OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, Sta...

OK Health Care Freedom Amendment, State Question 756

Created by CitizenTopix on Oct 11, 2010

1,604 votes

Click on an option to vote

Yes

No

Other (explain below)

Justaminute

Edmond, OK

#18353 Apr 22, 2012
Correction: Bush's deficit growth was 119%. And no it was not because of the last 2 years of a Democratic Congress, it was because of the Bush tax cuts. Those are facts, not opinion.
TFALLEN

Porter, OK

#18354 Apr 22, 2012
Packing Heat wrote:
All this is a stark difference from four years ago. At this time in 2008, Obama was still in an epic primary battle against Hillary Rodham Clinton. The fight for the nomination didn't end until June on the last day of the primary calendar, when Obama inched across the finish line. Obama was the junior senator from Illinois, a half white half black man with a funny sounding name. No foreign policy experience. No military experience. Just a lot of lies and bullshit that Americans ready for change bought into.
Obama's resume was very thin, but he parlayed his bullshit story and bullshit message of hope and change into a run for the Democratic nomination. Obama became the first bi-racial white/black man to win a major party to run for president. This year, Obama's march to the President has generated little interest because his lies and bullshit of hope and change has been exposed. Democratic voters are not unanimously behind the president. In Oklahoma, Randall Terry, who founded Operation Rescue, got 18 percent of the vote in the Democratic presidential primary March 6th but delegates were awarded to Obama because Randall Terry was the victim of political insider trading.
In Alabama, 18 percent of Democratic voters voted as uncommitted in the March 13th primary, so the state party will send eight uncommitted delegates to the Democratic national convention. Obama will not win Oklahoma or Alabama in the general election. In the general election, the choice Americans will have will be between a president who has failed to create jobs and restore economic security for the middle class, and a Republican nominee that will push for policies that lead to the economic recovery that American Voters expect. Voters knew that Obama was a blank slate four years ago and people bought into that blank slate their in hopes for a better future. Now that Obama has a record, the question is "How'd that work out for you?"
The real question voters will be asking when they pull the lever for a new President in this election is "Am I better off now than I was 4 years ago". Obama will not be able to sell the same bullshit he sold in 2008, but he still has plenty of bullshit he will try to sell. He won't have what he had the first time because he lost that with his failed policies of class warfare, his bullshit liberal agenda and his failed economic policies. He knows where the people are and can't figure out how to bullshit them again.
"Mitt Romney will beat Obama's ass like a nappy head step child."
>Except for the pesky facts that say otherwise.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/gallup-dail...
http://www.gallup.com/poll/153902/Romney-Obam...
According to polls, it can go either way. One thing they are not factoring in is the third option on the ballots that may pull a lot of republican votes away from Romney. http://www.americanselect.org/
This is an internet chosen candidate and is almost done getting them put on the ballots in every state.
---
"In the general election, the choice Americans will have will be between a president who has failed to create jobs and restore economic security for the middle class, and a Republican nominee that will push for policies that lead to the economic recovery that American Voters expect."
>Again, the stimulus created jobs. It slowed down our decline and actually stopped it. I've already proven this, but again, you aren't interested in facts. http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/2010-08...
http://articles.cnn.com/2011-08-31/opinion/be...

Again, I pose the question, what exactly is it that you don't like about Obama? Answers based on lies will not do.
TFALLEN

Porter, OK

#18355 Apr 22, 2012
Packing Heat wrote:
<quoted text>
ONE LAST THING TWIT BRAIN,
That is the plan, to stop Obama's incremental approach toward Socialism and Social Injustice dead in its tracks. Furthermore, what is this "us" and "we" phrase you constantly use, do you have a mouse in your pocket? I have read this entire thread and not one time up to this post have I read where anyone posted that the liberal retard "TFALLEN" speaks for me. Care to explain? Take your time, I'll wait until you pull your head out of your ass.
How do you expect us to take you seriously if you can't even keep to your word about not replying to me anymore. LOL
---
"That is the plan, to stop Obama's incremental approach toward Socialism and Social Injustice dead in its tracks."
>I'm still waiting for your evidence that Obama has backed anything that will lead to the government's TOTAL control over ALL goods and services.
---
"I have read this entire thread and not one time up to this post have I read where anyone posted that the liberal retard "TFALLEN" speaks for me. Care to explain?"
>Because as you said, you don't want to debate with me or read anymore from me. Also, I base my opinions on facts and you have already admitted to not being able to do the same. By the way, there have been those who have said they agree with me just the same as they have disagreed. But again, at the end of the day, I'm relying on facts instead of prejudice. You are no better than a racist...and you may even be that as well.
---
"Furthermore, what is this "us" and "we" phrase you constantly use, do you have a mouse in your pocket?"
>What us's and we's do you speak of? Perhaps I usually speak for myself, but if I say us and we, then I'm probably acknowledging the fact that I live in a country with more people in it than just myself. This is something, which you seem to find hard to acknowledge yourself though.
---
"Take your time, I'll wait until you pull your head out of your ass."
>You may call all the names you like, but at the end of the day, I have proven my claims. I've even proven your claims to be false. So you might want to heed your own advice about pulling one's head out.
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

