Who do you support for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2010?

[Aggie23]

Synergy wrote:

This BRILLIANT man explains EXACTLY why I don't like the Obamas. I totally agree with every word he wrote. It's a little long, but absolutely worth the read.
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/why-i-do-not...
I'm not going to argue with anyone about this. This is how I feel and I don't have to explain my feelings. You have your feelings and I have mine. "nuff said.

Wow, very well stated and I cannot see much (if anything) I disagree with.

[Aggie23]

Bigdave1 wrote:

This is exactly what I was talking bout in another post several days ago.
These old elite Republicrats need to go. They are RINO's and are political cowards. They never stand up for principle and always bow down to the elitist power structure. They always fall in line with the wishes of the progressives and are shameless cowards. McCain was a brave war hero but somewhere along the line he was either brain washed by the N. Viet Nam or just lost his way somewhere. Graham has openly claimed he was a progressive, has been in office way too long, and it shows.
They just want everybody to just sit down, shut up and not to make any waves. They are stars in "Lets Make a Deal". Two old incompetent farts that should have never been reelected. They are not Republicans and they are not conservatives. People such as these guys should be booted out of office or this country will not survive. Check out the link below.
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/inside-po...

Agree completely, I was both stunned and disgusted this morning when I saw Graham disparaging what Paul did, and then McCain follows suit. They have both been in my "please retire and go away" column, but I had actually found them worthy of more respect recently when they would not back down on questioning the circumstances about Benghazi. But, surprise, surprise, they found a way to completely erode that respect again.

[Bill in Dville]

Synergy wrote:

This BRILLIANT man explains EXACTLY why I don't like the Obamas. I totally agree with every word he wrote. It's a little long, but absolutely worth the read.
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/why-i-do-not...
I'm not going to argue with anyone about this. This is how I feel and I don't have to explain my feelings. You have your feelings and I have mine. "nuff said.

+1

Great article.

Interesting thing about the lies that have been told, but no one on the left seems to care.

It's Bush's fault!

[Bigdave1]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>What's your opinion on how the government is responding to the nuclear strike threats made by North Korea? How would you respond differently if at all? You seem to me as the most leveled headed guy here.

I don't have enough information to make a decision on that one. The pentagon forgot to call me today with an intelligence briefing. What I mean by that is.
I don't know if they actually have the capability to actually put a warhead on a missile and if they have a missile that will reach us.
If they do, I would look very hard at making a first strike on them as they have threatened to blow us up with a nuclear bomb. I would have to take the threat serious as too many American lives are at stake. So if I were president I would probably make a first strike making sure that they had no capability left to attack or threaten us. Sounds nasty but sometimes you have to do what you have to do. America and its people comes first.

[Bigdave1]

Aggie23 wrote:

<quoted text>
Agree completely, I was both stunned and disgusted this morning when I saw Graham disparaging what Paul did, and then McCain follows suit. They have both been in my "please retire and go away" column, but I had actually found them worthy of more respect recently when they would not back down on questioning the circumstances about Benghazi. But, surprise, surprise, they found a way to completely erode that respect again.

It is easy to look like you care and are doing your job by asking questions that you know you won't get answered. Think about it.

[OMTE]

Bigdave1 wrote:

<quoted text> I don't have enough information to make a decision on that one. The pentagon forgot to call me today with an intelligence briefing. What I mean by that is.
I don't know if they actually have the capability to actually put a warhead on a missile and if they have a missile that will reach us.
If they do, I would look very hard at making a first strike on them as they have threatened to blow us up with a nuclear bomb. I would have to take the threat serious as too many American lives are at stake. So if I were president I would probably make a first strike making sure that they had no capability left to attack or threaten us. Sounds nasty but sometimes you have to do what you have to do. America and its people comes first.

Bush invaded Iraq for far less.

[Bigdave1]

Synergy wrote:

This BRILLIANT man explains EXACTLY why I don't like the Obamas. I totally agree with every word he wrote. It's a little long, but absolutely worth the read.
http://mychal-massie.com/premium/why-i-do-not...
I'm not going to argue with anyone about this. This is how I feel and I don't have to explain my feelings. You have your feelings and I have mine. "nuff said.

