Selden grandfather convicted of child sex abuse

Aug 21, 2008 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: Newsday.com

The morning after they were molested, two girls huddled in the bathroom of their abuser's home, Suffolk prosecutors said, and made a pinkie promise to one day to tell authorities what had happened to them.

Comments
61 - 80 of 95 Comments Last updated Feb 25, 2014
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Oct 7, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S LIE AT THE TRIAL one of the lies
BARBARA MONACO THE EVIL.

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
(Tr. at 552, 561-62.)
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and [G.G.] made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that [G.G.]–
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
...
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
(Tr. at 710-12.)
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t.
(Tr. at 770.)
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department.”
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Oct 7, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S LIE AT THE TRIAL one of the lies
BARBARA MONACO THE EVIL.

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
(Tr. at 552, 561-62.)
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and [G.G.] made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that [G.G.]–
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
...
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
(Tr. at 710-12.)
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t.
(Tr. at 770.)
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department.”

THE COURT FOUND BARBARA Monaco and KERRY Petersen LIED
The EVIL BARBARA AND KERRY

1)Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged B.M.’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

2)Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, B.M., and G.G. spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the B. M. and K
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Oct 7, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S THE EVIL LIE AT THE TRIAL one of the lies

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
Tr. at 552, 561-62.
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and G.G. made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that G.G.
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
Tr. at 710-12.
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t.
Tr. at 770.
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department.”

COURT FOUND EVIL BARBARA M and KERRY P LIED

Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged BM’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, BM, and GG spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the BM and K were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
Five Oh

Baldwin, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Oct 7, 2013
 
Just like Friedman, guilty savage trying to hide behind shit lawyers.
BeckyA

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Oct 7, 2013
 
Dude, give it up already.. you can copy and paste your crap all day long but at the end of the day.. anyone with any common sense knows he was a big child molesting piece of crap.. and he got punished for it.. first in jail and then by God!
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#72
Oct 7, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S EVIL LIE AT THE COURT'S TRIAL- TRUE FACTS

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
Tr. at 552, 561-62.
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and G.G. made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that G.G.
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
Tr. at 710-12.
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t.
Tr. at 770.
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department.”

COURT FOUND EVIL BARBARA M and KERRY P LIED

Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged BM’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, BM, and GG spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the BM and K were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
BeckyA

Ashburn, VA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#73
Oct 7, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Thank God...one more child molester off the streets!!! I hope the girls that he molested are doing well and living a happy life.. they are brave girls.
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#74
Oct 8, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S EVIL LIE AT THE COURT'S TRIAL- TRUE FACTS

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
Tr. at 552, 561-62.
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and G.G. made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that G.G.
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
Tr. at 710-12.
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t.
Tr. at 770.
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department.”

COURT FOUND EVIL BARBARA M and KERRY P LIED

Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged BM’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, BM, and GG spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the BM and K were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#76
Oct 13, 2013
 
Judge Barbara Khan (Judge only in name)
DA Thomas Spota ADA Dana Brown produced fake evidences knowingly or did not bother to know to justify the evil girls's Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersens's timeline against Thomas Green. that's EVIL how can they sleep at night?
Barbara Khan in her ruling for motions 330 and 440 after she saw proof that evidences were fake she twisted a well establish Law just to denied Mr Green justice. Quoting Federal Judge Spatt ruling against Barbara Khan's twisted ruling :
"However, a close review of the County Court’s decision makes clear that, even affording the state court its due deference, its decision rejecting Green’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland – both on the performance prong and the prejudice prong – and should not stand."
It's EVIL how can Barbara. Khan sleeps at night? Barbara Khan also referred to Cindy Green as Mr Green's daughter , sited her testimony as a reason for her twisted ruling Barbara Khan knew better . Cindy Green was the daughter in law which was at the time in a bitter divorce proceedings with Mr. Green's son . After Cindy Green saw the proof of the fake evidences she recanted her testimony but Judge Barbara Khan ignored it . WHY? She Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice? No it is not.
Here is the quote from Judge A. Spatt ruling:(Petitioner’s Exh C). As Green observes, the County Court’s description of Cindy as “defendant’s own daughter” was factually incorrect; Cindy was Green’s daughter-in-law and, at the time of her testimony, was in the process of divorcing Green’s son." Barbara Khan Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice?
There are evil people that we have to guard from but DA Thomas Spota , ADA Dana Brown and a real good judge's JOB also to guard us from evil girls and boys and not to seek conviction or deny motions that proved that the trial was loaded with fake evidences and lies by Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersen.
Quoting Judge R Spatt:
Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,” and thus counsel’s errors can be presumed to have “infect[ed] all of the counts of which petitioner was convicted.” Gersten, 426 F.3d at 614-15.
Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, B.M., and G.G. spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the B. M. and K. were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
Barbara Khan also denied Mr Green a hearing on the evidences after it was found they were fake why? Where is justice ? There is none!!!
There was justice at last by a real JUDGE A. SPATT for Thomas F. Green but too late for him and the people who love him.
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#77
Oct 13, 2013
 