#18356 Apr 22, 2012
Correction again:

Reagan had 325% deficit growth. And you guy's think he was a genius.

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18357 Apr 22, 2012
A state law cannot override a federal law so it was a waste of resources to even place this state question on the ballot.

The supreme court will decide if it is constitutional. The only real concern is the fact that once enacted, there will have to be government funded programs to help people who cannot afford any health insurance to obtain health insurance.
The "Romney care" or "Obama care" laws are a good attempt to universalize healthcare in the United States. We should not allow any more people to "slip through the cracks".

It is not so much an issue in a place where the majority of the population claims to be "full blooded Native American". Look it up. Almost none of Adair, CO claims to be "mixed".
However for non-Native Americans... Health care can be difficult to obtain, especially in rural areas that do not have public transportation systems to take residents to the city "free" health clinics.

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18358 Apr 22, 2012
Justaminute wrote:
Correction again:
Reagan had 325% deficit growth. And you guy's think he was a genius.
Haha! I like you.
Reagan re-privatized the banks "that were federalized during the depression".

The republicans are already talking about re-privatizing the US banks. I hope they fail, because most of us here in Oklahoma are not rich enough to afford to pay for the rich to become richer.
No Rose Colored Glasses

Douglas, GA

#18359 Apr 22, 2012
The only thing proven, justaminute, is your socialistic mindset. You would be better off moving to China, North Korea, or Russia. You'd fit in quite well there. They welcome people like you... As for me, I'll fight till the death to preserve that little freedoms we have left. The Bible tells us to "pray for the peace of Jerusalem", which I do daily, but we all need to pray for the "future" of America. We can't afford to have Osama (opps, I mean Obama) in office another 4 years, nor can we afford a man like Romney.
Bye Bye Barry

United States

#18360 Apr 22, 2012
Justaminute wrote:
Correction again:
Reagan had 325% deficit growth. And you guy's think he was a genius.
You are an IDIOT!! Tip O Neil controlled the House under Reagan and not once did they ever adopt Reagan's budget!!!!! The govt operated under "continuing resolution". Did you really not know this when you made your stupid comment?? Where the Hell were you? Oh I know. You were in Iran looking for somebody that would have your unpatriotic ...
Packing Heat

United States

#18361 Apr 22, 2012
Bye Bye Barry wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an IDIOT!! Tip O Neil controlled the House under Reagan and not once did they ever adopt Reagan's budget!!!!! The govt operated under "continuing resolution". Did you really not know this when you made your stupid comment?? Where the Hell were you? Oh I know. You were in Iran looking for somebody that would have your unpatriotic ...


I totally agree with you, her and her twin bother TFALLEN. I fell out of my chair laughing at that fool when him/her stated they read USA-Today and CNN then claim he/she made his/her case. The only thing TFALLEN proved is he/she is definitely an idiot because those sources are as leftwing as can be. Anyway, have fun kicking the liberal loonies ass with facts even if they do deny or ignore them, it is fun to read and know they are squirming in hopes Obama could win. November 6th will be when we will all really know if this country will sink or swim. Even with Romney at the helm we still have a long swim to overcome the damage the Obama Clan has done.

By the way I read somewhere along the way that DustyOutlaw died of a heart attack and RedSonja2000 was captured and sent back to Hong Kong. Have you heard?
Justaminute

Edmond, OK

#18362 Apr 22, 2012
Bye Bye Barry wrote:
<quoted text>
You are an IDIOT!! Tip O Neil controlled the House under Reagan and not once did they ever adopt Reagan's budget!!!!! The govt operated under "continuing resolution". Did you really not know this when you made your stupid comment?? Where the Hell were you? Oh I know. You were in Iran looking for somebody that would have your unpatriotic ...
Well hello BB Barry, you little racist. It's always the Dems fault, like Reagan doesn't know what a veto is or the Dem's had a veto proof majority which they didn't. Repubs are always the victims. Boo f**king Hoo.