Great post.+1
The man told it like it is, and if you are liberal sometimes the truth really hurts.

[OMTE]

Bigdave1 wrote:

<quoted text>
Great post.+1
The man told it like it is, and if you are liberal sometimes the truth really hurts.

I disagree. I think this guy is an uncle tom; put out there to say all the things that most of the white tea party are scared to say.

[domino]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>Bush invaded Iraq for far less.

OMG! YOU ARE THE MOST FULL OF $HIT EMBICILE ON THE PLANET.

[Informed Opinion]

uninformed opinion wrote:

<quoted text>my question has been answered. Its still Bush's fault? u r that stoopid.

So now we all understand-

you're one if those hypocritical buffoons who loved Right Wing Bush destroying the Constitution
- but suddenly is all "outraged" when Obama does exactly the same thing Bush did.

A shame - just another low information, mentally lazy reactionary unworthy of consideration.

[Informed Opinion]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>WHY is this important NOW? If the poster says, "yes", he'll be called a liar. If he says, "no", he'll be called a George Bush lover and Obama hater. WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES THIS MAKE NOW????? We are concerned about what is happening NOW, TODAY. Can YOU get past Bush????? The other libs can't. Perhaps YOU can't either. Whether or not someone bitched during the Bush years has absolutely NO affect on NOW. All the PAST bitching in the world is not going to change anything NOW. BTW, government corruption did NOT start with Bush. Sheesh.......

Just can't take hypocrites seriously.

If you weren't against Bush shredding the Constitution - you can't be taken seriously now - our country doesn't need people who only claim to care about Constitutional rights when the man holding the gun is a Black Democrat, otherwise it's all hunky dory.

[Informed Opinion]

all that wrote:

<quoted text>Your dislike for the common man is showing AGAIN. Without Unions we would have NO middle class, argue that point. Corporations took advantage of workers until over time Unions stopped it. Corporations allowed Unions to gain advantage during the boom years when lots of money was flowing and made no real attempt to correct the mistake until the great recession. You seem to fault Unions for wanting wage increases, please give me the name of anyone who doesn't want just that. Unions have taken a huge hit recently, one that needed to be made. In some cases governments have in my opinion treated their union workers in a terrible way taking away things that were promised, just to gain public support and votes. A lot of those government jobs did not pay that well, but the benefits made it worthwhile. Not much difference from paying into a program like social security vs. getting paid less to be part of a program government with promised benefits. Just proves government has no problem taking away what it has agreed to give, if it’s politically advantageous to them. If the numbers worked in the politicians favor Social Security would be gone today! You should be very happy, over the last 20 years spendable income for middle American has declined, while your rich idols has increased, a lot.

Politicians take millions of dollars from ANYONE, not just Unions! They are an equal opportunity offender on both sides, you got the cash, you got a politicians attention. Today thanks to the current Supreme Court its possible for one person to get a candidate elected on a national level. And you won’t even know for sure who that person is, money is no problem. Georgia politicians for once have done something good,just recently. They have severely limiting what can be given by lobbiests and making it public record. One of the few things in recent memory they have done that made any sense. The feds need to do the same thing, but they won't as long as abortion, Mexicans, church in government and guns is all anyone seems to care about.

Now exactly whose fault is all that??

Great post.

When corporations attempt to maximize profits and income - that 'Merican Capitalism;

When workers try to maximize profit and income - that's socialist Democrap.

What's good for the goose just ain't good for the gander it seems.

[Black Guy]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>I disagree. I think this guy is an uncle tom; put out there to say all the things that most of the white tea party are scared to say.

Uncle Tom calling a bro an Uncle Tom.

[v93george]

As to the North Korean problem, every time they want a bigger handout than we are willing to give them, they puff out their chests, break out the missile pictures, and start trying to browbeat us into giving them what they want. As my fellow Marines were fond of saying back in 'Nam, kill 'em all... let God sort 'em out !!!

