Joe

Leesburg, FL

#2227 Jul 28, 2013
FatAss wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty stupid for a know it all. This forum is titled " Who do you support.....in 2010" Why don't you start a new forum if you want to discuss all this other crap. Or, don't you know how , smart ass ?
Your wait6ing for an answer to throw the topic off balance even more. You can have my answer now senator, my offer is this Nothing!
Joe

Leesburg, FL

#2228 Jul 28, 2013
It's a post from 2010! How on topic do you expect to be?
fun games and then

Spring Hill, FL

#2229 Jul 28, 2013
see my name

topix is that as named

the try to go to '99 is like trying to fly with out feathers

please can we be NEW*
\
|
/
*perhaps old is new to who
FatAss

Lady Lake, FL

#2230 Jul 28, 2013
Joe wrote:
It's a post from 2010! How on topic do you expect to be?
Yeah, the topic is the Florida Attorney General. Do any of you know who won ? Who is teh current Attorney General ? How long is his term ? Has he been replaced since this forum started in 2010?
Come on, it's 2013, start a NEW thread already.
Joe

Leesburg, FL

#2231 Jul 28, 2013
The current Attorney General is Pam Bondi. Some people sound like they voted for her because she -was hot. Unfortunately now she has a fat ass.
Go figure

United States

#2232 Aug 11, 2013
Pam is just an azx
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2234 Aug 12, 2013
Republicans Coup of Democracy.
Starts at the beginning of our USA. Not all were for democracy. Not all were satisfied with the “no one left behind liberal nonsense.” There were those that had opportunities to corner vast segments of the newly forming economics of this Nation. Siphoning of wealth to a small minority.
Big Stick Teddy was the first to recognize the disparity in wealth distributions. Realized this would lead to the demise of democracy. Immediately attacked the core of these “Robber Barons, Monopolies and the Tyranny of the Industrialist Empire. Legalizing Unions and raising taxes to these democratic assassins. With his dying breath to his political career he split the republican conservative party to topple Taft from reelection in favor of {D} Wilson. Conservative republicans had become the haven for the affluent ideologies of ever increasing inequality.
Conservatives’ countered with emphasis on deregulations leading to the 1929 Great Depression from which they amassed greater wealth from the impoverished majority. F.D.R. cleans up the mess of the republicans near complete destruction of our democracy. Strict regulations to shackle the minority affluent beast. 1933 minority exposes that they have formed a union. They will use their wealth to influence our government for their profits of inequality to the minority to increase.
Kennedy assassinated less than 4years into his term. Strong supporter Civil Rights and decreasing inequality. Held the troops for containment of communism, at same level as Eisenhower.{29,000}. Conservatives crying for war to feed their Military Industries was being denied until LBJ succumbing to a lie rolls out the troops. Realize he was lied to that initiated a war with no end. Refused nomination and steps down and out of politics in shame. Robert Kennedy a favorite to win the election took stage. Announcing his desires for the decrease of inequality and returning of our troops. He is promptly assassinated. Coincidence? Hoover for 1929 and Hoover for the Kennedy’s? Orchestrating a symphony that empowers Nixon who is all for inequality. Supplying wealth to the Military Industries. Lost Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia but was able to support the overthrow of a new fledging democracy in Chile {1973} and help seat a tyrant dictator that remained for just under 20 years in power exiling millions of the populace and torturing tens of thousands. Regan trying to out do this by supplying weapons to anti democratic forces in Nicaragua.{Iran/ Contra} Increases debt of nation to over 2 Trillion! Promotes “Trickle Down Economics” which provided wealth ever increasing to the minority from the impoverished.
Then comes the Bushwhacking years with minimal productivity and the creation of the Great Recession through same tactics employed for the 1929 collapse. Deregulations primer for collapses. Obama pulls nation back from total collapse. Returns a growing economic middle class dynamo, calls back troops from republican wars. Reduces rate of increasing inequality. The Primer for Democracy’s collapse.
Will Democracy survive the erosive abusive forces of the minority or will the minority come to once again rein supreme…? Majority , well head them up and move em out…
To be continued…
Bernie Foreskin

United States

#2235 Aug 12, 2013
The Bush family is, without a doubt, both polarizing and prominent. With the exception of the Kennedys, the Bushes have the distinction of being America’s foremost political dynasty.