Your like all the trashing talking Repubs..They are so busy scrubbing their web pages and twitter posts like Romney's new spokesman. Ha Ha Like you can erase those things. You, you just make trash statements and change your name. Ha Ha Ha Ha Ha
Bye Bye Barry

United States

#18363 Apr 22, 2012
Packing Heat wrote:
<quoted text>
By the way I read somewhere along the way that DustyOutlaw died of a heart attack and RedSonja2000 was captured and sent back to Hong Kong. Have you heard?
ROFLMAO!!! Oh man!! Could we be so lucky? I was laughing so hard my eyes watered up. That was the best one of the week!

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18364 Apr 22, 2012
I love right wing neo-fascism....

The US republican party is not the most famous right wing party in history though. Germany took that honor during the late 30's and early 40's. Their "Nazi" political party was quite famous; rather I should say "infamous". They also followed the "conservative" political ideas that were first written by Benjamin Disraeli.

Perhaps one day the tragedy that was brought about by the Nazi party will be duplicated. It appears they have a large fan-base. I hope oppression and fascist idealism will be extinguished by the coming generations.

P.S. If you are done fighting gay marriage and saving unborn fetuses, try oppressing the drug we market to children.
A "mind altering drug" that is a CNS stimulant (like cocaine and methamphetamine) called caffeine. Highly addictive and marketed to primarily children in the form of soda-pop.
Bye Bye Barry

United States

#18365 Apr 22, 2012
All you have to do is look at the "Occupy Wall St" movement to see who is really in cahoots with the Nazi's. BAM!!!! Yep, it's the Dimocrats, Mustafa Obama, the Communists, the Nazis, Hamas, KKK and all of the other radicals together again!! Ouch!!! You shouldn't have gone there, because that just blew up in your face. Lmao

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18366 Apr 22, 2012
Bye Bye Barry wrote:
All you have to do is look at the "Occupy Wall St" movement to see who is really in cahoots with the Nazi's. BAM!!!! Yep, it's the Dimocrats, Mustafa Obama, the Communists, the Nazis, Hamas, KKK and all of the other radicals together again!! Ouch!!! You shouldn't have gone there, because that just blew up in your face. Lmao
The Nazi party doesn't exist anymore, and they were not just a group. They were a political party.

I am glad you believe that you have invalidated my statement; the method used was indicative of a self defeating statement.
Tamara

Edmond, OK

#18367 Apr 22, 2012
d3m0gr4ph1cn4tur3 wrote:
I love right wing neo-fascism....
The US republican party is not the most famous right wing party in history though. Germany took that honor during the late 30's and early 40's. Their "Nazi" political party was quite famous; rather I should say "infamous". They also followed the "conservative" political ideas that were first written by Benjamin Disraeli.
Perhaps one day the tragedy that was brought about by the Nazi party will be duplicated. It appears they have a large fan-base. I hope oppression and fascist idealism will be extinguished by the coming generations.
P.S. If you are done fighting gay marriage and saving unborn fetuses, try oppressing the drug we market to children.
A "mind altering drug" that is a CNS stimulant (like cocaine and methamphetamine) called caffeine. Highly addictive and marketed to primarily children in the form of soda-pop.
You know that is what parents are suppose to do is to watch what their kids eat and drink. First of all don't buy anything with caffeine. But then again sugar is not all that good for children either and you can say to much McDonalds is not all that healthy if it is a regular stop. The government should not have to be the parents!

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18368 Apr 22, 2012
Tamara wrote:
<quoted text>You know that is what parents are suppose to do is to watch what their kids eat and drink. First of all don't buy anything with caffeine. But then again sugar is not all that good for children either and you can say to much McDonalds is not all that healthy if it is a regular stop. The government should not have to be the parents!
I agree with you. Children should be supervised by their parents and their health and diet should be more strictly controlled.

However, caffeine is not regulated and not often recognized as being a mind altering and addictive drug. With no age restrictions, anyone of any age may obtain caffeine in several forms, even from vending machines.

At least there are laws prohibiting (or rather just limiting) children from accessing other legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Caffeine is not a totally safe and healthy chemical compound though. Neither is Chocolate.
Packing Heat

United States

#18369 Apr 22, 2012
d3m0gr4ph1cn4tur3 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you. Children should be supervised by their parents and their health and diet should be more strictly controlled.
However, caffeine is not regulated and not often recognized as being a mind altering and addictive drug. With no age restrictions, anyone of any age may obtain caffeine in several forms, even from vending machines.
At least there are laws prohibiting (or rather just limiting) children from accessing other legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Caffeine is not a totally safe and healthy chemical compound though. Neither is Chocolate.