JUDGE BARBARA KHAN (Judge only in name)
DA Thomas Spota ADA Dana Brown produced fake evidences knowingly or did not bother to know to justify the evil girls's Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersens's timeline against Thomas Green. that's EVIL how can they sleep at night?
Barbara Khan in her ruling for motions 330 and 440 after she saw proof that evidences were fake she twisted a well establish Law just to denied Mr Green justice. Quoting Federal Judge Spatt ruling against Barbara Khan's twisted ruling :
"However, a close review of the County Court’s decision makes clear that, even affording the state court its due deference, its decision rejecting Green’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland – both on the performance prong and the prejudice prong – and should not stand."
It's EVIL how can Barbara. Khan sleeps at night? Barbara Khan also referred to Cindy Green as Mr Green's daughter , sited her testimony as a reason for her twisted ruling Barbara Khan knew better . Cindy Green was the daughter in law which was at the time in a bitter divorce proceedings with Mr. Green's son . After Cindy Green saw the proof of the fake evidences she recanted her testimony but Judge Barbara Khan ignored it . WHY? She Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice? No it is not.
Here is the quote from Judge A. Spatt ruling:(Petitioner’s Exh C). As Green observes, the County Court’s description of Cindy as “defendant’s own daughter” was factually incorrect; Cindy was Green’s daughter-in-law and, at the time of her testimony, was in the process of divorcing Green’s son." Barbara Khan Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice?
There are evil people that we have to guard from but DA Thomas Spota , ADA Dana Brown and a real good judge's JOB also to guard us from evil girls and boys and not to seek conviction or deny motions that proved that the trial was loaded with fake evidences and lies by Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersen.
Quoting Judge R Spatt:
Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,” and thus counsel’s errors can be presumed to have “infect[ed] all of the counts of which petitioner was convicted.” Gersten, 426 F.3d at 614-15.
Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, B.M., and G.G. spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the B. M. and K. were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
Barbara Khan also denied Mr Green a hearing on the evidences after it was found they were fake why? Where is justice ? There is none!!!
There was justice at last by a real JUDGE A. SPATT for Thomas F. Green but too late for him and the people who love him.
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#78
Oct 13, 2013
 
JUDGE BARBARA KAHN (Judge only in name)
DA Thomas Spota ADA Dana Brown produced fake evidences knowingly or did not bother to know to justify the evil girls's Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersens's timeline against Thomas Green. that's EVIL how can they sleep at night?
Barbara Khan in her ruling for motions 330 and 440 after she saw proof that evidences were fake she twisted a well establish Law just to denied Mr Green justice. Quoting Federal Judge Spatt ruling against Barbara Khan's twisted ruling :
"However, a close review of the County Court’s decision makes clear that, even affording the state court its due deference, its decision rejecting Green’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland – both on the performance prong and the prejudice prong – and should not stand."
It's EVIL how can Barbara. Khan sleeps at night? Barbara Khan also referred to Cindy Green as Mr Green's daughter , sited her testimony as a reason for her twisted ruling Barbara Khan knew better . Cindy Green was the daughter in law which was at the time in a bitter divorce proceedings with Mr. Green's son . After Cindy Green saw the proof of the fake evidences she recanted her testimony but Judge Barbara Khan ignored it . WHY? She Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice? No it is not.
Here is the quote from Judge A. Spatt ruling:(Petitioner’s Exh C). As Green observes, the County Court’s description of Cindy as “defendant’s own daughter” was factually incorrect; Cindy was Green’s daughter-in-law and, at the time of her testimony, was in the process of divorcing Green’s son." Barbara Khan Ignored her own mistake !! and kept Thomas Green in jail. Is that justice?
There are evil people that we have to guard from but DA Thomas Spota , ADA Dana Brown and a real good judge's JOB also to guard us from evil girls and boys and not to seek conviction or deny motions that proved that the trial was loaded with fake evidences and lies by Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersen.
Quoting Judge R Spatt:
Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,” and thus counsel’s errors can be presumed to have “infect[ed] all of the counts of which petitioner was convicted.” Gersten, 426 F.3d at 614-15.
Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, B.M., and G.G. spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the B. M. and K. were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details.
Barbara Khan also denied Mr Green a hearing on the evidences after it was found they were fake why? Where is justice ? There is none!!!
There was justice at last by a real JUDGE A. SPATT for Thomas F. Green but too late for him and the people who love him.
Paul

Baldwin, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#79
Oct 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

A dead child rapist.

