Crimmins allowed Sheiber corruption to cont.?

[onlycommonsense]

When Crimmins became judge after Robert Sheiber, why didn't Crimmins stop all the crime committed by Stoughton cops?

Why didn't Crimmins go after Stapleton and Mary Dacey-White for all their willful injustice?

How could all these people be so blind unless they wanted to be?

Where are the responsible adults?

[Judge NOT DA]

onlycommonsense wrote:

When Crimmins became judge after Robert Sheiber, why didn't Crimmins stop all the crime committed by Stoughton cops?
Why didn't Crimmins go after Stapleton and Mary Dacey-White for all their willful injustice?
How could all these people be so blind unless they wanted to be?
Where are the responsible adults?

He was a judge not the District Attorney you dummy.

So, please tell us the crime you believe you were wrongly convicted of,

[Tin Foil Hat]

Another criminal crying on the boards. It's a conspiracy! I hope that the judges hire someone to pursue slander charges.

[Shell Answer Man]

What are Defamation, Libel and Slander?
Generally speaking, defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.

Typically, the elements of a cause of action for defamation include:

A false and defamatory statement concerning another;
The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement);
If the defamatory matter is of public concern, fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
Damage to the plaintiff.
In the context of defamation law, a statement is "published" when it is made to the third party. That term does not mean that the statement has to be in print.

Damages are typically to the reputation of the plaintiff, but depending upon the laws of the jurisdiction it may be enough to establish mental anguish.

Most jurisdictions also recognize "per se" defamation, where the allegations are presumed to cause damage to the plaintiff. Typically, the following may consititute defamation per se:

Attacks on a person's professional character or standing;
Allegations that an unmarried person is unchaste;
Allegations that a person is infected with a sexually transmitted disease;
Allegations that the person has committed a crime of moral turpitude;
While actions for defamation have their roots in common law, most jurisdictions have now enacted statutes which modify the common law. They may change the elements of the cause of action, limit when an action may be filed, or modify the defenses to an action for defamation. Some may even require that the defendant be given an opportunity to apologize before the plaintiff can seek non-economic damages.

[I will not soe]

Shell Answer Man wrote:

What are Defamation, Libel and Slander?
Generally speaking, defamation is the issuance of a false statement about another person, which causes that person to suffer harm. Slander involves the making of defamatory statements by a transitory (non-fixed) representation, usually an oral (spoken) representation. Libel involves the making of defamatory statements in a printed or fixed medium, such as a magazine or newspaper.
Typically, the elements of a cause of action for defamation include:
A false and defamatory statement concerning another;
The unprivileged publication of the statement to a third party (that is, somebody other than the person defamed by the statement);
If the defamatory matter is of public concern, fault amounting at least to negligence on the part of the publisher; and
Damage to the plaintiff.
In the context of defamation law, a statement is "published" when it is made to the third party. That term does not mean that the statement has to be in print.
Damages are typically to the reputation of the plaintiff, but depending upon the laws of the jurisdiction it may be enough to establish mental anguish.
Most jurisdictions also recognize "per se" defamation, where the allegations are presumed to cause damage to the plaintiff. Typically, the following may consititute defamation per se:
Attacks on a person's professional character or standing;
Allegations that an unmarried person is unchaste;
Allegations that a person is infected with a sexually transmitted disease;
Allegations that the person has committed a crime of moral turpitude;
While actions for defamation have their roots in common law, most jurisdictions have now enacted statutes which modify the common law. They may change the elements of the cause of action, limit when an action may be filed, or modify the defenses to an action for defamation. Some may even require that the defendant be given an opportunity to apologize before the plaintiff can seek non-economic damages.

Don't worry Shell Answer Man...I won't sue you for slander!

Heck, someone posted here that I was a Eunich! Now that is slanderous! But this is all in good fun!

Now, all those who slandered innocent police officers stating they were criminals and would fall next in the now closed FBI probe...they should concern themselves with being sued for slander!

Peace!

[onlycommonsense]

Judge NOT DA wrote:

<quoted text>
He was a judge not the District Attorney you dummy.
So, please tell us the crime you believe you were wrongly convicted of,

Who is the DUMMY?

Read CANON 3:09 of the court rules you moron.

Anytime a judge is aware of wrongdoing, they SHALL take action to correct the crimnalities.

Even the DA is obligated to take action to protect the People from wrongdoing.