You have got to be kidding about chocolate!
11 Reasons Chocolate Is Good for Your Health

It turns out that chocolate—especially dark chocolate—reduces body mass, prevents blood clots, improves numeracy, may prevent cancer, and doesn’t ruin your complexion.

A new study suggests that eating chocolate can help you stay thin. Researchers at the University of California-San Diego found that people who frequently eat chocolate have lower body-mass indexes than people who don’t. Other evidence indicates that chocolate can also ward off strokes, heart attacks, and diabetes. So here are 11 reasons to indulge in some s’mores this summer (no word yet on the health benefits of marshmallows)…

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03...
Packing Heat

United States

#18370 Apr 22, 2012
d3m0gr4ph1cn4tur3 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you. Children should be supervised by their parents and their health and diet should be more strictly controlled.
However, caffeine is not regulated and not often recognized as being a mind altering and addictive drug. With no age restrictions, anyone of any age may obtain caffeine in several forms, even from vending machines.
At least there are laws prohibiting (or rather just limiting) children from accessing other legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Caffeine is not a totally safe and healthy chemical compound though. Neither is Chocolate.


When to consider cutting back caffeine:

For most healthy adults, moderate doses of caffeine — 200 to 300 milligrams (mg), or about two to four cups of brewed coffee a day — aren't harmful. But some circumstances may warrant limiting or even ending your caffeine routine. Read on to see if any of these apply to you.

Although moderate caffeine intake isn't likely to cause harm, too much can lead to some unpleasant effects. Heavy daily caffeine use — more than 500 to 600 mg a day — may cause:

Insomnia
Nervousness
Restlessness
Irritability
Stomach upset
Fast heartbeat
Muscle tremors

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/caffeine/NU0...
Packing Heat

United States

#18371 Apr 22, 2012
d3m0gr4ph1cn4tur3 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree with you. Children should be supervised by their parents and their health and diet should be more strictly controlled.
However, caffeine is not regulated and not often recognized as being a mind altering and addictive drug. With no age restrictions, anyone of any age may obtain caffeine in several forms, even from vending machines.
At least there are laws prohibiting (or rather just limiting) children from accessing other legal drugs like alcohol and tobacco. Caffeine is not a totally safe and healthy chemical compound though. Neither is Chocolate.


The point is that Government needs to stay the hell out of our personal life. Hell, wild women and whiskey can be bad for you too but I damn sure don't want Government to tell me I can't have either. The damn Government says Marijuana is illegal and yet it is the best and only medicine I take and have 43 years. I have no medical issues of any kind and always have perfect results on every annual physical, which is the only time I ever go to a Doctor.

“Lets call KATS!”

Since: Apr 12

Stilwell, Ok

#18372 Apr 22, 2012
:)

Chocolate "cocoa" contains several chemical compounds. Theobromine and Phenethylamine are probably the most active compounds.
Theobromine is lethal at about 1,000mg per kg of body weight. That translates to an average adult being 75kg, a lethal dose is about 75grams. Extra Dark Chocolate often contains as much as 14g per kg Theobromine. That means that you would have to eat around 10lbs of extra dark chocolate for a lethal Theobromine dose, however it is much more lethal in dogs.
Phenethylamine is found in a variety of forms, and is considered the active compound in most stimulants including cocaine, methamphetamine and of course chocolate.
Chocolate also contains flavins, a group of chemicals that are amine oxidases.

Caffeine becomes mostly Theobromine when it passes through the liver.

I agree that the government should not be allowed to tell us what drugs we can or cannot take.

I agree that marijuana is a very safe and effective drug and can be used safely as a recreational drug or for long term treatment of many physical and psychological disorders.

Did you know?... Marijuana, even when smoked, can help reduce the effects of asthma when used in moderation?
THC resembles a naturally occurring chemical in the brain and bonds to naturally occurring receptors.
THC never reaches brain cells, and does not cause brain damage. In fact most chemicals cannot and do not reach the brain cells.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Stilwell Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Snitch List (Feb '16) 6 hr He is a snitch 45
Wing boys Wed SadStilwellLady 5
Kevin Flynn Wed YOU OWE ME PUNK 20
Reyna bailey Wed Concerned 1
Lavonna grimmett Feb 21 Yeah 2
DHS CORRUPTION in ADAIR COUNTY (Sep '14) Feb 21 Joe 24
Frankie & Jessica Feb 21 Im here 2

Stilwell Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Stilwell Mortgages