Bushes have served in both the executive and legislative branches of our federal government — the family provided a pair of Presidents – the 41st and 43rd, and have held two state governorships.

Because of George W. Bush’s close ties to Texas and connections with the oil industry, the Bush family is often perceived as a bunch of oil tycoons.

In reality, however, the oil industry is just one of many in which the Bush family displayed their financial expertise. The family tradition, which continues to this day, was founded upon the pursuit of riches through investment banking and wartime business ventures.

This is why the family has had a hand in businesses from Halliburton to Merrill Lynch, and also has a history of owning major league sports teams.
Panamaed

United States

#2236 Aug 12, 2013
Both parties keep changing poles more often than the Sun.
hot cold weak bold

Spring Hill, FL

#2237 Aug 12, 2013
Been told

you all go

'nowhere'

yata yata yata
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2238 Aug 12, 2013
Panamaed wrote:
Both parties keep changing poles more often than the Sun.

You can not decipher the differences of the two parties? Exposing a lack of…?
Want to make some money on stock markets. Play the numbers..
How to go long on Markets. Simply observe the party in power.{R right wing} Play Bear ,{D left wing} Play Bull simple as that.
A mathematical investigation was produced by the statisticians Pedro Santa Clara and Rossen Valkanov that exposes the superior performance of the stock markets under democrats. That this is but one example of the democrat’s superiority, as there are more.
Their study encompasses 80 years. Study demonstrates systematically and positively surprised by democratic policies. Comparing the stewardship of the two parties. They calculated each economic indicator as an “annual average” during the democrats and republicans of their economic stewardship of their 40 years each. Turns out to be a landslide for democrats providing beneficial returns to the nation. One example; Democrat’s presided over a very respectable average annual compound return of 9.60% during their 40 years where in as republicans averaged a dismal 0.58%.
Consider this; a 401K plan invested in stocks and had a value of $100,000 at the beginning of the 40 years. Democrats would accumulate in compound interest $ 3,912,210 where in as republicans would only produce $126,027 . Another example; “IF” an employee were to invest $5,000 per year into their 401K for 40 years in a democratic stewardship the employee would have $1,985,526 in the bank. Where as the republican would produce a dismal $224,375.
That republicans advocate that they are good for businesses is false as compared to the democrats
Another interesting fact emerges within the statistical study. The income gap between the 99% and the top 1% has widened considerably under republicans. Averaging .49% as compared to the democrat’s .41% That is to say under republicans the income gap in 40 years, widened by 19.6% and narrowed 16.4%. Resulting in a 36% difference.
LOL on debt republicans increased debt by 2.5 times greater than that of the democrats. Republicans $7.1 Trillion vs. the democrats $2.8 Trillion.
GOP’s Self-Proclamation for economic dominance; in fact it is a misnomer to call the GOP a fiscal responsible party and or a smaller government, when in fact the contrary is true.
Obama’s administration indicates he sought the great leaders on these issue. Eccles and FDR, Clinton and O’Neill to do what is most productive for our nation.
Now pass on this one small example of the fallacies of the republican’s erroneous policies and deceptions..
.