Do you think the Stoughton cops just went bad over the past few weeks or do you have a single functioning braincell to understand that this has been going on for years and years under the nose of the judges?

Why do you think the FBI is investigating, becasue they have nothing else to do?

What a moron and Poltroon..........

[Judge is not a DA]

onlycommonsense wrote:

<quoted text>
Who is the DUMMY?
Read CANON 3:09 of the court rules you moron.
Anytime a judge is aware of wrongdoing, they SHALL take action to correct the crimnalities.
Even the DA is obligated to take action to protect the People from wrongdoing.
Do you think the Stoughton cops just went bad over the past few weeks or do you have a single functioning braincell to understand that this has been going on for years and years under the nose of the judges?
Why do you think the FBI is investigating, becasue they have nothing else to do?
What a moron and Poltroon..........

I am not a dummy or a moron..$at least concerning this particicular post!

I said in my post that the judge is not a DA you doofus. You just said the "Canon." I am smart enough to know without any Canon to refer to that you should go to the DA with your allegations. Then you point out the Canon says the DA has an obligation to look into the matter. So what is your beef with what I said.

[onlycommonsense]

Judge is not a DA wrote:

<quoted text>
I am not a dummy or a moron..$at least concerning this particicular post!
I said in my post that the judge is not a DA you doofus. You just said the "Canon." I am smart enough to know without any Canon to refer to that you should go to the DA with your allegations. Then you point out the Canon says the DA has an obligation to look into the matter. So what is your beef with what I said.

Read CANON 3:09, the judge is to go to the SJC and request the investigation of the actions of a judge that may be criminal.
The DA has NO AUTHORITY to investigate a judge - separation of powers nitwit.

DA does NOT have to investigate any complaint they don't want to.

Look at all the compalints against the Democrat State Sen Marzilli made by women, the Democrat DA took no action nor did any of the Clerk Magistrates who took complaints.

You know not of what you speak.

[The Dingbat wrote]

onlycommonsense wrote:

<quoted text>
Who is the DUMMY?
Read CANON 3:09 of the court rules you moron.
Anytime a judge is aware of wrongdoing, they SHALL take action to correct the crimnalities.
Even the DA is obligated to take action to protect the People from wrongdoing.
Do you think the Stoughton cops just went bad over the past few weeks or do you have a single functioning braincell to understand that this has been going on for years and years under the nose of the judges?
Why do you think the FBI is investigating, becasue they have nothing else to do?
What a moron and Poltroon..........

Hey Dingbat! You wrote..."Even the DA is obligated to take action to protect the People from wrongdoing."

Get your head out of your as s!

[The Dingbat wrote]

Hey Dingbat. Read the rest of the book. Here is the Anon you should be looking at you dummy! Belly ache to the proper authorities...an please remove your head from your as s!

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Rule 3:12: Code of Professional Responsibility for Clerks of the Courts

[Disclaimer]

CANON 1. Purpose and Applicability. This Code shall be known as the "Code of Professional Responsibility for Clerks of the Courts of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts." Its purpose is to define norms of conduct and practice appropriate to persons serving in the positions covered by the Code and thereby to contribute to the preservation of public confidence in the integrity, impartiality, and independence of the courts.

The word "Clerk Magistrate" in this Code, unless otherwise expressly provided, shall mean anyone serving in the position of Clerk Magistrate, Clerk, Register, Recorder, Assistant Clerk Magistrate, Assistant Clerk, Assistant Register, or Deputy Recorder, in the Supreme Judicial Court, the Appeals Court, or a Department of the Trial Court of the Commonwealth, whether elected or appointed, and whether serving in a permanent or temporary capacity. The words "elected Clerk Magistrate" shall also include a person who is appointed to complete the term of an elected Clerk Magistrate. The word "court" in this Code shall mean the Supreme Judicial Court, the Appeals Court, a particular division of a Department of the Trial Court, or a particular Department of the Trial Court if the Department does not have divisions.

CANON 2. Compliance with Statutes and Rules of Court. A Clerk Magistrate shall comply with the laws of the Commonwealth, rules of court, and lawful directives of the several judicial authorities of the Commonwealth. The words "judicial authorities" in this Code, unless otherwise expressly provided, shall mean the Justices of the Supreme Judicial Court and Appeals Court, the Chief Administrative Justice of the Trial Court, the Administrative Justices of the several Departments of the Trial Court, or Associate Justices of the Trial Court, as is appropriate under the circumstances.

