"Octo-mom" controversy sparks legal action in Mo.

Friday, March 06, 2009 at 5:48 a.m. The controversial birth of octoplets in California has sparked legal action in Missouri.

[George Kingfish Stevens]

what do planned parenthood have to be saying about dis mess?

[Dr Thompson]

"Come on everybody! We're all gonna get laid!"

[George Kingfish Stevens]

W T F-F T W wrote:

Planned Parenthood supports Pro Choice, they only offer services, education and advice

and under age services as proved by an undercover reporter

[George Kingfish Stevens]

give em an inch and dey will be takins a mile. follow de money.

[leah]

W T F-F T W wrote:

Forced Abortions, how considerate.
how about, therapy pre-procedure, to make sure that the parents are going to be okay with the possibility of killing some embryos.
American Economy, More For The Money

she has no right to be mooching off our money when she's earning millions of dollars from her babies' pictures and just blowing it, instead of feeding her children.
I can't imagine why they'd start a show with her.
That just encourages her to have the babies.
It's so stupid.
So she payed thousands of dollars to make more babies when she couldn't afford the ones she already had. We shouldn't be paying for this crap.
She makes money from that tv show.
Spend it on your kids for once instead of being irresponsible with it, and using our tax money for them.

[leah]

W T F-F T W wrote:

<quoted text>
they can provide a child an abortion, with out really proving who their parents are, just as long as some one their is providing a name as thou they are a guardian.
but, pros and cons come in different varieties, like flavors, can't always have your sweets with out it being a little sour.
A lot of the kids that were going to the clinic because they knew that their parents would not find out that they wanted birth control, it is BS that the parents are not informed that their child is sexually active, on the same token, this prevented the parents from having to find out that their child is expecting a baby of their own, or that they have random abortions because they are not properly educated and their parents are unaware of their activities. Being against kids having sex is not a solution to an epidemic, awareness is.

I can see where you're coming from, as the parents would definitely want to know.
And I can see how they might have the right to know. However, some teens don't have caring, loving parents. Some teens are scared of their parents, and scared of having this baby. In fact, I bet many teens who are having sex, and not taking neccesary precautions do not have good family backgrounds. They might get beaten, or kicked out of the house, or terrible things could happen that would put them in a bad spot.

Also, the parents might force her to have the baby, which is scary for a teenage girl. Still a girl herself, and she is forced to carry this thing inside of her. This thing that will ruin her entire life. This thing that will make her fat and will cause her immense pain. This thing that will get her kicked out of school. This thing that will make her give up her life for it. This thing that asks for everything, and gives nothing back. For babies are selfish. They don't know better. It takes parents to raise a baby to be kind and loving. Remember, people were never born good people. They were raised good people. They could be born leaders, but it is the parents who raise them to either lead a gang or a church