blood brothers should have the same right to marry as homosexuals do? Is one a bigot if they don't want blood brothers to marry?

See the Elijah and Milo Peters brothers in my previous post.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35806 Nov 1, 2012
a clown wrote:
Yes, You SHOULD be ashamed of yourself.
We forgive your complete lack of education.
<quoted text>
You are truly a mental midget.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35807 Nov 1, 2012
NikkiShae wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks for clearing that up. I agree brothers or best friends in loving relationships who make out and flirt with each other without ever doing the act are still homosexuals.
The Peters Twins

&fe ature=plcp

http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePetersTwins

If they wanted to marry each other would that be OK with you and the rest of the homosexual community? If you say NO you are probably a bigot.
a clown

Saint Louis, MO

#35808 Nov 1, 2012
Come On Bashy.
You can do better than that!!!
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
You are truly a mental midget.
a clown

Saint Louis, MO

#35809 Nov 1, 2012
You will now be referred to as:
Weak Gay Basher
weak gay arguments wrote:
<quoted text>
The Peters Twins
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =6ZMmsqyc2xgXX&feature=plc p
http://www.youtube.com/user/ThePetersTwins
If they wanted to marry each other would that be OK with you and the rest of the homosexual community? If you say NO you are probably a bigot.
weak gay arguments

Saint Paul, MN

#35810 Nov 1, 2012
a clown wrote:
Come On Bashy.
You can do better than that!!!
<quoted text>
You are such a mental midget and bigot you don't even know it. Would you allow blood brothers like the Peters brothers to marry?

I believe that the homosexuals for gay marriage and their apologists are hypocrits of the tallest order. They are also selfish.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Streamwood Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Who do you support for U.S. House in Illinois (... (Oct '10) 11 hr watched him 178
Review: Sarah Kelly Anderson Feb 12 SARAH KELLY ANDERSON 2
SPRINGHILL Il, WALMART closing JUNE 1st 2018 Feb 8 customer 22 1
News Red-light cameras: Carol Stream police officer ... (Jul '09) Feb 8 NOYFB 180
News Possible cougar spotted in suburban forest pres... Feb 4 Capt Dingdong 1
Triple H Home Improvement Are Very Crooked Jan 31 Stiffed 3
South Elgin is Kane County's Most Corrupt Polic... (Mar '12) Jan 26 TJZ 54

Streamwood Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Streamwood Mortgages