[Woof Woof]

Doink The Clown wrote:

CW ate all the sandwiches... Now she is waiting for a lift home!!
Just as I thought..... A big laugh fest at Rose Street!
Only in Clown town!

Doinkstoughton.org reports:

No standard police cruisers were available when CW was ready to leave the SPD Open House today. The Chief offered her the opportunity to be driven home in a K-9 Unit cruiser. CW grudgingly agreed to the ride and got in the back seat with the drug sniffing dog. The dog freaked, fled the vehicle, and escaped from the area. At the time of this report the dog is still missing.

Smart dog.

Film at 11:00pm.

[onlycommonsense]

Rule 3:09 CANON

(B) Administrative Responsibilities.

(3) If a judge shall become aware of unprofessional conduct by a judge or a lawyer
(a) he shall, in the instance of a judge, report his knowledge to the Chief Justices of this court and of the court of which the judge in question is a member,.........

How could Crimmins not see the corruption of the Stoughton police and of Judge Robert Sheiber?

What is the arrest vs conviction rate of the police?

ADA Mary Dacey-White conviction rate?

If the court is broken, when will it get fixed??

[then do something]

onlycommonsense wrote:

Rule 3:09 CANON
(B) Administrative Responsibilities.
(3) If a judge shall become aware of unprofessional conduct by a judge or a lawyer
(a) he shall, in the instance of a judge, report his knowledge to the Chief Justices of this court and of the court of which the judge in question is a member,.........
How could Crimmins not see the corruption of the Stoughton police and of Judge Robert Sheiber?
What is the arrest vs conviction rate of the police?
ADA Mary Dacey-White conviction rate?
If the court is broken, when will it get fixed??

OK. You made your point (I think)!

Either the judge looked the other way...or in my opinion didn't see what you have seen.

So, you have other avenues where you can properly take your concerns. Take them there.

We already have had an FBI probe. Concerns for Clerk's of Court can be addressed by Rule 3:12 CANON. DA's can be addressed with the Board of Bar Overseers.

Go address them!

[Ed D the architect]

Smart Clown wrote:

If the court is broken, it will be fixed by the architect of the new stoughton fire station.

Well we are in trouble if it is Ed DeFelice our FinCom member the architect who tried to waste $100K to design the old Armory to make it our new fire station. If he is in charge then our schools will go as his proposed new fire station...nowhere!

[the irony of it all]

Out of town Clown wrote:

<quoted text>Same folks that attended the last open house... LOL!
"Simps Hate Clowns In Clown Town"

I coulnn't male it...but I hear EVERY SPD hater, and former hater, were there. Go figure. The irony.

[Who let the Swartz out]

Who who!

[Who Who Nitwits]

Who let the Swartz out wrote:

Who who!

The nitwits! You know, the ones who made a career on local cable destroying the reputations of a number of police officers that never did anything wrong! Now, after one free cup of coffee and one Open House they love the SPD. Where are their apologies?

[the truth is]

Who Who Nitwits wrote:

<quoted text>
The nitwits! You know, the ones who made a career on local cable destroying the reputations of a number of police officers that never did anything wrong! Now, after one free cup of coffee and one Open House they love the SPD. Where are their apologies?

they were right, you were wrong, get help if you can't admit it.

[apologize and moe on]

the truth is wrote:

<quoted text>
they were right, you were wrong, get help if you can't admit it.

They were right about all those current members of the force that they said would be indicted, abused drugs and has promiscuous relationships. What about all of them?

True, they and others were correct about a handful of police officers who certainly failed themselves and the town. I am talking about the other 60+ police officers they talked about on local cable. They viciously attacked many based on rumor and innuendo.

Sure, it's ok for them to brag about being right on the 5-6 officers who failed us. However, I am simply saying that this would be a good time for them to apologize to all the others who did nothing wrong...but were painted negatively with their broad brush.

They say it is a new day and moving on. Part of the healing process would be an apology. I am sure the officers would accept it and be grateful.

Is that asking too much?

[the truth is]

there's a 1000.00 to charity here somwhere for an apology to the townsfolk and the taxpayers i think.

also the 5-6 were only the one's caught. clearly look at the trials and see the VAST amount of perjury and think of what was missed. JMHO