Good riddance. Society is safer.
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#80
Oct 15, 2013
 
BARBARA MONACO'S EVIL LIE AT THE COURT'S TRIAL- TRUE FACTS

With regard to the belated disclosure of the abuse, Barbara.Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. Why didn’t you want to right away?
A. Cause I was scared.
Q. Where did you talk to [G.G. immediately after the incident]?
A. In Mr. Green’s bathroom.
Q. And what did you say to her?
A. I told her when we get older and ready to face it that we were going to tell. Q. And what did you do in that regard?
A. We made a pinky promise to tell.
Q. What was the reason you didn’t want to tell then?
A. Because I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through all this at that age.
Q. What does that mean,“all this”?
A. All the courts, all that, I wouldn’t understand all of it, it was so frustrating when I was younger.
Tr. at 552, 561-62.
On cross-examination, B.M. testified:
Q. And you indicated that you made a decision that you were going to tell when you got older?
A. Yes.
Q. And you say at the time this happened you were seven years old, right?
A. Yes.
Q. And one of the reasons that you and G.G. made this particular promise when you were seven years old was that you said “I knew I wasn’t going to be able to go through this at that age”?
A. Yes.
Q. That you didn’t want to go through all the courts, I wouldn’t understand all of it, right?
A. Yes.
Q. Let me ask you this. At age seven, how did you know what you were going to go through with the courts?
A. Cause my mom used to watch Law and Order.
Q. You understood at age seven what was going to happen?
A. I understood that it was a big responsibility, yes.
Q. And because of what you saw on Law and Order you made a decision with [G.G.] not to disclose this, is that what you’re saying?
A. And I knew that G.G.
Q. No. No. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. Was there a particular show on Law and Order that left this impression on you when you were seven?
A. No, it’s just Law and Order.
Q. What?
A. It’s just another Law and Order show.
Q. Was there a show about a young girl who was seven years old who had to go to court?
A. No.
Q. Or anything like that?
A. No, but [Law and Order: Special Victims Unit] is all about molestation and rape.
Q. Was that on in 1998?
A. Yes.
Q. It was?
A. Yes.
Q. You used to watch it?
A. Yes.
Q. So you made a decision – could you distinguish between, you know, fiction on TV and real life? Could you do that?
A. Yes.
Tr. at 710-12.
On re-direct examination, Barbara .Monaco. testified as follows:
Q. You had testified before on cross-examination that telling would be a big responsibility, what does that mean?
A. It’s just how I am now, if I was seven, if I was ten years younger now, could you see me up here doing this? I can’t
Tr. at 770.
With respect to the Law and Order testimony , the private investigator stated that “a quick internet search [] immediately revealed that the very first episode of this program was September 20, 1999,” many months after she alleged she was molested and failed to report it based on her viewing of the program.(Id.) The private investigator further averred that to verify the Law & Order information, he “plac[ed] a simple phone call to NBC’s legal department”

COURT FOUND EVIL BARBARA MONACO and KERRY P LIED

Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged BM’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, BM, and GG spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the BM and K were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#81
Oct 19, 2013
 
JUDGE BARBARA KAHN
Barbara Monaco
Barbara"s mom Denis Monaco
Kerri Petersen
Kerri's sister Brittany
Stephanie Belkin
Kerri's Mom
ADA Dana Brown
DA Thomas Spota
ADA Carla Lato
Paul Geannelli
Judge Rienaldo E Rivera
Judges RUTH C. BALKIN
J.P. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ARIEL E. BELEN
Judge Susan P Read
They are all the evil characters who took part in robbing Thomas Green's life an innocent man one of the best man on earth , Judge A Spatt at last gave Thomas Green Justice. Justice came too late because of the evil characters above. Evil girls Barbara Monaco Kerri Petersen Stephanie Belkin Keri sister Brittany . Evil girl's mothers Mrs. Petersen and Denis Monaco . Evil DA Thomas Spota. Evil ADA Dana Brown.Evil ADA Carla Lato. Evil Paul Geanelli .Evil Judge Rienaldo E Rivera
Evil Judges RUTH C. BALKIN . Evil Judge J.P. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL. Evil Judge ARIEL E. BELEN. Evil Judge Susan P Read
Evil Judge Barbara Kahn The one who should know better .
Quoting Federal Judge Spatt ruling against Barbara Kahn's twisted ruling :
"However, a close review of the County Court’s decision makes clear that, even affording the state court its due deference, its decision rejecting Green’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland – both on the performance prong and the prejudice prong – and should not stand."
All the rest cowered judges followed her twisted decision not thinking as judges despite the fraud evidences were right in front of their eyes they all did not care that Thomas Green was rotting in jail as long as they did not have to shake their JOB on the bench. We just saw how girls can be evil in Florida and caused a girl to kill herself. Those Girl Barbara and Kerri Petersen and all the rest are not less evil.
The Job of the DA to guard us from evil people but also to guard us from EVIL GIRLS and boys like Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersen and the Evil "engine" behind them.
This is american tragedy!!!
RIP Thomas Green .
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#82
Oct 20, 2013
 