plenty

Spring Hill, FL

#2239 Aug 12, 2013
Bernard Forand wrote:
<quoted text>
You can not decipher the differences of the two parties? Exposing a lack of…?
Want to make some money on stock markets. Play the numbers..
How to go long on Markets. Simply observe the party in power.{R right wing} Play Bear ,{D left wing} Play Bull simple as that.
A mathematical investigation was produced by the statisticians Pedro Santa Clara and Rossen Valkanov that exposes the superior performance of the stock markets under democrats. That this is but one example of the democrat’s superiority, as there are more.
Their study encompasses 80 years. Study demonstrates systematically and positively surprised by democratic policies. Comparing the stewardship of the two parties. They calculated each economic indicator as an “annual average” during the democrats and republicans of their economic stewardship of their 40 years each. Turns out to be a landslide for democrats providing beneficial returns to the nation. One example; Democrat’s presided over a very respectable average annual compound return of 9.60% during their 40 years where in as republicans averaged a dismal 0.58%.
Consider this; a 401K plan invested in stocks and had a value of $100,000 at the beginning of the 40 years. Democrats would accumulate in compound interest $ 3,912,210 where in as republicans would only produce $126,027 . Another example; “IF” an employee were to invest $5,000 per year into their 401K for 40 years in a democratic stewardship the employee would have $1,985,526 in the bank. Where as the republican would produce a dismal $224,375.
That republicans advocate that they are good for businesses is false as compared to the democrats
Another interesting fact emerges within the statistical study. The income gap between the 99% and the top 1% has widened considerably under republicans. Averaging .49% as compared to the democrat’s .41% That is to say under republicans the income gap in 40 years, widened by 19.6% and narrowed 16.4%. Resulting in a 36% difference.
LOL on debt republicans increased debt by 2.5 times greater than that of the democrats. Republicans $7.1 Trillion vs. the democrats $2.8 Trillion.
GOP’s Self-Proclamation for economic dominance; in fact it is a misnomer to call the GOP a fiscal responsible party and or a smaller government, when in fact the contrary is true.
Obama’s administration indicates he sought the great leaders on these issue. Eccles and FDR, Clinton and O’Neill to do what is most productive for our nation.
Now pass on this one small example of the fallacies of the republican’s erroneous policies and deceptions..
.
yes plenty
very impressive

but ca you explain fully para 6
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2241 Aug 13, 2013
plenty wrote:
<quoted text>
yes plenty
very impressive
but ca you explain fully para 6
You will have to be more specific. Which word or set of words is giving you problems? Perhaps a dictionary would help?
Panamaed

United States

#2242 Aug 13, 2013
Judge Tool appreciates anyone taking the focus off his Florida governmental corruption buddies.
That is his job.
oh my

Spring Hill, FL

#2243 Aug 13, 2013
Panamaed wrote:
Judge Tool appreciates anyone taking the focus off his Florida governmental corruption buddies.
That is his job.
profound

out of squeeky mouths mouth
Lustful

Bonifay, FL

#2244 Aug 13, 2013
Go figure wrote:
Pam is just an azx
But Bondi is still a desirable sex pot!
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2245 Aug 22, 2013