[Aggie23]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>I disagree. I think this guy is an uncle tom; put out there to say all the things that most of the white tea party are scared to say.

I had decided to completely ignore you because you are so full of garbage and frankly not worth the time, but HOW DARE YOU call that gentleman an Uncle Tom. That is the bigotry of the Left. Blacks are NOT ALLOWED to "leave the plantation" and think for themselves. You disgust me. Now come back with some of your sophomoric ad hominem attacks, it makes me laugh that that is the best you can do.

[Synergy]

Informed Opinion wrote:

<quoted text>
Just can't take hypocrites seriously.
If you weren't against Bush shredding the Constitution - you can't be taken seriously now - our country doesn't need people who only claim to care about Constitutional rights when the man holding the gun is a Black Democrat, otherwise it's all hunky dory.

Exactly whom do you think IS taken seriously? YOU? ME? ANYONE? Obviously not. We are merely observers of our country going down the tubes.
The race card? Seriously? Oh, brother. I thought you MIGHT be above that.

[Synergy]

Aggie23 wrote:

<quoted text>
I had decided to completely ignore you because you are so full of garbage and frankly not worth the time, but HOW DARE YOU call that gentleman an Uncle Tom. That is the bigotry of the Left. Blacks are NOT ALLOWED to "leave the plantation" and think for themselves. You disgust me. Now come back with some of your sophomoric ad hominem attacks, it makes me laugh that that is the best you can do.

You nailed it! I was wondering which liberal would throw down the Uncle Tom card. Good gosh! They are so predictible.

[Bigdave1]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>Bush invaded Iraq for far less.

You may have a valid point. I didn't like Bush as the whole thing was a prelude of making our National Security into a huge government takeover of our rights and privacy. This is not about Bush. It is about a rouge little nation that has bullied year after year with threats to get fuel oil, food, and money. N.Korea has always succeeded in getting its way because our State Department always thought it was easier to bribe them off then to have a war.
Now times have changed and the N.Koreans now feel that they can up the demands as it has always worked before.
The huge problem is that they now have nuclear weapons. They are developing missiles and warheads to carry them across the world.
They have become more emboldened which makes a mistake of miscalculation on their part more likely.
If a man walks up to you with a gun in his belt and says that I have this gun and i am going to use it soon to kill you. What are you going to do just wait for him to kill you and then have your family call the police, or defend yourself? Nope. Too late then.You would take steps to have this man stopped by any means so that he does not shoot you as he said he would.
The same thing goes for N.Korea. If they have the capability to nuke us and say that they are going to do it, then we have every right to take steps to stop them before they kill millions of Americans. Everyone has the inherent right to self defense. That includes the United States of America. If we wait for them to take the first step then we are fools. It will be to late and our people will suffer like never before.
N.Korea must retract its statement about attacking us. If not then they should face the obvious consequences.

[Informed Opinion]

Synergy wrote:

<quoted text>Exactly whom do you think IS taken seriously? YOU? ME? ANYONE? Obviously not. We are merely observers of our country going down the tubes.
The race card? Seriously? Oh, brother. I thought you MIGHT be above that.

Sorry - you're right - only those whose posts about Obama that include references to bananas, watermelon, thick lips, welfare, multiple daddies, etc. deserve the presumption the author is basing his ideas on Obama's skin tone.


So we'll put you down as one of those people screaming bloody murder when Bush lied us into War in Iraq; started the program to reward the Banksters for looting and destroying America's economy; and created the UnPatriot Act;

Not one of those folks who supported all those things when Bush did it - but are now outraged when Obama follows suit.

Welcome aboard.

[Bigdave1]

OMTE wrote:

<quoted text>I disagree. I think this guy is an uncle tom; put out there to say all the things that most of the white tea party are scared to say.

Tell me why would you say a thing like that? The man has a brain just like you and I and has a right to use it. He has the right to his opinion just as we do and evidently he can think well enough to form his own opinions.
Oh dear, Did he step off the plantation? Does that have you upset?
He is a man and he is Black. So what? If he were a White man what would you say about him then? Would that make his views more or less valid?
Sometimes you puzzle me.