JUDGE BARBARA KAHN of Suffolk county NY
Barbara Monaco
Barbara"s mom Denis Monaco
Kerri Petersen
Kerri's sister Brittany
Stephanie Belkin
Kerri's Mom
ADA Dana Brown
DA Thomas Spota
ADA Carla Lato
Paul Geannelli
Judge Rienaldo E Rivera
Judges RUTH C. BALKIN
J.P. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL
ARIEL E. BELEN
Judge Susan P Read
They are all the evil characters who took part in robbing Thomas Green's life an innocent man one of the best man on earth , Judge A Spatt at last gave Thomas Green Justice. Justice came too late because of the evil characters above. Evil girls Barbara Monaco Kerri Petersen Stephanie Belkin Keri sister Brittany . Evil girl's mothers Mrs. Petersen and Denis Monaco . Evil DA Thomas Spota. Evil ADA Dana Brown.Evil ADA Carla Lato. Evil Paul Geanelli .Evil Judge Rienaldo E Rivera
Evil Judges RUTH C. BALKIN . Evil Judge J.P. JOHN M. LEVENTHAL. Evil Judge ARIEL E. BELEN. Evil Judge Susan P Read
Evil Judge Barbara Kahn The one who should know better .
Quoting Federal Judge Spatt ruling against Barbara Kahn's twisted ruling :
"However, a close review of the County Court’s decision makes clear that, even affording the state court its due deference, its decision rejecting Green’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel constituted an unreasonable application of Strickland – both on the performance prong and the prejudice prong – and should not stand."
All the rest cowered judges followed her twisted decision not thinking as judges despite the fraud evidences were right in front of their eyes they all did not care that Thomas Green was rotting in jail as long as they did not have to shake their JOB on the bench. We just saw how girls can be evil in Florida and caused a girl to kill herself. Those Girl Barbara and Kerri Petersen and all the rest are not less evil.
The Job of the DA to guard us from evil people but also to guard us from EVIL GIRLS and boys like Barbara Monaco and Kerri Petersen and the Evil "engine" behind them.
This is american tragedy!!!
RIP Thomas Green .
Al Busillo

Baldwin, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#84
Oct 22, 2013
 
Dead child molester.

Good riddance.
Al Busillo

Baldwin, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#85
Oct 22, 2013
 
Did he like little boys too?
Justice at last too late

East Setauket, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#86
Oct 22, 2013
 
COURT FOUND EVIL BARBARA MONACO and KERRY PETERSEN LIED:

Evidence surrounding the 1998-1999 incident was falsely dated, this evidence may have damaged BM’s credibility while bolstering the credibility of Green and the defense witness. Inasmuch as this case involved a credibility contest, the newly discovered evidence would have “cast doubt on the veracity of the alleged victim’s testimony in its entirety,”

Similarly, although counts eight and nine involve the alleged sexual abuse of K. in 2003, the proper dating of the physical evidence would have cast doubt on her credibility as well because she testified that she, BM, and GG spent time with Green in 1998 to 1999. The newly discovered evidence tending to show that the BM and K were, at the very least, mistaken might lead the jury to question how their stories shared the same incorrect details
Someone

Coram, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#87
Oct 22, 2013
 

Judged:

1

I really hope ALL THE GIRLS get what they deserve, a innocent man got robbed of his 5 years &died he can never get them back, these girls need to be put away for life & the family of green needs to sue ALL THE GIRLS ESPACAILLY BARBARA MONACO & DENISE MONACO & KERI PETERSEN AND HER FAMILY.
this family did not deserve to suffer like they did.

may you rest in peace MR Thomas green
Al Busillo

Baldwin, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#88
Oct 25, 2013
 
A good child molester is a dead child molester.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Stony Brook Discussions

Search the Stony Brook Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Blaming Israel for carnage (Jul '06) 31 min godChild 115,381
NY Who do you support for Comptroller in New York ... (Oct '10) 7 hr cornholio 437
NY Who do you support for Attorney General in New ... (Oct '10) 7 hr sdd 755
NY Who do you support for Lieutenant Governor in N... (Oct '10) 7 hr Wake up 669
NY New York Primary Election Sept 14: Will you vote? (Sep '10) 7 hr trs 16,778
NY Who do you support for Governor in New York in ... (Oct '10) 9 hr land of the slaves 6,371
Suffolk County,N.Y. CPS,DSS (Oct '06) 11 hr tommie dick 384
•••
•••

Stony Brook News Video

•••
•••

Stony Brook Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Stony Brook People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Stony Brook News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Stony Brook
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••