Are you pregnant? Under the present republican plan of Health Care you can expect this…
Renée Martin pregnancy in Laconia N.H. was a wake up call to her and her husband Mark Willett both professionals with Health Care Insurance. Her present policy does not cover maternity! Soon they began to question each cost factor. Epidural anesthesia with the option of a birthing tube labor became a serious decision. Additional investigation as to what the actual cost of maternity care was vague to non existence. Inquiry to Hospitals finance offices had little help. Giving Ms. Martin a range of $4,000 to $45,000 ! Actually the “average” cost is slightly above $37,000 in the USA. Ms. Martin discovered many of the arrays for maternity have no fixed price if any. Midway through her pregnancy she received a bill for $935 for an ultrasound that she had already paid a radiologist to read the scan $256, which took 20 minutes. After extensive stressful negotiations bill was reduced to $655 from the $935 billing.
“I feel like I’m in a used-car lot,” Ms. Martin replied.
Sticker shock on pregnancy can be attributed to how the cost has tripled since 1996.{N.Y. Times, Truven Health Analytics} Four Million annual births now cost the USA over $50 billion. Other developed nations through out the world have fractions of that cost to their Health Care programs. Additionally they provide all the same quality technological and primary care that the USA offers on their most expensive maternity procedures.“It’s not primarily that we get a different bundle of services when we have a baby,” said Gerard Anderson, an economist at the Johns Hopkins School of Public Health who studies international health costs.“It’s that we pay individually for each service and pay more for the services we receive.”
As of 2011, up to 62% of American women with private insurance and not through an employer denied or excludes maternity care. Those that do have them are feeling the cost as their deductibles and co-payments accelerating. All the while certain pregnancy related services become excluded. 2004 to 2010 vaginal births cost rose 49% and Caesarean sections by 41% Out of pocket expense quadrupled! Three Health Care groups hired Truven for that analyst as well as to the average total price of delivery. Which is as follows; Vaginal births $30,000 and $50,000 for the C-section. Insurance paid out an average of $18,329 and $27,866 end of report. Survey by Childbirth Connection reported that the women’s out of pocket fee average $3,400 .
In the other developed nations there s little to no charge for maternity care. They consider it vital to ensuring the health of future generations.
Ireland free maternity at public hospitals and a small fee for deliveries in private hospitals. Switzerland, France and the Netherlands have an Average price for a vaginal delivery of $4,000 of which the mother pays very little of that due to strict regulations and price settings. France, one example of many in the developed nations, have their mothers remain for up to a week to recoup where in the USA 1 to 2 days and out they go.
With Obamacare we can rein in this messed up maternity nonsense. Republican’s Austerity ideology does not work is evident in all factors of our cultures here and through out the world.
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2246 Aug 22, 2013

The Myth
In a land far, far away. There was once upon a time, when nations all over the world sought to emulate America.
Economist within these nations searched for the truth. What they found; was that the U.S. economy was unstable even when all was appearing as well, according to the GDP. They realized that growing inequality of wealth and income was being siphoned to the 1%. Hoarding the wealth and no distribution would soon run the engine of the working class out of the fluid movement of the fuel they required. Resulting in sputtering and inefficient production. For lack of production and the fluid income to sustain consumption, it soon proved to be a catastrophic error, Demise soon followed.
Half a century in the making by right wing policies. Living standards regressed back to earl 1900’s !
USA kept up appearances with the GDP increasing from 1980 to 2010.
Increasing by three fourths. All the while the male income declined.
Increases in austerity polices of the right continued. Siphoning wealth and income to the 1 % producing ever increasing inequality.
Thus; 1} U.S. Income growth occurs greater to the 1% and lesser to the 99%.
2} Inequality of laborer’s productivity distribution blossoms.
3} Middle class and below lose their standard of living to equate with what they were a century ago.
4} Inequalities’ in wealth is greater than the inequality of income!
5} Insecurity in income, health and home materializes.
6} Increasing poverty subjugates ever increasing amount of the middle class populace.
7} Middle class essentially is hollowed out.
8} Income mobility decreases advancing America “Land Of Opportunity” to be identified as a Myth.
9} America is now recognized by the rest of the advanced industrial nations as aA land of ever increasing inequality surpassing their own.
Right wing confronted with These analyst from the economist find it “Inconvenient”. Befuddled to explain it..
2014 coming up people….
Tolstoy

Spring Hill, FL

#2247 Aug 22, 2013
in the year '96 that is 1896 I too wrote a myth

and now I say - BIG DEAL
Bernard Forand wrote:
The Myth
In a land far, far away. There was once upon a time, when nations all over the world sought to emulate America.
Economist within these nations searched for the truth. What they found; was that the U.S. economy was unstable even when all was appearing as well, according to the GDP. They realized that growing inequality of wealth and income was being siphoned to the 1%. Hoarding the wealth and no distribution would soon run the engine of the working class out of the fluid movement of the fuel they required. Resulting in sputtering and inefficient production. For lack of production and the fluid income to sustain consumption, it soon proved to be a catastrophic error, Demise soon followed.
Half a century in the making by right wing policies. Living standards regressed back to earl 1900’s !
USA kept up appearances with the GDP increasing from 1980 to 2010.
Increasing by three fourths. All the while the male income declined.
Increases in austerity polices of the right continued. Siphoning wealth and income to the 1 % producing ever increasing inequality.
Thus; 1} U.S. Income growth occurs greater to the 1% and lesser to the 99%.
2} Inequality of laborer’s productivity distribution blossoms.
3} Middle class and below lose their standard of living to equate with what they were a century ago.
4} Inequalities’ in wealth is greater than the inequality of income!
5} Insecurity in income, health and home materializes.
6} Increasing poverty subjugates ever increasing amount of the middle class populace.
7} Middle class essentially is hollowed out.
8} Income mobility decreases advancing America “Land Of Opportunity” to be identified as a Myth.
9} America is now recognized by the rest of the advanced industrial nations as aA land of ever increasing inequality surpassing their own.
Right wing confronted with These analyst from the economist find it “Inconvenient”. Befuddled to explain it..
2014 coming up people….
Bernard Forand

Fort Myers, FL

#2248 Aug 23, 2013
Your inability to discern between the two parties indicates a lack of simple research.

Want to make some money on stock markets. Play the numbers..
How to go long on Markets. Simply observe the party in power.{R right wing} Play Bear ,{D left wing} Play Bull simple as that.
A mathematical investigation was produced by the statisticians Pedro Santa Clara and Rossen Valkanov that exposes the superior performance of the stock markets under democrats. That this is but one example of the democrat’s superiority, as there are more.
Their study encompasses 80 years. Study demonstrates systematically and positively surprised by democratic policies. Comparing the stewardship of the two parties. They calculated each economic indicator as an “annual average” during the democrats and republicans of their economic stewardship of their 40 years each. Turns out to be a landslide for democrats providing beneficial returns to the nation. One example; Democrat’s presided over a very respectable average annual compound return of 9.60% during their 40 years where in as republicans averaged a dismal 0.58%.
Consider this; a 401K plan invested in stocks and had a value of $100,000 at the beginning of the 40 years. Democrats would accumulate in compound interest $ 3,912,210 where in as republicans would only produce $126,027 . Another example; “IF” an employee were to invest $5,000 per year into their 401K for 40 years in a democratic stewardship the employee would have $1,985,526 in the bank. Where as the republican would produce a dismal $224,375.
That republicans advocate that they are good for businesses is false as compared to the democrats
Another interesting fact emerges within the statistical study. The income gap between the 99% and the top 1% has widened considerably under republicans. Averaging .49% as compared to the democrat’s .41% That is to say under republicans the income gap in 40 years, widened by 19.6% and narrowed 16.4%. Resulting in a 36% difference.
LOL on debt republicans increased debt by 2.5 times greater than that of the democrats. Republicans $7.1 Trillion vs. the democrats $2.8 Trillion.
GOP’s Self-Proclamation for economic dominance; in fact it is a misnomer to call the GOP a fiscal responsible party and or a smaller government, when in fact the contrary is true.
Obama’s administration indicates he sought the great leaders on these issue. Eccles and FDR, Clinton and O’Neill to do what is most productive for our nation.
Now pass on this one small example of the fallacies of the republican’s erroneous policies and deceptions..
.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

St. Cloud Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Jason Hisaw Sun Still waiting 102
David Askew Saint Cloud Florida City Council...... Oct 17 Think Twice 17
Motorcycle Accident 10/14 Oct 16 just curious 1
Settling cruise bill has been rough sailing (Mar '08) Oct 15 GFL 257
Sheriff Hansell Oct 14 Jipped 1
Smith Bro's in Taft (Feb '11) Oct 12 taftboy 3
looking for shawn bishop (May '11) Oct 12 taftboy 3
St. Cloud Dating
Find my Match

St. Cloud Jobs

St. Cloud People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

St. Cloud News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in St. Cloud

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]